China’s trade war with the United States has tended to dominate the news agenda in the past year. But a bigger challenge for Beijing could be the threat of a water crisis which would submerge the world’s second-largest economy and wash away growth.
Two reports by Greenpeace East Asia and Chinadialogue.net, an independent, non-profit organization, have highlighted the risks that President Xi Jinping’s administration faces because of climate change and homegrown pollution.
Earlier this week, Greenpeace released research showing that glaciers in the western China provinces of Qinghai and Gansu, as well as the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, are rapidly melting, causing natural disasters and reducing the drinking-water supply.
“This is a wake-up call for China and the world,” Liu Junyan, a climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace East Asia, said. “It is critical that we speed up the transition away from coal and other fossil fuels.”
Glaciers in the country’s western regions are the source of a network of rivers which supply drinking water to an estimated 1.8 billion people.
Known as “Asia’s Water Tower,” Greenpeace pointed out, it is the largest concentration of freshwater outside the polar regions.
“These glaciers are the source of many of Asia’s largest rivers, which flow as far as Afghanistan, Vietnam and southern India. They comprise more than half of ‘Asia’s Water Tower’”
“Almost one-fifth of glacier area in China is already gone,” the study entitled “China Glacier and Climate Change Impact Project,” stated.
“These glaciers are the source of many of Asia’s largest rivers, which flow as far as Afghanistan, Vietnam and southern India. They comprise more than half of ‘Asia’s Water Tower’,’” it added.
In May, a Chinadialogue report, entitled “China’s Looming Water Crisis,” illustrated the geographical hurdles in averting a full-blown water shortage in parts of the dragon economy.
“The problem is that 80% of the water is in southern China, meaning that eight northern provinces suffer from acute water scarcity, four from scarcity, and a further two [Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia] are largely desert,” the study said. “These 12 provinces account for 38% of China’s agriculture, 46% of its industry, 50% of its power generation [coal and nuclear use a lot of water] and 41% of its population.”
Efforts to ease the chronic shortage go back as far as 1952, when one of the largest canal pipelines was proposed by the ruling Communist Party.
It eventually came online in 2014. Stretching more than 1,400 kilometers, the US$100 billion “South-North Water Transfer Project” ships water from the Yangtze to the country’s arid northern regions, including Beijing, China Daily reported.
But since then, demand for water has outstripped supply.
Describing the situation in blunt terms, former Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao has warned that the lack of water threatens the “very survival of the Chinese nation itself” in the Chinadialogue report.
For Beijing, this is a watershed moment.

Onl if China does what it does best, copy everyone else’s ideas.
Douglas Houck er no, it requires a knowledge of chaos theory, black body radiation, an understanding of the solar cycle and finally the positive/negative feedback of greenhouse gases…. have I lost you yet with your High School science ?
Douglas Houck er no, it requires a knowledge of chaos theory, black body radiation, an understanding of the solar cycle and finally the positive/negative feedback of greenhouse gases…. have I lost you yet with your High School science ?
Tom Kahane OK Tom, I suggest you get your placard and stand in the middle of Tianamen Sq and demand less money spent on the Puny Liberation Army/Navy and more given to climate research (am I right in thinking this means more research grants, not real action).
I’ll get my pop-corn and watch the tanks toll over you.
Tom Kahane OK Tom, I suggest you get your placard and stand in the middle of Tianamen Sq and demand less money spent on the Puny Liberation Army/Navy and more given to climate research (am I right in thinking this means more research grants, not real action).
I’ll get my pop-corn and watch the tanks toll over you.
WuKong Sun The Viet’s will kick your tiddly-wink asses just like they did in 1978. Or just like the Japs did in Nanking (when Mao ran away).
WuKong Sun The Viet’s will kick your tiddly-wink asses just like they did in 1978. Or just like the Japs did in Nanking (when Mao ran away).
Now that is a good question !
Now that is a good question !
I think you are harvesting air and turning it into methane.
I think you are harvesting air and turning it into methane.
Art Laramee
Hmmm, gosh, and it only takes high school science and math to show that climage change (warming) is the result of increased CO2 caused primarily from the burning of fossil fuels by humans.
Art Laramee
Hmmm, gosh, and it only takes high school science and math to show that climage change (warming) is the result of increased CO2 caused primarily from the burning of fossil fuels by humans.
Yashad Rizvi u constantly surprise me with how fvcking brilliant u can be given the 2nd grade vocabulary and sentence structure. I must admit I’m starting to like being imperial and planning my trip to Vietnamese https://youtu.be/4HvnWYshUx0
Yashad Rizvi u constantly surprise me with how fvcking brilliant u can be given the 2nd grade vocabulary and sentence structure. I must admit I’m starting to like being imperial and planning my trip to Vietnamese https://youtu.be/4HvnWYshUx0
Robert Simpson
No, you are wrong. Dead wrong. The only way to resolve this issue is to reduce the defence budget from 1.7 trillion to less than trillion and allocate 700 billion towards water. That is more than enough. And to do that, we need to respect and be sensitive towards each other. That is what required. Even if you half the population, the problem will not go away since we are rat racing in destroying each other. We need cooperation.
Robert Simpson
No, you are wrong. Dead wrong. The only way to resolve this issue is to reduce the defence budget from 1.7 trillion to less than trillion and allocate 700 billion towards water. That is more than enough. And to do that, we need to respect and be sensitive towards each other. That is what required. Even if you half the population, the problem will not go away since we are rat racing in destroying each other. We need cooperation.
Will this affect the beer supply?
Will this affect the beer supply?
Philip Barclay Well, since you are so easily persuaded by arguments proven faulty by time and experience, I’ll take your characterization of my intellectual capacity and knowledge as acriticism without merit, more than likely an apt characterization of you.