China’s trade war with the United States has tended to dominate the news agenda in the past year. But a bigger challenge for Beijing could be the threat of a water crisis which would submerge the world’s second-largest economy and wash away growth.
Two reports by Greenpeace East Asia and Chinadialogue.net, an independent, non-profit organization, have highlighted the risks that President Xi Jinping’s administration faces because of climate change and homegrown pollution.
Earlier this week, Greenpeace released research showing that glaciers in the western China provinces of Qinghai and Gansu, as well as the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, are rapidly melting, causing natural disasters and reducing the drinking-water supply.
“This is a wake-up call for China and the world,” Liu Junyan, a climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace East Asia, said. “It is critical that we speed up the transition away from coal and other fossil fuels.”
Glaciers in the country’s western regions are the source of a network of rivers which supply drinking water to an estimated 1.8 billion people.
Known as “Asia’s Water Tower,” Greenpeace pointed out, it is the largest concentration of freshwater outside the polar regions.
“These glaciers are the source of many of Asia’s largest rivers, which flow as far as Afghanistan, Vietnam and southern India. They comprise more than half of ‘Asia’s Water Tower’”
“Almost one-fifth of glacier area in China is already gone,” the study entitled “China Glacier and Climate Change Impact Project,” stated.
“These glaciers are the source of many of Asia’s largest rivers, which flow as far as Afghanistan, Vietnam and southern India. They comprise more than half of ‘Asia’s Water Tower’,’” it added.
In May, a Chinadialogue report, entitled “China’s Looming Water Crisis,” illustrated the geographical hurdles in averting a full-blown water shortage in parts of the dragon economy.
“The problem is that 80% of the water is in southern China, meaning that eight northern provinces suffer from acute water scarcity, four from scarcity, and a further two [Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia] are largely desert,” the study said. “These 12 provinces account for 38% of China’s agriculture, 46% of its industry, 50% of its power generation [coal and nuclear use a lot of water] and 41% of its population.”
Efforts to ease the chronic shortage go back as far as 1952, when one of the largest canal pipelines was proposed by the ruling Communist Party.
It eventually came online in 2014. Stretching more than 1,400 kilometers, the US$100 billion “South-North Water Transfer Project” ships water from the Yangtze to the country’s arid northern regions, including Beijing, China Daily reported.
But since then, demand for water has outstripped supply.
Describing the situation in blunt terms, former Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao has warned that the lack of water threatens the “very survival of the Chinese nation itself” in the Chinadialogue report.
For Beijing, this is a watershed moment.
I think you are harvesting air and turning it into methane.
Now that is a good question !
Now that is a good question !
WuKong Sun The Viet’s will kick your tiddly-wink asses just like they did in 1978. Or just like the Japs did in Nanking (when Mao ran away).
WuKong Sun The Viet’s will kick your tiddly-wink asses just like they did in 1978. Or just like the Japs did in Nanking (when Mao ran away).
Tom Kahane OK Tom, I suggest you get your placard and stand in the middle of Tianamen Sq and demand less money spent on the Puny Liberation Army/Navy and more given to climate research (am I right in thinking this means more research grants, not real action).
I’ll get my pop-corn and watch the tanks toll over you.
Tom Kahane OK Tom, I suggest you get your placard and stand in the middle of Tianamen Sq and demand less money spent on the Puny Liberation Army/Navy and more given to climate research (am I right in thinking this means more research grants, not real action).
I’ll get my pop-corn and watch the tanks toll over you.
Douglas Houck er no, it requires a knowledge of chaos theory, black body radiation, an understanding of the solar cycle and finally the positive/negative feedback of greenhouse gases…. have I lost you yet with your High School science ?
Douglas Houck er no, it requires a knowledge of chaos theory, black body radiation, an understanding of the solar cycle and finally the positive/negative feedback of greenhouse gases…. have I lost you yet with your High School science ?
Onl if China does what it does best, copy everyone else’s ideas.
Onl if China does what it does best, copy everyone else’s ideas.
Yashad Rizvi Climate change science is based on rate of change. The solar flares you mention are 400 year cycles. Read this https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/todays-climate-change-proves-much-faster-than-changes-in-past-65-million-years/?wt.mc=SA_Twitter-Share
Yashad Rizvi Climate change science is based on rate of change. The solar flares you mention are 400 year cycles. Read this https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/todays-climate-change-proves-much-faster-than-changes-in-past-65-million-years/?wt.mc=SA_Twitter-Share
Karan Bavandi I’m sorry it is so much more complex, check out Milankovitch cycles…. etc. Our GCM’s (I was involved in research in the 80’s) cannot model the Little Ice Age or the Medieval warm period vrs CO2.
No one is denying the climate is changing (hasn’t it always ?) the question is ‘will you stop driving a car or using electricity’. I doubt it. But of course you want all the darker peoples to do just that.
The West gets far more GDP from alot less energy than 100yrs ago, and no doubt this will continue. Birthrates plummet in almost every nation. I am optimistic.
How much is due to Man (woman, LBGT+ and whatever) and how much is nature ?
In Aus we can state that every new gaff will have a rainwater tank (grey water), solar panels and HWS, as well as double glazing. But the Polies prefer to open a new coal-fired power station leading to 1000 jobs.
Karan Bavandi I’m sorry it is so much more complex, check out Milankovitch cycles…. etc. Our GCM’s (I was involved in research in the 80’s) cannot model the Little Ice Age or the Medieval warm period vrs CO2.
No one is denying the climate is changing (hasn’t it always ?) the question is ‘will you stop driving a car or using electricity’. I doubt it. But of course you want all the darker peoples to do just that.
The West gets far more GDP from alot less energy than 100yrs ago, and no doubt this will continue. Birthrates plummet in almost every nation. I am optimistic.
How much is due to Man (woman, LBGT+ and whatever) and how much is nature ?
In Aus we can state that every new gaff will have a rainwater tank (grey water), solar panels and HWS, as well as double glazing. But the Polies prefer to open a new coal-fired power station leading to 1000 jobs.
No one ‘nurses’ nature better than the developed world. Undeveloped countries can’t afford to.
No one ‘nurses’ nature better than the developed world. Undeveloped countries can’t afford to.
Check out Dr. Patrick Moore, cofounder of Greenpeace on his opinion in PragerU. They have none Kevin Connolly.
Check out Dr. Patrick Moore, cofounder of Greenpeace on his opinion in PragerU. They have none Kevin Connolly.
It’s a socialist UN climate scam. Climate has many drivers. CO2 is not a significant one. Although it is an essential ingrediant to life. Without it, all life dies.
It’s a socialist UN climate scam. Climate has many drivers. CO2 is not a significant one. Although it is an essential ingrediant to life. Without it, all life dies.
Population growth will take care of itself, Robert Simpson. That’s if we quit the demonization of the fossil fuels that drive development. One billion people live without electricity. Developed countries naturally just don’t grow very rapidly.
Population growth will take care of itself, Robert Simpson. That’s if we quit the demonization of the fossil fuels that drive development. One billion people live without electricity. Developed countries naturally just don’t grow very rapidly.
Barry Bateman Not sure if it’s a socialist (though I do blame them for alot) scam, but certainly it’s a scam that many crooks have bought into.
Certainly a tax on something we breath out and can’t see, really works for the elites.
Not a good idea to change the composition of the atmosphere, but one was to fix the CO2 is to plant more trees.
Barry Bateman Not sure if it’s a socialist (though I do blame them for alot) scam, but certainly it’s a scam that many crooks have bought into.
Certainly a tax on something we breath out and can’t see, really works for the elites.
Not a good idea to change the composition of the atmosphere, but one was to fix the CO2 is to plant more trees.
Barry Bateman Patrick Moore was not a co-founder of Greenpeace. Now if he would lie about that… https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/
Barry Bateman Patrick Moore was not a co-founder of Greenpeace. Now if he would lie about that… https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/
Do you?
Do you?
Tom Kahane, thats very nice and all but it wont happen, so Roberts comment still stands.
Tom Kahane, thats very nice and all but it wont happen, so Roberts comment still stands.