Vietnam has protested against China’s recent announcement that it will erect weather stations on the disputed Spratly Islands.
The Chinese government revealed last week that three islands will have weather stations built on them that will offer forecasts to fishermen operating in the South China Sea and nearby countries.
The weather forecasts will also be available to ships that pass through the area.
In response, Le Thi Thu Hang from the Foreign Ministry in Hanoi told the press that Vietnam has a solid legal claim, including historical evidence that will allow them to assert their claim over the Spratly and Paracel Islands, the Associated Press reported.
She said that China’s actions have violated Vietnam’s sovereignty over the islands and called on Beijing to stop the building infrastructure on the islands immediately.
The spokeswoman said China should follow the principles that were agreed between the two countries regarding the maritime issues and settlements, as well as the Declaration of the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea while maintaining peace and stability.
.
***She said that China’s actions have violated Vietnam’s sovereignty***
Since when has Vietnam ever been a sovereign state?
I think the history goes something like this: prior to the DPR(P) (or Poopsland), it was puppet Miss Piggy ala Americana ruled by the thumbs of Washingtonia.
From there, it was La French Republica de la Indochina. You have Napoleons signature written all over the panhandle, no Viet identity.
Previous to that, Imperial Japan tried its hand but the longevity wasn’t too great.
Still previous, it was a centuries old tributary of the Qing Empire — the fear that consumes them…
Further still, a tributary of Yuan China; and still further, a (dominion), a tributary of the various Kingdoms warring days of China…
So, how authentic and reliably arguable is her history and her claim to this region?
C’mon! Be serious. VIETNAM SOVEREIGNTY? Give me a BREAK!
.
.
***She said that China’s actions have violated Vietnam’s sovereignty***
Since when has Vietnam ever been a sovereign state?
I think the history goes something like this: prior to the DPR(P) (or Poopsland), it was puppet Miss Piggy ala Americana ruled by the thumbs of Washingtonia.
From there, it was La French Republica de la Indochina. You have Napoleons signature written all over the panhandle, no Viet identity.
Previous to that, Imperial Japan tried its hand but the longevity wasn’t too great.
Still previous, it was a centuries old tributary of the Qing Empire — the fear that consumes them…
Further still, a tributary of Yuan China; and still further, a (dominion), a tributary of the various Kingdoms warring days of China…
So, how authentic and reliably arguable is her history and her claim to this region?
C’mon! Be serious. VIETNAM SOVEREIGNTY? Give me a BREAK!
.
Vietnam was actually part of China for more than 500yrs. Most women in villages would love to married to Chinese men and have better life.
Vietnam was actually part of China for more than 1000yrs. Most viet women in villages would love to married to Chinese men and have better life. Especially North Vietnam is very similar to Southern China, especially Cantonese in dialect, food, and mannerism than Cantonese vs Northern China!
Vietnam was actually part of China for more than 1000yrs. Most viet women in villages would love to married to Chinese men and have better life. Especially North Vietnam is very similar to Southern China, especially Cantonese in dialect, food, and mannerism than Cantonese vs Northern China!
.
Viet Poopers (of none Han demographic), Pinoys, and Orangoutangs, are vicious wild animals. Who needs losers like them.
.
.
Viet Poopers (of none Han demographic), Pinoys, and Orangoutangs, are vicious wild animals. Who needs losers like them.
.
WuKong Sun
There are two demographics of Vietnamese which makes up the Vietnamese masses.
1) The Ho Chi Ming kind (i.e., Surname Ho or Hu). This group settles mostly in the northern panhandle and is associated more with what was once Nam Yuet China.
The other demographic have Austronesian genomes and traits. This group is genomically related to Indonesians and Filipinos which is why they like animals…
“We know how beastly blood thirsty the latter breed is by the ‘98 massecre of Chinese in Indonesia and the massacre of Hong Kong tourisrs aboard a bus in Manilia.
And here, they just focus on the 14 hour days those Austronesian maids put in in Hong Kong as domestic servants…
WuKong Sun
There are two demographics of Vietnamese which makes up the Vietnamese masses.
1) The Ho Chi Ming kind (i.e., Surname Ho or Hu). This group settles mostly in the northern panhandle and is associated more with what was once Nam Yuet China.
The other demographic have Austronesian genomes and traits. This group is genomically related to Indonesians and Filipinos which is why they like animals…
“We know how beastly blood thirsty the latter breed is by the ‘98 massecre of Chinese in Indonesia and the massacre of Hong Kong tourisrs aboard a bus in Manilia.
And here, they just focus on the 14 hour days those Austronesian maids put in in Hong Kong as domestic servants…
Flora de los Sinensis
In terms of ethnic composition, Vietnamese is probably more than 70% South Chinese ethnics and the rest from neighboring countries from the South.
In terms of culture, Vietnamese are probably 85% chinese.
But mysteriously, the stupidity that has been implanted in a large part of Vietnamese by recent Western colonialists make them hate Chinese.
The result? Fvcked!
Flora de los Sinensis
In terms of ethnic composition, Vietnamese is probably more than 70% South Chinese ethnics and the rest from neighboring countries from the South.
In terms of culture, Vietnamese are probably 85% chinese.
But mysteriously, the stupidity that has been implanted in a large part of Vietnamese by recent Western colonialists make them hate Chinese.
The result? Fvcked!
Richard Truong
***85% Chinese***
I could have sworn that the majority extending from Ho Chi Minig City all the way northwards to Haiphong clearly sports this tint of Malay and Indonesians in them (or Austronesian characteristics), which is distinct from northerners whose trait are tied to Guangxi, Yunnan, and Laotion sources.
I visited the pandhandles back in 2010. I can clearly distinguish the two groups apart. Yes, it is that distinct.
Their surnames alone tells the story.
.
Richard Truong
***85% Chinese***
I could have sworn that the majority extending from Ho Chi Minig City all the way northwards to Haiphong clearly sports this tint of Malay and Indonesians in them (or Austronesian characteristics), which is distinct from northerners whose trait are tied to Guangxi, Yunnan, and Laotion sources.
I visited the pandhandles back in 2010. I can clearly distinguish the two groups apart. Yes, it is that distinct.
Their surnames alone tells the story.
.