China has been warned by the United States to dismantle its missile systems shield deployed in the disputed Spratly Islands chain in the South China Sea.
The move, believed to be the first time Washington has directly addressed the issue, came in a statement following high-level talks at last week’s second annual US-China Diplomatic and Security Dialogue.
Trade war tensions were expected to dominate the meetings in Washington.
But it was the military buildup in the South China Sea which was brought into sharp focus during discussions between US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis and their opposite numbers, Beijing’s leading diplomat Yang Jiechi and Defense Minister General Wei Fenghe.
“The United States called on China to withdraw its missile systems from disputed features in the Spratly Islands, and reaffirmed that all countries should avoid addressing disputes through coercion or intimidation,” the US statement said.
Concerns have been growing among Southeast Asian nations and Washington that China was slowly establishing an air defense zone around previously uninhabited islands, reefs and atolls in one of the world’s most important sea lanes.
US and allies
Military bases have been constructed as Beijing flouts international law, claiming the islands are integral parts of China.
The US and its allies have been told by President Xi Jinping’s administration to stop sending ships and aircraft near what the world’s second-largest economy considers to be sovereign territory.
In response, Mattis has made it clear that the US will “fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows.”
During the past year, the US and its allies have conducted maneuvers in the South China Sea, which is vital for global trade with goods and products worth between US$3 trillion and $5 trillion passing through vital sea routes.

“The Chinese side made it clear to the United States that it should stop sending its vessels and military aircraft close to Chinese islands and reefs and stop actions that undermine Chinese authority and security interests,” Senior Foreign Policy adviser Yang said.
Back in June at the Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore, Mattis told defense ministers from 28 Asia-Pacific nations about the threat of “militarization” on former barren islands and reefs.
Outlining the problems faced by China’s naval and missile presence in their own backyard, he raised the question of “intimidation and coercion.”
“China’s militarization of artificial features in the South China Sea includes the deployment of anti-ship missiles, surface-to-air missiles, electronic jammers, and more recently, the landing of bomber aircraft at Woody Island,” Mattis said at the time.
“Despite China’s claims to the contrary, the placement of these weapons systems is tied directly to military use for the purposes of intimidation and coercion,” he added.
Opening gambit
Yet this is just the opening gambit, according to Patrick G Buchan, who specializes in Indo-Pacific security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
He stressed that China has a long-term strategy and is looking to become the “paramount power” in the region.
“China talks up a big game and understands the value of perpetrating a mythology of its inevitable dominance. It is an attractive and reasonably plausible message. But in this context, it is important to understand China’s endgame – to be the Indo-Pacific’s paramount political, military and economic power,” Buchan said.
“Essentially, China seeks to ease the United States out of the door, deadbolt it, and make sure it doesn’t come back. To this end, China is utilizing all the tools in the statecraft toolkit,” he continued.
“It deploys anti-ship and surface-to-air missile systems on its artificial islands, bullies the United States and allied ships on the high seas, splashes around cheap money, and dictates to foreign airlines how they should refer to Taiwan,” he said. “Across much of the Indo-Pacific, China currently sets the tone of the game. Critically, the United States does not,” Buchan added.

So it’s funny the CCP let the Western nations sail with impunity their their supposed national waters.
Why couldn’t they, or didn’t they stop them.
Very small weapons.
So it’s funny the CCP let the Western nations sail with impunity their their supposed national waters.
Why couldn’t they, or didn’t they stop them.
Very small weapons.
WuKong Sun Well if they all wore black suits we could still tell them apart, unlike Chinese who all look the same.
WuKong Sun Well if they all wore black suits we could still tell them apart, unlike Chinese who all look the same.
Robert Li sure you don’t need to travel a bit any more 🙂
Robert Li sure you don’t need to travel a bit any more 🙂
Yashad Rizvi lame d!ck, how do u think cia agents disguise as? u think they fvcking walk around in blacks suits like in tv? hahahaha
https://youtu.be/C-CG5w4YwOI
hahahahah
Yashad Rizvi lame d!ck, how do u think cia agents disguise as? u think they fvcking walk around in blacks suits like in tv? hahahaha
https://youtu.be/C-CG5w4YwOI
hahahahah
The USA better beware, Chinese eat ducks, along with dogs, cats, in fact anything that moves.
FR always had it’s own army (except it ran away alot). KSA killed a journalist, they wouldnt dare kill a Yank spy… maybe KSA learned from the CCP to kill journo’s.
China will not budge, but it will collapse when people realise how much the CCP have lied.
The USA better beware, Chinese eat ducks, along with dogs, cats, in fact anything that moves.
FR always had it’s own army (except it ran away alot). KSA killed a journalist, they wouldnt dare kill a Yank spy… maybe KSA learned from the CCP to kill journo’s.
China will not budge, but it will collapse when people realise how much the CCP have lied.
Well Lawrence I dont come from Malaysia, but your racism is noted.
Maybe you aren’t a Wumao, your spelling and grammar is far too bad. Do you speak Chinese as badly as English ?
If you really do live in NSW does it upset you how many of your ladies prefer the gweilo ? Is that why you are bitter, and rant online ?
Well Lawrence I dont come from Malaysia, but your racism is noted.
Maybe you aren’t a Wumao, your spelling and grammar is far too bad. Do you speak Chinese as badly as English ?
If you really do live in NSW does it upset you how many of your ladies prefer the gweilo ? Is that why you are bitter, and rant online ?
Robert Li Oh that’s why Malaysia has a policy discriminating against Chinese, Indon’s regularly riot and rape Chinese. Sg are Chinese but hate the Mainlanders. Viets, Cambodians and Laotians also hate Chinese and Thai find your tourists loud and rude,
But they are nice to your face as they like your money.
Robert Li Oh that’s why Malaysia has a policy discriminating against Chinese, Indon’s regularly riot and rape Chinese. Sg are Chinese but hate the Mainlanders. Viets, Cambodians and Laotians also hate Chinese and Thai find your tourists loud and rude,
But they are nice to your face as they like your money.
Winston Medved
I don’t need to travel to SEA. I live in SEA. I can tell you that cambodians, laotians, thais, malaysians, singaporeans, bruneians, filipinos, myanmars, papuans (PNG), even the empire bought-out indonesians love china. Except for the dongs who is longing to get whack again by their former tormentors – the empire.
Winston Medved
I don’t need to travel to SEA. I live in SEA. I can tell you that cambodians, laotians, thais, malaysians, singaporeans, bruneians, filipinos, myanmars, papuans (PNG), even the empire bought-out indonesians love china. Except for the dongs who is longing to get whack again by their former tormentors – the empire.
Yashad Rizvi
I didn’t know i was challenging someone with attention deficit disorder topped up with dementia. The tiananmen incident was proven by your own empire media to be a non-event. It was a failed regime change op. So suck on this and make sure you take it with you to your grave.
Yashad Rizvi
I didn’t know i was challenging someone with attention deficit disorder topped up with dementia. The tiananmen incident was proven by your own empire media to be a non-event. It was a failed regime change op. So suck on this and make sure you take it with you to your grave.
Vikram Reddy
I don’t know if the empire trust china enough to outsource the manufacture of the tomahawks to them. If they do, at least Raytheon made more money than if they were to be made in the USA. After all, china is good and cheap.
But I am very sure they were fired (the 59 tomahawks fired at syria) by indian soldiers recruited as trainees by trump. The indian army has a history of screwing up their state-of-the-art weapons systems.
Out of 6 kilo class submarines bought from Russia, one burnt to a crisp while at the dock. Another one was driven into an ocean cliff while fully submerged. And do you still remember your only nuclear powered ballistic missile sub on lease from Russia was flooded bcos one of the crew forgot to close a trapdoor? The whole ship had to be towed back to russia for an overhaul.
LOL! LOL! LOL!
Vikram Reddy
I don’t know if the empire trust china enough to outsource the manufacture of the tomahawks to them. If they do, at least Raytheon made more money than if they were to be made in the USA. After all, china is good and cheap.
But I am very sure they were fired (the 59 tomahawks fired at syria) by indian soldiers recruited as trainees by trump. The indian army has a history of screwing up their state-of-the-art weapons systems.
Out of 6 kilo class submarines bought from Russia, one burnt to a crisp while at the dock. Another one was driven into an ocean cliff while fully submerged. And do you still remember your only nuclear powered ballistic missile sub on lease from Russia was flooded bcos one of the crew forgot to close a trapdoor? The whole ship had to be towed back to russia for an overhaul.
LOL! LOL! LOL!