China has been warned by the United States to dismantle its missile systems shield deployed in the disputed Spratly Islands chain in the South China Sea.
The move, believed to be the first time Washington has directly addressed the issue, came in a statement following high-level talks at last week’s second annual US-China Diplomatic and Security Dialogue.
Trade war tensions were expected to dominate the meetings in Washington.
But it was the military buildup in the South China Sea which was brought into sharp focus during discussions between US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis and their opposite numbers, Beijing’s leading diplomat Yang Jiechi and Defense Minister General Wei Fenghe.
“The United States called on China to withdraw its missile systems from disputed features in the Spratly Islands, and reaffirmed that all countries should avoid addressing disputes through coercion or intimidation,” the US statement said.
Concerns have been growing among Southeast Asian nations and Washington that China was slowly establishing an air defense zone around previously uninhabited islands, reefs and atolls in one of the world’s most important sea lanes.
US and allies
Military bases have been constructed as Beijing flouts international law, claiming the islands are integral parts of China.
The US and its allies have been told by President Xi Jinping’s administration to stop sending ships and aircraft near what the world’s second-largest economy considers to be sovereign territory.
In response, Mattis has made it clear that the US will “fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows.”
During the past year, the US and its allies have conducted maneuvers in the South China Sea, which is vital for global trade with goods and products worth between US$3 trillion and $5 trillion passing through vital sea routes.
“The Chinese side made it clear to the United States that it should stop sending its vessels and military aircraft close to Chinese islands and reefs and stop actions that undermine Chinese authority and security interests,” Senior Foreign Policy adviser Yang said.
Back in June at the Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore, Mattis told defense ministers from 28 Asia-Pacific nations about the threat of “militarization” on former barren islands and reefs.
Outlining the problems faced by China’s naval and missile presence in their own backyard, he raised the question of “intimidation and coercion.”
“China’s militarization of artificial features in the South China Sea includes the deployment of anti-ship missiles, surface-to-air missiles, electronic jammers, and more recently, the landing of bomber aircraft at Woody Island,” Mattis said at the time.
“Despite China’s claims to the contrary, the placement of these weapons systems is tied directly to military use for the purposes of intimidation and coercion,” he added.
Opening gambit
Yet this is just the opening gambit, according to Patrick G Buchan, who specializes in Indo-Pacific security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
He stressed that China has a long-term strategy and is looking to become the “paramount power” in the region.
“China talks up a big game and understands the value of perpetrating a mythology of its inevitable dominance. It is an attractive and reasonably plausible message. But in this context, it is important to understand China’s endgame – to be the Indo-Pacific’s paramount political, military and economic power,” Buchan said.
“Essentially, China seeks to ease the United States out of the door, deadbolt it, and make sure it doesn’t come back. To this end, China is utilizing all the tools in the statecraft toolkit,” he continued.
“It deploys anti-ship and surface-to-air missile systems on its artificial islands, bullies the United States and allied ships on the high seas, splashes around cheap money, and dictates to foreign airlines how they should refer to Taiwan,” he said. “Across much of the Indo-Pacific, China currently sets the tone of the game. Critically, the United States does not,” Buchan added.
Jason Jean While you are not a wumao ?
I get paid alot (in another industry), I do not insult Chinese, only those (probably small & physically insecure) that believe in the nonsense of the CCP.
D’you know what, they aren’t going to make you stand tall in the world (only platform shoes will do that), but they’ll use you or their own ends (which is their continuing power).
Jason Jean While you are not a wumao ?
I get paid alot (in another industry), I do not insult Chinese, only those (probably small & physically insecure) that believe in the nonsense of the CCP.
D’you know what, they aren’t going to make you stand tall in the world (only platform shoes will do that), but they’ll use you or their own ends (which is their continuing power).
Robert Li Probably the tomahawks were outsourced and were made in China.
Robert Li Probably the tomahawks were outsourced and were made in China.
Winston Medved go to study the real history before you reply here. shame on you.
Winston Medved go to study the real history before you reply here. shame on you.
you want this to happen can be easy. Request US to remove the military base from all parts of the world first.
you want this to happen can be easy. Request US to remove the military base from all parts of the world first.
Hope Springs There is no way the American can take on China and the SCS with one simple word. American has no guts and no longer world power but showing their carrier only. Real paper tiger. Oh no, now should be degraded to name as paper fox.
Hope Springs There is no way the American can take on China and the SCS with one simple word. American has no guts and no longer world power but showing their carrier only. Real paper tiger. Oh no, now should be degraded to name as paper fox.
Yashad Rizvi you’re seriously the only commentator on Asia Times articles that I’m certain is a paid troll. You comment on almost every article about China, never say anything worthwhile, and do your best to insult China. For your sake I hope you get paid to do this because you’re wasting your life if you aren’t.
Yashad Rizvi you’re seriously the only commentator on Asia Times articles that I’m certain is a paid troll. You comment on almost every article about China, never say anything worthwhile, and do your best to insult China. For your sake I hope you get paid to do this because you’re wasting your life if you aren’t.
Small weapons. Easily destroyed, china is choking.
Small weapons. Easily destroyed, china is choking.
You’re putting your large weapons where they are not needed (Europe) or wanted (mid East), while the Asia (esp ladies) seems to like your larger weapons.
You’re putting your large weapons where they are not needed (Europe) or wanted (mid East), while the Asia (esp ladies) seems to like your larger weapons.
Peron, Clinton… you insult Peron. I would say Clinton is more like Madame Mao to Bill’s Mao (although Billl had something much bigger)
Peron, Clinton… you insult Peron. I would say Clinton is more like Madame Mao to Bill’s Mao (although Billl had something much bigger)
But the Chinese are not very big, in fact they are very small people
But the Chinese are not very big, in fact they are very small people