The doomsday predictions of an impending India-China confrontation in the Himalayas are petering out. The two countries are earnestly exploring a pathway to lead them to a détente.
This is the most obvious meaning of the announcement by Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on Sunday that an informal meeting has been scheduled between President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 27-28 in Wuhan, capital of central China’s Hubei province.
Wang was addressing a joint press conference with India’s visiting External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj.
By making the formal announcement in the presence of Swaraj, Beijing showed respect and high regard for the low-profile, self-effacing Indian minister who had suggested informal meetings between the two leaders to stabilize Sino-Indian ties and launch relations on a higher trajectory during Wang’s visit to Delhi last December.
The idea of an “informal meeting” is innovative and in the India-China context today it signifies a breakthrough. Xinhua cited Wang as saying that the new format aimed at “strategic communication on the world’s profound changes, and exchange, in an in-depth manner, views on overall, long-term and strategic issues regarding China-India relations.”
Beijing keen to deepen mutual trust
The Chinese side hopes to develop a “big picture” for the relationship from a long-term strategic perspective. The intention is to avoid the past mistake of missing the wood for the trees.
More importantly, Wang underscored that the informal meeting would “help deepen mutual trust between the two leaders, make strategic judgment on world patterns and China-India relations, and guide the two countries to set new goals and open up new prospects for bilateral ties.” He was confident that such a process “not only benefits the two countries and peoples, but will also exert significant and positive influence on regional and world peace and development.”
Wang described China and India as “natural cooperation partners.” He summed up, “The two countries should take the opportunity of the leaders’ meeting to cement strategic trust, deepen substantial cooperation, properly settle disputes and realize common development, therefore contributing to regional and world peace and development.” These are hugely significant remarks underlining China’s expectations.
Indeed, the new format can be expected to incrementally develop a critical mass of strategic understanding, while being flexible enough to create space for each side to pursue its interests in the international arena. The format presents a novel experience for India, whose diplomacy traditionally moved within structured grooves.
Although Swaraj’s proposal regarding the informal meeting took over four months to germinate on Chinese soil, much has been happening in this period. The turning point was the visit by India’s newly appointed Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale to Beijing in February. Beijing has confidence in Gokhale, a former envoy to China, to bring new thinking into the bilateral relationship. China’s Vice-Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou conveyed the dates for the Wuhan meeting to Gokhale during his “return” visit to Delhi in early April.
Suffice to say, the meeting in Wuhan will be anything but an impromptu encounter. Interestingly, Modi is undertaking an overnight trip and will have several hours of talks with Xi.
Both countries disenchanted with the US
The conversation will be imbued with what wang described as “the world’s profound changes.” Both China and India feel disenchanted with the United States – each for its own reasons – and there is no doubt that the two countries are stakeholders in free trade and globalization. And India has no illusions that President Donald Trump has the trade balance with India in his sights, too.
Despite Modi’s best efforts to draw the US into a relationship that would help in his vision to transform India as an emerging power, all he got was a periodic flow of mellifluous rhetoric pandering to Indian vanities. Modi, a down-to-earth politician with native Indian wisdom, knows that it is empty vessels that make big noise.
The US has been largely focused on penetrating the Indian market for its exports – military exports, in particular. Equally, India understands that there is no such thing as a “Thucydides trap” threatening US-China relations and Washington’s strategy is to negotiate more effectively with China – be it under Barack Obama or Trump.
In the Asian scenario too, Modi places great store in India’s relations with Russia and Iran and will not be stopped on his track by Trump’s policies. Trump placed India on a high pedestal in his so-called South Asia strategy in relation to the Afghan war, but Delhi harbors profound misgivings regarding the war itself and the lack of transparency in the US approach.
A significant outcome of the Wuhan meeting could well be that India and China work together to strengthen regional security. The Wuhan meeting will be taking place just six weeks before the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Qingdao (which Modi is due to attend).
Modi keen for big Chinese investments
The strategic communication aims to harmonize the two countries’ South Asian policies. The effort will be to avoid treading on each other’s toes while pursuing legitimate interests. The bottom line is that Modi is keen to draw big-time Chinese investments into the Indian economy. And on its part, China sees the Indian economy as the last frontier.
But mutual confidence is needed. Nepal becomes a test case with Beijing repeatedly signaling interest in a trans-Himalayan economic corridor to India. Meanwhile, Delhi has visibly toned down its skepticism regarding China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
Delhi has reached this point after a long four-year path of confronting China – a tortuous sojourn that eventually proved futile, counter-productive and unsustainable. Modi’s own instincts would have been to create a foreign-policy legacy by transforming India’s relationship with China, and ironically, Beijing also probably saw in him initially a rare forceful Indian leader with whom it could do business.
But Modi ran into strong headwinds from powerful quarters within India, which viewed China’s rise through a prism of envy, suspicion and fear, mixed with an irrational sense of rivalry and paranoia, which was of course steadily fuelled by western think tanks and media. These forces (and affiliated interest groups) still remain very much at large. But, if any Indian leader has the grit and tenacity to put them on a tight leash, only Modi could do that. The Chinese most likely realize that too.

Please don’t abuse Indian leaders and show your class. For me all leaders in China are there for respect and have you seen any Indian giving any disresepct to any leader from China…grow up.. Dont day dream, China is strong and powerful but compared to US , they are nothing… your propoganda will not work on us. We are Indians…..who taught your forefathers about love and peace through Buddhism. So please shut up.
Michael Wang With CHina, its all about power either military or money .. so they discuss only with respect to strenght…so all y our saying of peace and correct approach is all eye wash. Just because they are under pressure from everywhere from US , Japan, Australia, EU except North Korea and Pakistan…. they want talks…but ball is in China’s court , show deeds and then we can believe. Nothing else matters. If countries like India are threatened , they will throw everything possible but not let INdians humilated.
Vk Jain
What are you on about?
I am talking about finding the best way forward for countries. There is only one correct way, but there can be many different wrong ways. When your approach is not producing the best outcome for yourself, you have not done things correctly.
What have these got anything to do with power and/or threat?
India & china should come under the umbrella of trust.
Victory with India is not a victory, look at the victory of Japan getting the high speed train contract, what a night mare.
As for Trump, he is pulling out all stop all alright. Look at all those visible hindus in office. Turning America, pr the wolrd into a hindu nation, an other night mare….
Srinivasa Nanduri sir, dont waste time on such people, they are paid trolls.
Indians think the way you described. But in relation to china ,nothing productive was forthcoming, and India was even threatened. No doubt ancient China was great, and current China is powerful, but India is not weak. Even countries like US cannot threaten India, so what r is China, frankly, chine scholars overestimated their power and as a result common people like us have become pragmatic. We are sure we don’t want hostile relationship, but for friendship, ball is in China’s court and by sweet talk Only this is not possible or buying a few Indian authors here and there is also not possible Just wish Chinese scholars grow up.
Hatred of India should not blind you. Your country Pakistan got the money from China so use it productively to teach your kids sciences. Why spread hate?
A nation led by an illiterate tea boy cannot achive anything except hunger, rape, plunder, filth and poverty.
Vk Jain India is hardly a big country, it has 1.4 billion slum dwellers living in filth and squalor, with 80% defecating on street corners and raping women as national sport….china is the next worl superpower…..you should know your place…..gutters of Bombay
sigh to the comments.
If only people can see facts on a longer time span and on a larger perspective.
What were the economic standings of various players 30 years ago, 60 years ago?
What were their technological strengths relative to each other 30 years ago, 60 years ago?
How were the wellbing of their citizens relative to each other 30 years ago, 60 years ago?
Now can you think about what these comarisons 30 years from now?
Then you know who has been doing the right thing!
You go to suadis and imf and china. You people need funds urgently.
Hidayat Khan A slave you say. What skewed history you read. Granted Delhi Sultanate was barbaric, 1000 times worse then ISIS but by the time of Akbar we had a religious and social rejuvenation via bhakti and Sufi movements. Hemu led a Hindu+Muslim force against Akbar at Panipat. In haldighati Akbar’s army was led by Hindu and Rana Pratap’s by a Muslim. When Abdali came to loot Delhi it was defended to death by a maratha army that was a mix of Hindus and Muslims. We have your kind in our country. We call them hindutva bigots Folks like you read history in black and white and are fed up on propaganda.
Bal Krishna Koju Actually when Portugal came, India was under Akbar and when British overtook Portugal, Marathas were at their peak. Later post panipat 3 India became weak and British won one kingdom after other. Yes Indians we’re work horses for British empire. But we fought our way for independence and got it. So I know my history and value my freedom, no need to remind me. This is one reason why we don’t want another far east India company at our shores, in this case borders.
Vk Jain sir I never hated India infact i feels Indians are brother to me. What i criticized is the British imperial legacy current free India is carrying on its shoulder that is directing it to bully small neighbouring nation
Srinivasa Nanduri sir When British and potugues landed on Indian soil Indian princely states are fighting each other. Instead of resisting they turn to use them for reducing each others influence. As a result they all get conquered. Seems history is repeating again your wisdom is blinded by hatred and inferiority complex
Bal Krishna Koju sir, all countries have different dynasties in past like today is cpc in. Hina, but earlier were different dynasties. Why different standard for India from you. Hating India should not blind you. India is the Oldest unified unit on the world, only broken in 1947
Just remember you were a SLAVE for 1000 years!
Vk Jain sir That was Maurya Empire not India
No shame after all that chest thumping, go and take your begging bowl to America, England, and Japan, your so-called Natural Partners.