India’s premier military training institution, the National Defense Academy (NDA), is facing an unprecedented burnout. Between January 2008 and November 2017, as many as 1,256 cadets quit the academy. This amounts to between 16% and 20% of the intake each year.
The excessive nature of the unsanctioned rigor at the NDA is purportedly leading to one-fifth of the cadets failing to complete the course.
A report jointly prepared by the Integrated Defense Staff Headquarters and the NDA, accessed by Asia Times, has revealed the rate of young cadets quitting the institution.
The NDA is arguably the only military training institution of its kind. Sixteen-year-olds join the Pune-based institute as army, navy and air force cadets after passing an entrance exam and a five-day personality, psychological and medical examination. They receive a bachelor’s degree at the end of three years and then enroll in their respective service academies – the Indian Military Academy (IMA), the Indian Naval Academy or the Air Force Academy – where they train to be future commissioned officers.
NDA alumni squarely blame ragging, “unofficial training” and excessive physical punishment for the high attrition rate and describe the torture at the hands of senior cadets as sadistic and misguided.
Retired Colonel P K Royal Mehrishi, an NDA alumnus, explained how senior cadets ask juniors to roll down staircases of three-story buildings, vault over a wooden horse, do backflips, hand-springs etc without the supervision of any qualified instructor.
“Senior cadets believe they’re toughening them for war or better performance in the hard-fought inter-squadron competitions,” he said.
A former NDA instructor, retired Colonel Vinay Dalvi, said senior cadets often justified the punishments as a mode of getting the freshmen into the grind. He said a senior cadet, or the overstudy, often faced punishment from divisional officers for newcomers’ mistakes. This, he said, put severe pressure on the freshmen.
Ankur Chaturvedi, a former NDA cadet, reveals that the bulk of the injuries are reported during the initial terms. He sustained a kidney injury during a boxing bout and left the academy in 1996.
Retired Air Marshal P P Rajkumar, a former deputy commandant and alumnus of the NDA, confirmed the long-standing culture of ragging and unstructured training. In 1975, a senior cadet lost his life after juniors assaulted him for all the physical abuse he had put them through, he offers as anecdotal evidence.

“This happened during the run-up to the passing-out [graduation] parade when the departing cadets bury the hatchet with the juniors while parting company in an event called Socials. Here, the junior cadets in the squadron are allowed to rag the sixth-senior cadets in a friendly setting. However, a group of juniors hit him so hard that he died,” he said.
Too exacting
Colonel Mehrishi suggests that the NDA’s revised physical standards are a bit too exacting, even more than that of commissioning academies such as the IMA. Retired Brigadier L C Patnaik points out that even cadets with backgrounds in sports find themselves underperforming in tasks such as a front roll. He pointed out that this is apart from the late-night unofficial punishments, which cause complaints of dizziness, headache, fatigue and changes in sleep patterns.
In his book Quality Military Leadership, Colonel Dalvi quotes a former director and commandant of the Armed Forces Medical College, retired Air Marshal B Keshav Rao, who had carried out an assessment of the NDA’s training regimen: “Inadequate rest between periods of intense physical exertion, inadequate sleep, missing meals and inadequate focus on personal hygiene [and] off-syllabus physical activity at the squadron level mitigated attempts at scientific and structured strength and stamina building.”
“Relegations,” “withdrawals” and “resignations” are the three heads under which departures from the academy are classified, depending on whether the cause was academic failure, rustication, medical fitness or voluntary separation. “Relegations” refers to repeating a semester for failing an academic or outdoor training (ODT) test. Dalvi said that sometimes the reason for relegation might be both, because a cadet is too exhausted to focus on studies, thereby flunking his exams or not having adequately recovered from the grueling physical regimen to crack the ODT.
Two consecutive relegations can lead to a “withdrawal,” which is a permanent release from the academy. It can also be on disciplinary or medical grounds. In the case of “resignations,” the cadet can choose to leave the academy within two weeks of joining, without paying the NDA the 1.35 million rupees (US$21,250) incurred on his three-year training.
It is not the only armed-forces institute witnessing burnout. According to the Directorate General of the Armed Forces Medical Services, the hospitalization rate among officer cadets across military-training institutes in the country between 2013 and 2015 was 34.14%.
Officials at the NDA did not respond to a detailed e-mail query sent on December 15, citing the absence of officials and staff on account of the mid-term break. This story will be updated if they respond.

Need for scientific methodology
Both Colonel Dalvi and Brigadier Patnaik recommend phased training that progressively increases the physical strain. Dalvi said cadets’ endurance and strength would have peaked by the time they graduated as officers. Patnaik recommended a scientific assessment of cadets, such as muscle and bone-density testing, before subjecting them to the rigorous regimen at the NDA. He said a dedicated department of physical education should be set up to oversee the cadet for the first year, with the proportion of military training gradually increasing in the last two years.
For retired Admiral Arun Prakash, former navy chief and commandant of the National Defense Academy, the remedies lie in the service headquarters paying greater attention to the training academies and ending the ad hoc methods in appointing the commandants. He said the commandant is a three-star officer, usually slated to retire within a couple of years. He argued that the commandant should ideally be a two-star officer, with another promotion left to go.
“A blue book for academies, prepared by the Chiefs of Staff Committee, with inviolable rules for their functioning, should be introduced. No commandant or instructor can introduce their own ideas,” he proposed.
Colonel Mehrishi advocates a mandatory supervision of all training and punishment by qualified instructors with a “ruthless, zero-tolerance ragging policy.” Most military veterans Asia Times spoke to believe that the problem also lies with the outdated officer-selection system.
Brigadier Patnaik says the existing personality and psychological tests that assess “officer-like qualities” only consider the behavioral process and observable responses, neglecting the mental processes that trigger actions and decisions. He points that out tests such as the British Army Recruitment Battery and the Australian Computerized Cognitive Assessment Tool judge the mental processes and not the response.
Medical tests, Patnaik insists, should be revised to include exercises such as 1.6-kilometer shuttle runs, pushups, chin-ups, sit-ups etc to match with the physical capability required during training.
Dalvi argues that the British Raj-era selection and training system has destroyed the careers of many talented young potential officers.
(Parth Satam is a Navi Mumbai-based freelance writer and a member of 101Reporters.com, a pan-India network of grassroots reporters.)

This article is far from reality … training for Armed Forces is going to be tough … not only the training has gone soft over the years but new generations are physically and mentally weaker …
This article is far from reality … training for Armed Forces is going to be tough … not only the training has gone soft over the years but new generations are physically and mentally weaker …
It’s NOTHING to do with ragging !
It’s just a huge differential between the aspirations and expectations of new cadets, so created by the advertising hype, and the actual grind which they face in the NDA.
This social media and cyber savvy generation needs two fold handling. One, they need to be told what actually to expect, so that they drop out pre-selection, and don’t waste opportunities for others. And two, a segregation for the FIRST SEMESTER, so that they are broken into the structured routine before being exposed to the vagaries of NDA LIFE.
I’ll close by making it clear, that its the "unsanctioned training" which makes "men out of spoilt school boys", not the sanctioned curriculum. We all know it. Let’s be man enough and say it !
It’s NOTHING to do with ragging !
It’s just a huge differential between the aspirations and expectations of new cadets, so created by the advertising hype, and the actual grind which they face in the NDA.
This social media and cyber savvy generation needs two fold handling. One, they need to be told what actually to expect, so that they drop out pre-selection, and don’t waste opportunities for others. And two, a segregation for the FIRST SEMESTER, so that they are broken into the structured routine before being exposed to the vagaries of NDA LIFE.
I’ll close by making it clear, that its the "unsanctioned training" which makes "men out of spoilt school boys", not the sanctioned curriculum. We all know it. Let’s be man enough and say it !
Sub standard and a generic article which is based on poor research. A. You have no access to cadets passing out of NDA recently. You are interacting with your 60 year old contacts and generalising their opinion for the Academy. The cadets would tell you better how much of old fabled "ragging" still remains. As of now, any unofficial physical training is illegal and has resulted in disciplinery Action on those involved.
B. Just maybe, the world outside is too lucrative for a youngster who is watching how your journo ilk treats soldiers, martyrs and their dependents including apathy of government and Ill treatment by bureaucracy.
C. Maybe the standards for academy is set and one either rises to it or leaves. Lowering the bar would be a great disservice to the nation.
D. Just because Forces don’t fight back against their own , your don’t have to be pick on them like imbeciles.
Training Pattern in NDA needs NO change whatsoever.Remember Cadets ,A Good Mix of All Gentleman with Varying Traits of Personalty join the Course. As a Natural Phenomenon the Weaker lot Falls behind & Feel inability to Cope Up with peer group which creates a kind of Psychological Stress on individual. As frustrating one He tends to Give Up. Main reason for this appears to be the Casual attitude to Sports in Schools aiming only on Excellence in Academics, Indoor Games,less opportunities for Outwardly life,Weak Socially Responsible attitude,Courage of Conviction & Youngsters Not willing to Soil Hands etc etc. Education System need to Strengthen Sporting Activities at School Level and Facilitate development of Physical & Mental Stamina at equal footings.Also Standard of lowering the Cut off at Selection stage be stopped just to fill the Vacancies. The Lowering of Standards of Defence Officers compared to Civil Service officers in terms of Pay & Allowances & Perks etc is also be Noticed with Utmost Attention by Younger Generation in which Area A LOT needs to be done for Quality Inspiration.
I wonder who are these so called journalist and from where they get these idiotic ideas. Most of these journalist have a hidden ulterior motive in publishing such article. They should be charged with treason for degrading one of the finest institution in the world.
What An aimless, stupid and incorrect analysis based on personal misunderstandings of few losers… I’m an NDA aluminus and know for sure.
High attrition rate is because not everyone has the mental and enjoying makeup to undergo rigors of military training. It’s to get rid of quitters and weaklings at the earliest…
The author’s research and understanding of the are pitiful at best.
As a 16 yr old who was 4’10" on joining the NDA I went through the whole process of ‘Officer material training" and it was tough. If someone tries to put me through it again I think every exNDA would say " God save me the agony"
But each one, save the weak and those without the SPUNK to face the training, are proud to be alumni of such an unparalleled Institution.
I went on to become a GTO at an SSB. Just to explain the way an SSB works. There is no, absolutely no focus on physical capability. All that we seek to find are candidates who will make average officers. Not generals. Just guys who would be healthy members of a team. And the armed forces need good team members.
But, for those who have not lived or trained in this kind of life, physical toughness is secondary to the mind. And that can not be built up by a whole set of rules and regulations which support the weak. The weak need to be weeded out. How else would you have an armed forces which is the best in the world. And I really believe ours is the best.
Some academics have also commented. As an instructor in the DIPR we have always discussed the selection process and what the training in academy’s should be.
The fact that the whole process has been continually examined and modified, and has produced the best breed of officers, is proof.
There are always aberrations. Maybe a cadet was overly troubled during training or a very senior officer was found guilty of a
Misdemeanour. It’s an aberration- no fault of selection or training.
Timmy
I am not an alumnus of NDA. But had a stint in NDA as an academic faculty. Fortunately had a stint, pretty long one of 8 years, in SSB too. With this background I can vouch that there is absolutely nothing wrong either in the training system in NDA or in the selection process in SSBs. NDA is just one of its kind. Even the SSB selection process is also unique. Updation, doesn't mean complete overhaul, is also common in both. One odd incidence cannot be generalised. Burnouts are common in any training institutes. All the alumni withstood the tests of time and proved the worth of both selection process as well as training. So one should not take too much of cognizance of the article. Of late the youth, due to their bringing up, is looking for softer options rather than facing challenges.
When I joined the NDA in 1961, the age group was 14 to 16, after doing class 10. There were cadets even then who could not take it, but most them left in the first term itself. After finishing six months, the only withdrawals were on medical or disciplinary grounds. I agree with the siuggestions of Admiral Arun Prakash, a dear friend, course mate and ex-Commandant. The instructional staff should be carefully selected, and the Commandant must be someone who is not due for retirement. There should be a blue book, so that ad hoc changes are not carried out at whims. NDA is probably the best training institution we have in the country and its standards must not be diluted.
NDA is a unique institution that is fast falling behind and there are good reasons that the Indian Naval Academy cadets are doing better than those from NDA. Ragging has been officially outlawed for several decades, yet continues in its worst form. – that speaks volumes for discipline and integrity among the cadets and officers to boot.The issue at stake is not that cadets dont need to be rough and tough but how and how much that needs to be done, by the NDA or decided by lawless cadets and officers. Primary need today is to install the software and program the gadget that the cadets carry between their shoulders and shoulders must be strong enough. The standard of education imparted is poor and does not meet the needs of the armed forces at large. After the terrible ragging and punishments its rather difficult for cadets to hoist in anything though times have changed but brawn is unfortunately stressed by the older ex-cadets. We want the cadets to obtain BTech degrees. Earlier we change the better it will be and ex-cadets should be part of the change rather than oppose it on nostalgia. I honestly believe the NDA should go to the Army and the others should move out and train their people as required by their respective services
PS. I am exRIMC, exNDA, 2 tenures in NDA and Personnel Br and Inter svcs
Its all trash dished out to put a Category A+ institution in bad light. Parts of the content shown in this video are not from NDA. I am myself an ex-NDA (63rd Course) from the most notorious Hunter squadron and had no such problems in the academy. In fact we had a deep sense of pride in being from that squadron. We also had a few weaklings who could not bear the harships of training and left. The weaker ones will not accept that they could not take it but they will blame the academy and float such non sense. Armed Forces are in any case not for these weaklings.
NDA prayer covers it all, "O lord, help me choose the harder right than the easier wrong". The package generates a never say die attitude and the indomitable Coursemate spirit, which we all swear and live by, something no other Institue inculcates.
If I may submit: I feel some of the comments reflect a lack of open-mind to accept that there could possibly be challenges and therefore there is a need to analyse better for bringing a method to the madness, if and as necessary. Instead, one finds a largely defensive mindset, glossing over or downright denial. ‘I have gone through it all and why not others’ attitude. This is no solution. Blaming it all on input quality amounts to questioning Darwinism. Argument that the selection system is periodically updated is as undefendable as it can be. Need could be to bring-in process improvements at each stage from sourcing to selection to training and not necessarily change everything outright.
The article should only be taken as a thought stimulant.
Don’t shoot the messenger!
The NDA is a cradle….. nay… crucible for leadership….. in the armed forces. Where these same young men (cadets) will have to lead other men into war…. as leaders themselves.
Those numbers “1256 dropping out” are mere statistics peddled for sensation mongering journalism.
I speak as a graduate of this elite institution (1980) of one of the squadrons which had a relatively much tougher standard of “so called ragging”.
Yes it was tough when we had to undergo it. And no one will admit he enjoyed it. But it had a mental aspect to it, no matter how tough the physical pushups or rolling down the stairs or bicycle Bajri order or heat treatment (lying bare backed on hot tar with seniors walking on you) or manhandling etc were…. there was a mental reasoning behind all this stuff…. and at least one of the reasons was that you obeyed unconditionally the commands you got from your superiors…Just think what would happen if you started questioning commands while going into battle. What would the men you are leading into battle expect…. what if they questioned you when you told them to attack straight ahead…
I think men would die. And yes, men die in battle, but it’s better to die obeying s lawful command rather than disobeying one.
The other aspect is the culling of the weaker lot. Those statistics don’t divide the 1256 into how many dropped out within a few weeks of getting the “culture shock” of a military life after being spoilt brats at home or in college. And how many were actually mistreated due to “faulty training methods” whatever they are purported to be….
Tell them to stop crying and grow up.
Stay. Join the army.
It will make men out of them if nothing else.
The major reason perhaps lie somewhere else. The trend of the intake these days is from the original aspirants of IIT. Those who do not make it to major engineering colleges reluctantly join the academy by edging out original NDA aspirants who do not score as well as former class.
So when the going gets tough. Weaklings opt out.
The rigour has reduced a lot since past years.
Sorry, the the last comment is by Brig M A Devaiah and not Veena Devaiah
Am an ex- NDA and during service have posted as the Head of the Training Team at OTA Chennai and also as the SI / CI at the Commando Wing
I’m of the opinion that we need to weed out the weak at the training stage itself. This would imply that higher rate of attrition is accepted.
In order to keep the attrition levels low, a tendency to accept lower qualifying physical standards at the Academies has crept in.
This has a cascading effect and we observed a sizeable number of young officers performing poorly in the Commando Course and also do not live up to the expectations of the men in the Units.
Of course following a scientific method of training is desirable; and demeaning and brutal ragging should be checked.
Let us not have an Army of chocolate cream soldiers
Paul Abraham well said