India’s premier military training institution, the National Defense Academy (NDA), is facing an unprecedented burnout. Between January 2008 and November 2017, as many as 1,256 cadets quit the academy. This amounts to between 16% and 20% of the intake each year.
The excessive nature of the unsanctioned rigor at the NDA is purportedly leading to one-fifth of the cadets failing to complete the course.
A report jointly prepared by the Integrated Defense Staff Headquarters and the NDA, accessed by Asia Times, has revealed the rate of young cadets quitting the institution.
The NDA is arguably the only military training institution of its kind. Sixteen-year-olds join the Pune-based institute as army, navy and air force cadets after passing an entrance exam and a five-day personality, psychological and medical examination. They receive a bachelor’s degree at the end of three years and then enroll in their respective service academies – the Indian Military Academy (IMA), the Indian Naval Academy or the Air Force Academy – where they train to be future commissioned officers.
NDA alumni squarely blame ragging, “unofficial training” and excessive physical punishment for the high attrition rate and describe the torture at the hands of senior cadets as sadistic and misguided.
Retired Colonel P K Royal Mehrishi, an NDA alumnus, explained how senior cadets ask juniors to roll down staircases of three-story buildings, vault over a wooden horse, do backflips, hand-springs etc without the supervision of any qualified instructor.
“Senior cadets believe they’re toughening them for war or better performance in the hard-fought inter-squadron competitions,” he said.
A former NDA instructor, retired Colonel Vinay Dalvi, said senior cadets often justified the punishments as a mode of getting the freshmen into the grind. He said a senior cadet, or the overstudy, often faced punishment from divisional officers for newcomers’ mistakes. This, he said, put severe pressure on the freshmen.
Ankur Chaturvedi, a former NDA cadet, reveals that the bulk of the injuries are reported during the initial terms. He sustained a kidney injury during a boxing bout and left the academy in 1996.
Retired Air Marshal P P Rajkumar, a former deputy commandant and alumnus of the NDA, confirmed the long-standing culture of ragging and unstructured training. In 1975, a senior cadet lost his life after juniors assaulted him for all the physical abuse he had put them through, he offers as anecdotal evidence.

“This happened during the run-up to the passing-out [graduation] parade when the departing cadets bury the hatchet with the juniors while parting company in an event called Socials. Here, the junior cadets in the squadron are allowed to rag the sixth-senior cadets in a friendly setting. However, a group of juniors hit him so hard that he died,” he said.
Too exacting
Colonel Mehrishi suggests that the NDA’s revised physical standards are a bit too exacting, even more than that of commissioning academies such as the IMA. Retired Brigadier L C Patnaik points out that even cadets with backgrounds in sports find themselves underperforming in tasks such as a front roll. He pointed out that this is apart from the late-night unofficial punishments, which cause complaints of dizziness, headache, fatigue and changes in sleep patterns.
In his book Quality Military Leadership, Colonel Dalvi quotes a former director and commandant of the Armed Forces Medical College, retired Air Marshal B Keshav Rao, who had carried out an assessment of the NDA’s training regimen: “Inadequate rest between periods of intense physical exertion, inadequate sleep, missing meals and inadequate focus on personal hygiene [and] off-syllabus physical activity at the squadron level mitigated attempts at scientific and structured strength and stamina building.”
“Relegations,” “withdrawals” and “resignations” are the three heads under which departures from the academy are classified, depending on whether the cause was academic failure, rustication, medical fitness or voluntary separation. “Relegations” refers to repeating a semester for failing an academic or outdoor training (ODT) test. Dalvi said that sometimes the reason for relegation might be both, because a cadet is too exhausted to focus on studies, thereby flunking his exams or not having adequately recovered from the grueling physical regimen to crack the ODT.
Two consecutive relegations can lead to a “withdrawal,” which is a permanent release from the academy. It can also be on disciplinary or medical grounds. In the case of “resignations,” the cadet can choose to leave the academy within two weeks of joining, without paying the NDA the 1.35 million rupees (US$21,250) incurred on his three-year training.
It is not the only armed-forces institute witnessing burnout. According to the Directorate General of the Armed Forces Medical Services, the hospitalization rate among officer cadets across military-training institutes in the country between 2013 and 2015 was 34.14%.
Officials at the NDA did not respond to a detailed e-mail query sent on December 15, citing the absence of officials and staff on account of the mid-term break. This story will be updated if they respond.

Need for scientific methodology
Both Colonel Dalvi and Brigadier Patnaik recommend phased training that progressively increases the physical strain. Dalvi said cadets’ endurance and strength would have peaked by the time they graduated as officers. Patnaik recommended a scientific assessment of cadets, such as muscle and bone-density testing, before subjecting them to the rigorous regimen at the NDA. He said a dedicated department of physical education should be set up to oversee the cadet for the first year, with the proportion of military training gradually increasing in the last two years.
For retired Admiral Arun Prakash, former navy chief and commandant of the National Defense Academy, the remedies lie in the service headquarters paying greater attention to the training academies and ending the ad hoc methods in appointing the commandants. He said the commandant is a three-star officer, usually slated to retire within a couple of years. He argued that the commandant should ideally be a two-star officer, with another promotion left to go.
“A blue book for academies, prepared by the Chiefs of Staff Committee, with inviolable rules for their functioning, should be introduced. No commandant or instructor can introduce their own ideas,” he proposed.
Colonel Mehrishi advocates a mandatory supervision of all training and punishment by qualified instructors with a “ruthless, zero-tolerance ragging policy.” Most military veterans Asia Times spoke to believe that the problem also lies with the outdated officer-selection system.
Brigadier Patnaik says the existing personality and psychological tests that assess “officer-like qualities” only consider the behavioral process and observable responses, neglecting the mental processes that trigger actions and decisions. He points that out tests such as the British Army Recruitment Battery and the Australian Computerized Cognitive Assessment Tool judge the mental processes and not the response.
Medical tests, Patnaik insists, should be revised to include exercises such as 1.6-kilometer shuttle runs, pushups, chin-ups, sit-ups etc to match with the physical capability required during training.
Dalvi argues that the British Raj-era selection and training system has destroyed the careers of many talented young potential officers.
(Parth Satam is a Navi Mumbai-based freelance writer and a member of 101Reporters.com, a pan-India network of grassroots reporters.)
What about those who are thrown out of NDA or IAF for being unfit to be service piolets, and then get commisdioned as Short Service commissioned officrrs,and become Generals of Indian Army.Even those who are commussioned from OTA, Chennai,or IMA, graduate entry from IMA,are are equally competent officers. Actually, joining NDA in todays environment is considered foolish, as one can definitely achieve better results through IMA, than wasting 3 years in NDA.
Further, this institution has done gr8 harm to Indian Armed Forces, by producing Brahmins officers cadre in three services.!
I never recommend any parent to send ones wards to this institution.
R G Udhaykumar Just shows how narrow your thinking is. In fact, it borders on idiotic!! Does IMA & OTA produce Naval & Air Force Officers?? It is quite apparent that you have been jiggered by some Ex NDA officer in your Service, if you have actually disgraced the Holy Uniform of the Armed Forces.
R G Udhaykumar Just shows how narrow your thinking is. In fact, it borders on idiotic!! Does IMA & OTA produce Naval & Air Force Officers?? It is quite apparent that you have been jiggered by some Ex NDA officer in your Service, if you have actually disgraced the Holy Uniform of the Armed Forces.
R G Udhaykumar Now I’m convinced that you have been given a nice "pull through" for your misdemeanor, by some Senior ex NDA officer!! Serves you right, for this stupid line of thinking!!
R G Udhaykumar Now I’m convinced that you have been given a nice "pull through" for your misdemeanor, by some Senior ex NDA officer!! Serves you right, for this stupid line of thinking!!
This article is crap and the author does not have a holistic viewpoint.
NDA is the best institution in the country and makes the best out of the best!
This article is crap and the author does not have a holistic viewpoint.
NDA is the best institution in the country and makes the best out of the best!
There are a lot of comments on weeding out the sissys and yes, sissys should be weeded out, but how do we know that the toughies who bore it all are not sheep who don’t have the guts to stand up to nonsense? In the Australian academy it was found that there was an initiation rite for new commers, as the years went by new torture methods were added to this rite. Elaborate arrangements involving ice blocks, slides, mud ponds, eating dirty stuff and in general stupid things one can say. The irony of it was that those who passed out drew great pride of having gone through worse than their predecessors. So this whole thing of bravado over having gone through a ‘tough’ routine must be taken with a pinch of salt. There is apparent confusion in some people over mental toughness and physical toughness, both can be trained separately and both trainings can be combined in a single activity, but one needs to realize that it is possible that a physical activity has nothing to do with mental toughness at all; the person who is obeying his senior might be shit scared that he may get expelled from the academy and called a sissy, or scared that he may not pass out of the NDA to become an officer and lose out on a career, so he must be acting out of that fear… that is no mental toughness. Mental toughness could be the ability to stand firm and have a level headed discussion with an IAS officer without running for cover or without trying to bulshit or without trying to pull one’s rank. Mental toughness would be the ability to admit one’s short comings and say “this NDA training is not for me; let anybody say anything (call me sissy or anything), this is not the way one needs to be treated.” It is already discussed in what the delta factor is. How can we be so sure that the diamond that passed out of NDA was not a diamond when it came in. The fact that NDA officers do great is not conclusive proof that that brilliance must be attributed to NDA alone. Delta factor is sum total of the additions and subtractions that happen to a cadet when he is at the academy. How can we be so sure that a self-driven achiever from a civil college is not a better leader than a kick-start cadet that has emerged out of NDA? What if great talents are being taken into the NDA and are not being allowed to attain their true potential because they went through the NDA? Yes we don’t know… so if NDA is all that great why are alumni shit scared of putting the NDA through a proper systematic study, why is the NDA product afraid of a scientific, statistical analysis of the comparison of NDA products and products of other academies? At worst what can happen? Somebody who is an expert in leadership training, in sports medicine, in psychology, in spirituality is going to give his views and recommendations on what is wrong with the NDA or what is good about it… take it or leave it… but the way it is being avoided, in the name of ‘don’t tinker with it’ it shows that after all one holds a fear that it was bad after all… A great institution is never one that is frozen in time, it must be a live animal… we know how a few gun wielding men destroyed a huge army of swordsmen… all the training that the swordsmen did, of how they would reach out for the opponents throat and how they would smash the skull with the shield… everything went to naught when someone stood at a distance and fired small metal balls at him by pulling a small trigger. The times are changing at this moment. All this happening at the NDA may amount to nothing if the cadet has not learnt enough to handle media, the digital media, if he does not understand strategy and human rights, if he does not know that a bee sized drone; ( a swarm of them can simply destroy his entire army by making holes in the skulls of the soldiers). We need to ignore these bombastic assertions and get down to business. If NDA has to be the cradle of military leadership it better pull up its socks and have a clear understanding of what the true status is. As it is other academies may already be contesting as to why the epithet of Cradle should be enjoyed by NDA alone.
There are a lot of comments on weeding out the sissys and yes, sissys should be weeded out, but how do we know that the toughies who bore it all are not sheep who don’t have the guts to stand up to nonsense? In the Australian academy it was found that there was an initiation rite for new commers, as the years went by new torture methods were added to this rite. Elaborate arrangements involving ice blocks, slides, mud ponds, eating dirty stuff and in general stupid things one can say. The irony of it was that those who passed out drew great pride of having gone through worse than their predecessors. So this whole thing of bravado over having gone through a ‘tough’ routine must be taken with a pinch of salt. There is apparent confusion in some people over mental toughness and physical toughness, both can be trained separately and both trainings can be combined in a single activity, but one needs to realize that it is possible that a physical activity has nothing to do with mental toughness at all; the person who is obeying his senior might be shit scared that he may get expelled from the academy and called a sissy, or scared that he may not pass out of the NDA to become an officer and lose out on a career, so he must be acting out of that fear… that is no mental toughness. Mental toughness could be the ability to stand firm and have a level headed discussion with an IAS officer without running for cover or without trying to bulshit or without trying to pull one’s rank. Mental toughness would be the ability to admit one’s short comings and say “this NDA training is not for me; let anybody say anything (call me sissy or anything), this is not the way one needs to be treated.” It is already discussed in what the delta factor is. How can we be so sure that the diamond that passed out of NDA was not a diamond when it came in. The fact that NDA officers do great is not conclusive proof that that brilliance must be attributed to NDA alone. Delta factor is sum total of the additions and subtractions that happen to a cadet when he is at the academy. How can we be so sure that a self-driven achiever from a civil college is not a better leader than a kick-start cadet that has emerged out of NDA? What if great talents are being taken into the NDA and are not being allowed to attain their true potential because they went through the NDA? Yes we don’t know… so if NDA is all that great why are alumni shit scared of putting the NDA through a proper systematic study, why is the NDA product afraid of a scientific, statistical analysis of the comparison of NDA products and products of other academies? At worst what can happen? Somebody who is an expert in leadership training, in sports medicine, in psychology, in spirituality is going to give his views and recommendations on what is wrong with the NDA or what is good about it… take it or leave it… but the way it is being avoided, in the name of ‘don’t tinker with it’ it shows that after all one holds a fear that it was bad after all… A great institution is never one that is frozen in time, it must be a live animal… we know how a few gun wielding men destroyed a huge army of swordsmen… all the training that the swordsmen did, of how they would reach out for the opponents throat and how they would smash the skull with the shield… everything went to naught when someone stood at a distance and fired small metal balls at him by pulling a small trigger. The times are changing at this moment. All this happening at the NDA may amount to nothing if the cadet has not learnt enough to handle media, the digital media, if he does not understand strategy and human rights, if he does not know that a bee sized drone; ( a swarm of them can simply destroy his entire army by making holes in the skulls of the soldiers). We need to ignore these bombastic assertions and get down to business. If NDA has to be the cradle of military leadership it better pull up its socks and have a clear understanding of what the true status is. As it is other academies may already be contesting as to why the epithet of Cradle should be enjoyed by NDA alone.
While not questioning the intelligencia of the stated few there are thousands who have passed out through the same grind albeit with flying colours and trust me there wasn’t anything scientific abt it….with time changes may be adopted but don’t kill the soldierly ethos under the garb of science and eloquent phrases ….
While not questioning the intelligencia of the stated few there are thousands who have passed out through the same grind albeit with flying colours and trust me there wasn’t anything scientific abt it….with time changes may be adopted but don’t kill the soldierly ethos under the garb of science and eloquent phrases ….
May be we won’t see a Manoj Pandey or a Vikram Batra and legends like them running through a barrage of bullets voluntarily….coz again no science can justify these acts….it’s something insane …..but yes checks and balances for "ragging for the sake of it" needs to be incorporated….
May be we won’t see a Manoj Pandey or a Vikram Batra and legends like them running through a barrage of bullets voluntarily….coz again no science can justify these acts….it’s something insane …..but yes checks and balances for "ragging for the sake of it" needs to be incorporated….
The facts are grossly wrong.. a one sided write up by a person who is has a myopic view of the academy and the selection process..
The facts are grossly wrong.. a one sided write up by a person who is has a myopic view of the academy and the selection process..
He is Royal
He is Royal
P
P
All institutions belong to this great country, most of the time weaklings take recourse to their institutions ,good ones do not , Sham memnekshow was not from NDA . So focus on individual you find good guys everywhere. Since str of NDA is more hence obviously good guys would be more. So no fight all are good . Let’s fight together.
All institutions belong to this great country, most of the time weaklings take recourse to their institutions ,good ones do not , Sham memnekshow was not from NDA . So focus on individual you find good guys everywhere. Since str of NDA is more hence obviously good guys would be more. So no fight all are good . Let’s fight together.
All guys are goods it depends on individual proove whichever way he wants.nobody own bad guys from any instructions.
All guys are goods it depends on individual proove whichever way he wants.nobody own bad guys from any instructions.
NDA is a class one institution. No doubt about it.
Individual, group activities, punishment etc are ok.
However, little more emphasis be given to academics to meet the standards out side.
Constitution, History, Governance and administration, Judiciary and law etc should be thought. For this some time can be taken out from physical activities. These activities may be compensated in IMA or respective service institutes after NDA. May be the erst while 2years IMA training be brought back.
NDA is a class one institution. No doubt about it.
Individual, group activities, punishment etc are ok.
However, little more emphasis be given to academics to meet the standards out side.
Constitution, History, Governance and administration, Judiciary and law etc should be thought. For this some time can be taken out from physical activities. These activities may be compensated in IMA or respective service institutes after NDA. May be the erst while 2years IMA training be brought back.
Bhanwar Rathore The weightage for trainability is an inherent part of assessment. Longer the training period, younger & more receptive the candidate, greater is his trainability. NDA, ACC more or less fall in this category.
Bhanwar Rathore The weightage for trainability is an inherent part of assessment. Longer the training period, younger & more receptive the candidate, greater is his trainability. NDA, ACC more or less fall in this category.
The article is an eye opener and was long overdue. I have had the privilege of being an alumni at NDA and Divisional Officer at both NDA and the Naval Academy. In addition, I have also been a member of the Selection board for four years.
In my opinion, the whole system needs a relook and realignment. Our society has undergone many changes in the last few decades and Armed Forces are no longer a preferred choice. The quality of input has changed drastically which will obviously influence the end product.
In current political upheaval our country is witnessing, the future of the Armed Forces is certainly a matter of concern to us Veterans.
The article is an eye opener and was long overdue. I have had the privilege of being an alumni at NDA and Divisional Officer at both NDA and the Naval Academy. In addition, I have also been a member of the Selection board for four years.
In my opinion, the whole system needs a relook and realignment. Our society has undergone many changes in the last few decades and Armed Forces are no longer a preferred choice. The quality of input has changed drastically which will obviously influence the end product.
In current political upheaval our country is witnessing, the future of the Armed Forces is certainly a matter of concern to us Veterans.