In recent years, global food security has suffered from overlapping crises caused by conflicts, geopolitical tensions, climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic, resulting in severe food supply disruptions.
These disruptions have been accentuated by several “food chokepoints” such as in the Red Sea where Yemen-based Houthi fighters have attacked merchant ships and caused uncertainty in food shipments via the Suez Canal.
The shipping traffic through the Panama Canal has decreased due to drought which also hit river transportation systems such as the Mississippi River and the Rhine River.
As the global food system is already increasingly dependent on the movement of food from a few major “breadbasket” exporting regions to food-deficit areas around the world – often through these “food chokepoints” – the reliance on specific shipping routes intensifies the pressure on global food security.
It also impacts agricultural product competitiveness, delivery schedules, as well as food availability and prices. Longer shipping durations also put perishable foods at risk, while shipping disruptions such as changes to shipping schedules strain cargo handling and road transport sectors, causing major delays.
What this means for Asia
For both food-exporting and importing countries, challenges loom. Exporting countries may face profit margin pressures, which reduce the prices for producers while importing countries grapple with potential increases in transportation costs, which lead to higher food prices, greater price volatility and altered consumption patterns.
Southeast Asia, East Asia, and South Asia face heightened vulnerability due to their reliance on European and Black Sea markets for key agricultural products and fertilizers.Import disruptions pose inflation risks, contributing to a cost-of-living crisis.
In countries already grappling with crises like extreme weather (Pakistan), conflict (Bangladesh and Myanmar), economic turmoil (Sri Lanka) and political uncertainties (Thailand), food price inflation exacerbates poverty, stalling socioeconomic growth.
The most impacted – the lower-income and middle-income households – may also face heightened malnutrition risks, threatening to reverse decades of development progress in Asia.
Trade disruption implications
The US announced plans in late December 2023 for a task force to counter the Houthi attacks in the Red Sea but immediate relief for trade disruptions and food price inflation is unlikely.
Continued supply chain disruptions coupled with escalating geopolitical tensions, raise concerns about food and fertilizer supplies being weaponized, as exemplified in the Ukraine-Russia war.
Amid recurrent crises, urgent reforms to food systems are essential. Governments and policymakers must prioritize preparedness and resilience-building at national and regional levels to address food security issues and mitigate future impacts.
For the many net food importing countries in Asia, aside from increasing national stockpiles, governments and policymakers should diversify sources to mitigate supply chain disruptions.
A good example is Singapore, which, while importing over 90% of its food, has reduced vulnerability to food price and supply fluctuations through contact with more than 180 countries and regions.
This strategy has been largely successful, resulting in Singapore enjoying the world’s second most affordable food, behind Australia. The average Singaporean household spends less than 10% of monthly expenses on food, in contrast with the Philippines’ 38%.
Additionally, the Philippines, which has a large food deficit, ranks low in affordability, importing nearly 80% of its agricultural imports. Food inflation in the Philippines reached 8% in 2023.
Facilitating food access
Nationally, governments must implement early action plans and bolster social safety nets to ease the burden of the cost-of-living crisis. Initiatives like food relief, cash support, and food voucher programs for lower-income households can help alleviate the burden. Subsidies and tax measures, which can provide temporary relief, may also be considered.
With average households spending over a third of their income on food in countries like the Philippines, and lower-income households in countries like Indonesia spending up to 64% on food monthly, addressing food price inflation is crucial to safeguard average and lower-income households from undernutrition.
To address the interconnected issues of food availability, access, and affordability, Asian governments reliant on food imports could sign agreements with agricultural exporting countries in the region such as grain and oilseed powerhouses Australia and New Zealand. Doing so can avoid risks posed by chokepoints.
Greater focus on intra-regional trading could also be encouraged, such as in Southeast Asia, which has large exporters of key agricultural products including rice (Vietnam and Thailand) and palm oil (Malaysia and Indonesia).
Increased intra-regional trade could reduce regional food import dependency while also increasing regional food accessibility, market stability, and economic development. This could be supported by initiatives to encourage investments in agricultural research and development in the region to boost the production of other staples (such as wheat) and reduce reliance on imports.
Looking ahead
For Asian governments and policymakers, the ongoing supply chain disruptions in the Middle East are a reminder of the importance of resilient national and regional food supplies and agrifood systems. Amid continuing food price inflation and malnutrition, countries must seek to address these interlinked concerns at national and regional levels in both the short and long term.
By implementing policy measures such as food import diversification and strengthening social safety nets, the region has a better chance of bracing itself for the food security challenges ahead.
Genevieve Donnellon-May is a Research Associate at the Asia Society Policy Institute, Melbourne, Australia. Paul Teng is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre), S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.
This article first appeared on RSIS Commentary and is republished with kind permission.
In addition to grain and oilseed, Australia and New Zealand are also large beef, lamb and dairy producers. Because their farmers don’t get subsidies from their governments like in the EU and USA, their produce has to be of a higher quality for the higher prices charged. Part of the reason why the Australia-EU FTA hasn’t gone ahead is that quality Australian agricultural produce would be a threat to EU farmers and the Australia-US FTA sets increasing tariffs on Australian meats depending on the exceeded total amounts exported up to the US at a point in time. Cattle and sheep from Australia and NZ are also exported live to Muslim countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, etc. Savings could be made if those countries were willing to accept frozen produce.