South African novelist Deon Meyer wished the deadly virus wreaking havoc in his 2016 thriller Fever had not turned into an eerily accurate depiction of the coronavirus pandemic ravaging the world.
“I find no pleasure in it. I keep thinking of the sorrow of all those thousands of people who have lost loved ones, lost their jobs, and are living in fear,” the crime fiction author and screenwriter said.
Fever tells the heart-wrenching story of the survival of a father and son in a desolated South Africa after a virus wiped out 95% of the world’s population.
Upon release, the novel was widely acclaimed as a post-apocalyptic masterpiece worthy of Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, for which the American novelist received the Pulitzer Prize in 2007.
Four years later, the parallels between Meyer’s Fever and the Covid-19 pandemic are chilling – a coronavirus transmitted from animals to humans, spreading like wildfire across the globe.
In a bizarrely premonitory scenario, borders are shut and characters grow increasingly wary of the other as survival instincts kick in.
“Fever was the culmination of so many different emotions, concerns and a lot of reading,” Meyer, 61, said in a telephone interview, after being in lockdown at his southern Stellenbosch home.
“I’ve always loved post-apocalyptic fiction, and read the genre intensely in my 20s and 30s,” he explained.
“As I became more and more aware of global warming, Ebola, the Avian Influenza (H5N1) of 1996 and the H1N1 Swine Flu virus of 2009-2010, I could not help but think that we live in a world where an apocalypse is a possibility,” he added.
Those concerns became a source of inspiration in 2012 during a flight back from New York.
“I bought a collection of short stories, and read them on the plane,” Meyer recalled. “One of the stories … was post-apocalyptic and got me thinking about other possible directions the author could have taken.”
By the time Meyer touched down in Cape Town, the Fever storyline had started taking shape in his head.
During the next three years, the ex-journalist gathered scientific information to feed into his scenario.
“I needed to kill off 95%t of the world population, but leave all infrastructure intact,” he explained. “A virus seemed to be the ideal choice.”
Hours of consultations with two virology experts led him to the “best candidate” for the task: a coronavirus.
“They … gave me full details on how it could happen,” Meyer said.
The trio’s imaginary scenario was fleshed out into the novel’s pages.
“A man somewhere in tropical Africa lays down under a mango tree,” Meyer wrote. “The man’s resistance was low, because he was HIV-positive and not being treated for it. There was already one coronavirus in the man’s blood.
“In the mango tree there was a bat, with a different kind of coronavirus in its blood,” he continued. “One that could infect other people easily when inhaled, and with the ability to make them extremely ill.”
When the first cases of coronavirus were detected in China last December, Meyer admitted going back through his notes in shock.
“Even most of the developing countries had extensive plans for such an incident,” reads another extract of Fever. “In theory, these should have worked. But nature paid no heed to theories, and nor did human fallibility.”
As he has watched a coronavirus play out in the real world, Meyer felt that most governments had based their responses on “good scientific advice.”
“So far, so good,” he said, alluding to US President Donald Trump as one of the “few exceptions.” But the author also feared the consequences of potential months under lockdown.
“How long will people be able to consider the greater good as more important than the survival of them and their families,” he asked.
Poorer nations, including South Africa, have already been battling to keep citizens indoors – most of whom live off informal work.
In Fever, that struggle blows up into a full-fledged war between survivors under the watch of a small group of humans that has engineered the virus.
Similar conspiratory theories are making the rounds of social media today, claiming the pandemic was man-made. Meyer hoped his novel would not provide fuel for “wacko conspiracy theorists.”
He found solace in the fact that such people were unlikely to “read beyond a few wacko websites.”
As South Africa slipped into its fourth week of lockdown and coronavirus continued to spread, Meyer knew what his next project would be.
“A crime novel,” he said. “Set during the lockdown.”