World finance chiefs discuss trade tensions at the G20 Ministerial Meeting on Trade and Digital Economy at Tsukuba International Conference Center in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Photo: AFP

Global trade tensions posed the “principal threat” to the world economic outlook and US-China tariffs could make a “significant dent” in any recovery, the head of the International Monetary Fund warned Sunday

“The principal threat stems from continuing trade tensions,” said Christine Lagarde in a statement after a meeting of the G20 finance ministers and central bank chiefs that laid bare differences between the United States and other nations.

Earlier, after 30 hours of wrangling in what one official described as a “tense” atmosphere, the world’s top financial policymakers produced a final statement acknowledging that “growth remains low and risks remain tilted to the downside.”

“Most importantly, trade and geopolitical tensions have intensified,” the statement said, adding that they “stood ready to take further action” if required.

As a compromise pushed by Washington, the statement omitted language from a previous draft that mentioned a “pressing need to resolve trade tensions.”

The statement capped two days of talks in the western Japanese city of Fukuoka that also tackled the thorny issue of taxing internet giants and, for the first time, the economic challenges posed by ageing.

But trade battles were front and centre of policymakers’ minds as the US and China continue to threaten each other with tariffs that economists fear could slam the brakes on global growth.

The IMF has said US-China tariffs could shave global GDP by 0.5 percent in 2020 or about US$455 billion, stressing the need to resolve the differences to avoid plunging the world economy into another crisis.

The G20 ministers heaved a sigh of relief just hours before the meeting when the US and Mexico clinched a deal over immigration that stopped Washington imposing 5% tariffs on Mexican goods.

But US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told reporters that Washington stood ready to impose more tariffs on China if President Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping fail to strike a deal at the G20 summit later this month in Osaka.

“If China wants to come back to the table and negotiate on the basis that we were negotiating, we can get a great historic deal. If they don’t, we’ll proceed with our tariffs,” Mnuchin told reporters on Saturday.

Taking a different line from the other policymakers, Mnuchin said the slowdown in some parts of the world was not due to trade difficulties and even said the friction could benefit some countries if companies relocated from China to avoid tariffs.

“There will be winners and losers,” said the treasury secretary.

Reforming global tax system

The quandary of reforming the global tax system to take into account the rise of internet giants such as Google and Facebook was another issue exercising the minds of policymakers in the coastal city.

In the final statement, the G20 agreed to “redouble our efforts for a consensus-based solution with a final report by 2020.”

However, here again, the Fukuoka meeting exposed a difference of opinion over what form this reform should take.

Frustrated by a lack of global action on the issue, some countries such as Britain and France have already introduced a so-called digital tax, but Mnuchin was blunt in his assessment of these policies.

“I would say the US has significant concerns with the two current taxes that are being proposed by France and the UK but let me give them some good credit for proposing them in the sense (that) they have created an urgency to deal with this issue,” Mnuchin said at a public meeting before the formal G20 started.

“Although I don’t like them, I do appreciate the impetus for these issues,” added the top US finance official.

Appropriately for a meeting held in Japan – which is on track to become the world’s first “super-aged” society in which more than 28% of the population is over 65 – the G20 ministers discussed for the first time the “challenges and opportunities” posed by ageing.

They suggested getting more women and elderly people into the workforce and “promoting elderly-friendly industries”, as well as reforming the fiscal and banking systems to take into account ageing populations.

“You basically have a very large portion of mankind that is ageing and then the workforce is shrinking,” OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria told AFP in an interview.

Solving the issue will require wholesale changes to the way society is organised, added Gurria.

–  Agence France-Presse

Join the Conversation

1103 Comments

  1. Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with? I’m looking to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a hard time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique. P.S Sorry for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  2. I keep listening to the news bulletin talk about receiving free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the most excellent site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i acquire some?

  3. Hey just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same results.

  4. Whats Going down i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I’m hoping to contribute & assist different users like its helped me. Great job.

  5. Hi there I am so delighted I found your blog page, I really
    found you by accident, while I was researching on Google for something else, Regardless I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a fantastic post and
    a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read
    through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so
    when I have time I will be back to read a lot
    more, Please do keep up the superb work.

  6. I do agree with all the ideas you’ve presented in your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too short for newbies. Could you please extend them a little from next time? Thanks for the post.

  7. A lot of of the things you articulate happens to be supprisingly appropriate and it makes me ponder why I had not looked at this in this light previously. This particular article truly did turn the light on for me as far as this specific subject matter goes. Nonetheless at this time there is 1 position I am not really too cozy with and while I make an effort to reconcile that with the actual central idea of your position, let me observe just what all the rest of the subscribers have to point out.Very well done.