When eight foreign flags flew over Beijing in August 1900, no one in the Forbidden City could have imagined that the city would, 125 years later, host the president of the United States as a guest of honor and the president of Russia just days afterward.
The contrast is almost cinematic. In 1900, some 51,755 troops from Austria-Hungary, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States marched into the Chinese capital, looted the Forbidden City and the Old Summer Palace, destroyed volumes of the Yongle Dadian and the Siku Quanshu, and imposed the punitive Boxer Protocol of September 1901.
In May 2026, those same eight capitals — through their successors and alliances — watch as Beijing, not foreign legations, sets the choreography of great-power diplomacy.
The Boxer Protocol was a humiliation engineered around indemnity, extraterritoriality, and the permanent garrisoning of foreign troops on Chinese soil. The 2026 Trump–Xi summit was the photographic negative of that arrangement.
It was the visiting US president who lavished praise, calling Xi Jinping “my friend” and “tall, very tall,” while the Chinese side responded with measured boilerplate and conceded almost nothing concrete on Taiwan, trade, fentanyl or artificial intelligence.
Where 1901 ended with signatures extracted from a fleeing Qing court at Xi’an, 2026 ended with Air Force One departing Beijing before the US president publicly mentioned Taiwan at all.
This is not a moral scorecard; it is a structural observation. The same geographic stage — Beijing — now functions as a convening power rather than a conquered one, and the choreography of who travels to whom has quietly inverted.
In 1900, the Eight-Nation Alliance was bound by no treaty and no formal declaration of war, only by a temporary convergence of interests against a common adversary. In 2026, the language of friendship has migrated to the other side of the table.
President Xi reserves the word “friend” for President Putin, with whom joint statements, pancakes-and-vodka summits, and a “no limits” partnership have been cultivated since 2022.
Putin’s visit to Beijing on the heels of Trump’s — explicitly to “share opinions on the contacts that the Chinese had with the Americans” — suggests that triangular diplomacy now runs through Beijing rather than around it.
Yet the relationship is asymmetric in ways that mirror, in reverse, the asymmetries of 1901. Russia depends on China for more than a third of its imports and a quarter of its exports, while accounting for only about 4% of Chinese trade — less than Vietnam.
The supplicant in the room has changed – the room has not. It would be tempting to read this arc as a linear ascent. The evidence is more interesting than that.
The argument that China’s peak is now rests on hard numbers: a fertility rate of 1.0 in 2025, a fourth consecutive year of population decline, a generation of young Chinese reporting no desire for children, and 2021 as the high-water mark of nominal-GDP convergence with the US. Belt and Road has stalled in places; demographic gravity is unforgiving; cultural soft power remains, by global metrics, modest.
So the 2026 tableau captures not a permanent new order but a particular moment — perhaps a maximum — in which industrial scale, diplomatic patience, and the relative disorganization of competitors have converged. The Eight-Nation Alliance arrived at a Chinese nadir; today’s summits may be occurring at, or near, a Chinese zenith.
Both are snapshots, not destinies. Three implications follow.
Sovereignty has become the default, not the prize. The 1901 Protocol made Chinese sovereignty conditional; the 2026 summits assume it absolutely. Any future Asian order will be negotiated among sovereign equals or not at all, regardless of which capital is ascendant in a given decade.
Personality diplomacy has limits in both directions. Trump’s wager on charm yielded vague commitments on Boeing jets and soybeans that Beijing declined to confirm in detail. The lesson is not partisan; it is procedural. Centralized states reward preparation, not improvisation, and this is true whether the visitor comes from Washington, Moscow, or Tokyo.
The window is narrower than triumphalism suggests. If demographic and growth trends hold, the strategic latitude China enjoys in 2026 may not extend to 2046. That should counsel patience in every capital — including Beijing, whose best long-term insurance is restraint while the cards are favorable, and including Washington, whose best response is competence rather than spectacle.
The Eight-Nation Alliance dissolved within a year of victory; no formal agreement had ever bound it together. Coalitions assembled around a single moment rarely outlive that moment.
The same caution applies to any partnership — Sino-Russian, transpacific or otherwise — that looks unshakeable in the glow of a state banquet. History’s most reliable lesson, from 1901 through 2026, is that the photograph on the palace steps is never the whole story.
Y. Tony Yang is an Endowed Professor at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
Please welcome your new Chinese overlords my miserable western amigos 🤣🤣🤣🤣