Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shakes hands with supporters after addressing them at his Likud Party headquarters in the Israeli coastal city of Tel Aviv on election night early on April 10, 2019. Photo: AFP/Thomas Coex

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu completes the process of forming a government in the coming weeks, foreign policy may not be on his mind. But the region’s enduring conflicts and geopolitical shifts will require some attention from Netanyahu and could lead to some adjustments in Israeli positions. Which coalition partner gets the Foreign Ministry won’t really matter; Netanyahu is such a dominant player and has been the architect of an indisputably effective Israeli diplomatic strategy in recent years.

Closest to home, the recent flare-up in violence in Gaza seems to be resolved, but Hamas’ ability to inflict fear and property damage on civilians in southern Israel keeps the security system on alert, and Israeli punishments set back any prospects for an improved atmosphere for the Palestinians that would lead to a more productive interaction with the Netanyahu regime.

The long-awaited US peace plan, if it ever materializes, is presumed to be so favorable to Israeli interests that Palestinians may feel compelled to resume their low-intensity conflict with Israel, and a new Intifada or other form of popular revolt could well engage much more than Hamas’ followers, affecting youth in the West Bank as well as in Gaza.

Israel and the administration of US President Donald Trump seem to believe they have lined up support in the Arab Gulf region, and financial largesse, for their plan. They have been working with the young leadership in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who are signaling that they are less burdened with the existential Palestine question than their elders. Jared Kushner and other foreign-policy novices are counting on their risk-taking counterparts in Arab capitals being ready to make a big break with the past, and being willing to cushion the blow for Palestinians with significant economic compensation.

But even Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman has a boss, and it’s clear that as long as the king and his generation are alive, they will not compromise on Jerusalem and other sovereignty issues that have been sacred causes for them for 70 years. The Palestinians get to speak first, and if they reject the plan, the Arab leaders who would love to be rid of this issue cannot make it happen. The logic of the US administration has been this “outside-in” strategy, but in the absence of any real coordination between the wealthy Arab countries and the disheartened Palestinians, it’s quite a long shot to imagine all the pieces falling into place.

Syria presents a different set of challenges, as the test bed for the containment of Iran, and, quietly, for a kind of normalization of relations between the surviving Assad regime and the Israeli government. In late April, Israel released two Syrian prisoners in exchange, apparently, for the return of belongings of an Israeli soldier killed in a battle with Syrian forces in 1982. The Russians facilitated the return when Netanyahu was on one of his frequent trips to Moscow.

In truth, Syria is a place where US and Israeli interests diverge as much as converge. Israel is quietly content with President Bashar al-Assad’s survival, and has avoided the rhetorical formulas that have caused successive American administrations to stumble

In truth, Syria is a place where US and Israeli interests diverge as much as converge. Israel is quietly content with President Bashar al-Assad’s survival, and has avoided the rhetorical formulas that have caused successive American administrations to stumble. Washington insists that Assad has lost legitimacy, and peace requires a change at the top; Israel makes no such pronouncements and most Israelis in policy positions prefer a strong state as a neighbor to the uncertainties of a more open and chaotic political system.

On Iran, whether it is the matter of its presence in Syria or its possible breakout from the 2015 nuclear agreement, Israel is closer to the US position than to that of Russia or the European Union. They prefer to contain Iran and keep the nuclear agreement intact, rather than pursue a more confrontational course.

Netanyahu has been both lucky and effective in aligning his anti-Iran passion with that of the Trump administration. He was one of the sources of the early May alert by Trump officials of a heightened threat from Iran, for example, although few noted the connection between the Trump decision to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization and the Iranian pronouncement soon thereafter that it now considered the US military in the same way.

But one cannot assume, as the tensions ratchet up, that Israel and the US will be on the same wavelength. It could well be that Israel – and its newfound Gulf friends – expects that any use of force either to destroy Iran’s remaining nuclear facilities to prevent any new activity, or to punish Iran for any direct or proxy actions deemed hostile to the US, will be handled by the US alone, with any needed logistics support from the regional friends.

Yet President Trump may have in mind that his strategy of robust support for Saudi and Israeli security requirements vis-a-vis Iran will empower them – the regional states – to share the burden. The US military prepares its contingencies to act alone as circumstances require, but Trump’s political agenda still depends on avoiding new military adventures and entanglements.

In sum, a confident Netanyahu with an unprecedented fifth term in office faces no immediate pressure to make major changes in Israel’s national-security policies. But the political solidarity he enjoys with the Trump administration may not be sufficient to navigate the turbulence of the “day after” the Kushner plan, or the new escalation in US-Iran tensions.

This article was provided to Asia Times by Syndication Bureau, which holds copyright.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now. 

Ellen Laipson

Ellen Laipson, a former vice-chairwoman of the US National Intelligence Council, is currently director of the international security program at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University in Virginia. She is a former president and CEO of the Stimson Center in Washington. Prior to this, Laipson spent a quarter-century in government service.

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into
    any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement?
    My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it
    is popping it up all over the internet without my authorization. Do you know any techniques to help stop content from being
    stolen? I’d really appreciate it.

  2. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically
    tweet my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like
    this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this.
    Please let me know if you run into anything.
    I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.

  3. I’m amazed, I have to admit. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s
    both equally educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the
    head. The issue is an issue that too few folks are speaking intelligently about.

    I am very happy that I stumbled across this during my hunt for something concerning this.

  4. Its such as you read my mind! You seem to understand a lot approximately this, like you wrote the
    ebook in it or something. I feel that you just could
    do with a few percent to force the message home a little bit,
    but other than that, this is magnificent blog. An excellent read.
    I will certainly be back.

  5. I feel that is among the such a lot vital information for me.
    And i’m happy studying your article. However wanna observation on some basic things, The website style is ideal,
    the articles is in point of fact excellent : D.
    Good task, cheers

  6. I’m impressed, I have to admit. Seldom do I encounter a blog
    that’s equally educative and interesting, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head.
    The problem is something which too few people are speaking intelligently
    about. Now i’m very happy that I found this during my search for something concerning this.

  7. We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.

    Your site provided us with valuable information to work on. You
    have done an impressive job and our entire community will be thankful to you.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *