Demonstrators pose as Russian leader Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump face off with model rockets in a square in Berlin amid debate over the demise of the INF treaty. Photo: AFP / Paul Zinken / Dpa

One of the pillars of nuclear-arms control became history on February 2, with the expiry of the 60-day deadline that the United States had given Russia to save the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Russia blithely let the deadline pass. But so did the European Union, abetted by Germany. Europe is now entering a potentially dangerous period and must play a much more active role in the nuclear-arms debate.

The INF Treaty prohibits the stationing of medium-range nuclear missiles in Europe. Its near-certain demise dims prospects for extending the US-Russian New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty when it expires in 2021. And without a contractual nuclear-arms framework between Russia and the US, the international Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons cannot survive.

Non-proliferation depends on the two nuclear superpowers’ willingness to subject themselves to arms control and verification. If the US and Russia instead engage in a nuclear-arms buildup, smaller powers will follow suit, because they believe that doing so makes them invulnerable. North Korea and Iran are just the first examples of this.

Non-proliferation depends on the two nuclear superpowers’ willingness to subject themselves to arms control and verification. If the US and Russia instead engage in a nuclear-arms buildup, smaller powers will follow suit

An extension of the INF Treaty to prevent a new nuclear-arms race in Europe would have been worth fighting hard for. As the first – and, so far, only – true disarmament agreement, it gave the continent previously unheard-of security from nuclear confrontation. But instead of high-level summits and shuttle diplomacy to rescue the treaty, all we got were whistle-stop efforts.

The chances of saving the INF Treaty are now negligible. Both the US and Russia want to free themselves from all nuclear-arms limitations – not to face off against each other, but because they now regard China as their true nuclear adversary. Because China was not on the international radar for disarmament talks in the late 1980s, it is not part of any current arms-reduction and disarmament treaty. But today, about 80% of China’s nuclear arsenal is in exactly the medium ranges that the INF Treaty prohibits for the US and Russia. Despite their public war of words over real or alleged treaty violations, the US and Russia share an overriding goal: arming themselves against China.

Germany and Europe are thus of secondary importance to the two nuclear superpowers. From the perspective of the US and Russia, a new nuclear-arms buildup in Europe would represent only collateral damage. But for Europe, it may bring dreams of a common European Foreign and Security Policy to a sudden end. If the North Atlantic Treaty Organization were to launch serious discussions about the renewed stationing of medium-range nuclear missiles in Europe, Eastern European members – skeptical that Western Europeans (especially the Germans and the French) – would be willing to die for their freedom, would almost certainly follow the lead of the US. Meanwhile, Germany and other parts of Western Europe would likely experience massive political turmoil.

Faced with this scenario, Europe must now try to apply some kind of brake to current development and gain time for negotiations, without annoying US President Donald Trump and making him likelier to leave the alliance. The debate must begin within the EU, which is not formally a negotiating partner on the nuclear-arms issue and currently is standing on the sidelines. With Trump clearly unwilling to inform NATO members, let alone the EU, about his next steps, Europe must assert itself.

As a first step, it should take greater responsibility for Eastern Europe’s military security by deploying more European – and more German – conventional troops in these countries. This must be accompanied from the start by talks between Europe and Russia on conventional and nuclear weapons. The first step is arms control, an instrument intended for difficult times. Confidence-building measures, such as mutual inspection of military capabilities and development, can help to rebuild trust, which is a prerequisite for subsequent arms reduction and disarmament.

An audit of the Russian SSC-8 (9M729) cruise-missile system, which the US claims violates the INF treaty, is of course a top priority. Although the US and Russia acknowledged inspections under the agreement only until 2001, revitalizing the treaty’s Special Verification Commission would offer a way forward here.

Russia recently made a verbal offer to open its nuclear arsenals for inspection – on the precondition that the US does the same. But US agreement looks unlikely, because the Trump administration seems more focused on countering China’s nuclear capabilities than on Russia and Europe. Here, Europe, and particularly Germany within NATO, must take a clear stance toward the US. Even a conditional US acceptance of verification by Russia would represent progress.

Russia’s willingness to engage in nuclear-arms control with Europe, meanwhile, will depend not least on the readiness of France and the United Kingdom to allow inspections of their own arsenals. France and other countries that want European security and defense policy to become more independent from the US must be prepared to take such measures. The aim must be to return to a reliable and credible European security architecture, something that ceased to exist when Russia invaded Crimea and fostered insurrection in Eastern Ukraine.

Pacifying this conflict is probably a key precondition for re-engaging in arms talks with Russia. This will require a United Nations peacekeeping mission that – robustly if necessary – maintains the truce between Ukraine and Russian-backed separatists and oversees the removal of heavy arms from eastern Ukraine. Germany is a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council in 2019. Its overarching task should be to pull talks about a UN mission in Eastern Ukraine out of the mud and drive them to a successful conclusion.

This would clear the path for building a new European security architecture, and enable Europe to play a more central role in containing the new nuclear-arms race.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019.
www.project-syndicate.org

——

Asia Times has relaunched on www.asiatimes.com. Download our brand new native App for a sweeping selection of geopolitical and business news from across Asia.

Sigmar Gabriel, former German minister of foreign affairs, is a member of the Bundestag.

Join the Conversation

28 Comments

  1. Attractive element of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to
    say that I get actually loved account your weblog posts.
    Any way I’ll be subscribing on your feeds and
    even I achievement you get admission to persistently fast.

  2. I seriously love your website.. Great colors & theme.
    Did you build this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create my own blog and would like
    to know where you got this from or what the theme is named.
    Thanks!

  3. We stumbled over here coming from a different web page and thought I might check things out.
    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to looking at your web page repeatedly.

  4. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on websites
    I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It’s always exciting to read articles
    from other authors and use something from their websites.

  5. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images
    on this blog loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end
    or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

  6. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account
    your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently rapidly.

  7. Wow that was odd. I just wrote an really long comment but
    after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up. Grrrr…
    well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say superb blog!

  8. I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Reading this info So i am happy to convey that I have a very good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I most certainly will make certain to don’t forget this website and give it a glance regularly.

  9. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I get in fact loved account your weblog
    posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing on your augment or
    even I success you get right of entry to persistently fast.

  10. I used to be suggested this blog through my cousin. I am now not positive whether this submit is written by means of him
    as nobody else recognize such targeted about my problem.

    You are amazing! Thanks!

  11. Today, I went to the beach front with my kids.

    I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter
    and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I
    had to tell someone!

  12. Somebody essentially assist to make significantly posts I would
    state. That is the very first time I frequented your website page and
    up to now? I surprised with the research you made to create this
    actual put up extraordinary. Great activity!

  13. Generally I don’t learn post on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very
    compelled me to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has been amazed
    me. Thanks, very nice article.

  14. I have been browsing online more than 4 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all website owners and
    bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much
    more useful than ever before.

  15. I’m not sure exactly why but this website is loading extremely slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this issue or is it a issue on my end?
    I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *