Asia spent the last 22 months fearing Donald Trump’s angry Twitter feed. Turns out, it’s the United States president’s hologram that poses the biggest risk to the most dynamic economic region.
The three-dimensional projection in question is Mike Pence, Trump’s vice-president. In two speeches spread 44 days apart, Pence gave up America’s Asia game plan for 2019. And it won’t be pretty for policymakers, markets or investors in the most dynamic economic region.
On October 4 in Washington and October 17 in Papua New Guinea, Pence channeled “teleprompter Trump,” those rare moments when his boss sticks to script and spells out a specific policy. Divining one on China trade has been near impossible.
When Trump talks of China, Japan and Southeast Asia, it’s a word salad of resentment, fantasy and paranoia that drives translators batty. Teleprompter Trump sounds like something approaching a traditional American leader.
Pence played that role well enough at recent summits of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. What can Asia investors now conclude? Three things.
Misunderstanding
One is that US$505 billion worth of tariffs are coming. Trump has been teasing the idea of doubling the $250 billion worth of levies on Chinese goods.
Depending on the day, it’s been hard to discern where the odds lie. Trump often contradicts himself in the same interview – at once saying a deal with Xi Jinping is possible, at other moments telegraphing more tariffs.
Trump’s misunderstanding of trade leads him to believe that the $505 billion of goods China sent to the US in 2017 means Beijing ripped off American workers by that same amount. Hardly.
Still, Pence’s October 4 “we-will-not-stand-down” China speech suggested 2019 could get even worse for Beijing. His November 17 comments – “The US will not change course until China changes its ways” – came with fresh warnings of new taxes on Chinese goods.
Pence’s words suggest there will be no Trump 2.0 doctrine following the beating the Republican Party took in November 6 midterm elections. Instead, expect the White House to double down on a trade war it thinks is working.
Pence’s assurance that “we’re here to stay” could mean a brutal 2019 for Asian stocks, export growth and epic volatility in currency markets.
One of Trump’s biggest missteps on the world stage was believing President Xi Jinping, a fellow nationalist strongman, would buckle. Just as Trump maintaining his base requires him looking resolute, Xi’s legitimacy in Communist Party circles relies on projecting Chinese strength.
Bowing to the hate-tweeter-in-chief isn’t an option for a Chinese president aiming to be in office long after the Trump era.
Cold War
Then, there is the second issue – China will retaliate. So far, Xi’s team has pulled punches in its responses. As Xi put it on November 17, “confrontation, whether in the form of a hot war, cold war or trade war, will produce no winners.”
Yet as Trump digs in for greater confrontation, Xi is under pressure to return fire. And Beijing has a rich selection of weapons.
China could start dumping its $1.2 trillion of Treasury debt holdings, slamming the dollar and sending US interest rates skyrocketing. Sure, it would be a Pyrrhic victory. Any step that reduces the spending power of US consumers is bad for China’s ability to grow at 6.5%. It would surely get Trump’s attention, though.
Xi’s government could begin imposing exit taxes on US goods made in China. That would surely ruin Apple’s year. Beijing could make it harder for Chinese tourists to visit America and slow the flow of students dropping tens of thousands of dollars a year at US universities.
It could clamp down on work visas for American executives and corporate licenses.
What’s to stop Beijing from doing surprise tax audits, inspections of US airlines, hotels, restaurants and adding new logistics bottlenecks that halt the flow of vital supplies? Trademarks could be revoked, or new taxes imposed. Capital controls could be imposed to impede the operations of US investment banks on the mainland.
Big question
Finally, there is issue number three – Asia picking sides could roil markets.
At last week’s ASEAN summit, Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong asked the question on the mind of every Asian leader: What to do when they’re forced to choose between Trump’s America and Xi’s China? This is, after all, a when, not an if, and 2019 is the year decisions are due.
Shinzo Abe’s Japan long ago chose Trump, while Rodrigo Duterte’s Philippines has pivoted in Xi’s direction. Elsewhere in the region, leaders are weighing how to co-exist with two leaders who really know how to hold a grudge – and exact pain.
Just ask South Korea, which is still dealing with the fallout from Xi’s wrath for hosting US-built missile-defense systems. Or Mahathir Mohamad’s Malaysia, which is keen to get out of China’s shadow but loath to embrace the Trump White House. Good luck with that balancing act.
As these deliberations leak into the press, Asian leaders risk irking Xi, Trump or perhaps both. The resulting tensions – strains Pence suggest will only intensify – could bleed into markets in unpredictable ways. Any new Trump tariffs would slam equities, bonds and currencies. Moves by Beijing to limit access to China’s middle class will reverberate far and wide.
One strategy is waiting out the Trump clock, betting that Americans elect a more rational, pro-trade leader come 2020. All bets are off if Trump wins a second term, giving us six more years (counting from now) of Trump versus Xi spooking markets.
As Pence, Trump’s hologram, reminds us, Asia hasn’t seen anything yet.
I agree trump is a liar, just like winnie xi pooh
"China could start dumping its $1.2 trillion of Treasury debt holdings, slamming the dollar and sending US interest rates skyrocketing. Sure, it would be a Pyrrhic victory. Any step that reduces the spending power of US consumers is bad for China’s ability to grow at 6.5%. It would surely get Trump’s attention, though." Sorry, it’s not that easy! There’s a lot of countries out there just wait to absorb that silly ‘ T-bond dump’ of China. In the worst-case scenario, the Fed could intervene to handle this sort of financial sabotage. Of course, there’ll be grave repercussions for both sides, but don’t forget China is still an export-driven country, so it sure will suffer heavier damages economically!
"China could start dumping its $1.2 trillion of Treasury debt holdings, slamming the dollar and sending US interest rates skyrocketing. Sure, it would be a Pyrrhic victory. Any step that reduces the spending power of US consumers is bad for China’s ability to grow at 6.5%. It would surely get Trump’s attention, though." Sorry, it’s not that easy! There’s a lot of countries out there just wait to absorb that silly ‘ T-bond dump’ of China. In the worst-case scenario, the Fed could intervene to handle this sort of financial sabotage. Of course, there’ll be grave repercussions for both sides, but don’t forget China is still an export-driven country, so it sure will suffer heavier damages economically!
Richard Truong What’s that got to do with the one purpose of the BRI that intentionally harms the US? What China wants to do for itself is not terrible, but because it harms the US means we have to defend ourselves against it.
Richard Truong What’s that got to do with the one purpose of the BRI that intentionally harms the US? What China wants to do for itself is not terrible, but because it harms the US means we have to defend ourselves against it.
if I have to pick side, I won’t choose people who can’t even make toilet paper and has to import every thing they use daily.
if I have to pick side, I won’t choose people who can’t even make toilet paper and has to import every thing they use daily.
Most likely a lunatic. I already flagged this lunatic as spam long time ago.
Most likely a lunatic. I already flagged this lunatic as spam long time ago.
Art Laramee
Funny that for you, everything orbits around the US. FYI, China trade with Middle East all the way near Europe existed a millennium before the US existed.
Art Laramee
Funny that for you, everything orbits around the US. FYI, China trade with Middle East all the way near Europe existed a millennium before the US existed.
It is easy to choose side. The US economy is on steroid, fueled by tax cuts and foreign debts. Now the steroid is wearing off, stocks are falling, economy is slowing down, and we haven’t even seen fed rising the rates or China seriously retaliate. When those happen, the US will see hell that make 2008 crisis look like a child play. China on the other hand, is doing the painful reform to steer the economy away from hard landing. Sure there are pains now, but in the long term, things look rosy for China. If you’re in Asia, with geography and future consideration, it is easy to choose.
In essence, trump (not the US as a whole) doesn’t want to see China taking over US position as the world’s superpower.
In essence, trump (not the US as a whole) doesn’t want to see China taking over US position as the world’s superpower.
Art Laramee . You are now speculating. Which speech was that.
Art Laramee . You are now speculating. Which speech was that.
John Rintala You uninformed talking points mimic. Xi Jinpings stated policy back in 2013 with the announcement of the New Silk Road, now known as the BRI, was to marginalize the US by making China the center of interbational commerce and replacing the dollar with the yuan as the world’s reserve currency.
John Rintala You uninformed talking points mimic. Xi Jinpings stated policy back in 2013 with the announcement of the New Silk Road, now known as the BRI, was to marginalize the US by making China the center of interbational commerce and replacing the dollar with the yuan as the world’s reserve currency.
Does that list include raking the California forests, especially those in dry deserts? This will go a long way in helping America and seal the deal. HAHAHAHAHAHA
Does that list include raking the California forests, especially those in dry deserts? This will go a long way in helping America and seal the deal. HAHAHAHAHAHA