The demise in Hong Kong of “one country, two systems” – Beijing’s constitutional arrangement with London that guaranteed its restoration of sovereignty over the British colony – should serve as a lesson for Taiwan.
This somewhat undiplomatic observation came from veteran US diplomat Stephen Young, who served as Consul General to Hong Kong while holding the rank of “ambassador” between 2010 and 2013 as well as director of the American Institute in Taiwan, Washington’s de-facto embassy on the self-ruled island.
Communist Party patriarch Deng Xiaoping first mooted the “one country, two systems” concept for the return of Hong Kong as well as the future reunification of Taiwan.
By Deng’s design, “one country, two systems” would be sufficiently successful to serve as a model for resolution of the much thornier Taiwan question. That is, when they witnessed the marvelous job done of preserving Hong Kong’s preeminent status, the Taiwanese would be convinced and their doubts dispelled so that they might embrace Beijing’s sovereignty at a future date.
“From the very beginning, Taiwan’s leaders consistently rejected any such linkage. As it developed, many Taiwan friends quietly hoped that China would never pull the Hong Kong plan off, making their case for no settlement with Beijing all the stronger over time,” writes Young in the Taipei Times.
The fact back then was that most Hong Kong people decided to give things a chance, though many of them hedged their bets by obtaining citizenship status in Canada, Australia, Britain and the US. With the escape hatch of a foreign passport to fall back upon, they continued to live and work in Hong Kong after the city’s 1997 handover. Rudimentary democracy was installed in the initial years of the new Special Administrative Region.
“Some felt that Hong Kong’s return to Beijing sovereignty had been so successful that its gradual transition into a fully Chinese political entity by 2047 – the year of expiry of Beijing’s guarantee of “two systems” – would become anticlimactic,” notes Young.
Young was so much of a thorn in Beijing’s side that the Chinese foreign ministry once condemned him for meddling in Hong Kong’s internal affairs when he was still posted in the city. Nor has he minced words in his comments on Beijing’s recent headstrong policy shifts regarding Hong Kong, in particular after Xi Jinping came into power in 2012.
Young laments that Xi doesn’t seem able to leave a good thing alone: Xi’s aggressive policies have drawn into question whether any promise China makes there [for Hong Kong and in the future for Taiwan] is worth the paper it is written on.
Xi fears that if he does not rein in Hong Kong and Taiwan, the influence of more liberal practices and thoughts from two locations on the doorstep of China proper will endanger the party’s authoritarian rule on the mainland.
Young is of the view that the slew of not-so-heartening developments in Hong Kong under Xi’s watch has made Hong Kong people, especially the youngsters, despair for their future.
Major controversies in Hong Kong include Beijing’s sham universal suffrage proposal in 2014 to water down its previous pledge to allow the people of Hong Kong to select their own leaders, as well as the recent crackdown on freedom of speech and association by banning a pro-independence political outfit and expelling a Financial Times editor who hosted a talk for a separatist.
All but the most naive observers there can now dismiss the illusion that China’s treatment of Hong Kong offers anything useful to the people of Taiwan, writes Young.
He says the world will probably shake their heads but then turn away if Hong Kong reverts to becoming simply another part of authoritarian China, but Taiwan has an alternative to drifting further into Beijing’s orbit, with American political support and defense commitments.
Read more:
Dreaming of a vibrant past and fearful of an uncertain future
HK bans separatist party that pushed for independence
Hongkongers head to Taiwan despite threats of another takeover
This guy is trying to interfere with taiwan’s coming local mayor elections on saturday (24 Nov). He is writing this piece to swing the votes to the failing DPP Tsai Ing-wen’s government who is also the empire’s agent in taiwan.
This guy is trying to interfere with taiwan’s coming local mayor elections on saturday (24 Nov). He is writing this piece to swing the votes to the failing DPP Tsai Ing-wen’s government who is also the empire’s agent in taiwan.
Had this man not seen what’s going on in his own country between his president and the US justice system? Maybe he should be a bit more worried about that situation than what is happening here and elsewhere in this part of Asia..
Had this man not seen what’s going on in his own country between his president and the US justice system? Maybe he should be a bit more worried about that situation than what is happening here and elsewhere in this part of Asia..
I doubt anyone outside of mailand China’s firewall think Xi tells the truth about anything anymore.
I doubt anyone outside of mailand China’s firewall think Xi tells the truth about anything anymore.
Was Hong Kong an island of democracy during the 100 years of British rule?
Was Hong Kong an island of democracy during the 100 years of British rule?
British house of lords is still by inheritance. I was on a ducky tour of UK and I’ve never heard anyone, a white man, complain about his own country so much with specific examples of sites we passed by. US Federal government was never a mass democratic one. PotUS is still elected by electoral college, not directly by the people. Senate is per state not per capita. Why? Because Mass Democracy is the most unstable and manipulated form of government and of course the West wish it onto other countries but their own.
British house of lords is still by inheritance. I was on a ducky tour of UK and I’ve never heard anyone, a white man, complain about his own country so much with specific examples of sites we passed by. US Federal government was never a mass democratic one. PotUS is still elected by electoral college, not directly by the people. Senate is per state not per capita. Why? Because Mass Democracy is the most unstable and manipulated form of government and of course the West wish it onto other countries but their own.
Free Taiwan now!!!
Free Taiwan now!!!
Interesting how an ambassador would seek to actively alter the domestic politics of another state. Especially when the country he represented clearly recognizes Hong Kong and Taiwan as inalienable parts of China. It’s also interesting to note that nothing but abstract generalizations and sweeping comments were used in this article. As though nothing of substance could be presented to substantiate their comments…almost as though it is propaganda.
Interesting how an ambassador would seek to actively alter the domestic politics of another state. Especially when the country he represented clearly recognizes Hong Kong and Taiwan as inalienable parts of China. It’s also interesting to note that nothing but abstract generalizations and sweeping comments were used in this article. As though nothing of substance could be presented to substantiate their comments…almost as though it is propaganda.