Facilitated by a largely unquestioning media, Indonesian President Joko Widodo’s government has become a master at the game of smoke and mirrors, which in its simplistic form is all about convincing the public that things are happening when they really aren’t.
The protracted negotiations with US mining giant Freeport McMoran Copper & Gold are a good example, but going back to the presidency of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono the deceptive game-playing has covered everything from beef to natural resources to infrastructure.
While not new, the official obfuscation and embellishment of the truth has become more apparent as the 2019 legislative and presidential elections approach and Widodo and his palace spin doctors perceive the need to display his accomplishments.

Yudhoyono played this game back in mid-2011 when the Australian government suspended live cattle exports to Indonesia over animal welfare issues, and Jakarta decided some payback was in order by ordering a ban of its own.
Over the next two years, it slashed cattle imports by half and sought to convince consumers that the local industry could fill the gap when rising prices – and one of the lowest per capita beef consumption rates in Asia — clearly showed it could not.
Fast forward to the much-vaunted China-backed US$5.8 billion Jakarta-Bandung fast-rail project, once seen as the showcase of Widodo’s ambitious infrastructure program and now stalled over land acquisition issues that should have been foreseen.

Getting it started hasn’t been for the want of trying. Widodo attended a ground-breaking ceremony in January 2016, only to see Transport Minister Jonan Ignasius call a halt to the project five days later because of several “unresolved issues.”
Widodo and the Chinese weren’t amused. In July, the same month the construction permit for the project was finally issued, Ignasius — the former, highly successful chief executive of state-run railway Kareta Api — was unceremoniously sacked.
The president should have already learnt his lesson. In mid-2015, he had presided over the ground-breaking of the US$4 billion, Japan-funded Batang power station in Central Java, only to discover local farmers were still refusing to sell a key patch of land.
The courts finally resolved that one, but the railway still isn’t going anywhere despite the efforts of State Enterprise Minister Rini Soemarno, who showed up last July for yet another ground-breaking event – this one a tunnel.
It takes a lot to beat the whole Freeport saga, though, starting with last year’s framework agreement which was hailed at the time as a major victory for the Widodo government in forcing the company to agree to divest 51% of its shares in its local subsidiary.
Maybe so, but no-one seemed to notice that the devil was in the small print. In fact, the Indonesia media failed to point out at the time that the crucial questions of valuation and management control had yet to be settled.

Little surprise then that the negotiations continue, interspersed on frequent occasions with reassuring pronouncements by senior government officials that a final, final deal is just around the corner. It has been a long corner.
So far, there have been at least four government-imposed deadlines, all based on the extension of Freeport’s permit allowing it to continue exporting copper concentrate from its high-altitude Grasberg mine in Papua’s Central Highlands. The next one is in June.
Refusing the permit would clearly hurt the company’s profits, but it would also cut deeply into government revenues and, perhaps more importantly, lead to worker lay-offs that could spark unrest in the country’s already volatile Papua region.
In the latest show-and-tell, the government last week ceremonially signed a memorandum of understanding under which it will hand over 10% of the Freeport Indonesia shares it still needs to acquire to the Papua provincial administration.
The government spin machine has also recently turned to eastern Indonesia’s Marsela natural gas project, which for reasons even some senior Indonesian politicians can’t figure, Widodo wants to be developed on a remote, sparsely-inhabited island.

Joint venture partners Inpex and Shell have been dragging their feet, arguing that only an offshore facility makes sense, given the undersea terrain and a lack of existing infrastructure.
With the project seemingly in limbo, the government announced earlier this month that the partners were working on detailed plans for an onshore plant that would be finished by the end of this year. Tellingly, there was no word from either company.
“The officials are talking on behalf of the company, without the company knowing anything about it,” says one Indonesian oil veteran. “That’s politics, but for me as an industrialist it is very troubling.”
The French oil giant Total has maintained a similarly stoic silence since the state-run Pertamina oil company claimed the firm wanted back into the Mahakham gas field, which it had to leave when its contract expired last December.
In fact, with little money to maintain the Mahakham, it is the government that has been offering Total a slightly higher 39% participating interest to entice it to return as a partner in the field it ran for more than 40 years.
Widodo also adopted Yudhoyono’s cattle chicanery, part of an economic self-sufficiency program in which, with little planning and a lot of wishful thinking, Indonesia was hoping to produce all its own beef, rice, sugar, corn and soybeans.

In 2015, it was proudly announced that the proportion of beef imports to total consumption had dropped from 31% to 24%, without anyone noting that Indonesians were eating just 2.7 kilograms a year, the lowest per capita rate in the region.
A year later, that figure had shot back up again to 32% and last year it increased yet again to 41% with the price of beef at US$10 a kilogram and officials acknowledging the obvious: that Widodo’s five-year self-sufficiency target was now unattainable.
Again, that has a familiar ring to it. By importing rice, seen as almost a crime in some nationalistic quarters, past governments have often been forced to admit (if anyone is listening) that Indonesia’s supposed self-sufficiency in rice is nothing but a myth.
That would have former President Suharto, who did achieve rice self-sufficiency back in the early 1980s with careful planning and a slew of coordinated programs, rolling over in his grave.
Sooner or later, the smoke and the mirrors will inevitably lift to reveal hard realities.

A’an Alireki : I’d love to…
faster better…
Indonesia must be save from stupid guys just like you ans your idol of course 😀
f*cking retard says retard…
stupidity lvl out of 100% :v
Oh yea? so what about your ‘idol’ Mr Joko English?
check it on this video :v
https://youtu.be/15hZHf7Zl5M
and so many more Hhaha :v
I agree with Roza, this article more than 100% accurate
Andy Han My indicator just simple. That if there is any different in place i stay, study, work, or visit these past years. I’m using vehicle to see how many growth is going on every years in my region. When Megawati were a president. There’re too few cars and not many motorcyles. Also people tend to stay at home than went somewhere on sunday. In SBY regime there’re quite many cars and many motorcycles people tend to go outside on Sunday. Jokowi regime there’re too many cars and motorcycles. Traffic far more worse then in SBY era. Between Jokowi and SBY there’s some different and in Jokowi regime at least bureaucracy in my place had been better and the petrol price without subsidy is a good thing. It is a good thing for people who actually have money but buying cheapest petrol in pertamina (premium). That subsidy for petrol is out of target. And also tax amnesty is a good thing although not perfect. There’s too many rich people who don’t want to pay taxes although they’re already rich.
Trustworthy matamu !!
Agus Nizami stupid.
There is no Cyber Army for Jokowi.
See the facts on Facebook..
Who are Cyber Army supporting to…
fact will never change your mind, believe me this shit make our people fight each other, no one open their eyes for a simple fact, they just try to be brave on the internet, everyone think he’s clever than the other, look at the comment you will see what i mean…
40 years being journalist for a crap ?
Come on, John… !
Keren Om Arung
Tapi tanya kenapa, Target/Janji versus Realisasi gak pernah dibahas? Semua itukan terukur, ada angka dan jangka waktu. Itu aja yg jadi parameter hebat atu tidaknya Pemimpin. Kalau puja puji aja, yg menang pasti yg menguasi media. cmiiw
Ini bener anak Undip yg di atas tadi entah UI yg mana? sorry
Malu-maluin..bawa2 UI
Woooooooiy…
Kontra Jokowi lagi nyari dukungan dari luar negeri.. wkkwkwk
Cyber ARmy apaan ?! wkwkwk
Yang ada juga dari pihak yang kontra Jokowi yang rame pakai nama Cyber Kremi, eh.. Army.. 😀 😀
Andy Han , lets continue to Twitter: @_Sansekerta ,,, its tiring back to back here.
Schillachi Bianco , lets continue to Twitter, _Sansekerta (my acc). Anyway, you kids have a very good q, why don’t u find out. Trans Papua? Your shortcut mind just like “One night stand.” Lol.
In indonesia they call me cebong
Titiek Titiek you are so funny by saying trans Papua only built in the past 3yrs under Jokowi. In fact before Jokowi took his post trans Papua have been done around 3500km from total 4300km. Dont take too much of micin hahahahahaha…
Caka Aja Idem ditto with Andy Han’s question. Oh… wait the minute, Trans Papua? That would be another laughing out loud.
Titiek Titiek Indonesia economy is growing at 5% while Malaysia, Cambodia, Myanmar and Philippines are at….., ….., …., and …. ?
Ouch, louder please… I couldnt hear you. Smoke and mirrors are well defined here….
what is the real fact then?
Reading the article and most of the comments (CMIIW), we missed one perspective. Profesionalism, in the form of achievements versus the targets. Targets that consist of political promises, with their effects on society well being.
We can’t say something like this "He’s doing great, try to understand his position" etc, because when he accepted the votes and elected as the Indonesia Presiden, a leader of more than 200 millions souls, he must realize the risk and responsibility. On the contrary, we can’t also based our opinion on stuffs like "Joko Widodo fooled me", etc. We can’t based our opinion based on hatred and heart ache. So how would it be? the best thing to digest this article made and published by foreign media? I propose an approach on profesionalism. We won’t hesitate to say that we’re disappointed on a service/product that we pay right? That’s profesionalism, we pay the cost for the service/product that’s promised or promoted for us to enjoy with a certain exchange of money/goods. On this matter, we have paid mr. Jokowi in a way through taxes, buying gasoline, paying services, paying other fees that we need to pay to live our life properly. So let’s see the goods we have. I will not conclude nor make a directive statement, just a bunch of questions we need to ask ourself as a citizen and tax payor.
1. The "No transactional political on his cabinet of ministers".
– Will you believe that a president can mistakenly sign a policy that will benefit the legislative because he didn’t read the whole document?
– Will you believe that a president misjudge a person nationality before he decided or promoted that person to become a minister?
– How’s the news of a website that was called spent almost 200 millions rupiahs for the making? We deserve to know right? Do you think it’s worth the cost?
2. The "availability of job and employment opportunity for people".
– Have you check the number from BPS on the rate of employment versus poverty? Isn’t it a bit strange if the unempoyment number still not moving significantly with the "2 million" job opportunities the president target to provide?
– With the massive and main target of infrastructure development, in simple logical thinking they should absorb the number of unemployment, has it using local workers?
3. More transparent governance with e-budgeting, e-government, and other online platform.
– Have we been informed about any of this project progress? It should be done in 2-3 weeks accoding to mr. President, where have they been progressing in these 3 years?
4. Buying back several Government company like Indosat.
Have we bought them back yet?
5. Stability in IDR vs USD exchange rate.
This has never been a factor we can control, so with a target that hard how’s our president doing? Have you enjoy a stable exchange rate for USD to IDR or vice versa?
6. No import policy for several local goods to enhance the wellfare of our local farmers.
Have we enjoy our local rice easily?
Have our farmers now live in a better life?
Have rice, salt, beef, and several vegetables being produced in our benefit and farmers advantage?
How is the comparison of rice prices during Mr. Jokowi regime with other presidents?
I think, IMHO before we start to critisize or compliment this well made article by John Mcbeth we should all ask those questions to ourself. I am very sure that there are more things I might have missed, hence I am too tired and too sleepy to mention all. But, we need to take things to profesionalism perspective before we spent our energy to debate with each other. We need to measure the priority of the target that mr. President has with the level of society wellfare before we can declare that he either has failed or succeed in leading this country. We have to be fair for our next generation and stop our selfishness for whatever reason toward the achievement of our president. We should be more open to new information and updates, also willing to trade in different information from other parties, before we can say that this nation needs to change. Because whatever changes will never worth dying for if the changes are just to serve our own truth.
2018-01-31
Arung.
hahaha… spot on!
Caka Aja Take it easy… I was asking simple question… "are you loughing or laughing?" What is wrong in that? I am laughing out loud – again…