It seems France is set to join the ranks of India’s “anti-China front” in the Indian Ocean. Last week, Paris and New Delhi announced their decision to increase military cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. The statement came during a two-day visit to the Asian country by French Defense Minister Florence Parly, and amid attempts by the Indian government to try to contain Beijing’s growing assertiveness from the Arabian Sea to the Bay of Bengal.
Parly and her Indian counterpart Nirmala Sitharaman said last Friday that the naval collaboration between their countries in the Indian Ocean was part of a broader plan to expand bilateral defense ties. In particular, France and India aim to improve military-to-military relations, counter-terror cooperation and their ability to develop arms systems jointly under the “Make in India” initiative.
The Indo-French military connection
While India considers China’s military presence in the Indian Ocean a strategic challenge to its regional role, it shares with France the goal of keeping international waters free and secure. Beijing’s militarization of the South China Sea, which is one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, is viewed both in Paris and Delhi as an attack on the rules-based world order.
As an Indo-Pacific actor, given its overseas dependencies in the Indian Ocean and the South Pacific, France has an interest in safeguarding regional stability. Paris is well aware that the global center of gravity is shifting to the Asia-Pacific region, notably in trade terms. French exports to South and East Asia were worth US$61.4 billion in 2016, or 12.5% of the European country’s total, according to the World Bank.
French warships routinely sail through the Indian and Pacific oceans to protect freedom of navigation. At the moment, as far as maritime collaboration in the area is concerned, Paris and New Delhi plan to expand their information-sharing deals and the scope of Varuna naval drills, slated for early 2018. The annual Varuna exercises were launched in 2001 with the purpose of improving the capacity to conduct joint operations by the navies of the France and India.
French President Emmanuel Macron’s trip to India in December will reveal more about the consistency of Paris’ military partnership with New Delhi. The question is whether France is sincere about its offer of cooperation or it is wooing India into acquiring more French-manufactured arms.
French aircraft manufacturer Dassault Aviation sold 36 Rafale fighters to India in September 2016 and is now competing to provide the Indian Air Force with another 36 multirole jets. As well, French state-owned shipbuilder Naval Group is contributing to the construction of six Scorpene-class submarines for the Indian Navy and is a contender for the realization – in collaboration with an Indian shipyard – of six advanced stealth submarines.
Multilateral counterbalance to China
France maintains it is an Indo-Pacific power, but it cannot conduct extended naval campaigns in the Indian Ocean or the South China Sea. If it wants to contribute to regional security in South Asia and the Pacific Rim, it must inevitably team up with India, the United States, Japan and Australia. This entails the improvement of interoperability and joint capabilities with the navies of these countries.
Steps have been taken by Washington, Tokyo and Canberra to extend naval assistance to New Delhi against China’s advancements in the Indian Ocean, where it has deployed warships, submarines and spy ships.
India is strengthening naval cooperation with Japan. On Tuesday, the Indian and Japanese navies wrapped up anti-submarine-warfare drills initiated two days earlier. The US has recently shown interest in boosting security collaboration with India. And Australia has an increased focus on the Indian Ocean and is keen to enhance security and defense ties with the Indian government.
France is deepening relations with all these Indo-Pacific powers. The path that Paris and New Delhi are treading is similar to that proposed by the US to ramp up its defense cooperation with India. In essence, Washington is ready to develop joint capabilities with the Indian armed forces, besides fostering defense trade and technology sharing.
Indian foreign policy remains “liquid.” On Sunday, for instance, India concluded military drills with Russia. Started on October 19, they were the most ambitious ever conducted by the two nations, according to the Russian side, and saw the simultaneous participation of their air, naval and ground forces for the first time.
But the level of India’s engagement with the US and its allies (including France) is acquiring a considerable dimension. As a result, it is plausible that New Delhi will manage to put up some sort of “multilateral” counterbalance to Beijing in the Indian Ocean.

What about China dredging parts in the seas building islands which are armed to the teeth! Mr. Peter Soo!?
Albert Chiu Chinese people often mistake/misunderstand the sentiments of non-Chinese. Most people are not anti China as such, but rather anti CCP. There is a big difference – China is not the CCP and the CCP is certainly not China, despite the best efforts of the Party to convince its citizens and the world. Many people support the rise of China and its citizens and wish the country well; however, the CCP is (if one has done ANY research) a brutal and harsh regime that tortures its citizens, harvests organs from political prisoners and has no rule of law, freedom of press/association or any political freedoms. In some areas it has been very efficient and overseen great prosperity for 10-20% of the population, though at a massive environmental cost. The endless CCP narrative about the ‘100 years of humiliation’ is true and was a shameful way to treat another country, though maybe time to move on and stop using it to justify everything the CCP wants to do. What about Tibet and Xinjiang? Do they like being brutalised by the CCP? Hypocritical maybe? Chinese claims in the SCS are delusional and absurd at best – it has militarised the area, which is against international law and not only China’s goods pass through there – also Japan’s, S.Korea, Taiwan, Philippines etc. so they have no right to continue their imperialist territorial claims. The CCP is giving China a bad name and undermining the Chinese people’s right to be proud citizens of the world – instead they are associated with a regime that is nasty, brutish and short on any international friends. If China under the CCP is such a wonderful system, then why does it have very little soft power? (the ability to naturally attract and influence through a state’s natural appeal…) Until the CCP radically reforms its policies (being a nasty international bully) and political model (doesn’t have to copy the West – just not brutalise its own people), it is disgracing the legacy of ancient China.
As US embraces China, all the followers will do the same thing , because they used to be brainless , not knowing what is right & what is wrong.
France to join ? It is funny as France needs so much from China. You got to be more realistic !
Siddharth Dev Haobijam hahaha that a good point!. so… enough talking! start the fight! nuke each other…. let see how has the big mouth!
Kh Johnson Whenever someone runs out of arguments, the insults and stereotypes starts. What makes you think I am from China? Have you not read Atimes articles at all? China is now transitioning from manufacturing into a service and consumerism economy. Its Africa and South East Asia who will move into manufacturing as wages are too high now in China. Yes indeed it is still developing, there are still millions in poverty. Xi has set a target of zero poverty by 2020. I doubt he can reach it but even close to it would be incredible, Then you look at HK and the coffin cubicles where the poor stay in. You are still living in the 70s. You go to Bunnings in Australia and all the super brands you love like Stanley, Bosch, Black and Decker. Guess where they are made? You get what you pay for.
KS Chin do u think everybody cannot survive without your cheap, copy cat products of western or else where products.. ur Chinese products may be worth a while and as I say again it will not last long except great wall! What about service sector, other than manufacturing sector. A country is defined as developed when its GDP is moving from agrarian to manufacturing and then to service sector.. China is still in manufacturing stage. So still far from calling developed country.. I hope I am more in 1900’s than ur 1800’s
Super powers should show good example to small countries instead of showing up their strength to other nation
Why do super powers don’t want to cooperate with each others and live Peacefully instead of
Good move for France and India
You should study more, China has spread its tentacles in the South China Sea illegally building man-made islands in International waters there. There has been the 2017 China India border standoff recently and lets not forget China invaded and still holds Tibet by the throat as well as not recognising Taiwan as an independant state. China would love nothing more than to change India’s borders.