The economy of the vast Xinjiang region in far western China is officially growing at a robust pace, faster than the country as a whole. That is largely thanks to big investments in infrastructure from Beijing as the region – with its links to much of central Asia – is critical to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s new Silk Road initiative.
But traders, business owners and residents in Xinjiang’s capital, Urumqi, are seeing little benefit from the central government’s cash injection, according to about 20 interviews with people in the city.
One major reason for that, they say, is due to tightened security as the Chinese government seeks to control one of its biggest domestic threats. Beijing accuses separatist extremists among the Muslim Uyghur ethnic minority of plotting attacks on the ethnic Han majority in Xinjiang and other parts of China, following a series of violent events in recent years.
As a result, there are roadblocks and stringent security checks across the region, including at restaurants, hotels and shops, making it slow and frustrating to move around.
The New Silk Road, officially known as the Belt and Road, or One Belt, One Road (Obor) initiative, is Xi’s signature foreign and economic policy, which aims to increase economic and political ties through roads, railways and other projects that link China to Central Asia and beyond.
But the contrast between that ambition and the views at street level in Urumqi reflects the difficulty Beijing faces in trying to balance security against its other top priorities.
This is particularly the case as China is determined to avoid any trouble ahead of a critical Communist Party congress in the autumn at which Xi is expected to consolidate his power, and as it faces the threat from some Uyghurs who have become battle-hardened Islamic State (ISIS) fighters in the war in Syria and Iraq and may return home.
Deliveries difficult
The impact of the clampdown is clear at the Frontier International Trade Center in Urumqi, where padlocked stores outnumber traders.
“Business became really bad last year. I’ve got nothing to do except a stocktake,” said Wei Chun, a shoe trader, surrounded by piles of high heels.
She blames poor sales partly on the impact of sluggish economies in neighbors Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, among the eight countries with which Xinjiang has borders. But she also says the Chinese authorities’ obsession with keeping Xinjiang secure at all costs is making it tough to do business.
The Belt and Road initiative doesn’t help small businessmen like me.It helps big state-owned enterprises that do energy or have big infrastructure projects
– Zhou Bangquan
“It helps big state-owned enterprises that do energy or have big infrastructure projects.
“It’s very difficult to send and receive deliveries because of the security crackdown,” she said, complaining that authorities will often shut down the delivery system for “security reasons.”
The Xinjiang government declined to make officials available for comment for this article. It also did not respond to a series of faxed questions.
Xu Bin, the head of the Xinjiang government’s statistics bureau, told reporters in February that its growth – which was 7.6% last year – is mostly fueled by fixed-asset investment.
But he then added: “Xinjiang faces slowing economic growth, falling industrial prices, companies are feeling the pain of falling profits and the growth rate of our tax revenue has dropped off.”
Xinjiang’s trade with other countries fell in the first quarter of this year, according to the customs bureau, and is still below the level it recorded in the first quarter of 2013, the year that Obor launched.
Much of that drop was because a slump in the rouble in 2014-2015 hurt Xinjiang’s neighbors, and following the 2015 establishment of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). That aims to develop Central Asia and lessen its reliance on Chinese goods.
Events cancelled
People here point to many disruptions in ordinary life as one reason the economy doesn’t feel buoyant at street level.
Group gatherings, whether for charity fun runs or trade expos, are often banned or cancelled at the last minute, they say. Phone lines sometimes go dead, and there’s no 4G internet because the authorities fear high-speed internet would help militants organize.
While Obor has created opportunities, small businesses complain these projects often reward large state-owned enterprises.
“The Belt and Road initiative doesn’t help small businessmen like me,” said Zhou Bangquan who sells men’s shoes in Urumqi.
“It helps big state-owned enterprises that do energy or have big infrastructure projects.”
Among the projects financed are a highway to Pakistan and a network of high-speed railroads connecting cities in Xinjiang and the rest of China, with 1.5 trillion yuan (US$219.54 billion) in capital investment expected in the region this year alone.
It’s very difficult to send and receive deliveries because of the security crackdown
– Wei Chun
But it is unclear how much of the money is used to buy materials from factories outside the region or ends up being sent to other provinces by workers brought in temporarily from elsewhere in China.
It’s not just heightened security measures that concern businesses. People are required to attend flag ceremonies and other patriotic education, instead of working, say locals. Such events are meant to encourage Uyghurs to become patriotic Chinese citizens, but can also be used to monitor their behavior.
Patriotic education
“I’m losing my mind, I’ve already had six staff sent back to their hometowns this past month for study,” said a restaurant manager in Urumqi who, like many people Reuters spoke to in Xinjiang, declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue.
His Uyghur staff were required to return home to southern Xinjiang for one month’s study of Putonghua, another month learning about China’s legal system and a month of vocational training, he said.
“We all spend so much time doing things that aren’t our actual jobs. I have to take my staff to watch a flag-raising 40 weeks of the year. If I don’t, I will be taken away for 30 days of study,” he said.
We all spend so much time doing things that aren’t
our actual jobs. I have
to take my staff to watch
a flag-raising 40 weeks
of the year
As well as the time spent on such matters, Uyghurs – who represent just over 45% of the population – are being increasingly marginalized by the Han Chinese, undermining the overall economy.
Three Han Chinese entrepreneurs told Reuters local authorities had told them not to employ Uyghurs. And a Han Chinese real estate agent in Urumqi said he had been told not to sell properties to Uyghurs from southern Xinjiang.
There has been a change in attitude towards balancing stability and economic growth in Xinjiang since Chen Quanguo became its new Communist Party boss last August in what analysts say was an implicit endorsement of his previous hard-line management of ethnic strife in Tibet.
“Xinjiang used to have a policy of ‘with one hand we maintain stability, with the other hand we grow the economy,’ but now it’s just ‘maintain stability with both hands, at all costs’,” said a local businessman and former government official.
Chen said in a speech last September that “all our work in Xinjiang revolves around maintaining a tight grip on stability.”
Reuters
To make a killing in business does not mean that you should afford to adopt a flippant attitude about security. Before the BRI, the surrounding countries is a molass of Soviet decay. Today some Rays of hope have returned to Eurasia, but these economic gains have not uneasily won because any Mackinder foreign powers are always ever ready there to game the Wahhabi Jihadism to destablise the region for Control of the new Silk road connectivity.
Simply quote a few questionable individual Reuter is at it again to spread half true and fake news irregardless of the consequence for the people on the ground. If they have their way, soon Xinjiang and the Stans will become the new middle East.
I’m not Chinese or a Muslim, just a consumer of news. My impression is current Chinese leadership has tried very hard to give the Uyghurs a stake in the economic future promised by the BRI. What confuses me is the ideology of Muslims is such that they rely on violence, often barbaric violence to assert therir influence and in the process create violent reactions to defend against the threat they represent. The claim is the majority of Muslims are peace loving people, but I have trouble believing this. If that were true, they would not support the violent ones, they would not provide a supportive environment and some Muslims would provide the victims of the violent Muslims with intelligence to defeat them and would in fact provide an army of defenders against them to protect the image of the good Muslims. Lacking this leads me to believe that their passivity is actually reluctant support.
There you are Darryl Shen at it again- speaking out of the gutter. You are so prompt to rationalize and shoot.
If you read carefully, this writer Sue-lin Wong is a Reuter’s journalist who has few articles on this magazine where she/he writes using the same written pattern. She/he (I am using both she/he because I can’t tell the journalist’s gender). Usually, she/he starts with a nice point of view and then she/he goes into the attack providing negative information, right and left.
I also doubt about her credibility as a journalist. For example, I wonder how much time she/he spends doing some research into a particular subject. For example she says, .."according to about 20 interviews with people in the city."… There, she/he does not provide any information as how the interviews were done or who were the interviewers, or what city is she/he is talking about. We supossed to believe her/his blindly. But then, she/he is very elaborate making her/his point of view.
Her/his type of written pattern makes me pense and question how reliable her/his articles could they be.
By the way, Darryl Shen I searched you on Facebook and found you to show your name, only. There are not pictures of yourself, where you are from, nothing- are you really who said you are ?