Papua New Guinea elections. Photo: iStock
Papua New Guinea elections. Photo: iStock

2016 for Papua New Guinea (PNG) was both politically turbulent and economically stressful with government revenues and currency falling, but inflation and deficit rising.

The nationwide election in June-July 2017 will be a major measure of the political impact of the government’s critics, and the sustainability of Prime Minister Peter O’Neill’s bankrolling tactics.

In May 2016, a five-week strike by university students called on O’Neill to resign over corruption and misgovernment allegations. Then in June, police shot at students marching to lobby parliament.

After years of parliament not even considering attempted motions of no confidence, the Supreme Court ruled in July that the government must be held accountable.

O’Neill survived the July 22 vote of no confidence 85 to 21, after allegedly dispersing district funds totaling many millions of kina through members of parliament (MPs).

The prime minister was expanding a pattern set by Sir Michael Somare of a government largely based on allocating billions of kina each year to districts, funds that have contributed to PNG’s fiscal crisis.

Unfortunately, these funds – which MPs effectively control – have little positive impact on essential services.

The government acknowledges there is corruption, but it’s not fighting it hard. The Police Fraud Squad director has estimated that in 2016 complaints of official fraud totaled 1.5 billion kina (US$472 million). Across the country, social media analysts have spread details of collapsing government services and corruption.

O’Neill’s parliamentary dominance failed to stop the opposition’s critiques of corruption. Former prime minister and treasury secretary Sir Mekere Morauta is so alarmed by corruption and economic mismanagement that he is standing for parliament again, warning of O’Neill’s “octopus with many tentacles, invading every crevice, every nook and cranny where there is the smell of money.”

Recent trends indicate that the huge task of managing frenetic elections could overwhelm the state’s limited budget, administrative capacities and undisciplined and too often trigger happy security forces.

The Electoral Commission and police are both underfunded. MPs can dominate their districts’ bureaucracies and influence both the voter enrolment processes and electoral administration, which in turn can bias outcomes.

Detailed election observations report high levels of “money politics,” intimidation and – especially in 2002 – post-election violence. While the Electoral Commission has drawn up a code of conduct, it has been signed by only eight of the 45 registered parties.

PNG’s political and social fragmentation is notorious and every election has resulted in multi-party coalitions.

Constitutional rules almost inevitably determine that the prime minister will come from the party with the most endorsed candidates elected and that they will form a multi-party coalition.

O’Neill’s People’s National Congress led after the 2012 election and then used funding to attract other parties, while allegedly starving out opposition MPs. The largest category elected in 2012 were the non-party independents – some of whom were concealed nominees of major parties – who mostly joined the richest bandwagon.

PNG’s political parties have trouble working together. The current opposition is made up of three main parties with leaders who had all either resigned or were sacked from O’Neill’s ministry. As Somare’s National Alliance found in 2011, political loyalty can be unreliable.

In April this year, the current National Alliance Party leader and Treasurer Patrick Pruaitch bitterly attacked O’Neill, saying that under the prime minister’s economic management PNG has “fallen off a cliff.”

In response, O’Neill said Pruaitch’s position was “untenable” yet he kept him on as minister without a portfolio. On May 16, the National Alliance party quit O’Neill’s government, making Pruaitch a direct rival for the premiership.

Government wastage and impoverished services are the most salient election issues nationally and there are signs O’Neill feels vulnerable. Loi Bakani, Central Bank Governor, has asked candidates to refrain from comment on the economy.

Competition will be intense in this upcoming election, as candidates seek renown for themselves, their village or clan. There will be 3,332 candidates contesting a total of 111 seats, including 165 women – just shy of the 2012 record of 3,343 candidates.

Extreme localism combined with widespread malfeasance can bring an apparent randomness to election outcomes. An average of over 60% of sitting MPs lost out in the last three elections and current MPs will be nervous.

Candidates usually campaign on similar local issues – roads, bridges, schools and health services – and complaints against the incumbent.

Yet trust is lacking and hopefuls rarely coordinate to achieve a common goal. Women candidates hoping to break gender barriers must try to bridge kinship groupings and need a demonstrable record of delivering benefits to potential voters. Only three of the 135 women candidates were elected in 2012.

International issues will have little salience in this election, although resentment towards the economic presence of Chinese small businesses is growing.

PNG will host the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in late 2018, but O’Neill’s extravagant APEC-related infrastructure investments in the capital have served to weaken his key programs on school education and health services.

While the Regional Processing Center for asylum seekers on Manus Island has hurt PNG’s image internationally, it has barely received any attention domestically.

O’Neill agreed with Australia’s then Rudd government in 2013 to resettle refugees, but he now speaks against it. The asylum seekers and refugees fear community hostility and PNG’s current move to close the center will embarrass both governments.

The Australian government surely knows the O’Neill government’s weaknesses, but its officials seem to prefer him to any other candidate.

Morauta has complained that Prime Minister Turnbull’s visit in April this year could be seen as support for O’Neill. This Australian factor echoes the 2002 election when Somare’s belief that the Howard government had wanted Morauta to retain power created a legacy of resentment that lasted until the parliament removed Somare from office in 2011.

While the constitutional rules of the game will favor the largest party in the house, only a brave observer will predict the outcome of PNG’s upcoming election.

Bill Standish is an Honorary Senior Lecturer at the School of Culture, History and Language in the College of Asia and the Pacific at The Australian National University. He has observed seven national elections in PNG.

The article first appeared on East Asia Forum. Read it here.

One reply on “Elections in Papua New Guinea’s dysfunctional democracy”

Comments are closed.