Image: Ian Shaw / Alamy Live News via The Conversation

The deal struck by Donald Trump with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, on October 9 to allow Russia to sell millions of tonnes of diesel is a major departure from US policy and runs counter to Ukrainian and European interests.

It also directly contradicts a law signed by the US president in September to authorize fresh US sanctions and tariffs on nations that import Russian oil and gas.

The timing of this deal was unfortunate. A senior Ukrainian and European delegation was in Miami for talks with Trump’s envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. On the table were apparently new US proposals that included a pre-winter de-escalation in the four-and-a-half-year war.

Once in the room, the US envoys reportedly signaled that sanctions relief on Russia was coming. But this still left Ukrainian and European officials blindsided by the announcement. Unsurprisingly, the talks ended the same day without any agreement and a day earlier than planned.

If the diesel deal between the US and Russia was just about fuel, it would be modest at best. The amounts mentioned in Trump’s announcement amount to just under six million barrels. This is roughly a day and a half of US diesel demand based on data from the US Energy Information Administration.

The deal will hardly have any significant impact on global diesel prices, even if Russia can provide the volumes in Trump’s announcement. And this is already in doubt, given that the lack of Russian diesel exports is primarily due to a Kremlin-imposed export ban.

Meanwhile, the rise of diesel prices began with, and is primarily a result of, Trump’s war against Iran. So if the deal is about bringing the price of diesel down ahead of the crucial midterm election in the US in early November, it’s unlikely to have a major impact.

But its effect on the Ukraine war is likely to be considerably larger and more damaging.

Bullying tactics

Since returning to power in January 2025, Trump’s approach to ending the Russian war against Ukraine has often been to try and bully Kyiv into concessions. These attempts have largely failed. Ukraine – and its European allies – have consistently rejected the idea of ceding any territory to Russia.

Trump’s diesel deal is another attempt to bully by pressuring Ukraine to give up one of its most effective, recent tools. Kyiv’s long-range drone and missile campaign against Russian refineries has reportedly caused Russian refining capacity to fall by up to 60% over recent months.

In recent weeks, Trump has been trying to force Zelensky to stop targeting Russian refineries, blaming Ukraine – rather than the war against Iran – for high diesel prices. Kyiv’s position in this regard has been consistent.

As Zelensky said again after Trump announced his diesel deal: “Ukraine will not set Russian oil refineries on fire if Russia does not destroy our energy infrastructure.”

This was a reiteration of a proposal made by the Ukrainian president on September 22 and endorsed by Trump. But Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that a halt to refinery strikes would not on its own bring down prices. That, he said, would also require the lifting of sanctions on Russian energy exports.

The diesel deal with Russia that Trump announced on October 9 provides this sanctions relief. So Putin got the economic half of an energy truce that he really wanted without having to commit to its military half.

Indeed, when Trump declared an “energy ceasefire” that “both parties have agreed” (both sides said they hadn’t agreed anything), Russia greeted Trump’s announcement by striking Ukrainian power plant.

Long hard winter in prospect for Ukraine

Trump followed his announcement of the diesel deal by further aligning himself with the Russian leader, telling Ukraine on October 10 to “get a new leader.”

Rocky relationship: a meeting between the US and Ukrainian presidents at the White House in February 2025 ended in discord. Photo: EPA/Jim Lo Scalzo/pool via The Conversation

Meanwhile, it emerged from the talks in Miami at the weekend that Washington has threatened to cut intelligence sharing and block weapons sales to Ukraine if the strikes continue, although the US has declined to comment on the claims.

Ukraine has recently achieved a major battlefield success with its Operation Vivaldi counteroffensive, which analysts believe has halted Russia’s attempts to seize the strategically vital Donetsk region in eastern Ukraine. This has made the economic front of the war all the more important.

It has also added strain to already fragile transatlantic relations. The EU’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said that “suspending sanctions on Russian diesel provides Moscow with more revenues to wage war” and that this was “not the time to ease pressure on Russia, and Europe won’t.”

But Europe now depends more on US diesel than it did in the past, a vulnerability that is likely to limit how hard Europe will push back. Europe’s dependence on energy imports from the US more generally also puts a question mark over how effective and sustainable the EU’s next sanctions package will really be.

Meanwhile, a pathway to a comprehensive settlement remains just as hard to envisage as it was before the diesel deal. The lifting of US sanctions on Russian diesel means that even a partial energy truce will now be harder to reach – adding more pain and suffering for Ukraine as winter approaches.

Most worrying in the long term, all the signs are that under Trump the US is closer to Moscow’s position than at any point since the full-scale invasion.

Stefan Wolff is professor of international security, University of Birmingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Stefan Wolff is professor of international security at the University of Birmingham.

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. Thirty years of NATO expansion and the West’s refusal to join a comprehensive Europe-wide security structure, the US refusal to respond to Russia’s call for negotiations in the months leading up to the war, and Boris Johnson’s interference in the Istanbul negotiations forced Russia into a war that sacrificed Ukraine as cannon fodder.

      1. … In Lieu of 5 UN veto awfulness: Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa, Islamic …???… interim era only, hopefully…???…

    1. Oh, that charming Russian habit of victim-blaming that’s been around forever. Russia is always afraid, always under threat from someone… So much so that it’s the world’s largest country by land area. What a convenient excuse for conquering one nation after another.
      And what are these “comprehensive Europe-wide security structure negotiations” that Russia has been calling for!? Stripping Ukraine and the countries of Central Europe of their sovereignty. NATO would never have been formed if a drunk Medvedev hadn’t bluntly admitted that Russia wants “Russia from Lisbon to Vladivostok.”
      Joining NATO was a sovereign decision by the countries of Central Europe and the Baltic states, which suffered under Russian crimes and fought against Russian occupation throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. And now that they’ve turned their backs on the Русский “мир” they’re experiencing the greatest economic boom in their history—and the world’s greatest boom of the past 30 years. I wonder why? Setting aside international law and the right of nations to self-determination. Russia wanted a free ride to control Ukraine and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, whose combined GDP exceeded Russia’s—and, taking the Scandinavian countries into account (Putin’s great success in limiting NATO’s “expansion”), their military strength as well. Russia has nuclear weapons, and no sane person would attack it. Especially not the citizens of countries who want to live happily and in prosperity.
      You’re getting tangled up in your own propaganda. Russia “was forced into war” because Johnson broke off negotiations in Istanbul… Negotiations about a war that Russia had already started🤦
      If you’re comfortable in the role of a slave, Russia is wide open to you. It will decide whether you have enough to eat and whether or not to send you on a mясной штурм…

  2. Another image of KKK Wizard’s handys… KSA/Pak muscle seems worse than weak sans IRGC as well… Keep playin’ …..

  3. There is no conspiracy here between Chump and Putin.

    Chump has a self interest. Russia has a self interest. Both are served by this “deal”

    The anti Russia mental midgets, like the anti Iran mental midgets, and the anti China mental midgets, who all happen to be ALL on Team Epstein, are crying like chumps over this nothing burger deal.

    Maybe the European imbeciles ought to ask themselves why they are behaving like Israel. Shi**ing in your front and backyard and complaining about the smell.

    1. Totalitarian-based order – You’ve convinced me. Countries where people learn such poetic speech must be wonderful places to live. Especially Russia 🫡🪖⛓️

    2. Meanwhile Pak does the work of the Yanquies and Chosen People by joining with KSA to fight the Houthis.
      Reality, don’t you love it !