Xi and Trump. Photos: Asia Times Files / AFP / Dan Kitwood and Nicholas Kamm

What will China and in particular the Chinese Communist Party do now that President Donald Trump has slapped 145% tariffs on them? Most of the commentariat seems to think they’ll match the United States tit for tat on tariffs, complain mightily and then quietly put out feelers to cut a deal. And Trump has suggested they already are doing that.

Maybe so. That’s what we would do if we were Xi Jinping. But don’t expect Xi to respond the way America would. 

Xi Jinping will let his own people absorb any amount of hardship. And he’s been telling them for years to get ready to “eat bitterness.” He’s also been sanctions-proofing the Chinese economy for years. While he’s not there yet, he’s not helpless, either.

Economic retaliation and narrative warfare

China has banned certain rare earth mineral exports, ordered Chinese companies not to buy Boeing aircraft, and placed 125% tariffs on American imports.

It has also enlisted US proxies, of whom there’s no shortage, to make the case that the American republic will collapse if Walmart’s everyday low prices go up.  

Beijing will also use the American trade pressure to rally the public.

Xi can’t be seen caving in to the foreigners. If he does, his many domestic enemies might remove him, quite literally.  

Even more fundamentally, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is in a battle to the death with the free world. The way the CCP sees things, only one of the two can survive – freedom is an existential threat to communism.

A strategic calculation

So, Xi (and his predecessors) have been preparing for war for years. Since at least 2019, state-linked media have said China is in a “people’s war” against the US.

Also, at his instruction, Xi’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is now competent enough to throw its weight around inside and beyond the first-island chain. Go about it right, and the PLA can even give the Americans a bloody nose.   

So perhaps Xi Jinping thinks starting a shooting war is a reasonable option? He would have the advantage of surprise. The Americans don’t think he will (or don’t want to entertain the possibility). 

It needn’t be against the US, with all that involves, but maybe against  Taiwan or the Philippines? This would give the US and everyone else a massive jolt. A trade war and a potential nuclear war are two different things. There will be no end to people blaming President Trump, especially as Xi claims that “you Americans pushed me into it.”  

Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te (seated right) meets with US Senator Pete Ricketts (standing) at the Presidential Office in Taipei, April 18. Photo: Central News Agency

Out come the wolves

Every Democrat on Capitol Hill, for starters, and many RINOs (Republicans in Name Only) will blame Trump. As will all of Wall Street and most of America’s business class. Recall how many people fretted after 9/11 that the US somehow provoked Osama bin Laden into attacking: “Why do they hate us?” 

It will be even easier when China (and Donald Trump) are involved. Such is Trump derangement syndrome.

But are the tariffs on the PRC, high as they are, enough to make war look like a good move for Xi?  

It may not be the same as the oil and financial embargoes imposed on Imperial Japan in 1941. However, for the CCP, it’s bad enough in its own way. Especially if major or even smaller countries settle their disputes with the US, or refuse to absorb China’s rising exports, which could overwhelm their own domestic industries.

Need for hard currency

The Chinese can withstand punishment, but China’s Ponzi scheme economy depends on exports to earn hard currency. And also imports of American and Western technology.  

The CCP hasn’t got half the foreign exchange it needs to meet its US dollar-denominated obligations. Or to buy what it needs: say, Australian iron ore to make steel to build PLAN ships. Nor does it have the US technology that, for example, went into the spy balloon that flew over America in 2023.

And Xi would prefer to keep people employed. China is still a place where 600 million people live on $5 a day, and many others live on less.  

It’s a volatile place. And maybe Trump has more than tariffs and readjusting the trade imbalance in mind. Perhaps this is building to a substantial decoupling from the Chinese market, thus creating free-world and “unfree world” trading blocs.

Even before the tariffs, the Trump administration’s America First Investment Policy was worrying China with its tightened restrictions on inward Chinese investment. And just as bad, clamping down on outbound American investment and tech transfers to the PRC.

Kinetic conflict?

The US has never pressured China like this in the 53 years since Richard Nixon’s visit. There’s been a lot of talk but never much real pressure – except during Trump 1.0, which was only for a couple of years and never went for the jugular.

Xi might now count on the Americans losing interest and being placated and strung along with the promise of talks, and easing up.

But what if the Americans learned their lesson and realized China is already at war with the United States? The US didn’t start this war, but for the first time, it looks like it’s getting ready to fight.

Maybe Xi will figure now’s the time to shoot – or “go kinetic” in today’s jargon. A shooting war may not be how we would respond to tariffs. But we’re not Xi Jinping.

Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and former US diplomat. He is the author of the book When China Attacks: A Warning To America.

This article was originally published by Japan Forward and is republished with permission.

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. The author cannot seem to understand that most of the world outside his circle can separate the issue of Taiwan’s status from that of the unilateral tariffs promulgated by this US administration against the rest of the world in violation of WTO norms and rules.

    1. Very good point. Neither Taiwan nor the Unilateral Tariff is an existential matter to the Chinese unlike the American oil and economic embargo was to Japan thereby provoking Pearl Harbor.

  2. This author seems to have a one track mind. No matter if reality is staring him in the face, he can only see China is bad and China will fall. I would not bother following his twisted contortions of reality. But it’s about time for him, like lots of people have, to open his eyes to the possibility of USA is bad USA will fall.

  3. I bet the author has never been to China and not even read anything about recent China. I bet the author also doesn’t follow any recent development in US lately.

    This article is not worth to be published unless of course it fits the narrative of the one who sponsored it.

  4. smart answer to a dumb question – “Will Donald Trump start a war over China’s tariffs retaliation ?” – here, fix it for ya …

  5. After a military education, like the author has had, war is always at the forefront of thinking. Fact is, China has the least to gain from war with the United States, notwithstanding that she could win a local conflict. The real war is economic. Taiwan will be picked up in the course of time and the Philippines is irrelevant.

    1. You don’t need war when you can watch the US collapse with a chair and a bag of popcorn. The Trump show is in town.

  6. The only way for USA to win and continue being the hegemon is to ferment an excuse to entice China into a war, so that USA can nuke China and also bring the surrounding region (ASEAN, Asia Pacific) back into poverty, like in the early 1900s. After all, when non-white people die, it feel different to the West. We should be more concerned about USA trying to precipitate a conflict.

  7. China’s doing something better than start a war and that is ignoring Trump and getting on with the hard work and letting Trump tear the US to pieces. Grant has to acknowledge that his once proud and strong USA is collapsing.

  8. Writer has typical mentality of the establishment…everything is a nail and I am a hammer. China doesn’t need to take over Taiwan which has only one thing going for it which is TSMC. Besides that its just a rock where they grow good mangoes and has half decent night markets. China’s semiconductor development momentum is picking up and they will leapfrog silicon like they did land lines and ICE cars.