Image by Manfred Richter from Pixabay

In 2008, I was co-leading an investigation into a multimillion-dollar health project in Odisha, India, alongside the World Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity team. Our mission was to uncover the truth behind allegations of corruption, and the journey led us to nearly 50 hospitals across the state.

What we discovered was shocking – a web of corruption deeply embedded within the system. Witnessing first-hand how a massive loan amount meant for public good was siphoned off through a nexus of politicians and bureaucrats was a stark revelation.

The evidence we gathered painted a grim picture of a system rigged against transparency. When we presented our findings to the Odisha government, it sent shockwaves through the administration.

The media played a crucial role in amplifying our voice, igniting a public outcry that reached the state assembly. Finally, the government was compelled to hand over the case to the Odisha Vigilance Department, leading to some action.

However, the fight was far from over. The pressure, threats, and harassment I faced were a stark reminder of the immense power wielded by those involved. It became painfully clear that standing up to such forces, especially for an ordinary citizen, was no easy feat.

My experience demonstrates that the fight against corruption requires unwavering dedication, a willingness to stand tall against intimidation, and a relentless pursuit of justice. Only then can we hope to dismantle the insidious networks that continue to plague our systems, ensuring that resources meant for public good serve their intended purpose – the betterment of all. 

Fifteen years later, while the definition of corruption may have evolved, the fight for transparency remains constant. The 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) by Transparency International paints a disheartening picture, revealing that the systemic issues I witnessed persist. The scale and patterns may have changed, but the fight against corruption continues to demand courage and perseverance.

The CPI-23 report says that more than two-thirds of countries fall short of the mark for clean governance. The Covid-19 pandemic served as a breeding ground for corruption, with emergency responses and resource allocation creating fertile ground for malfeasance. The absence of safeguards opened doors to exploiting critical areas like health care and relief efforts.

Corruption’s global grip

East Asia, while boasting generally lower corruption scores, faces concerns about state capture and the undue influence of powerful business groups. South Asia presents a mixed bag, as Pakistan and Afghanistan grapple with political instability, weak rule of law, and bureaucratic inefficiencies that hinder anti-corruption efforts.

Southeast Asia echoes this complexity, with Singapore leading the charge against corruption while Cambodia and Myanmar struggle with organized crime and political interference.

The dominance of ruling parties and resource exploitation pose significant challenges to transparency and accountability. Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East face particularly daunting challenges due to limited resources, weak rule of law, and the prevalence of large-scale corruption, state capture, and cybercrime. 

Corrupt actors often use sophisticated methods to conceal their misdeeds, while governments with opaque processes and limited political will may deliberately suppress information. Ineffective legal frameworks, restricted media access, and the influence of criminal networks can all hinder data-collection efforts.

The clandestine nature of corruption makes it difficult to track trends and measure progress. Weak governance, limited data-collection systems, and deliberate suppression of information by regimes further hinder transparency.

While the CPI-2023 relies on expert assessments and surveys, the lack of real data remains a significant limitation.

This raises crucial questions: Who benefits from hiding corruption data? What are the obstacles in different countries? How can we overcome these challenges? What are the obstacles in different countries? Ineffective legal frameworks, restricted media access, and the influence of criminal networks can all hinder data collection efforts.

The report highlights a worrying trend as the countries with declining democratic institutions and rule of law tend to have higher levels of corruption. This is because democratic checks and balances, along with a strong independent judiciary, are crucial for keeping corruption in check.

The rise of authoritarianism and populism in many countries threatens these essential safeguards. Adding to the complexity, the absence of a universally agreed-upon definition of corruption makes measuring it even more challenging. This lack of standardization hinders the development of accurate and objective methods for data collection and analysis. 

Building bridges, not walls

Despite its limitations, the CPI serves as a vital wake-up call. It highlights the need for more robust data-collection methods, utilizing innovative techniques such as social-media analysis and advanced data analytics to shed light on hidden patterns.

By acknowledging the limitations of the CPI and actively working to address them, we can create more accurate tools and take effective action to combat corruption’s devastating impact on our world. This is not just about numbers; it’s about people’s lives. Let’s shine a light on the shadows and build a future free from corruption.

Strengthening democratic institutions, ensuring access to information, and building strong justice systems are crucial first steps. Additionally, fostering public participation and empowering citizens to hold their governments accountable are essential for lasting change.

Funding independent research, strengthening whistleblower protection, and fostering global collaboration are essential steps. Additionally, utilizing innovative techniques like social-media analysis and advanced data analytics can shed light on hidden patterns.

Sachi Satapathy is an international development practitioner who has worked on large-scale projects. His interests are in public policy, poverty alleviation and public-private partnerships for development in middle-income and developing countries.

Leave a comment