On February 1, Myanmar’s military, known as the Tatmadaw, invoked Article 417 of the 2008 constitution, dismissed State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi, and arrested her and other members of her National League for Democracy (NLD) party.
Condemnation of the coup was swift, although there would be reason for hesitancy in the reaction: Aung San Suu Kyi, who had been the face of the democracy movement until her release from house arrest in 2010, ruined her reputation when she went to the International Court of Justice in 2019 to defend her country’s genocide against the Rohingya people. No longer is Aung San Suu Kyi the unalloyed symbol of democracy and human rights.
Within Myanmar, protests against the coup continue. Tens of thousands of people, many wearing red (the color of the NLD), have taken to the streets across the country, not only in the more congested cities but also in the countryside, to protest the coup.
The momentum against the coup picked up when associations of civil servants refused to work for the military. While this wave began with medics, it escalated to involve workers in the railways and education, and workers in the social-welfare and construction ministries. Staff in the Department of Social Welfare released a statement that read, “We will get back to work only after power is handed back to the democratically elected government.”
By the second week of February, protests entered Myanmar’s typically quiet capital city of Naypyidaw, with motorcycle parades and demonstrations at the main marketplaces.
Myanmar’s military built this city as the capital and shifted all administrative offices from Yangon to this interior town in 2005. Naypyidaw was built with the intention that it would remain a military stronghold, safe for the rulers of the country who would not be disturbed by the messiness of democracy.
However, in the elections of 2015 and 2020, the military’s election vehicle, Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), did not prevail even in Naypyidaw, where the NLD won handily. That demonstrates the appetite among Myanmar’s public for a democratic process.
Myanmar’s military seized power over the country’s institutions in 1962. It has not yet turned over that control to civilians.
The 2008 constitution, written substantially by the Tatmadaw, provides a legal fiction to prolong military domination. One in four seats in the parliament – the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw – is held by a person nominated by the military. The military continues to hold the cabinet portfolios for Defense and Home Affairs, both held until the coup by lieutenant-generals in the Tatmadaw.
The constitution’s Article 417 allows the military to declare a “state of emergency” and dismiss the civilian fig leaf. This is exactly what the Tatmadaw did on February 1.
What happened that day was both a coup and not a coup; it was a coup because the military dismissed the civilian government and took power, but it was not a coup because the military did not hand over power after the 2010 elections (the USDP ran unopposed and took over the government, exchanging fatigues for suits).
General Min Aung Hlaing had hoped to become the head of government after his term as commander-in-chief of Myanmar’s army ended. As it is, Min Aung Hlaing controls a substantial part of the economy through Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd (MEHL), an army conglomerate, and through the businesses of his children Aung Pyae Sone and Khin Thiri Thet Mon.
Sources in Yangon told me that in 2015 Min Aung Hlaing’s close associate Than Htay was put in charge of the USDP, ensuring that it became an instrument of Min Aung Hlaing. The general took the defeat of the USDP in the November 2020 election personally; it was this animus that led to the tens of thousands of cases of election fraud alleged by the USDP against the NLD.
Before the November 2020 election, Min Aung Hlaing warned the candidates not to be swayed by foreign influence. This was seen in Myanmar as a threat to the NLD.
Accusations of fraud in that election did not carry weight even with the Election Commission. On January 26, military spokesman Major-General Zaw Min Tun said the Tatmadaw would act if the accusations were not taken seriously. This is precisely what it did a few days later.
Caught between the US and China
China and Myanmar share a 2,100-kilometer border, and China is Myanmar’s largest investor and one of its key economic partners. A decade ago, the US government attempted to wean Myanmar away from its links to China and to reorient its economy toward the United States. This became part of US president Barack Obama’s “pivot to Asia.”
In 2007, Derek Mitchell, who would later become Obama’s special representative for Myanmar, co-authored an article that pointed out that sanctions had been ineffective and that a new “roadmap” was needed to reform the Tatmadaw.
Myanmar’s military had its own roadmap: It created a new constitution in 2008, held elections in 2010 that brought the USDP to power, released Aung San Suu Kyi from prison that year, and allowed her to run for elections in 2015. Obama went to Myanmar in 2012, and then the US removed sanctions in October 2016, hoping that these moves would signal a shift from Myanmar’s links to Beijing toward Washington.
But this did not happen. Neither the Tatmadaw nor Suu Kyi could logically break trading ties with its neighbor. In May 2017, Suu Kyi went to Beijing to sign an agreement to bring Myanmar into China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
In mid-January this year, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited Naypyidaw to discuss the Belt and Road projects as well as China’s assistance to fight the Covid-19 pandemic. On the agenda was the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, including the China-Myanmar Border Economic Cooperation Zone, New Yangon City, and the Kyaukpyu Deep Sea Port.
Washington’s attempt to push China out of Myanmar had no bearing on the February 1 coup; both the military and NLD are committed to the strategic link with China. But it does not help that this “new cold war” has deepened the instability that has marked Myanmar’s history since 1962.
The people are on the streets now in the midst of what they are calling a “drum revolution.” With each passing day, more and more people are joining the call for a return to civilian rule, even if this means going back to the status quo, with the military pulling the strings in the background.
This article was produced by Globetrotter, which provided it to Asia Times.
Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He is a senior non-resident fellow at Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest book is Washington Bullets, with an introduction by Evo Morales Ayma.