to Asia Times for
$100 per year or $10 per month.
Special discount rates apply for students and academics.
Thanks for supporting quality journalism!
Your story will be shown in a few seconds.
(if it doesn't, click here.)
Enjoy the read.
As much as Covid-19 has been instrumentalized by the 0.001% to social-engineer a Great Reset, Beirut’s massive port explosion is already being instrumentalized by the usual suspects to keep Lebanon enslaved.
Facing oh-so-timely color-revolution-style “protests,” the current Lebanese government led by Prime Minister Hassan Diab has already resigned.
Even before the onshore portion of the port blew up, Beirut had requested a US$10 billion line of credit from the International Monetary Fund. It was denied, of course, so long as trademark neoliberal Washington consensus “reforms” such as a radical slashing of public expenses, mass layoffs and across-the-board privatization were not implemented.
Post-explosion, French President Emmanuel Macron, who’s not even capable of establishing a dialogue with the Gilets Jaunes/Yellow Vests at home, has opportunistically jumped in full-neocolonial mode to pose as a savior of Lebanon – as long as the same “reforms,” of course, are implemented.
On Sunday, France and the United Nations organized a videoconference to coordinate a donor response, in conjunction with the European Commission, the IMF and the World Bank. The result was not exactly brilliant: a paltry 252 million euros ($296.6 million) was pledged, once again on condition of “institutional reforms.”
France came up with 30 million euros, Kuwait with 40 million, Qatar with 50 million and the European Commission with 68 million. Crucially, neither Russia nor Iran was among the donors.
The US – which is harshly sanctioning Lebanon – and Gulf Cooperation Council allies Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) pledged nothing. China had just a pro forma presence.
In parallel, Maronite Christians in Brazil – a very powerful community – are sending funds for the color-revolution protests. Former president Michel Temer and industrialist tycoon Paulo Skaf even flew to Beirut. Former Lebanese president Amin Gemayel (1982-1988) maintained a lot of businesses in Brazil with funds he reputedly skimmed when in power.
All of the above points to neoliberalism taking no prisoners when it comes to keeping its deadly grip on Lebanon.
The Hariri model
Lebanon’s profound economic crisis, now aggravated by the Beirut port blast, has nothing to do with Covid-19 or the US proxy war on Syria, which brought a million refugees to the nation.
It’s all about proverbial neoliberal shock and awe, conducted non-stop by the Hariri clan: former prime ministers Rafiq, assassinated in 2011, and Saad, chased out of power last January.
The Hariri model was focused on real estate speculation and financialization. The Solidere group, controlled by Arab investors and a few Lebanese, Hariri included, destroyed Beirut’s historic downtown and rebuilt it with luxury real estate. That’s the classical rentier neoliberalism model that always profits a tiny elite.
In parallel, the Bank of Lebanon was attracting funds from the Lebanese diaspora and assorted Arab investors by offering very generous interest rates. Lebanon suddenly had an artificially strong currency.
A small middle-class sort of flourished throughout the 2000s, comprising import-export traders, tourism operators and financial market traders and punters. Yet, overall, inequality was still the name of the game. According to the World Inequality Database, half of Lebanon’s population now holds less wealth that the top 0.1%.
The bubble finally burst in September last year, when I happened to be in Beirut. With no US dollars in circulation, the Lebanese pound started to collapse in the black market. The Bank of Lebanon went berserk.
When the Hariri racket imposed a “Whatsapp tax” over calls, massive protests erupted in October. Capital fled wholesale and the currency collapsed for good.
There’s absolutely no evidence the IMF, the World Bank and assorted Western or Arab “donors” will extricate a now devastated Lebanon from the neoliberal logic that plunged it into a systemic crisis in the first place.
The way out would be to focus on productive investments, away from finance and geared towards the practical necessities of an austerity-battered and completely impoverished population.
Yet Macron, the IMF and their “partners” are only interested in keeping monetary “stability”, seducing speculative foreign capital and making sure that the rapacious, Western-connected Lebanese oligarchy will get away with murder, including by buying Lebanese assets for peanuts.
Belt and Road or bust
In stark contrast with the exploitative perpetuation of the Western neoliberal model, China is offering Lebanon the chance to “Go East” and be part of the New Silk Roads.
In 2017, Lebanon signed to join the Belt and Road Initiative. In 2018, Lebanon became the 87th member of the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank.
Over the past few years, Lebanon was already taking part in the internationalization of the yuan, offering bank accounts in yuan (not for individuals but for companies investing in the country) and increasing bilateral trade in yuan.
Beijing was already engaged in discussions revolving around the upgrading of Lebanese infrastructure, including the expansion of Beirut’s harbor.
This means that Beijing may now be in a position to offer a renewed, joint rebuilding and security deal for Beirut port, just as it was about to clinch a smaller agreement with Diab’s government focused only on expansion and renovation.
The bottom line is that China has an actual Plan A to extricate Lebanon from its current financial dead end. And that’s exactly what was and remains total anathema to the interests of the United States, NATO and Israel.
The Donald Trump administration recently went no-holds-barred to prevent Israel from having China develop the port of Haifa. The same “offer you can’t refuse” tactics will be applied with full force on whoever leads the new Lebanese government.
Beirut is an absolutely key node in the Belt and Road’s geopolitical-geoeconomic connectivity of the Eastern Mediterranean.
With Haifa temporarily out of the picture, Beirut grows in importance as a gateway to the European Union, complementing the role of Pireus and Italian ports in the Adriatic.
It’s crucial to note that the port itself was not destroyed. The enormous crater on the site replaces only a section quayside and the rest is on water. The buildings destroyed can be rebuilt in quick order.
Reconstruction of the port is already estimated at $15 billion, pocket money for an experienced company such as China Harbor.
Meanwhile, naval traffic is being redirected to Tripoli port, 80 kilometers north of Beirut and only 30 kilometers from the Lebanon-Syria border.
Its director, Ahmed Tamer, confirms that “the port has witnessed during the past years the expansion work by Chinese companies, and it has received the largest ships from China, carrying a big number of containers.”
Add to it the fact that Tripoli port will also be essential in the process of Syria reconstruction – to which China is totally committed.
The Belt and Road’s Southwest Asia connectivity network is a maze including Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
China is already planning to invest in highway and railroads, further to be developed into high-speed rail. That will connect the Belt and Road’s central China-Iran corridor – fresh from the $400 billion, 25-year strategic partnership deal soon to be signed – with the Eastern Mediterranean.
Add to it the role of the port of Tartus in Syria, which hosts a strong Russian naval presence. Beijing will inevitably invest in the expansion of Tartus, which is crucially linked by highway to Lebanon. The Russia-China strategic partnership will be involved in the protection of Tartus with S-300 and S-400 missile systems.
Historically, in a larger axis that went from Samarkand to Cordoba with strong nodes such as Baghdad and Damascus, what slowly evolved in this part of Eurasia was a syncretic civilization superimposed over an ancestral regional, rural and nomad background.
The internal cohesion of the Muslim world was forged from the 7th century to the 11th century: that was the key factor that shaped the lineaments of a coherent Eurasia.
Apart from Islam, Arabic – the language of religion, administration, trade and culture – was an essential unifying factor. This evolving Muslim world was configured as a vast economic and cultural domain whose roots connected to Greek, Semitic, Persian and Indian thought.
It was a marvelous synthesis that formed a unique civilization out of elements of different origins – Persian, Mesopotamian, Byzantine. The Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean were, of course, part of it, totally open toward the Indian Ocean, the Caspian routes, Central Asia and China.
Now, centuries later, Lebanon should have everything to gain by ditching the “Paris of the Orient” mythology and looking East again, thus positioning itself on the new right side of history.