Hong Kong’s police are confident they have the resources to continue battling pro-democracy protesters, even if violence escalates further, pouring cold water on concerns that the authoritarian mainland might need to intervene.
Three senior commanders said they were unaware of any plans by China to bolster their own ranks with mainland troops or police, even if the chaos worsens. In fact, they admitted that any move to do so would place the city’s police in uncharted waters.
But, they insisted, the issue was moot because the local force could handle the crisis.
“I can’t envisage it,” said one senior commander. “At the operational level, we have considerable depth. I think we have the determination, the cohesiveness and the depth of resources to keep going.”
The three officers agreed to sit down with a group of foreign journalists on condition of anonymity so they could speak more freely during the worst unrest the force has faced since leftist riots in the late 1960s.
Hong Kong’s summer of rage was sparked by broad opposition to a plan to allow extraditions to the mainland, but has since morphed into a wider call for democratic rights in the semi-autonomous city.
Millions have hit the streets while clashes have broken out between police and small groups of hardcore protesters for 10 consecutive weeks in the greatest challenge to Beijing’s authority since the city’s 1997 handover.
Political solution needed
With neither Beijing nor Hong Kong’s leaders willing to offer any compromises, the police have become the loathed face of the government.
The chant “hak geng” – corrupt cops – has become routine, both from protesters and, more recently, local residents infuriated by police engaging in near-nightly battles in their neighborhoods.
Protesters, rights groups and the UN’s rights chief have accused police of using excessive force, with videos of teargas and rubber bullets generating renewed public outrage each weekend.
But officers insist they have deployed proportionate force against increasingly violent protesters armed with sling-shots, petrol bombs and bricks, and said they remained confident a “silent majority” of Hong Kongers still support them.
The three officers painted a picture of a force challenged by wildcat protests and hinted at frustration over the intransigence of Beijing and city leader Carrie Lam.
“This is a political issue. And a political issue needs a political solution to solve it,” said one.
But they also said attacks and insults directed towards their ranks had only reinforced morale and that there were ample reserves to call upon.
Of the 28,000 people in uniform, around 3,000 are engaged in frontline crowd control but there are hundreds of immediate reserves and a “scaling up” plan in place should the protests escalate.
“We’re not at full mobilization by any stage yet,” said one officer, a commander on the ground.
As China takes an increasingly hardline tone, state media have published images of military personnel and armored vehicles across the border in Shenzhen this week.
The United States has warned Beijing against sending in troops, a move many analysts say would be a reputational and economic disaster for China.
Loans and food deliveries
The three officers said there had been no discussions about what would happen if Beijing sent reinforcements and that there were no established protocols in place.
Asked if such a move would leave the force in uncharted waters, one officer replied matter-of-factly: “Yes”.
All three felt coverage and footage on social media had portrayed the force, or specific confrontations with protesters, in an unfair light and said officers were now being subjected to routine abuse.
At least 300 police have had personal data – such as ID card numbers and addresses – published online. Some have had fraudulent bank loans applied for in their name or food deliveries sent to their homes late at night.
One officer said his teenage daughter was approached by an adult at a recent sports day. “He pulled her to one side and said ‘What your father is doing is disgusting, you should be ashamed’,” the officer recalled. “Things like that I feel are completely, completely unreasonable.”
Since the clashes began in early June, police have made more than 700 arrests but so far there appears to be no let-up in the protests.
And even if the demonstrations end, analysts say the force has suffered unprecedented reputational loss in a city now deeply polarised between those who support and those who loathe the police.
Asked how long it might take to repair that damage, one commander said: “It’s not easy. I can’t tell you how long it will take, but it’s going to take time.”
Meanwhile, the city government’s surprise package of economic sweeteners does not appear to have eased tension among key levels of society – to dissuade younger adults from taking to the streets again.
On Wednesday, Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po announced HK$19 billion (US$2.44 bn) worth of tax cuts and other measures “to tackle the current economic difficulties and the coming economic headwind”. He claimed it was not related to the political crisis.
The package included tax waivers, extra payments for elderly and people with disabilities, plus benefits for people renting public housing, a subsidy for household electricity and cash handout to students from kindergarten and secondary schools.
But the core group in the protests – university students – may not directly benefit. And many say the move to ease public discontent won’t work.
“I will take the money but it doesn’t mean I won’t join the protest,” a middle-class mother surnamed Lee with a son aged six told Asia Times. Lee said she had joined protests since June against the extradition bill, and to oppose “excessive use of force” by the police.
“In fact, that is my money. I would rather the government give it back to me than to spend them on tear gas to fire the protesters or pay an overtime allowance to police who beat up protesters.”
A secondary school student surnamed Kwan, who will receive a HK$2,500 student subsidy, had a similar reaction, saying he would rather see the money spent on Hong Kongers rather than the construction of the Lantau Tomorrow Vision, a megaproject the chief executive Carrie Lam proposed, Sing Tao Daily reported.
Kwan said that with the government failing to respond to the five demands from protesters, he believed they must take to the streets or else it would be a betrayal of hundreds of their colleagues who have been arrested.
Other people said they will still go to the protests – and use the money to buy gear for protesters on the frontline.
The exclusion of university students or young people from the relief package was criticized as a bid by the government tried to polarize citizens.
Ivan Choy Chi-keung, a senior lecturer at the Chinese University Hong Kong, said the relief package may help the business sectors and low-income citizens. But the protesters were young middle-class people fighting for political demands, so they would not be appeased, local media reported.
Choi believed the measures aimed to help pro-government parties to avoid backlash in district council elections in November.
Other groups such as the Manufacturers’ Association welcomed the measures, saying it would reduce risks amid worsening economic prospects and the trade war.
With reporting by AFP