China's defense chief Wei Fenghe addresses the Shangri-La Dialogue meeting in Singapore, June 2, 2019. Photo: Simon Roughneen

Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD) on Sunday, Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe made many bold, controversial remarks. One such statement was his assertion that since its founding in 1949, the People’s Republic of China “has never provoked a war or conflict, nor has it ever invaded another country or taken an inch of land from others.”

To portray the Asian behemoth as a benign, peace-loving country in his speech at the Singapore-based security conference, Wei also said: “History has proven and will continue to prove that China will not follow the beaten path of big powers seeking hegemony when it grows strong. Hegemony does not conform to China’s values and national interests.”

Such a portrayal of a benevolent, altruistic China has also been repeatedly painted by Xi Jinping in his international homilies. For instance, in his keynote speech at the United Nations Office in Geneva in 2017, Xi, China’s most powerful and authoritarian leader since Mao Zedong, pledged: “No matter how strong its economy grows, China will never seek hegemony, expansion or sphere of influence. History has borne this out and will continue to do so.”

Alas, when it comes to the South China Sea, history has shown that the one-party PRC has not practiced what Wei and Xi preached. It has even done the opposite of what they said.

In 1974, China launched a brief but violent attack on the Paracel Islands, then under the control of US-backed South Vietnam. Defeating the South Vietnamese navy, which was by then very weak, China seized the Paracels and has hitherto occupied the islands.

Though Vietnam still – and strongly – claims sovereignty over the Paracels, called Hoàng Sa in Vietnamese, the PRC has in recent years undertaken massive reclamation work on the islands and deployed anti-ship and surface-to-air missiles as well as fighter jets to the disputed archipelago. In May 2018, China released footage of an H-6K long-range bomber landing on Woody Island, the biggest island in the area, leading to the US and other countries, including Vietnam, to condemn such an aggressive move.

Research published in the Naval War College Review found that the ‘short but intense’ skirmish [in 1974] ‘was the first step in China’s decades-long effort to establish and expand its presence in the South China Sea’

A well-researched study published in 2016 said that the “hitherto-unknown details of the [1974] battle illustrate how Chinese strategists tailored their tactics so as to coerce, deter, and defeat a rival claimant in the South China Sea.” That research, published in the Naval War College Review, also found that the “short but intense” skirmish “was the first step in China’s decades-long effort to establish and expand its presence in the South China Sea.”

It then correctly pointed out a number of China’s expansionist and antagonistic moves in the area. These include its seizure of six reefs and atolls of the Spratly Islands after another skirmish with Vietnam at Johnson South Reef in 1988 and the 2012 standoff with the Philippines, which resulted in Beijing compelling Manila to yield control of Scarborough Shoal.

What’s more, since 2013, the Asian giant has conducted an enormous expansion in the Spratlys, building up artificial islands and then militarizing those man-made bases. It was reported in May last year that China had installed anti-ship cruise missiles and surface-to-air missiles on three of its artificial bases in the Spratlys, namely Mischief, Fiery and Subi reefs.

For the Philippines, China’s seizure of Scarborough Shoal in 2012 was the last straw, prompting it to launch an arbitration case against China in 2013. In a landmark verdict three years later, a United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) tribunal unanimously invalidated many of Beijing’s contentious statements and unlawful actions. These included The Hague-based court’s findings that “there was no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources” within its so-called “nine-dash line,” which covers almost all the South China Sea, and that it “violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone [EEZ]” by, among others, “constructing artificial islands.”

Yet China forcefully ignored the final and legally binding award and used its huge economic, political and military might to compel other countries and organizations to sideline the milestone verdict.

China has also utilized its new-found power to curtail and coerce its smaller neighbors’ commercial activities in the South China Sea. For example, it has frequently harassed and attacked Vietnamese fishermen. In 2017 and 2018, China pressured its southern communist neighbor, which it also invaded in the brief but bloody border war in 1979, to cease oil and gas exploration operations in the areas that lie within Vietnam’s 200-nautical-mile EEZ because those offshore fields are also near its controversial “nine-dash line.”

Amid its multi-front conflict with the US, the PRC has now appeared less aggressive than it was a few years ago – when, as US president Barack Obama said, the Asian country used its “sheer size and muscle” to push around smaller nations in the South China Sea or applied “the old style of might makes right, as opposed to working through international law and international norms to establish claims, and to resolve disputes.”

That said, China hasn’t abandoned its ultimate aim of controlling the resources-rich and strategically vital waterway. In its recently released New Indo-Pacific Strategy, the US Department of Defense is probably right to claim that China “is engaged in a campaign of low-level coercion to assert control of disputed spaces in the region, particularly in the maritime domain. China is using a steady progression of small, incremental steps in the ‘gray zone’ between peaceful relations and overt hostilities to secure its aims, while remaining below the threshold of armed conflict.”

In his speech at the Shangri-La security conference, Wei defended his country’s controversial construction and militarization in the 3.5-million-square-kilometer sea, stating: “It is the legitimate right of a sovereign state to carry out construction on its own territory. China built limited defense facilities on the islands and reefs for self-defense.”

But as ruled by the UNCLOS tribunal, China’s “nine-dash line” claim is invalid according to international law. And as that infamous line was declared illegal by the international tribunal, many, if not most, of China’s contentious actions within it, including its land reclamation and military buildup, are also illegal.

It’s worth noting that the Chinese defense minister mentioned “international law” only once in his SLD speech, when he referred to the United States’ 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, asking: “Is it of Taiwan or the US? Is it a Chinese law or an international law?” That means, he didn’t mention international law when he talked about the South China Sea issue.

Other South China Sea claimants, including Vietnam, and many other nations, such as the US, Japan, India, Australia and Singapore, or outsiders, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, have long called for disputing states to clarify their maritime claims according to international law

Other South China Sea claimants, including Vietnam, and many other nations, such as the US, Japan, India, Australia and Singapore, or outsiders, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, have long called for disputing states to clarify their maritime claims according to international law.

In his remarks at the Group of Seven summit in Canada in 2017, Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, urged the G7 states (France, Germany, Italy, the UK, the US, Canada and Japan) to “demonstrate unity regarding the ongoing land reclamation and militarization in the South China Sea, as international law must apply to all countries, big and small, on land and at sea.”

China has still strongly objected to an international-law-based approach to the maritime dispute because adopting such an approach would mean it has to abandon its “nine-dash line” claim.

In his address, Wei Fenghe claimed that before the Shangri-La Dialogue, he visited Vietnam and “reached broad consensus” with his Vietnamese counterpart, General Ngo Xuan Lich, “on maintaining the stability in the South China Sea.”

Speaking shortly after the Chinese defense chief on Sunday, while stressing that “maintaining peace and cooperation is in common interest of the two nations and in fact the whole region”, Lich revealed that he and Wei “met to agree that Vietnam and China have differences in the East Sea [Vietnam’s name for the South China Sea] issues.”

In his remarks, Vietnam’s top military officer likewise stressed that the region and the world at large are “faced with security challenges and complexities” and listed “causes to such a situation.” These include “the mismatch between words and deeds, the behavior of power politics [and] the mentality of ‘might is right’.” Although Lich didn’t mention China or any country, China’s claims and actions in the South China Sea were probably, if not certainly, in his mind when he prepared and made such remarks.

In a keynote speech at the Singapore Lecture in 2016, Tran Dai Quang, then Vietnam’s president, said “the world is faced also with many grave difficulties and challenges,” including territorial and maritime disputes, and warned: “The seriousness of these challenges is extremely worrying as long as the ‘might makes right’ mindset and the resort to the use of force still exist.”

Again, though Quang did not mention China or any other country by name, his remarks were aimed at Beijing’s aggressive activities in the South China Sea and its might-makes-right approach to the maritime disputes in particular.

Speaking at the opening ceremony of this year’s SLD, Lee Hsien Loong spoke quite diplomatically, if not positively, about China, leading Beijing to voice its appreciation of the Singaporean prime minister publicly.

Still, in his remarks, Lee gave Beijing a lot of advice on how to deal with some of its major national, regional and international matters. For example, with regard to the China Sea disputes, he rightly and frankly opined: “China should resolve these disputes peacefully, in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS. It should do so through diplomacy and compromise rather than force or the threat of force, while giving weight to the core interests and rights of other countries.

“Then over time it will build its reputation as a responsible and benevolent power that need not be feared. Instead China will be respected as a power that can be relied on to support a stable and peaceful region,” the Singaporean leader added.

By giving such advice implicitly, yet pointedly, Lee implied that at the moment, China doesn’t want to settle the maritime disputes peacefully, in accordance with international law, nor is it seen as “a responsible and benevolent power” in the region.

Indeed, when it comes to the South China Sea, China’s nice words are fundamentally at odds with its aggressive deeds.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now. 

Join the Conversation

1094 Comments

  1. hello!,I really like your writing so so much! proportion we communicate more approximately your post on AOL? I need a specialist in this area to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking ahead to look you.

  2. I have been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this web site. Studying this info So i’m happy to show that I have an incredibly just right uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed. I most indubitably will make sure to do not fail to remember this site and provides it a look on a relentless basis.

  3. An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  4. Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

  5. That is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You understand so much its nearly arduous to argue with you (not that I really would want…HaHa). You positively put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!

  6. I’m impressed, I have to say. Actually rarely do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you could have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the problem is one thing that not enough individuals are talking intelligently about. I’m very comfortable that I stumbled across this in my search for one thing regarding this.

  7. Thanks a lot for giving everyone an extremely memorable chance to check tips from this blog. It’s always very kind and also packed with a great time for me personally and my office colleagues to search your website at the very least 3 times in one week to learn the new issues you have. And definitely, I’m so actually impressed with your great knowledge you give. Certain two tips in this posting are easily the most impressive we’ve had.

  8. With everything that seems to be developing throughout this area, many of your perspectives are quite refreshing. However, I am sorry, but I can not subscribe to your whole theory, all be it exciting none the less. It looks to everybody that your commentary are not completely justified and in actuality you are generally yourself not entirely certain of your argument. In any event I did enjoy reading through it.

  9. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?

  10. Hi, just required you to know I he added your site to my Google bookmarks due to your layout. But seriously, I believe your internet site has 1 in the freshest theme I??ve came across. It extremely helps make reading your blog significantly easier.

  11. Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

  12. I believe that is among the such a lot significant info for me. And i’m happy studying your article. But wanna commentary on few general issues, The site taste is wonderful, the articles is in point of fact great : D. Just right process, cheers

  13. Hi , I do believe this is an excellent blog. I stumbled upon it on Yahoo , i will come back once again. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and help other people.

  14. An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  15. Hey very cool website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds also…I’m happy to find a lot of useful information here in the post, we need develop more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  16. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. It’s important to cover these trends.

  17. Hiya very nice site!! Man .. Excellent .. Superb .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionally?KI am satisfied to search out numerous helpful info here in the put up, we’d like work out extra strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  18. hello!,I like your writing so much! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I require a specialist on this area to solve my problem. May be that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  19. I keep listening to the newscast speak about receiving free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the top site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i get some?

  20. Today, I went to the beach with my kids. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is entirely off topic but I had to tell someone!

  21. Hey! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!

  22. Admiring the time and energy you put into your website and in depth information you offer. It’s great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same unwanted rehashed information. Great read! I’ve saved your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  23. Good write-up, I am regular visitor of one’s blog, maintain up the nice operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *