Photo: AFP

As the United States and China get ready for another round of trade talks, a group of US foreign policy experts gave a reminder that the two countries’ differences are not limited to trade.

Earlier this week, a cadre led by Trump administration allies and advisors launched the Committee on the Present Danger: China, calling for a hardline foreign policy to challenge the “existential threat” posed by China under the “misrule” of its current government.

Borrowing the name of a Cold War-era institution, which was established and disbanded twice before the fall of the Soviet Union, speakers during the launch ceremony warned that – even if a trade deal is reached with China – the US is “still facing a world of hurt at their hands.”

The less-than-subtle allusion to the competition between the post-World War II spheres of influence reflects an emerging consensus in Washington that China’s rapidly growing economic clout, and comparatively less significant military expansion, somehow resembles the path of the Soviet Union.

“Four decades ago, another such committee helped Ronald Reagan defeat the previous totalitarian Communist government that sought our destruction: the Soviet Union. Ours launches today [one that is] determined to help President Trump do the same with respect to the present, Chinese danger of our time,” a statement released on the committee’s website read.

The tone of the speakers at the event on Monday reinforced a narrative coming from Beijing that Washington is being overrun by a “Cold War mentality.”

Frank Gaffney, vice-chairman of the new committee and head of the Center for Security Policy, suggested that US disagreements with China “ultimately emanate from the character of the communist regime, mainly that it is ruled, brutally, in a totalitarian fashion, by the Chinese Communist Party.”

Some say this type of rhetoric plays into the hands of the Chinese government, which has made efforts to paint US policy as stuck in the past. China’s Defense Ministry decried the Pentagon’s “Cold War mentality” as recently as last week, responding to testimony during a Senate hearing.

“We demand that the US side abandon the Cold War mentality, objectively and rationally view China’s national defense and military building, stop making false remarks, and take concrete actions to promote the healthy and stable development of relations between the two countries and the two militaries,” Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson Wu Qian said, as reported by Xinhua News Agency.

But despite signals from the Washington establishment, including as found in a new National Defense Strategy unveiled last year, which for the first time identified China as a “strategic competitor,” many are wary of comparing the current great power dynamics with those of the last century.

Elsa Kania, a specialist in China’s military modernization and senior fellow at the Center for New American Security, argued in a paper last year that Washington should “abandon Cold War prescriptions for containing China.”

“At best, such an approach would play directly into the hands of China’s propaganda machine. Instead, the United States must recognize that China’s ambition for what it describes as ‘national rejuvenation’ constitutes a challenge that eclipses the Cold War in both complexity and consequence,” Kania wrote.

“Were the United States to revert to a ‘Cold War mentality,’ concentrating primarily on countering and containing China’s economic resurgence and expanding influence, it might only accelerate the emergence of a more Sino-centric world order.”

To the extent that voices such as those heard from the new committee launched this week already predominate in Washington, it appears too late to avoid such an outcome.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now. 

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish.

    nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience
    over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly a
    lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  2. Howdy! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website?

    I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options
    for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me
    in the direction of a good platform.

  3. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and
    sources back to your blog? My blog site is in the exact same
    niche as yours and my users would really benefit from a lot of the information you present
    here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Many thanks!

  4. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. That is a really smartly written article.
    I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to learn extra of
    your helpful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  5. Undeniably consider that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest
    factor to understand of. I say to you, I certainly get irked even as folks consider concerns that they plainly do not recognise about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing with
    no need side effect , folks can take a signal. Will probably be back to
    get more. Thank you

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *