A member of the Women's Protection Units, part of the of the Syrian Democratic Forces, in the town of Shadadi on September 11, 2018. The US-backed SDF was fighting ISIS at the time. Photo: AFP / Delil Souleiman

The Turkish-Syrian border is getting back to normal. That, at least, is the message that Ankara is hoping to send. Last week, it reopened one gate on its southeastern border after eight years and promised to open a second one soon toward Afrin, the region from which it drove Syrian Kurdish militants just last year.

Yet what will happen at the border when the US withdraws its troops remains a deeply contentious issue. Talks between Turkey and the US over this buffer zone don’t appear to have reached any concrete conclusions – with Ankara vowing again last weekend to enforce a safe zone itself if the talks break down.

Broadly, there are three possible ways a buffer zone could be patrolled: jointly by US and Turkish troops; unilaterally by Turkish troops; or by Syrian troops if control of the zone passes back to the government.

But in a final throw of the dice, Syria’s Kurds have sought to promote a fourth option: getting European Union countries to fill the security gap after the US withdraws.

For weeks, Kurdish leaders have toured European capitals pushing this plan, which would see EU countries make up the bulk of an international monitoring force. This month, the US offered EU countries a March 8 deadline for signing up to the plan. That deadline has come and gone with not a single response from European nations.

It is certainly clear that EU countries would like to assist the Kurds as payback for their support in the war against ISIS, and so that the Kurds don’t retreat back into an alliance with the Syrian regime. But what the EU can do and what the Syrian Kurds want the EU to do are poles apart. Even if Europe wanted to, it cannot help the Kurds in the way they would like.

For weeks now, there has been frantic diplomacy among the many groups scrambling to impose their vision of what comes after the US withdrawal. This diplomacy has been a mixture of promises and threats

For weeks now, there has been frantic diplomacy among the many groups scrambling to impose their vision of what comes after the US withdrawal. This diplomacy has been a mixture of promises and threats.

When Ilham Ahmed, co-chairwoman of the Syrian Democratic Council, the political arm of the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces, toured Washington, London and Paris in early February to try to persuade politicians to support the Kurds, she also carried a threat: Help us or we will return to the regime.

The Syrian government, too, reached out with a threat, with President Bashar al-Assad warning the Kurds last month that “no one will defend you except the Syrian Arab Army.” Even Turkey has reached out to Syrian Kurds in a limited way, seeking to draw a distinction between the political leadership and the Syrian Kurds living in the border region. All are trying to persuade the Kurds to fall in line behind their vision of a buffer zone.

The option the Syrian Kurds favor is an international force where, instead of US troops, European soldiers would form the bulk of the monitoring force – one report suggested around 1,500 Europeans with a smaller contingent of 200 Americans.

The dilemma for the European Union countries is stark. The US and the Kurds are, in effect, asking them to take ownership of the border conflict, and put hundreds or thousands of their troops in harm’s way. But for what purpose has not yet been spelled out.

Would it be to create a buffer zone between Turkey and the Kurds, or to protect the Kurds from the Assad regime? Would it be to stop ISIS returning or a broader goal of halting Iran’s influence?

From the European point of view, a multinational force made up predominantly of European troops looks an awful lot like an open-ended commitment to support Washington’s policy goals. Some in the EU have already ruled that out: British Foreign Minister Jeremy Hunt has said explicitly that “there is no prospect of British troops going in to replace the Americans.”

Moreover, putting EU member states’ troops on the border would mean putting them directly in the crosshairs of NATO ally Turkey. It is one thing for EU nations to support the Syrian Kurds in the context of a war against ISIS; but it is quite another to support what is, in legal terms, a breakaway part of Syrian territory – and one governed by a group against which Amnesty International has raised credible allegations of forced displacement and mass destruction.

Nor, in any case, would having such an international force guarantee no conflict on the border. Turkey has twice demonstrated its capacity to conduct limited incursions to push out Kurdish militants. There is no reason to suppose it would not seek to do something similar again.

The idea that European troops would be an umbrella shielding Syrian Kurds from both Turkey and the Syrian regime, and in essence allowing them to continue building a proto-state, is fanciful. Neither the Turks, nor the Syrian regime, nor indeed the Europeans, want that. Trapped between Ankara and Damascus, Syria’s Kurds, in a final throw of the dice, are hoping that European countries will offer them a way out.

But from European capitals, it is not at all clear that they would be able to help the Kurds in such a way – even if they wanted to.

This article was provided to Asia Times by Syndication Bureau, which holds copyright.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now. 

Join the Conversation

21 Comments

  1. Have you ever thought about creating an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog based upon on the same subjects you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my audience would appreciate your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

  2. Someone necessarily lend a hand to make critically articles I’d state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and to this point? I surprised with the analysis you made to create this actual submit extraordinary. Fantastic task!

  3. Hello there, I do think your site could be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however,
    if opening in I.E., it has some overlapping issues.
    I merely wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
    Apart from that, great website!

  4. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over
    that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably
    come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

  5. My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of
    your post’s to be just what I’m looking for.
    can you offer guest writers to write content for you?
    I wouldn’t mind creating a post or elaborating on a few of the subjects you write related to here.
    Again, awesome blog!

  6. Great weblog here! Additionally your web site quite a bit up fast!
    What host are you using? Can I am getting your affiliate link
    in your host? I desire my site loaded up as fast as yours
    lol

  7. When I initially commented I seem to have clicked
    on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and
    from now on each time a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the same comment.
    Perhaps there is a means you can remove me
    from that service? Appreciate it!

  8. Great – I should certainly say I’m impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related info. The site ended up being truly simple to access. Good job.

  9. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.

  10. I was curious if you ever thought of changing the layout of your
    website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with
    it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  11. Hi would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using?
    I’m looking to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S Sorry for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  12. I do not know whether it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing problems with your blog. It appears like some of the written text in your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This might be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Kudos

  13. I have been surfing online more than 3 hours today, but I never discovered any interesting article like yours. It is beautiful price sufficient for me. Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the web can be much more helpful than ever before.

  14. Спрашивайте так, чтобы повопросу было ясно, что вы неплохо ориентируетесь в районе, но именно эта деталь вамнеизвестна Этот путь весьма долог, но неизбежно ведет к искомому результату

  15. Hey very cool blog!! Man .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also…I am happy to find numerous useful info here in the post, we need work out more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *