In the early hours of Tuesday, 12 Mirage 2000 fighter jets from the Indian Air Force (IAF) crossed into Pakistan and bombed a target in Balakot, a sleepy town nestled in the hills of eastern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
It was the first time since the 1971 war between the two nuclear-armed South Asian neighbors that air power has been used to hit targets. The jets took off from the Gwalior and Ambala air force bases before 3:30 am and crossed into Pakistani air space in minutes, top Indian defense officials said. The operation lasted till 3:54 am as Pakistani F-16s scrambled after the Indian jets fired its precision guided munitions at the pre-determined targets. A number of SU-30 combat jets from Bareilly and Halwara air force bases also took off to defend any retaliatory action from Pakistan, supported by two airborne early warning aircraft.
The incident comes in the wake of a terror attack in Pulwama in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 40 Indian policemen. New Delhi accused Islamabad of harboring the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), the militant group that claimed responsibility for the attack.
India’s Foreign Secretary, Vijay Gokhale, called the attack an “intelligence-based pre-emptive strike against non-military” targets in a prepared statement that was read out later in the day. Earlier, Major General Arif Ghafor, the official spokesperson of the Pakistani military, tweeted that Indian combat jets intruded into Pakistani air space early on Tuesday and reportedly dropped what was described as a “payload” in Balakot.

Initially, there was confusion about Balakot, since there is a similar sounding place near the Line of Control (LoC). Later on Ghafoor tweeted that the IAF planes made a hasty escape after being challenged by F-16s from the Pakistan Air Force.
While Ghafoor maintained that Indian jets entered “3-4 miles” inside Pakistani territory via Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, his claim that the aircraft’s payload was found near Balakot has raised question marks.
Dispute over target
Balakot, located roughly 40 kilometers, or 25 miles, from Muzaffarabad, is part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province. Pakistani security analysts note that the admission that the jets targeted KP would imply that India launched an attack inside Pakistan.
However, the same analysts also say Balakot’s location along KP’s border with Pakistan-administered Kashmir means that it is also likely that Islamabad will not claim that Indian forces targeted Pakistani territory.

However, local Villagers also confirmed they heard explosions in the morning. Witnesses from Jaba and Garhi Habibullah, towns near Balakot in KP, told local police they heard “blasts” and aircraft about 4 am local time. Multiple sources in the Indian security establishment also confirmed the target was Balakot in KP province.
“For years we had been building a major picture of the terrorist camps active in Pakistan. Balakot emerged as an important JeM camp,” a senior Indian security official told Asia Times. “We had credible reports that the JeM founder, Maulana Masood Azhar, and his brother Ibrahim Athar used to frequent the camp regularly to address cadres.”
Masood Azhar was in an Indian prison before being released in exchange for Indian hostages on board a hijacked Indian Airlines flight in December 1999.
His elder brother Ibrahim was the lead hijacker and was known as “Burger.” Azhar also had two brothers-in-law, Maulana Kamran Rasheed and Yusuf Azhar. While Kamran’s son Talha Rasheed was killed by Indian security forces along with Ibrahim’s son Usman last year, it is believed that Yusuf, also known as Ustad Ghauri, used to run the Balakot camp. However, Indian government sources said it was likely he survived the air strikes as the Azhar families had been moved out soon after the Pulwama suicide attack.
Indian foreign secretary Gokhale also said there was “credible intelligence” that more suicide attacks like the one in Pulwama were being planned. He said this “pre-emptive” strike was carried out to prevent further attacks in “self-defense”.
For the Pakistanis, embarrassed after US Navy SEALs carried out a raid to kill Osama Bin Laden, the violation of its air space was a sensitive issue. That led to the later denials that the target was Balakot in KP province.
However, both Pakistani and Indian sources have declined to confirm reports on the number of casualties, if any. While some media reports claimed 300 were killed, officials on both sides said no such figures were available.
“No camps have such a high number of cadres at any point,” a senior Indian security official said. “There could be a nearby madrassa, but it was empty at 3 am. So the casualty figures are imaginary,” the official said.
A new threshold
However, analysts on both sides agreed that a new threshold had been established. Anand Arni, who retired as a special secretary to the government of India and was a career intelligence professional specializing in Pakistan, said the “threshold has definitely been raised. Pakistan has to be careful on how it launches the next attack,” he said.

Air Commodore Kaiser Tufail, a former F-16 fighter pilot with the Pakistan Air Force and a scholar, remained skeptical of Indian claims.
“I do not see any reason for the IAF to send the so-called ‘heavy package of 12 Mirage 2000s to carry out the attack. I think this is just to spice up the ‘surgical strike’ story. Bala Kote [and not another town called Balakot which is well inside Pakistan] is just a couple of km from the LoC, so I see no reason why a stand-off attack could not be carried out,” he said.
“Why risk the shooting down of manned fighters? So to me, it was a stand-off attack. I do not believe that there is or was any training camp of Jaish or LeT or any other group,” he added.
However, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan called a meeting of the cabinet and called the Indian action an “uncalled aggression.” A decision was also taken to ferry journalists to the area of the attack, to ascertain the facts about India’s claims.
“The claimed area of strike is open for the world to see the facts on the ground. For this, domestic and international media is being taken to the impact site,” a statement from the Pakistan government said. “(The) Forum concluded that India has committed uncalled for aggression to which Pakistan shall respond at the time and place of its choosing.”
Pakistan will also raise the issue with the Organization of Islamic Countries, United Nations and friends and prepare for any kind of aggression. It also briefed foreign diplomats from key countries. Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said India was causing harm to regional stability, while vowing that Pakistan would continue to act “responsibly.”
“India is damaging regional peace, while Pakistan is being a responsible state. Pakistan desires peace but it has a right to defend itself and appropriately respond to Indian misadventures,” he said. A meeting of the National Command Authority of Pakistan, which also overlooks its nuclear weapons arsenal, will take further decisions and analysts believe it could plan a retaliatory strike against India in the coming weeks.
viagra from india п»їcialis cheap viagra generic
generic viagra walmart is cialis generic available cialis cheap overnight
levitra super active cheap us cialis without a doctor’s prescription viagra men sale
buy cialis with money order http://tadmedz.com viagra no prescription
buy viagra vietnam cialis maximum dosage buy cialis levitra
cialis pills india viagra or cialis viagra sale ebay
cheapest viagra soft tabs cialis erection penis discount cialis in canada
cialis for sale in the us cialis vidalista can i buy viagra in japan
buy cialis in costa rica http://tadmedz.com viagra for sale birmingham
where can i order cialis cialis professional cheap viagra men
buy cialis bangkok is cialis generic available how much does viagra cost
levitra professional cheapest generic cialis buy viagra bangkok
should buy cialis online side effects for cialis viagra canada
buy cheap generic cialis online average price cialis generic cialis discount
cialis discount australia http://tadmedz.com female pink viagra 100 mg pills
where can i buy viagra over the counter cialis coupon viagra sale asda
cheap-levitra.com daily use cialis cost viagra buy 24
buy cheap viagra uk online switching from tamsulosin to cialis cvs viagra
can u take 2 cialis pills generic cialis available cheap viagra china
buy viagra philippines http://tadmedz.com cheap viagra 50 mg
cialis price costco cialis online can you buy levitra over the counter
cheap cialis uk generic tadalafil vs cialis buy viagra legit
cialis a prix discount cialis going generic in 2019 in us cheapest place buy cialis
buying levitra online cialis before and after cialis wholesale prices
I think this is among the so much vital info for me. And i’m happy reading your article. But wanna remark on few common issues, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D. Just right job, cheers
viagra buy uk no prescription how long does 20mg cialis keep in system cialis best buy
how to buy levitra no prescription warnings for cialis best place to buy levitra
buy viagra and cialis online http://tadmedz.com cialis pills what are for
buy viagra melbourne online cialis viagra sale glasgow
buy viagra online new york liquid cialis cialis price
how to buy viagra cheap cialis vidalista otc cialis
buy cialis canada pharmacy cialis for peyronie cialis buy paypal
cialis over the counter 2019 http://tadmedz.com viagra women sale uk
how to order cialis how long does 20mg cialis keep in system how to take cialis pills
buy cialis au canadien cialis cialis for sale canada
cheap viagra 150 mg daily use of cialis how to buy cialis in toronto
where to buy viagra online walgreens price for cialis 20mg cheap cialis without rx
cialis pills online http://tadmedz.com cuanto sale pastilla cialis
cialis cheap usa expired cialis 3 years cialis for sale online in canada