Turkey, and its President Recep Erdogan, are engaged in a multifaceted push to assert influence over Turkic peoples in Central Asia and beyond. File photo: AFP

Samuel Huntington still casts a long shadow over modern Turkey. And that is unfortunate. The late Harvard professor once characterized the country as “torn” between East and West. And so according to the Huntington binary worldview of civilizational confrontation, the current Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is a dangerous Islamist determined to overhaul the secularist legacy of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founding father of Westernized Turkey. Thus many today see Turkey’s increasing divergence from the West to be a result of Turkey’s Islamic revivalism.

The problem is that nothing is truly binary or black and white. To be sure, Islam plays a role in Erdogan’s politics, but the real driver of his strategic vision is nationalism, an ideology that in fact appeals to all Turks – secularists, conservatives, progressives and Islamists alike. The flaw with Huntington and other such determinists has always been their overstatement of religion and culture at the expense of nationalism. Today, the East-West and secular-Islamist clichés no longer capture the complexity of Turkish domestic and foreign policy.

In fact, a more accurate way of understanding contemporary Turkey would be to recognize the similarities between the populist strongman of Turkey and France’s Charles de Gaulle, whose anti-Americanism and nationalism drove France into, among other things, leaving the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s integrated military command structure in 1966. France returned to NATO as a full member only in 2009, but still maintains its independent nuclear deterrent, achieved under de Gaulle’s pursuit of full independence from Washington.

The similarities between Erdogan and de Gaulle extend to domestic politics as well. It was under the guidance and pressure of de Gaulle that France transitioned, as Turkey did under Erdogan, to a strong presidential system.

No comparison is perfect, of course. France is a country with much deeper democratic traditions than Turkey, and Erdogan is no de Gaulle when it comes to their respective intellectual and political backgrounds. Yet Erdogan’s vision for Turkey, similar to de Gaulle’s for France, is motivated by a “certain idea of Turkey,” to restate the Gaullist dictum, based on independence, sovereignty and imperial grandeur. Erdogan may be a much more autocratic version of the French leader, but he shares with him an ability to monopolize the national will.

While France managed to balance the dangerous aspects of Gaullism with institutional checks and balances, Erdogan’s Turkey is free of such obstacles to the tyranny of populism. This is why, today, the real threat to Turkey’s Western and democratic orientation is no longer Islamization, but a broad-based Turkish nationalism and its frustration with liberalism and pluralism.

While France managed to balance the dangerous aspects of Gaullism with institutional checks and balances, Erdogan’s Turkey is free of such obstacles to the tyranny of populism

And this has become much more alarming lately. For it has allowed, after the failed coup in 2016, for an ultra-nationalist realignment in politics that threatens to pull Turkey toward proto-fascism. In essence, what has emerged is a marriage between Erdogan, the ultra-nationalist MHP (or Nationalist Movement Party) and the Turkish military (or what’s left of it, since more than a third of its flag officers have been discharged or detained since 2016).

In foreign policy, the supposed political opposites – Islamist neo-Ottomanism and secular Kemalism – actually share a Gaullist vision of the country striving for full sovereignty and independence from the United States and Europe. Both factions, moreover, are angry with Western support for the Kurds and supposedly for Fethullah Gulen, the Turkish cleric Washington refuses to extradite despite the Turkish accusation that he orchestrated the failed coup.

Admittedly, there are differences between the Kemalists and neo-Ottomans. And their divergence is clearly more pronounced in domestic politics. But even there they have more in common than one might suppose. Both camps are virulently anti-Kurdish, for example. And despite significant differences between the “secularist nationalism” of the Kemalists and the “religious nationalism” of the neo-Ottomans, both are strong proponents of nationalistic interests grounded in nostalgia for Turkish pre-eminence and independence from the West.

The neo-Ottomans and Kemalists, especially of the “Eurasianist” wing (who are well represented among military officers now progressing up the army echelons), are advocates of regional strategic alliances that boost Turkish leverage against Western partners in the trans-Atlantic alliance. Both neo-Ottomans and Kemalists share a state-centric view of the world that places Turkey at its very core.

Turkey’s military offensive in northern Syria, its growing anti-Americanism, its rapprochement with Russia and Iran, its frustration with the EU, and its war against the PKK Kurdish militant group are all factors that contribute to the growth of Turkish Gaullism. If current trends continue, what will emerge is not an Islamist polity but a Turkey with a strategic orientation that is much more defiant, independent, self-confident and self-centered – in short, a Turkish variant of Gaullism.

As in the case of de Gaulle’s anti-American and anti-NATO policies in the 1960s, this Gaullist Turkey already is questioning Ankara’s membership within the Atlanticist military structure and the logic of waiting for an elusive membership in the European Union. In search of full independence, full sovereignty, strategic leverage and, most important, “Turkish glory and grandeur,” a Gaullist Turkey may opt for its own force de frappe – a nuclear deterrent – and its own realpolitik engagement with countries such as China, India and Russia.

The West, obsessed with Huntington’s clash of civilizations, ignores this Gaullist trend in Turkey at its own peril. But just as importantly, the rest of the Middle East – given their even greater proximity to Turkey – should also want to consider what the strategic implications are for themselves.

This article was provided to Asia Times by Syndication Bureau, which holds copyright.


Asia Times has relaunched on www.asiatimes.com. Download our brand new native App for a sweeping selection of geopolitical and business news from across Asia.

Join the Conversation


  1. Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is wonderful, as well as the content!

  2. I’ve been browsing on-line greater than three hours nowadays, yet I by no means found any fascinating article like yours. It is lovely value sufficient for me. Personally, if all website owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the net shall be a lot more useful than ever before.

  3. Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to mention that I have truly enjoyed browsing your weblog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing on your feed and I’m hoping you write again soon!

  4. I think other web site proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and wonderful user friendly style and design, let alone the content. You are an expert in this topic!

  5. Hi would you mind letting me know which web host you’re utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good internet hosting provider at a honest price? Thanks, I appreciate it!

  6. After looking over a number of the blog posts on your web site, I
    honestly like your technique of blogging. I saved it to my bookmark
    site list and will be checking back soon. Please visit my website
    too and tell me how you feel.

  7. The subsequent time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I know it was my option to read, however I truly thought youd have one thing attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you could repair if you happen to werent too busy in search of attention.

  8. I just couldn’t go away your website before suggesting that I actually loved the standard information a person supply
    in your visitors? Is gonna be again steadily in order
    to inspect new posts

  9. Attractive component of content. I simply
    stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to claim that I get in fact enjoyed account your weblog posts.
    Any way I will be subscribing in your feeds and even I success you get right of entry to constantly rapidly.

  10. Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an very long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyways, just wanted to say great blog!

  11. I’m really enjoying the design and layout
    of your website. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?
    Exceptional work!

  12. I feel that is one of the most vital info for me. And i’m satisfied reading your article. However should statement on some common issues, The website taste is perfect, the articles is in point of fact great : D. Excellent process, cheers

Leave a comment