Chinese Vice President Wang Qishan attends a special address during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting, on January 23, 2019 in Davos, eastern Switzerland. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP)

After the billionaires jetted home from their annual convocation at Davos last week, there lingered in the thin air of the Swiss ski resort the usual sense that an event of great significance had taken place. Once again, the gods of capitalism (newly rebranded as Globalization 4.0, or the Fourth Industrial Revolution) had deigned to gather at their chosen Olympus to scatter pearls of wisdom.

Speakers offered solutions to pressing social issues from climate change to food shortages, although more often than not these boiled down to an old favorite: Leave it to the market (which is, of course, what one would expect a billionaire dependent upon a loosely regulated market to say). At Davos we were reassured that Globalization 4.0 will save the world.

Davos is the annual jamboree of the World Economic Forum, a self-appointed oracle of all things that describes itself as “a partner in shaping history.” It isn’t entirely clear how an organization set up in 1971 as the humble European Management Forum gained the credibility that the WEF, into which it morphed in 1987, possesses today.

Rubbing shoulders with the rich and famous, world leaders jostle for a place at the Davos table, and who can blame them? This is where the money is, and where those who control the investment decisions that can make or break national economies, can all be found under one roof. So it came as little surprise that last week Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s controversial new right-wing president, chose Davos as the destination for his first overseas trip as national leader.

Such is the global heft of the WEF, and the myriad opportunities it represents for so many actors, that it appears immune to the obvious contradictions that swirl around it

Such is the global heft of the WEF, and the myriad opportunities it represents for so many actors, that it appears immune to the obvious contradictions that swirl around it. This year, even as David Attenborough took to the Davos stage to urge the powerful to act to reverse climate change before it was too late, record numbers of private jets were refueling nearby.

Then there was the sanctification by many speakers of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, a term coined by WEF founder Klaus Schwab in 2015 and a nebulous concept that bundles together a raft of disruptive technologies, from AI and robotics to nanotechnology and biotechnology.

As Justin Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada, noted at Davos, this revolution will not be successful “unless it creates real opportunities for the billions who weren’t able to join us here this week,” but there seems to be no reason for confidence that it will.

That is not to say that driverless cars or miniaturized diagnostic cameras that can crawl in and out of patients aren’t good things. But their raison d’être is not to be good; it is to make money.

Similarly, being good is not the primary motivation of the billionaires who flock to Davos in their Gulfstream and Global Express jets. Their main purpose is to maintain and build their wealth, for the benefit of themselves, their families and those who will inherit that wealth.

True, many of the super-rich give away much money to charity, but even this seemingly unimpeachable act is not all it seems. In addition to being hugely tax-efficient, distributing largesse is much cheaper than actually paying tax, so the unanswered question is this: Is the good that results from money “given away” outweighed by the harm caused to society by the loss of withheld taxes?

Judging by Oxfam’s latest report, presented at Davos, the answer is yes. “Public Good or Private Wealth?” is full of damning evidence that, far from trickling down, wealth is retained by a tiny minority and maintained by the exploitation of the many. Last year, says Oxfam, the world’s richest 26 people owned more money than the world’s 3.8 billion poorest.

The answer, says the charity, is simple: fairer taxation. Around the world, the super-rich are paying lower rates of tax than they have in decades. If the richest 1% paid just 0.5% more tax, it would be enough to educate all 262 million children who currently receive no education and fund health care that would save the lives of 3.3 million people.

At Davos, the rich and the powerful have, once again, preached to the world on every topic under the sun. One question they failed to address was this: Exactly what, beyond their wealth and privilege, qualifies them to do so?

Étienne Davignon, former chairman of the Bilderberg Group, the WEF’s older, more-opaque counterpart, once dismissed the conspiracy theory that his organization was a shadowy world government with a joke. “If we were a secret government,” he said, “we should be ashamed of ourselves.”

His meaning was that, given the state of the world, they weren’t making a great job of running it. But that verdict rather depends on perspective – certainly, seen from a private jet above Davos, the world must look to be in terrific shape.

Perhaps the World Economic Forum truly is, as it proudly boasts, “committed to improving the state of the world.” But one does not have to be a conspiracy theorist to ask, for whom, exactly?

This article was provided to Asia Times by Syndication Bureau, which holds copyright.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now. 

Jonathan Gornall

Jonathan Gornall is a British journalist, formerly with The Times, who has lived and worked in the Middle East and is now based in the UK. He specializes in health, a subject on which he writes for the British Medical Journal and others.

Join the Conversation

18 Comments

  1. Hi there I am so glad I found your blog page, I really found you by accident, while I was searching on Yahoo for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say kudos for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the minute but I have saved it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the great work.

  2. Great – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, site theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Excellent task..

  3. Howdy! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could locate a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one? Thanks a lot!

  4. I think that what you published was very logical.
    However, what about this? what if you wrote a catchier title?
    I am not suggesting your content isn’t solid, however what
    if you added a post title that grabbed people’s attention? I
    mean What has Davos achieved this (or any other)
    year? – Asia Times is a little plain. You ought to glance
    at Yahoo’s home page and see how they create news titles to grab viewers to click.
    You might add a video or a picture or two to grab
    people excited about everything’ve written. In my opinion, it could bring your posts a
    little livelier.

  5. I have to convey my affection for your kind-heartedness in support of men and women who need assistance with your issue. Your real commitment to passing the message all over came to be surprisingly invaluable and have in every case encouraged those like me to attain their desired goals. Your amazing warm and helpful guidelines means this much to me and especially to my colleagues. Regards; from each one of us.

  6. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get setup?
    I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain. Any recommendations or
    advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

  7. I simply couldn’t leave your site prior to suggesting that I really loved the standard information an individual supply for your visitors?

    Is gonna be back continuously in order to check out new
    posts

  8. Hi it’s me, I am also visiting this web page on a regular basis, this website is actually fastidious and the users are truly sharing good thoughts.

  9. Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after going through many of the posts
    I realized it’s new to me. Regardless, I’m certainly delighted I found
    it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back often!

  10. Does your website have a contact page? I’m having problems locating
    it but, I’d like to shoot you an e-mail. I’ve got some ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
    Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it improve over time.

  11. Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem with your web site in internet explorer, would check this… IE still is the market leader and a big portion of people will miss your wonderful writing because of this problem.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *