President Xi Jinping faces a strategic dilemma amid mounting domestic concerns that his state-centric agenda is setting China on a collision course with the United States.
Concerns are surfacing that this will ultimately hurt the world second-largest economy’s already fledging growth.
In an unusual move, vocal pro-market voices are challenging Xi’s strategy as the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, celebrates the 40th anniversary of the opening up of the country.
This faction is calling for renewed reform impetus, which was inspired by Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping.
Xi admission
Yet in a rare admission, Xi acknowledged divisions within his own staff during “small talk” with Trump over dinner at the Group of 20 summit in Buenos Aires on December 1, when the two leaders agreed on a fragile trade truce.
When Trump joked about the fact that his team was made of “different people with different views,” Xi smiled and replied “Yeah, I have the same thing across my table,” according to Steven Mnuchin, the US Treasury Secretary, who attended the meeting.
This anecdote shows that differences have erupted even at the helm of the regime over how to manage ongoing trade talks and the economy.
“The trade war instills anxiety. Since summer, there is a realization that China faces a major risk,” Yuan Ding, the dean of the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS), in Shanghai said.
Washington’s decision to slap tariffs on Chinese exports worth more than US$200 billion in September sent a shockwave through Beijing.
It also reignited an old divide within the CCP, pitting pro-market reformers and supporters against those favoring a more socialist approach in line with Xi’s agenda.
Politburo debate
“There is no easy way out. The answer does not lie in the negotiation with the Americans, but within the Politburo. One key issue needs to be addressed: the role of the state within the economy,” Ding said in an unusually frank comment from the head of one of the major business schools in China.
The postponement of a key CCP meeting where the country’s economic strategy is to be discussed is seen as another indication of internal divisions. The plenum was expected to take place in November in Beijing, but no date has been yet announced.
The discussion comes at a symbolic time.
Forty years ago, a similar meeting was held, known as “Reform and Openness,” on December 18, 1978 under the leadership of the pragmatic Deng in a decisive departure from Mao’s orthodox socialist policies.
Four decades later, China has emerged as an economic powerhouse as it closes the gap with the US. But the old divide within the CCP is back on the table as Xi Jinping reaffirms the leading role of the Party over the economy and society.
“He believes in centralization, not diversity. He is coming back to the Soviet model,” David Shambaugh, a professor at George Washington University, said.
‘Self-reliance’
Escalating trade tensions with Washington bring a new twist to this old debate, adding a sense of urgency amid fears that the trade war will hurt GDP growth, which already at its lowest point in a decade.
In response to Trump’s tariff, Xi has called for manufacturing “self-reliance” during a tour in North China’s Heilongjiang province in September. The use of this Mao era slogan, as well as his repeated praises of the central role state-owned enterprises, or SOEs, has triggered unease among entrepreneurs, and reformers.
“What worries people is the priority given to the state over the private sector. Many entrepreneurs secretly hope that Trump will indirectly help their voice to be heard in Beijing,” Duncan Clark, a Beijing-based consultant and author of ‘Alibaba, the House that Jack Ma Built’, said.
Many observers noted that Xi has so far paid lip service to the celebration of Deng’s legacy. Tellingly, an exhibition in Beijing recalling 40 years of opening up downplays the “Paramount Leader’s” role. It showed only small framed pictures of him in sharp contrast with those dedicated to the current president.
Major speech?
Speculation abounds that Xi will deliver a major speech on this issue in December that will set the tone, for both China’s dealing with the US, as well as its economic domestic strategy. It could potentially signal a significant shift.
The 90-day window to negotiate a trade deal, agreed by Trump at the G20 will put to the test Xi’s proclaimed goal to pursue Deng’s reformist legacy.
As the US threatens a fully-fledged economic war if China does not open up key sectors, pro-market forces see an opportunity to challenge Xi’s state-centric strategy, calling for fresh reforms.
“The next six months will be decisive. The key question will be: Are we going to see a new set of reforms? Ding, asked.
Washington’s new aggressive stance poses a challenge to Xi, a princeling who has promoted a more assertive foreign policy, in sharp contrast with Deng’s cautious approach of “biding our time.”
In Buenos Aires, Xi committed to purchase more American agricultural products and to lower tariffs for US car manufacturers, according to Trump. But China has yet to provide any official figures.
Slim negotiating margin
The arrest of Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer and daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, by the Canadian authorities earlier this month at the request of the US, signals Washington determination.
“Xi is a very strong leader, therefore he cannot afford to lose face. If he gives in too much he will face domestic pushback,” Gary Leo, the president of the China Financial Reform Institute, said.
“It would be good for China to make difficult but necessary decisions,” the Shanghai-based economist, added, stressing that there should be a greater role for the market, as outlined during a Plenum in 2013 that has fallen short in tangible implementation.
China’s massive state subsidies are a key US complaint, alongside forced technology transfers. But Xi’s negotiating margin is slim – squeezed between a slowing economy and his determination to assert a strong renascent China in the eyes of his own population.
“Xi can make concessions, but only in a way that shows he is still a strong leader,” Leo said.
The writer has a very shallow understanding of the Chinese and its governance. One moment he is calling Xi a dictator. When different opinions surfaced, he called it lossing control and a rebellion. The country is united behind CCP to face the challenges posted by the US and its allies. Just another of those who write about China from his own perspective and dream.
The writer has a very shallow understanding of the Chinese and its governance. One moment he is calling Xi a dictator. When different opinions surfaced, he called it lossing control and a rebellion. The country is united behind CCP to face the challenges posted by the US and its allies. Just another of those who write about China from his own perspective and dream.
President Xi worked on a farm and spread dung fertiliser on the fields as a young man. The authpr defines this as a princeling training. LOL!
President Xi worked on a farm and spread dung fertiliser on the fields as a young man. The authpr defines this as a princeling training. LOL!
You mean he sh^t upon farm workers while he was a commissar.
You mean he sh^t upon farm workers while he was a commissar.
More humiliation for Xi, he’s messing with bigger people now.
More humiliation for Xi, he’s messing with bigger people now.
Huw Wong Comrade, I have never stopped shovelling manure, in farms, in the CCP and now on the world stage.
Huw Wong Comrade, I have never stopped shovelling manure, in farms, in the CCP and now on the world stage.
Winston Medved
Good on you! What type of dung and where?
Winston Medved
Good on you! What type of dung and where?
Capitalism is collapsing, but will communism collapse too ? One thing is clear the current world order is cracking up and a new matrix will take it’s place. What will it be ?
Capitalism is collapsing, but will communism collapse too ? One thing is clear the current world order is cracking up and a new matrix will take it’s place. What will it be ?
"Forty years ago, a similar meeting was held, known as “Reform and Openness,” on December 18, 1978 under the leadership of the pragmatic Deng in a decisive departure from Mao’s orthodox socialist policies.
Four decades later, China has emerged as an economic powerhouse as it closes the gap with the US."
So, what happened in this "four decade" gap? The author made it look like Deng Xiaoping made China neoliberal (which he didn’t, but for the sake of the argument…) and then, poof!, it became a superpower the next day.
"Forty years ago, a similar meeting was held, known as “Reform and Openness,” on December 18, 1978 under the leadership of the pragmatic Deng in a decisive departure from Mao’s orthodox socialist policies.
Four decades later, China has emerged as an economic powerhouse as it closes the gap with the US."
So, what happened in this "four decade" gap? The author made it look like Deng Xiaoping made China neoliberal (which he didn’t, but for the sake of the argument…) and then, poof!, it became a superpower the next day.
Huw Wong You mean fatter people. Isn’t America one of the most obese people on earth?
Huw Wong You mean fatter people. Isn’t America one of the most obese people on earth?
If the World does not want China’s peaceful rise, then China has no choice but give the what they ask for: a bloody rise.
If the World does not want China’s peaceful rise, then China has no choice but give them what they ask for: a bloody rise.
If the World does not want China’s peaceful rise, then China has no choice but give them what they ask for: a bloody rise.
This is another anti-China propaganda piece by a western writer. Sebastien wrote : " China’s massive state subsidies are a key US complaint, alongside forced technology transfers."
The US is the biggest whiner and hypocrite on the planet because it gave huge subsidies to its big corporations at both Federal and State levels.
US subsidies excluding subsidies to fossil fuels are: "Five corporations ranking among the 50 largest recipients of three kinds of funds: state subsidies; federal grants and tax credits; and federal loans, loan guarantees and bailout assistance. Those businesses which are “most successful at obtaining subsidies from all levels of government” are Boeing, Ford Motor, General Electric, General Motors and JPMorgan Chase."
Go to : https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2015/03/17/the-united-states-of-subsidies-the-biggest-corporate-winners-in-each-state/
US subsidies to the fossil fuel industry is also massive: " … found that in 2015–2016, the federal government provided $14.7bn per year to the oil, gas, and coal industries, on top of $5.8bn of state-level incentives (globally, the figure is around $500bn). And the report only accounted for production subsidies, excluding consumption subsidies (support to consumers to lower the cost of fossil fuel use – another $14.5bn annually) as well as the costs of carbon and other fossil fuel pollutants."
Go to : " https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jul/30/america-spends-over-20bn-per-year-on-fossil-fuel-subsidies-abolish-them
So, when the US finds it difficult to compete with China, it resorts to kidnapping the CFO of Huawei on grounds of fraud to bypass Iran sanctions.
First, it is illegal to force US domestic laws on Iran sanctions on China which has nothing to do with the quarrel between the US and Iran.
Second, the collapse of the US financial system in 2008 was caused by mega frauds perpetrated by mega US Banks. But not a single banking executive was charged and convicted except for a small Chinese-American Bank.
Third, the ongoing 21 trillion USDollar fraud by the Pentagon has not seen any response by the US Department of Justice and Congress. Instead, the DOJ kidnapped an executive from Huawei.
Go to : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4XRbcBz2Z4
No wonder, the US government is hated around the world especially in S America, the Mid East and Afghanistan. This hatred is spreading to the Chinese people.
Forced technology transfer is fake news. I will not talk about it because it will take too much space.
This is another anti-China propaganda piece by a western writer. Sebastien wrote : " China’s massive state subsidies are a key US complaint, alongside forced technology transfers."
The US is the biggest whiner and hypocrite on the planet because it gave huge subsidies to its big corporations at both Federal and State levels.
US subsidies excluding subsidies to fossil fuels are: "Five corporations ranking among the 50 largest recipients of three kinds of funds: state subsidies; federal grants and tax credits; and federal loans, loan guarantees and bailout assistance. Those businesses which are “most successful at obtaining subsidies from all levels of government” are Boeing, Ford Motor, General Electric, General Motors and JPMorgan Chase."
Go to : https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2015/03/17/the-united-states-of-subsidies-the-biggest-corporate-winners-in-each-state/
US subsidies to the fossil fuel industry is also massive: " … found that in 2015–2016, the federal government provided $14.7bn per year to the oil, gas, and coal industries, on top of $5.8bn of state-level incentives (globally, the figure is around $500bn). And the report only accounted for production subsidies, excluding consumption subsidies (support to consumers to lower the cost of fossil fuel use – another $14.5bn annually) as well as the costs of carbon and other fossil fuel pollutants."
Go to : " https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jul/30/america-spends-over-20bn-per-year-on-fossil-fuel-subsidies-abolish-them
So, when the US finds it difficult to compete with China, it resorts to kidnapping the CFO of Huawei on grounds of fraud to bypass Iran sanctions.
First, it is illegal to force US domestic laws on Iran sanctions on China which has nothing to do with the quarrel between the US and Iran.
Second, the collapse of the US financial system in 2008 was caused by mega frauds perpetrated by mega US Banks. But not a single banking executive was charged and convicted except for a small Chinese-American Bank.
Third, the ongoing 21 trillion USDollar fraud by the Pentagon has not seen any response by the US Department of Justice and Congress. Instead, the DOJ kidnapped an executive from Huawei.
Go to : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4XRbcBz2Z4
No wonder, the US government is hated around the world especially in S America, the Mid East and Afghanistan. This hatred is spreading to the Chinese people.
Forced technology transfer is fake news. I will not talk about it because it will take too much space.
What happened in the four decades is that China returned to capitalism. Without the detour into Communism between 1949 and 1979, it could have been close to the position it holds today 40 years earlier. Compare Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, the last of which serves as the model for so many cities in China today.
What happened in the four decades is that China returned to capitalism. Without the detour into Communism between 1949 and 1979, it could have been close to the position it holds today 40 years earlier. Compare Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, the last of which serves as the model for so many cities in China today.
If Xi is a very strong leader, he can afford to lose face. He may not wish to lose face, but he can afford to.
It is a weak leader who really cannot afford to lose face.
If Xi is a very strong leader, he can afford to lose face. He may not wish to lose face, but he can afford to.
It is a weak leader who really cannot afford to lose face.
Sebastien wrote: " China’s massive state subsidies are a key US complaint, alongside forced technology transfers…"
By not mentioning the fact that the US gives massive subsidies to its industries at both Federal and State levels, the writer presents a one-sided picture casting negative aspersions on China as the sole culprit of " unfair " trade practices.
The US government "….. has distributed $68 billion in grants and special tax credits to businesses,…" , go to
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2015/03/17/the-united-states-of-subsidies-the-biggest-corporate-winners-in-each-state/
US is an oil exporter and the government has given subsidies to its oil industry for export which violates WTO rules. This is unfair. Period.
" …. the federal government provided $14.7bn per year to the oil, gas, and coal industries, on top of $5.8bn of state-level incentives.."
Go to https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jul/30/america-spends-over-20bn-per-year-on-fossil-fuel-subsidies-abolish-them
Forced technology transfer is a myth as it has already been priced into the valuation of the joint venture.
Sebastien wrote: " China’s massive state subsidies are a key US complaint, alongside forced technology transfers…"
By not mentioning the fact that the US gives massive subsidies to its industries at both Federal and State levels, the writer presents a one-sided picture casting negative aspersions on China as the sole culprit of " unfair " trade practices.
The US government "….. has distributed $68 billion in grants and special tax credits to businesses,…" , go to
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2015/03/17/the-united-states-of-subsidies-the-biggest-corporate-winners-in-each-state/
US is an oil exporter and the government has given subsidies to its oil industry for export which violates WTO rules. This is unfair. Period.
" …. the federal government provided $14.7bn per year to the oil, gas, and coal industries, on top of $5.8bn of state-level incentives.."
Go to https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jul/30/america-spends-over-20bn-per-year-on-fossil-fuel-subsidies-abolish-them
Forced technology transfer is a myth as it has already been priced into the valuation of the joint venture.
Chairman Xi did fall into the same clap-trap as President Putin. Putin believed he could do business with the west too.
The arrest of Ms. Meng is shameful. President Trump says he will intervene if there will be a US-China trade agreement! Ms. Meng is a victim of a political game and will be an extortion hostage.
China must not be dependent of the US for ANY product or service.
Chairman Xi did fall into the same clap-trap as President Putin. Putin believed he could do business with the west too.
The arrest of Ms. Meng is shameful. President Trump says he will intervene if there will be a US-China trade agreement! Ms. Meng is a victim of a political game and will be an extortion hostage.
China must not be dependent of the US for ANY product or service.
Well said comrade, we have a place on the frontline for you.
Well said comrade, we have a place on the frontline for you.