The S&P 500 Index closed marginally higher after a day of wild swings. The most important price action was not in US equities, which failed to find direction after declines of more than 2% on both Friday and Monday, but in oil, which fell to a 14-month low of $47 a barrel for West Texas Intermediate.
The bond market’s estimate of future inflation, the difference between the yield on nominal Treasuries and inflation-protected Treasuries, has fallen even more sharply than the oil price.
That raises the question of whether the world economy is at risk of deflation. This question will have the Federal Reserve’s undivided attention at tomorrow’s meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee.

The same pattern applies to German and French breakeven inflation, which excludes the possibility that unusual technicals in the Treasury market are responsible for the extra 20 basis points of decline in US breakevens.
A sharp slowing of global economic activity has contributed to the oil price collapse, in addition to supply factors. Japan is in its second quarter of negative growth. So is Germany, judging by the disappointing reading for the country’s widely-followed IFO economic survey. The expectations component fell to 97, the lowest level since October 2012.
World trade contracted in September, the last month for which volume data are available. As we argued November 30, the decline in trade appears to be the result of a pullback in capital investment, probably in response to questions about the future of global supply chains in industries affected by the US-China trade war.
There are also signs of price softening in key US markets. That translates into good reasons for the Fed to be dovish.
Most important is the negative year-on-year change in rents nationwide according to an index published by the rental website Zillow.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ measure of housing inflation, so-called Owner Equivalent Rent, still shows a year-on-year change of over 3%. Owner-equivalent rent, as well as ordinary rental payments together, comprise 40% of the American Consumer Price Index.
The government data lag the private Zillow index by about a year, and the Zillow data point to a sharp decline in housing inflation over the next year. By my calculation, Owner Equivalent Rent should fall from about 3.4% year on year to 2.4% year on year during 2019, taking more than 0.3% off the Consumer Price Index, and driving inflation below the Fed’s target.

Of course, that isn’t a forecast, just a back-of-the-envelope sensitivity analysis. If the Trump Administration follows through with the full array of tariffs it has threatened against Chinese imports, Goldman Sachs economists calculated, the overall US price level will rise by a bit over 0.3%. That’s roughly the margin of decline in the CPI indicated by the home rental market.
Of course, an increase in prices due to a tax increase (tariffs are a tax) isn’t good for the economy.
The combination of collapsing stock prices, squishy home prices, and a free-fall in oil prices will figure prominently in the Fed’s calculations. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is neither an ideologue nor a hero. The prudent course of action is for the Fed to wait and see. That is what a chorus of voices, starting with President Trump, have told the Fed. Chances are the Fed will listen.
The question is whether the market will respond to a dovish Fed by asking what the Fed knows that it doesn’t know. The Fed put in the equity market is less effective than it has been in the past. I expect the Fed to postpone the 25 basis points increase in the federal funds rate widely expected by the market. That should make for a modest but temporary bounce in equity prices. Investors who haven’t lightened their equity exposure should look for an opportunity to do so.
As I’ve mentioned before: back to the 1970s stagflation for Uncle Sam. This time supporting multiple war fronts, going against 2/3 top world powers, retiring baby boomers… Good luck finding someone, like China back then, to shoulder and work for sweat USDs printed at wimps. Brave new world indeed. hahahaha
As I’ve mentioned before several times: back to the 1970s stagflation for Uncle Sam. This time shackled by multiple war fronts, going against 2/3 top world powers, retiring baby boomers… Good luck finding someone, like China back then, to shoulder and work for sweat USDs printed at wimps. Brave new world indeed. hahahaha
As I’ve mentioned before several times: back to the 1970s stagflation for Uncle Sam. This time shackled by multiple war fronts, going against 2/3 top world powers, retiring baby boomers… Good luck finding someone, like China back then, to shoulder and work for sweat USDs printed at wimps. Brave new world indeed. hahahaha
You speaking nonsense, china is clearly losing the game which America imposed to China as a form of punishment for Chinas malpractice and trade imbalances. China is now a crying imfant begging to US to halt another punishable tarrift againts China. China today as a result of punishment initiated by US is already at the edge of abbys that tantamont to civilian unrest and economic collapsed. Thst is the real thing. Search it for you to know
You speaking nonsense, china is clearly losing the game which America imposed to China as a form of punishment for Chinas malpractice and trade imbalances. China is now a crying imfant begging to US to halt another punishable tarrift againts China. China today as a result of punishment initiated by US is already at the edge of abbys that tantamont to civilian unrest and economic collapsed. Thst is the real thing. Search it for you to know
Controversy about who wins in trade between China and US whose economy is interconnected between producers and consumers on global trade!This was so until China is an advanced economy with her 600 million consumers far greater than US buying her products togather with her advanced technologies! Under current golbal geopolitical systen US is facing her biggest challange to impliment her wishes due to her powerful advarsaries like Russia China!
Controversy about who wins in trade between China and US whose economy is interconnected between producers and consumers on global trade!This was so until China is an advanced economy with her 600 million consumers far greater than US buying her products togather with her advanced technologies! Under current golbal geopolitical systen US is facing her biggest challange to impliment her wishes due to her powerful advarsaries like Russia China!
Kier Valdez Some Empires born,live and fade, Some Empire born,live and live and live and live…., US is the second one,
a thousand pt dow gain today.. the feds is scared to death of trump. no increase in the foreseable future.
a thousand pt dow gain today.. the feds is scared to death of trump. no increase in the foreseable future.
Many contrarians will welcome a weakened economy about to collapse.
Many contrarians will welcome a weakened economy about to collapse.
Penny Shore Actually Xi, and few people, understand New Yorker culture. When they call U a friend before a tough negotiation, they’re hinting they want to work with U to put up a good show so everyone thinks they’re winning, call it a good deal, and go home happy. Xi is just too serious as a lawyer. He can just agree to some superficial crap so Trump can say he’s winning big to the American public. This is called, another NY motto, "do whatever necessary to get into her pants"
Penny Shore Actually Xi, and few people, understand New Yorker culture. When they call U a friend before a tough negotiation, they’re hinting they want to work with U to put up a good show so everyone thinks they’re winning, call it a good deal, and go home happy. Xi is just too serious as a lawyer. He can just agree to some superficial crap so Trump can say he’s winning big to the American public. This is called, another NY motto, "do whatever necessary to get into her pants"