The popular large-cap China ETF (ticker FXI) led the S&P 500 during the market uptick of the past several days, driven by signals from Beijing and Washington that a resolution of the Sino-American trade dispute was possible.
President Trump this morning tweeted that he had made progress on trade negotiations with China, and had spoken by telephone with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping.
Just had a long and very good conversation with President Xi Jinping of China. We talked about many subjects, with a heavy emphasis on Trade. Those discussions are moving along nicely with meetings being scheduled at the G-20 in Argentina. Also had good discussion on North Korea!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 1, 2018

The correlation of S&P returns to FXI returns jumped in recent days to around 90%.

The October plunge in US equity prices, as well as weakness in recent US economic data, give the Trump Administration an incentive to reach a resolution with China.
As I reported from Beijing October 23, China is looking for a framework for a trade deal that would allow Trump to claim credit for better protection for American intellectual property as well as changes in China’s industrial policy. China may tone down its rhetoric about dominating high-tech industries under the “Made in China 2025” program, source of contention with the United States, although it will not abandon its economic goals.
I predicted October 25 that the slumping stock market would motivate the Trump Administration to seek a deal with China.
The October manufacturing survey of the Institute for Supply Management released Nov. 1 showed weaker-than-expected growth in US industry. The index fell from 58.8 to 56.8 while new orders fell from 61.8 to 57.4, and prices paid rose from 69.0 to 71.4. The numbers reflect the percentage of respondents who see expansion vs. contraction and came in far below the consensus of economic forecasters.
The Institute told Bloomberg news that tariffs are a concern to more than 40% of respondents in the broad-based survey. “Import tariffs and counter-tariffs are the biggest inhibitor to the expansion in manufacturing,” ISM official Timothy Fiore said.
Evidently, the administration’s initial confidence that the US would emerge nearly unscathed from a trade war with China has eroded in the face of poor stock market performance and softer-than-expected economic data.
In an open letter to Larry Kudlow published July 19, I warned that tariffs against Chinese imports would hurt the United States as much as they hurt China:
“The vast majority of China’s exports to the US are consumer goods, especially electronics. Most of these goods are assembled in China from imported components. China adds only a third or so the value added to these goods. China has a chronic labor shortage and is shifting low-paid assembly to lower-wage countries in Asia. If you tax consumer goods from China, American consumers will pay more, and the Chinese will accelerate the shift of low-wage employment to the new economic zone they are building in Asia through the $1 trillion One Belt, One Road program.”
I believe that the Trump Administration has come over to my point of view. That portends a sharp recovery in Chinese equities before year-end

I do not think so….that just your speculations without concrete proofs. ..hummmm
I do not think so….that just your speculations without concrete proofs. ..hummmm
gsdgsdgsdg
gsdgsdgsdg
Rudi Matich True, but your comment is irrelevant. The point is that Trump’s economic machismo is a whimpering failure.
Rudi Matich True, but your comment is irrelevant. The point is that Trump’s economic machismo is a whimpering failure.
More contortions from another so-called Austrian School devotee trying to justify Trump’s protectionism. Have you noticed that the American trade deficit has actually accelerated under Trump? Do you remember the 1970’s and how well protectionism worked then?
This President is indefensible. Come out and say it, if you want people to find your articles credible.
More contortions from another so-called Austrian School devotee trying to justify Trump’s protectionism. Have you noticed that the American trade deficit has actually accelerated under Trump? Do you remember the 1970’s and how well protectionism worked then?
This President is indefensible. Come out and say it, if you want people to find your articles credible.
Yeah …it’s a question of time !!! Hein !! But nothing is written yet …and with Trump uff ! It could be any thing !!
Yeah …it’s a question of time !!! Hein !! But nothing is written yet …and with Trump uff ! It could be any thing !!
Yes it’s a own goal …and they are blaming on the CHINESE side !!? Crazy Buffon mother ..fu..rs !!
Yes it’s a own goal …and they are blaming on the CHINESE side !!? Crazy Buffon mother ..fu..rs !!
Those foreigners you try to discredit shaped chinese history and way of life, and nowadays they are part and parcel of China itself,and if you try to become wholly Chinese and try to get rid everything foreigner, you have to give up your modern day industry and the internet and many more modern technologies,and return to China in the way it was 1800.
Those foreigners you try to discredit shaped chinese history and way of life, and nowadays they are part and parcel of China itself,and if you try to become wholly Chinese and try to get rid everything foreigner, you have to give up your modern day industry and the internet and many more modern technologies,and return to China in the way it was 1800.
What the Dow produces to start with ? The dow in strictly economic terms we can do without it, and the sooner we do the better off we will be.