It is essential at this time to reanalyze India-Bhutan relations in the backdrop of the Chinese inroads in South Asia. The recently concluded elections in Bhutan point to a wave of change in its domestic politics as the people of the landlocked country have voted a new party into power. How the new party defines and directs foreign policy will be closely watched by both India and China – Bhutan’s neighbors.
It appears that the new government of Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa (DNT) under Dr Lotay Tshering will be looking at ways to overhaul the domestic economy while trying to balance India’s concerns. DNT’s election agenda was focused on economic developments and not on foreign policy. The increase in youth unemployment is a major issue for the new government. In addition to this, the government will have to look for ways to correct the levels of debt Bhutan owes to India.
Bhutan and India share a unique relationship but the latter needs to wake up to the changing reality of its neighborhood. The year 2018 marked 50 years of establishment of the two countries’ diplomatic relations. During Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj’s visit to Bhutan to mark the event, the relationship was described as “exemplary ties.”
If India wants to continue its “warm” relations with Bhutan it needs to acknowledge the demands of Bhutan and its people and undertake efforts to fulfill them. In the words of S D Muni, a former diplomat and professor emeritus at Jawaharlal Nehru University, “If they move away from hydropower, the economic content of [the] India-Bhutan relationship will change. They would then want us to get into other areas. If the Chinese develop diplomatic ties with Bhutan, they would be able to help Bhutan diversify much faster.”
The demonetization and goods and services tax (GST) introduced by the government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hurt the Bhutanese economy. India will have to look for ways to stay true to its economic commitments toward its neighbors. However, the lax attitude of the Indian government toward meeting its promises has been a major catalyst in helping Chinese ambitions.
In recent years China has been undertaking every possible route to woo Thimphu. Bhutan shares diplomatic relations with just about 50 countries and is aware that in the highly globalized economy it will need new friends to help it develop.
Even though New Delhi came to Bhutan’s defense during the 73-day Doklam standoff, there is a growing sense of unease toward India. Some in Bhutan feel that the Indian embrace is becoming stifling and controlling. There has been an increase in discussion among citizens of Bhutan whether it needs new friends (other than India) to meet its development needs. After the Doklam standoff, there has been a rise in opinion in Bhutan supporting the option of normalizing relations with China and also reducing dependency on India.
The inflow of money from China to the other South Asian nations can also be a driving factor. Bhutan is in need of better infrastructure and new industries to garner employment, and China does appear keen on providing both.
China has started working toward improving its ties with Bhutan. This is apparent from the increase in Chinese imports in the form of cement, toys, and technical equipment. The number of Chinese tourists visiting Bhutan has also increased in the last few years. Bhutanese scholars are also arguing that tourism can be an important link in developing ties.
China is keen to open an embassy in Bhutan and also normalize relations. However, the major requirement for that will be settling of their boundary issues. Bhutan and China have concluded around 24 rounds of boundary talks without reaching any consensus. The 25th round of talks was postponed because of the Doklam standoff and is yet to be concluded.
The visit by Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou to Bhutan in July underscored the Chinese push for wooing Bhutan. During the visit, the two sides discussed the boundary issue and worked out dates for the next round of boundary talks in Beijing.
The inflow of Chinese goods to Bhutan has been on the rise and Beijing is extending fellowships to Bhutanese students and also pushing for Bhutan to join the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Before the Doklam incident, Chinese media were flush with articles arguing that China and Bhutan are unable to resolve their boundary dispute because of India. China has always argued that it is because of India that Beijing and Thimphu have not managed to have normal bilateral ties.
Even if Bhutan and China want to settle their border dispute, doing so will be highly unlikely without India’s involvement. The disputed tri-junction directly affects the security of India’s northeastern region, and it will be keenly watching the developments.
India and Bhutan have had long-standing historical and cultural relations. Bhutan may lean toward China with the hope of gaining access to funds but it will be no surprise that it will also be extra-cautious, keeping in mind the Sri Lankan and Maldives examples. Bhutan is aware that Chinese friendship comes with strings attached.
India will also need to be practical and cautious in its approach toward China-Bhutan relations. New Delhi needs to adopt new policies keeping in mind the new demands. If India is not proactive now, Beijing may succeed in swaying Bhutan.
So let me get this straight, China "invades" Doklam/Donglang, India "protects" Bhutan land, and how the Bhutanese want closer relations with China? Doesn’t that sound like nonsense? That’s because in 1998 China and Bhutan had already agreed how to manage their border dispute but they actually have had their negotiations blocked by India. Bhutan did not, and still does not care that China has troops in, and has built their road in Doklam/Donglang.
Regarding the supposed "Chinese military withdrawal" from the region after the stand-off, the Chinese government declared that they never left the region, continued to build their road, and even built military fortifications to prevent Indian troops from crossing the border again. The Indian government and media narrative never did match with reality. It’s impossible to understand China-India-Bhutan relations from listening to Indian media. You’d have to think that the Bhutanese people are simply crazy for wanting closer ties to China right after it supposedly militarily invaded an annexed part of their country.
So let me get this straight, China "invades" Doklam/Donglang, India "protects" Bhutan land, and how the Bhutanese want closer relations with China? Doesn’t that sound like nonsense? That’s because in 1998 China and Bhutan had already agreed how to manage their border dispute but they actually have had their negotiations blocked by India. Bhutan did not, and still does not care that China has troops in, and has built their road in Doklam/Donglang.
Regarding the supposed "Chinese military withdrawal" from the region after the stand-off, the Chinese government declared that they never left the region, continued to build their road, and even built military fortifications to prevent Indian troops from crossing the border again. The Indian government and media narrative never did match with reality. It’s impossible to understand China-India-Bhutan relations from listening to Indian media. You’d have to think that the Bhutanese people are simply crazy for wanting closer ties to China right after it supposedly militarily invaded an annexed part of their country.
"Even though New Delhi came to Bhutan’s defense during the 73-day Doklam standoff" Lol, This lie get repeated again and again. Indian soldiers on their own with their usual bravado went into territory claimed by Bhutan and China. Bhutan never asked Indian soldiers to go in there. There never was a situation where Bhutan needed defense. That is why Bhutan kept quite during the whole time. Indians tried to put up show and thoroughly embarassed themselves.
"Even though New Delhi came to Bhutan’s defense during the 73-day Doklam standoff" Lol, This lie get repeated again and again. Indian soldiers on their own with their usual bravado went into territory claimed by Bhutan and China. Bhutan never asked Indian soldiers to go in there. There never was a situation where Bhutan needed defense. That is why Bhutan kept quite during the whole time. Indians tried to put up show and thoroughly embarassed themselves.
Relationship between India and Bhutan is far better then this kind of statement. Every job in india states people of tibetan, bhutanese origin and people of Nepal can apply. So lets not cast aspersion on this relationship. India can certainly do more but india politicians are failing even their own electorate
Relationship between India and Bhutan is far better then this kind of statement. Every job in india states people of tibetan, bhutanese origin and people of Nepal can apply. So lets not cast aspersion on this relationship. India can certainly do more but india politicians are failing even their own electorate
India should be much more active in helping it’s close friends.
India should be much more active in helping it’s close friends.
Indias big brother attitude is helping small nations slipping out of its hand.Days were there when India tried to claim most of the business and resources here in south asia but now it is changing slowly .Chinese investmemt in Nepal exceeded indian investment.So showing security interst Indian are trying to prevent
the flow of chinese FDI
Indias big brother attitude is helping small nations slipping out of its hand.Days were there when India tried to claim most of the business and resources here in south asia but now it is changing slowly .Chinese investmemt in Nepal exceeded indian investment.So showing security interst Indian are trying to prevent
the flow of chinese FDI
Gunjan Singh it should be India invaded Bhutan and there was a 73 day China – India standoff at Doklam.
Gunjan Singh it should be India invaded Bhutan and there was a 73 day China – India standoff at Doklam.
We bhutanese know what we have to do and how we have to deal with situation related to China or india issues. We bhutanese don’t believe on indian media about the issues related to Bhutan, unless the documents are signed and had press released from foreign ministry. We know indian politics very well. Actually media must focus more on internal peace and welfare of public rather than foreign policy issues in which media can hardly make changes.
We bhutanese know what we have to do and how we have to deal with situation related to China or india issues. We bhutanese don’t believe on indian media about the issues related to Bhutan, unless the documents are signed and had press released from foreign ministry. We know indian politics very well. Actually media must focus more on internal peace and welfare of public rather than foreign policy issues in which media can hardly make changes.
Gus Sinha We all for good relations between Bhutan and India. We just need to expose the coming to Bhutan’s defence lies that this author and lot Indian media are spreading. Truth is India shamelessly made a huge miscalculation about their own strength and made assumptions about Bhutanese claimed territory being their own. They were the thoroughly defeated and sent back packing in a very embarassing fashion. So maybe that’s why they are going around spreading lies about coming Bhutan’s defence when Bhutan really didn’t need defending from China.
Just so you know, in order to keep India’s friendship, Bhutan has sacrificed millions of dollars in potential Chinese investments in infrastructure as countries all over Asia and Africa have benefited immensly. Meanwhile Bhutan has to contend with substandard infrastructure, built by India using very antiquated methods and technologies that take years to complete.
Gus Sinha We all for good relations between Bhutan and India. We just need to expose the coming to Bhutan’s defence lies that this author and lot Indian media are spreading. Truth is India shamelessly made a huge miscalculation about their own strength and made assumptions about Bhutanese claimed territory being their own. They were the thoroughly defeated and sent back packing in a very embarassing fashion. So maybe that’s why they are going around spreading lies about coming Bhutan’s defence when Bhutan really didn’t need defending from China.
Just so you know, in order to keep India’s friendship, Bhutan has sacrificed millions of dollars in potential Chinese investments in infrastructure as countries all over Asia and Africa have benefited immensly. Meanwhile Bhutan has to contend with substandard infrastructure, built by India using very antiquated methods and technologies that take years to complete.
Namgyel Ugyen
Bhutan must sacrifice millions of dollars that China is always trying to pay Bhutan for the Bhutan’s development but the Plan of China is that if BuutBh cannot pay back within a contracted period , then they move forward to rule Bhutan.
Moral is : Bhutan must continue to strengthen ties with India provided that India must reduce the taxes and immensely provide a better fund without much tax for Bhutan’s development..
Namgyel Ugyen
Bhutan must sacrifice millions of dollars that China is always trying to pay Bhutan for the Bhutan’s development but the Plan of China is that if BuutBh cannot pay back within a contracted period , then they move forward to rule Bhutan.
Moral is : Bhutan must continue to strengthen ties with India provided that India must reduce the taxes and immensely provide a better fund without much tax for Bhutan’s development..
My personal feeling Indian is our big bro and great helper I don’t see more door to open unless Indian feel they don’t want to help any more, then may need to look forward to open orher door.
My personal feeling Indian is our big bro and great helper I don’t see more door to open unless Indian feel they don’t want to help any more, then may need to look forward to open orher door.
The only free cheese is in the mouse trap.
The only free cheese is in the mouse trap.
Kumar Shanu That’s complete and utter hogwash which is sometimes promoted by the western and repeated Indian media. BTW India isn’t exactly altruisitic. The interest rates that it charges on the loans that new Hydro Project are around 10% compared to the 2% that China charges Nepal for their infrastructure projects. Plus the projects never get done on time. The cost and resulting interest end up ballooning to huge levels.
Kumar Shanu That’s complete and utter hogwash which is sometimes promoted by the western and repeated Indian media. BTW India isn’t exactly altruisitic. The interest rates that it charges on the loans that new Hydro Project are around 10% compared to the 2% that China charges Nepal for their infrastructure projects. Plus the projects never get done on time. The cost and resulting interest end up ballooning to huge levels.
I don’t know why you would pretend to be Bhutanese or speak for Bhutanese people. It’s a good thing majority of Bhutanese people don’t have this lapdog mindset that you do or the country would be in real trouble
I don’t know why you would pretend to be Bhutanese or speak for Bhutanese people. It’s a good thing majority of Bhutanese people don’t have this lapdog mindset that you do or the country would be in real trouble
Bhutan has always been a very good friend of India which India must very highly value. But India and the Indian media always boast of Bhutan"s dependency on Indian assistance. Actually it’s the other way round. Bhutan has been strategically located and has been acting as a buffer for India on the northern border thus saving a lot of money for India that could run into trillions if it has to maintain its own army on the northern border. India must treat Bhutan as a very faithful sovereign neighbour who stood by India through thick and thin. India should never have the slightest opinion that Bhutan has been dependent on india. India also must respect Bhutan"s sovereignty which is very sensitive to every Bhutanese and not treat Bhutan like their princely state. Long live Indo Bhutan Friendship.
Bhutan has always been a very good friend of India which India must very highly value. But India and the Indian media always boast of Bhutan"s dependency on Indian assistance. Actually it’s the other way round. Bhutan has been strategically located and has been acting as a buffer for India on the northern border thus saving a lot of money for India that could run into trillions if it has to maintain its own army on the northern border. India must treat Bhutan as a very faithful sovereign neighbour who stood by India through thick and thin. India should never have the slightest opinion that Bhutan has been dependent on india. India also must respect Bhutan"s sovereignty which is very sensitive to every Bhutanese and not treat Bhutan like their princely state. Long live Indo Bhutan Friendship.
Namgyel Ugyen that is sad , is it Govt of India or private companies.?
Namgyel Ugyen that is sad , is it Govt of India or private companies.?
Namgyel Ugyen I agree Chinese have money and they can invest, but they also bring in Chinese population and only work though loans.
Namgyel Ugyen I agree Chinese have money and they can invest, but they also bring in Chinese population and only work though loans.
Gus Sinha Indians also bring Indian population and are working through loans at much higher rates so I don’t see why Indian’s are any better
Gus Sinha Indians also bring Indian population and are working through loans at much higher rates so I don’t see why Indian’s are any better
Kumar Shanu – scaremongering will not help Bhutan. They need a country that has proven its ability to build infrastructure and that my friend happens to be China.
Kumar Shanu – scaremongering will not help Bhutan. They need a country that has proven its ability to build infrastructure and that my friend happens to be China.
Good article and thanks for sharing the truth.
Good article and thanks for sharing the truth.
India is heling Negative way.. Bhutan King is important, everything in Bhutan is important..but the citizens of different racial backgrounds are more important. India acted against the Lhotshampa (Gorkhas) the victims of Bhutan Govt. who were evicted brutally. But, India instead of helping to solve India suppressed Bhutanese refugees who were most loyal citizens for India.
India is heling Negative way.. Bhutan King is important, everything in Bhutan is important..but the citizens of different racial backgrounds are more important. India acted against the Lhotshampa (Gorkhas) the victims of Bhutan Govt. who were evicted brutally. But, India instead of helping to solve India suppressed Bhutanese refugees who were most loyal citizens for India.
Gus Sinha You see the Indian politics or the politicians are not expert all the times. They committed sins, they became bad since 1990 to till this date. I have the reasons nad remedies for all time.
Gus Sinha You see the Indian politics or the politicians are not expert all the times. They committed sins, they became bad since 1990 to till this date. I have the reasons nad remedies for all time.
Novel Man that is a big mistake, people making decision in India are not in touch on ground
Novel Man that is a big mistake, people making decision in India are not in touch on ground
even india want closer ties with China, without getting bullied. India and China trade close t o $100 b
even india want closer ties with China, without getting bullied. India and China trade close t o $100 b