A news item that has dominated the business media in India recently is that India has pipped France to become the sixth-largest economy in the world. Not surprisingly, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has made a big song and dance about it, as it does for almost everything. At the same time, those against the Modi government have been asking, What’s the big deal?
The truth, as usual, is somewhere in between. Let’s take a look at a graph that basically plots the gross domestic products of the world’s 10 biggest economies.
- The GDP of the global top 10 economies. Image: Vivek Kaul
What does the graph tell us? The French GDP in 2017 was US$2.582 trillion. The Indian GDP was $2.597 trillion. As India has grown over the years, it has become bigger than many economies. This is par for the course. It’s not the first time something like this has happened.
Let’s take the case of Canada. As we can see from the graph, Canada is the 10th-largest economy in the world. In 2009, the Canadian GDP was $1.371 trillion. The Indian GDP was slightly lower at $1.324 trillion. In 2010, the Canadian GDP was $1.613 trillion. The Indian GDP was $1.657 trillion. Thus, in 2010, India became a bigger economy than Canada.
Let’s go back a few years more and take the case of South Korea, which is currently the 12th-largest economy in the world. In 2006, it had a GDP of $1.012 trillion. The Indian GDP was $920.317 billion. In 2007, the Korean GDP was $1.123 trillion. The Indian GDP was $1.201 trillion. Thus India became a bigger economy than South Korea.
The point here is that the Indian economy has become bigger than other major economies even in the past, during the era when Dr Manmohan Singh was the prime minister.
As the pivot of global growth moves from Europe and North America to Asia (ex-Japan), the Indian economy will keep becoming bigger than other major economies in the years to come. It is more or less certain that the Indian economy will become bigger than the British economy this year. Getting back to France, that country has not grown in the last 10 years. In 2007, the French GDP was $2.657 trillion. In 2017, 10 years later, it was slightly lower at $2.582 trillion.
What about the UK? In 2007, the British GDP was $3.074 trillion. In 2017, it was significantly lower at $2.622 trillion.
The larger point here is that the Indian economy in terms of size has been competing against economies that have contracted or barely grown over the years. Even Germany, which is currently the fourth-largest economy in the world, barely grew between 2007 and 2017. In 2007, the German GDP was $3.44 trillion. In 2017, it was $3.677 trillion.
On the other side, as India has grown, it has pulled a multitude of its people out of poverty. A recent study by the Brookings Institution notes:
“According to our projections, Nigeria has already overtaken India as the country with the largest number of extreme poor in early 2018, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo could soon take over the No 2 spot. At the end of May 2018, our trajectories suggest that Nigeria had about 87 million people in extreme poverty, compared with India’s 73 million. What is more, extreme poverty in Nigeria is growing by six people every minute, while poverty in India continues to fall.”
Indeed, this couldn’t have been achieved without economic growth and the fact that the Indian economy has pipped many others to become a bigger economy over the decades.
If anything, this tells our politicians all over again that economic growth is the best antidote to poverty, which is something some of them refuse to believe. Having said that, there are other points that need to be made here:
- In 2017, India’s population was around 1.34 billion. It took 1.34 billion Indians to generate a GDP of $2.597 trillion. On the other hand, the population of France in 2017 was just 67 million, or around 5% of the population of India. They generated a GDP more or less similar to that of India. What that basically means is that an average Frenchman is much more productive than an average Indian. The per capita income of France in 2017 was $38,476.70 and that of India was $1,939.60. The French per capita income is nearly 20 times India’s. The poverty of India can also be gleaned from what it takes to be a part of India’s richest 1%. As James Crabtree writes in his new book The Billionaire Raj: A Journey through India’s New Gilded Age: “In North America it required $4.5 million in assets; in an average European country $1.4 million. In India the same figure was just $32,892.” The point is that the Indian economy still has a long way to go before it reaches anywhere near the French economy. GDP is just one measure.
- As India has grown over the years, the rich have captured the bulk of the gain. The World Inequality Report of 2018 points out that the top 10% of the Indian population earned around 55% of the national income. In 1980, this was close to 32%. While some inequality will always be a part of society, nevertheless, a rapid increase creates its own set of problems.
- Close to 10 million Indians enter the workforce every year and there are very few jobs available for them.
- Many Indian public-sector banks are technically bankrupt. A country that has ambitions of becoming a global economic power cannot have a large number of its banks not being in a position to carry out fresh lending.
- India’s health and education sectors continue to be in a mess and suffer from huge government apathy.
Yes, India has grown and become bigger than many of the world’s largest economies over the years, and that is a good thing, but there are many other things about the Indian economy that are holding it back. And from the way things currently are, it doesn’t look like the current government has much interest in correcting these things.
As always , bang on target !!!
What a stupid article that completely belittles the achievements of the current government. Manmohan Singh’s biggest achievement was the 2G scam!! Typical of a sickular liberal to write like this.
"They generated a GDP more or less similar to that of India. �What that basically means is that an average Frenchman is much more productive than an average Indian. The per capita income of France in 2017 was $38,476.70 and that of India was $1,939.60. The French per capita income is nearly 20 times India’s. �The poverty of India can also be gleaned from what it takes to be a part of India’s richest 1%." – What about France’s 1%? Do you know how much of France’s wealth they control? If so, then we can also determine what an average French is worth in terms of productivity. When Vivek Kaul get’s his head out of his ass and reply to this question, we can go forward looking at PPP, meaning how much can the average Indian buy to live comfortably vs a French with their 10 Euro per cup of coffee for starts.
Sirji, coffee in france is 1-2 euros per cup. The same quality of coffee in India is 50-100 rupees. Really baseless stuff. France is socialist and they are far ahead in standard of living. Agreed that ppp is a good comparison but even taking a ppp comparison average per capita gdp of an Indian is 1/4 th of that of a French citizen. Check your facts brother. Mere chest thumping isn’t enough to disprove a well researched article.
Oh so antimodi lobby working day and night, here and there to belittle every effort modi gvt doing to revive economy. Common people believe in him. Propaganda will not work in this case.
Lol total biased article. No credibility at all.
Nipun Sawhney Sire, there’s no chest thumping. Just trying to point out the flaws in the author’s arguement and in yours as well. Who isn’t agreeing that their standard of living isn’t good? We’re talking about sizes of the country’s economy and the improvement in the general life of it’s citizens as collateral. Or else we should all be looking at Liechtenstein GDP per capita as the gold standard and in that comparison, France is still shyte by your own logic – no?
Nipun Sawhney First off if you don’t know the person you’re having a debate with – don’t label them, I don’t know you and the feeling is likewise I think from your end as well, so let’s keep it that way. Secondly, I brought in Liechtenstein because you along with the author are in the habit of comparing extremes when it favors your cause. Let’s get back to coffee and cost of living in France vs India:
Indices Difference Info
Consumer Prices in France are 215.28% higher than in India
Consumer Prices Including Rent in France are 235.60% higher than in India
Rent Prices in France are 318.52% higher than in India
Restaurant Prices in France are 336.03% higher than in India
Groceries Prices in France are 189.87% higher than in India
Local Purchasing Power in France is 29.52% higher than in India
You can look up the other info from this link.
https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=India&country2=France
And from my personal experience growning up in Bangalore and having lived in Europe for 2.5 years and the last 10 years in the US, I can tell you that what you consider to live as a middle class in India would be tight as a salaried employee in Europe – things like taking your family for dinner or the movies are fairly expensive.
The good things to appreciate regardless of the government of the day is that after nearly 1000 years of loot and plunder especially in the last 300 years from our ex colonial masters where our GDP share went from 23% of the world to nearly nothing post independence, in 70+ years we’re climbing the ladder again and as urbunization of population is happening, people are coming in search of a better life and it looks like they’re staying because they have found it. We have miles to go, but it’s good to reflect on where we are now.
In heart of capital, three siblings died of starvation … – Times of India
Nipun Sawhney Your last line says it all, commie agents in disguise.
Atleast they did not die because some extremist decided to blow himself up for heavenly rewards.
India is a big and independent country in every way.
But India has to learn to act as a big and independent country with confidence.
Indian leadership suffers from inferiority complex. Nehru, Shastri and Indira had gutts.
Others were and are jokes.
God save India from Rahul!
All this inspire of Modi.
Nikhil Sundar This is exactly what I was talking about. Lol. `The salaried class` you talk about is the upper middle class and falls in the top 1% of income earners in India and not representative of the salaried class. The top 1% of income earners in France are not having to compromise with going out or anything like that so what you say is an unfair comparison – top 1 % earners in France earn 500000 dollars and above so even in this specific segment you get your facts wrong even with your wrong definition of salaried people.
Even a peon, a driver, a cook, a maid can be salaried with a fixed income but they would be better off in france. This is why I said andh bhakti. Khud ka bias lagalo bhai har jagah.
Vikram Reddy you are ignorant bigot commenting against a muslim guy with hate speech. Gandu hai tuh.
Nipun Sawhney Huh? Salaried class in India is Upper middle class, everyone else is living on foodstamps then? Devru, modlu helodu artha madko, illa muchkondu teppuge kuthko yakandre ninge thumba vishya gothilla. Gothiro pudang thara alladustha idya.
This article last parts does indicate the Amarthesen’s ideas about education and health care deficiencies. The present government is not responsible for this. The author must note it. You only played the numbers available to you. Certainly, the present government will take the credit of the progress of this nation. His intention is to belittle the achievements of this government and nation.
Grow up Vivek Kaul… Would u want to agree the same logic for Indira, Rajeev and Mr Nehru that they were not responsible for growth of India just like current govt… Why dont u include discreditinf these PM in ur article as well…
Nikhil Sundar use big Mac index to know real purchasing power parity
If growth cannot be attributed to the current govt so are the flaws in the economy.the author says nothing that a well read Indian doesn’t know.Blame and credit are two sides of the same coin.if current govt cannot be credited for growth it cannot be blamed for areas that we are lagging in.This article for me seems like another of propaganda tools which one political party uses for another.
I am neutral. neither BJP nor congress supporter. But this i do know – Asia Times is owned by Chinese owners. It is a well oiled propaganda machine that downplays India intentiinally. we are playing into their hands.
How dare you say stupid,if you can write opposite to it.
Very informative analysis of our status in world ranking.
Credit goes to KEJRIWAL
In analysis the data is used as it suits the author… the reality is that we are growing…per capita income was low previously but the gap has narrowed…
Indirectly author is crediting UPA regime for Growth and defaming NDA for not doing anything.
Stupid are people who fight without logic.
The talk of size of the Indian economy is not so simple, to base it on GDP or PPP or per capita income, the value of Indian currency can be increased by just changing the trade style, why we have trade deficit with China, do we really need to import trash,? Why people and companies are allowed to take money out of the country? Why make in India is not picking up, if only the flight of money is controlled the value of Indian currency will be doubled and the size of economy will be double, the price of a news paper is 20 times in the west, that does not mean our economy is 20 times bigger, on the whole I consider the size of Indian economy and military as the 3rd largest, and we are poverty world power, thanks the people that the economy of scams is over…
It’s that article is for stupid or illiterate one? Atleast go for gdp per capita, and compare it of 2013 as of to 2018. Then all can get that who is doing better.
Statistical analysis of the world countries to say rich and poor don’t serve any purpose. Comparison of a 1220 million people nation with 60 million country and say this is big and the other is low looks a strange one and a childish outlook. Also this is nothing but Ridiculous. A long time poor country is trying to pickup with all kind difficulties of inherited bottlenecks. There were so many historical negative impacts on India. Colonial rule after the long time rule of looters, thieves, and bugllers. Continuous looting of then Bharat by Afghan invaders no doubt made the country to suffer. There after the Moghul and colonial exploiters. After giving away two big portion of land in the West and East country continued to suffer with the terrorist menace and religion based extremism by the neighbours.
Whereas the French who had there warfare else where in the world and protected their mother land safe and rich. It is only during the world war they had the pinch of war. May be e the kings of that country went for wars with their neighbours during ancient and middle ages.
But the case of India is different and trying to point out that the growth is not because of the present leader is something unwarranted. No country in the world became rich overnight and only by a person within 4 years especially a land with 1200 million people. Also the comparison sounds bit silly. Let us point out any way out for positive changes if possible . If not better keep quiet rather than exposing any ignorance and personal prejudices.
Indian banks went bankrupt NCOs of corruption of UPA government.
NDA government is bringing back life in to them.
Everything aspect is correct except french people are more productive, french had colonies as same as England and they looted counties, that’s why they have that much of money and india did from scratch
Modi is responsible only for everything wrong in this country. Isn’t it? For anything and everything in this country Modi is responsible. Looks like he is the most responsible pm till date. 🙂
The article is sheer jugglery of statistics to belittle the achievements made by PM Modi govt. Also this govt is paying minute attention and is taking several measures for poor ,for education and for health. This is a biased view of India’s growth story.
Why should we compare India vs France. We should be doing it with China as both India and China missed Industrial revolution. For a long period of time both had colonialism, similar in many aspects except the political system. 30 Years ago India was slightly ahead of China. Now China is way ahead of us. We need to talk both at both micro and macro scale.
These days, you can know the contents of the article by seeing who has published it. It’s either praising Modi or belittling him. Nobody looks for logic these days
A vaguely presented facts with no deep insights.
This author is completely idiot.
Don’t read whole article, just read the last line, that is what he want to say at all.
Anybody can write such a article, here he praise fance even when their economy is gowing down, and here in India the GDP is growing with 7 to 7.5%, but still this idiot is not happy. This is not china that, it will grow above 10%, because India is democraty country, even to pass triple talaq bann govt have to suffer many problem. The chamcha are oppossing on every moment. While in china everything is smooth, because of communism(But still I prefer democracy). Whole world praise Modi reform like GST but still the opposition leader RaGa a.k.a pappu blame on GST. And when good results come he just turn around and will say that it is first introduced by our govt, lol.
Recently even some congi supporter said during manmohan era, the grow was 10% GDP, but that is pure BS, they just don’t count infliation(8%), don’t count diflicit or anything.
Anybody can write such a article, I thought someone will pointout in right directiong and will crticize govt in right way, but this author is completely mirror of pappu
Loved the realitistic and eye opening article. Thank you!
Loved the realitistic and eye opening article. Thank you!
Nipun Sawhney you on fire! woot woot!
Nipun Sawhney you on fire! woot woot!
Being a statistican, it amazes me how people quote one number to prove their biased point of view while ignoring ( better, hinding) 9 others. This simply cheating others. And bigger problme is that they get air time on reputed paltforms.
Being a statistican, it amazes me how people quote one number to prove their biased point of view while ignoring ( better, hinding) 9 others. This simply cheating others. And bigger problme is that they get air time on reputed paltforms.