Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou’s recent three-day visit to Bhutan failed to galvanize much media attention outside of the immediate region. But seasoned observers saw the senior envoy’s tour as a renewed Chinese charm offensive to win influence in the small, remote Himalayan kingdom at the expense of its traditional ally India.
The Global Times, a Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece newspaper, quoted a Chinese academic referring to Kong’s visit saying, “So far Bhutan cannot completely get rid of India’s influence on politics, economy, diplomacy and security. [But] China hopes Bhutan could be independent in these respects like Nepal.”
Nepal is a textbook example of how China’s mix of soft diplomacy, generous aid and getting on the right side of local politics has won over a South Asian nation that was previously firmly in India’s sphere of influence.
Another example is the island republic of Maldives, where China’s deft diplomacy, rich infrastructure-building and picking the right winner between incumbent President Abdulla Yameen and his pro-Indian, coup-ousted predecessor Mohamed Nasheed has paved new diplomatic inroads for Beijing.
Kong’s July 22-24 visit to Thimphu, Bhutan’s capital, was the first by a senior Chinese official since last year’s 72-day standoff between Indian and Chinese forces on the Doklam plateau, a high-altitude tri-junction area which is claimed by China while India and Bhutan see it as Bhutanese territory.
In June 2017, Chinese road construction crews protected by Chinese troops began to build a road through the disputed area located on the eastern flank of the Chumbi valley, a narrow salient between western Bhutan and the mountainous Indian state of Sikkim. The stand-off ended inconclusively when both India and China agreed to withdraw from Doklam last August.
But India’s initial reaction to the roadworks was likely exactly what China wanted in a well-laid diplomatic trap. India’s response to the infrastructure project made it appear as the belligerent party while at the same time raising concern in Bhutan, where India’s military presence is politically sensitive.
Now, some Bhutanese politicians want to lessen the small landlocked country’s dependence on India, an issue that has emerged ahead of National Assembly elections scheduled for later this year.
P Stobdan, a well-known Indian security analyst, argued in a local media article last year before the Doklam incident that Bhutan’s election “will be fought on pro- versus anti-Indian slogans.” That seems more likely in the standoff’s aftermath, where certain local politicians are pointing to the geopolitical risks as an argument for reducing national dependence on India.
If China wants to drive a wedge between India and Bhutan, then Kong’s visit was strategically timed. The Chinese envoy used the opportunity to promote President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), though firm plans will likely have to wait until the sides establish formal diplomatic relations.
India is known to view China’s BRI with suspicion as envisioned railways, roads and ports under the US$1 trillion venture crisscross its traditional areas of influence in the region and if fully realized will give China new access points to the Indian Ocean, where the two sides are increasingly jockeying for strategic advantage.
Unresolved border issues with China are known to compound India’s trepidation, as do recent revelations that ethnic insurgents from northeastern India have a clandestine presence in China’s southern Yunnan province. While Beijing has not acknowledged the rebel presence on its territory, Delhi will remember well China’s support for ethnic Naga, Mizo and Manipuri rebels in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.
That aid came to a halt in the mid-1970’s, but it seems Beijing is now more willing than in the 1980’s and 1990’s to allow rebels from northeast India to have safe havens (though without weapons) in the Chinese border town of Ruili in southern Yunnan province. Some analysts see the rebel havens as a tit-for-tat response for India’s allowing Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leader Dalai Lama to reside in its territory, a long-time irritant in bilateral ties.
Bhutan, another bastion of Buddhism, is the only neighboring country with which China does not have formal diplomatic relations, due in part to India’s past “guidance” of Bhutan’s foreign policy. But China and Bhutan have recently developed contacts through a long series of talks that have progressed on their disputed border.
In that dialogue, China has offered to give up its claim to a 495 square kilometer area in northern Bhutan and part of a 269 square kilometer area in the west in exchange for a nearly 100 square kilometer area in Doklam, near the China-Bhutan-India tri-border junction.
India views the proposed exchange as a potential security threat, as it would widen the area between Sikkim and Bhutan, just north of India’s so-called “chicken’s neck”, a narrow corridor that connects the volatile northeastern region with the rest of the country. Analysts say that if Bhutan agreed to the territorial exchange that the corridor could easily be cut off in a potential conflict scenario with China.
China and Bhutan have so far held 24 rounds of border talks, but they came to a halt following last year’s Doklam standoff. Now, some believe those talks could soon resume after Kong, a second-ranking official, met with Bhutan’s King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuk, Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay and Foreign Minister Damcho Dorji during his recent visit.
The Chinese foreign ministry said on its website that Kong “conveyed the warm regards of Chinese leaders to Bhutanese leaders, and expressed that China-Bhutan relations have maintained a sound development momentum in recent years.”
The statement also said that “the Bhutanese side admires the development achievements of China and welcomes the positive outcomes of the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping.”
The Bhutanese foreign ministry published a much shorter press release, mentioning little more than the names of the Chinese visitors and who they met in Thimphu.
China’s soft power overtures towards Bhutan have been wide-ranging, including the dispatch of circus artists, acrobats and footballers to the Himalayan kingdom. A limited but growing number of Bhutanese students have also received scholarships to study in China.
Beijing has also used its tourists as economic leverage. The number of Chinese tourists visiting Bhutan surged from less than 20 a decade ago to 9,220 in 2016. In 2017, in the wake of the Doklam standoff, that number fell to 6,421 out of a total of about 70,000 international visitors to the hermetic small nation that only recently opened to global tourism.
That figure does not include more than 170,000 Indians who do not require visas to visit Bhutan. The number of Chinese visitors last year was surpassed only by Indians, 9,220 Americans and 10,536 Bangladeshis. The number of Chinese visitors could rise again following Kong’s visit, which some believe signaled a re-normalization of relations after the Doklam incident.
Bhutan, a 38,394 square kilometer mountainous nation with only 797,000 inhabitants, now finds itself in the unenviable position of being squeezed between the world’s two most populous nations as they parry and thrust for regional influence.
Bhutan’s relationship with India dates back to old friendship treaties first signed with India’s British colonial masters and later with independent India. In 1971, Bhutan became a full member of the United Nations with India’s support and a revised treaty in 2007 gave the Bhutanese more independence from Delhi over its foreign affairs.
Even so, Bhutan is still highly reliant on India for security, including through the euphemistically named Military Training Team, a unit located in the Bhutanese town of Haa responsible for training the Royal Bhutan Army. Haa is located just 50 kilometers from Doklam and the strategic Chumbi valley.
China’s renewed charm offensive with Bhutan will inevitably stoke new suspicions in India. Indeed, with China’s growing influence in Nepal and Maldives, India is running out of assured allies in its immediate neighborhood.
Some suggest India has taken its long cozy relationship with Bhutan for granted and until now has been complacent about China’s overtures towards the kingdom. But Bhutan is clearly in China’s strategic sights ahead of an election that will be largely defined on how close the country wants to remain to India.
Sooner or later Bhutan will be looking to balance its relationship with India. This does not mean lndia is losing its influence over Bhutan. What they will have is a matured relationship. Every country wants to be treated with respect and as equal. For India the time has come for it to have a relook at its relationship with its peripheral country.
"India" is a western imperialist creation to enslave the Asians against the will of the indigenous people of South Asia, it is illegitimate alien and harmful to the Asians. The current "India" is an extension of its former colonial master, British imperialist, spreading their toxic divide-and-conquer discord among the Asians, and land grab of its neighbours, Sikkim, GOA, Kashmir, Tibet South, Nagas, Manipur, Assamese, … Unless this fascist regressive caste system Hindutva get destroyed this toxic cancer will destroy all humanity with its regressive, inhuman and barbaric caste system.
India’s armed invasion of Bhutan during the Doklam incident reminded Bhutan the annexation of Sikkim, GOA, etc., to be annexed by the imperialist fascist Hindutva India is their own asking if they continue the past relationship path with India.
That was an intesting thought.
Joe Wong, India is Western Imperialist" huh! "Illegitimate alien, huh!" That gives your masters the necessary excuse to "liberate" India. Bring it on. Everyone knows who imperialist and who is illegitimate. You guys have no friends. Just nations who you own because of all that money you throw on them. You have no friends, mister. Look around you. Pakistan, N Korea, and all those nations that take your money. You have no friends. That says a lot about your masters
Ilango Gurusamy, British first arrived India as a friend, it ended up they used divide and conquer to rule Indian as lackeys and slaves for few hundreds of years. American wanted Indian as a friend to encircle China, they encouraged and supported Indian to take Tibet by force as the inheritance from their British master, but the American never came to help when Indian was beaten to the ground and humiliated.
The Anglo even built a forward base, Diego Garcia, full of nuclear bombers and submarines that can bomb India back to stone age in order to make sure Indian call them friend too. If Indian can call those treacherous and murderous guys as friends, then who needs enemy.
This article utilized the Indian propaganda narrative of the Donglang plateau which simply doesn’t fit with events on the ground. The author claims that Indian and Chinese troops both agreed to leave the area; a suggestion the Chinese government rejected as this was claimed Chinese territory. When the Indian government originally claimed this event had occurred, Chinese government officials immediately denied that the Chinese troops had left the area. Additionally, after the Indian troops left the Chinese kept building their road and even fortified the area to prevent a future Indian invasion. One wonders how this all occurred if both sets of troops agreed to leave the area?
Additionally, as this article mentions, Bhutan-Chinese ties are becoming normalized again despite the Chinese military presently occupying the Donglang plateau. Bhutan doesn’t mind because they had resolved their boundary dispute with China in principle back in 1998. The formal border designation has been delayed due to Indian interference.
The basis of this story seems to be that India abused its relationship with Bhutan to such a degree with the stand-off last year that Bhutan realizes that they need other relationships to balance their relationship with India, which obviously doesn’t treat them as a sovereign, autonomous country.
A Chinese national who gave rare public testimony about China’s secretive “re-education” camps in Xinjiang will be allowed to stay in Kazakhstan, where she has applied for asylum.
Sayragul Sauytbay, an ethnic Kazakh from Xinjiang, had been at risk of deportation to China after being charged with illegally crossing the border.
Time has also come for China to give the people of Tibet and E Turkmenistan a vote on independence.
Glad that you are sharing this important aspect of the history. There never was a country called India. As Winston Churchilll said it’s a continent just as Europe and Asia are. Even under British Raj it did not have control over the entire sub-continent. Most of the people in the so call Northeast Territories are Asians and so are people from Bhutan.
India needs to look hard and fast why all its neighbors are adversaries or quickly becoming ones. These relationships should not be onesome. Bhutan, Kashmir, Nepal, Sri Lanka … name a few.
Ivor Large, There are hundreds of thousands of political refugees risked their lives and escaped to the USA and Australia with their families and small kids, why did the American and Aussie separate the small kids and their parents and locked them up in the remote concentration camps and offshore islands? They all have horror stories to tell including the new horror stories they are being abused by the American and Aussie such as they could not find their kids who were brutally separated by the American and Aussie border guards and militias.
Ivor Large, those pictures were taken by the Radio of Free Asia in India, it was a cooked-up that made Radio of Free Asia a laughing stock in the international Intel community.
Joe Wong Aus puts people who have crossed numeroud countries into offshore detention. It doesnt separate families.
In the case of the US, once again people who have crossed numerous safe countries then break laws and cross the US border illegally. The child has committed no crime can cant be detained, while the parents can.
But how many people seek asylum in China ?
Joe Wong Is that what the CCP tell you ?
Georgio Hein China also needs to ask the same thing, as it has border disputes with every neighbor. Quite a record.
As sovereign and free as Tibet & E Turkmenistan ?
Joe Wong , you are the eastern imperialist, remember. The entire world knows Tibet is not China’s Tibet. You cannot fool the world, Mr. Wong. Remember the Yuan dynasty. China was part of Mongolia too. Does that mean Mongolia should claim China as a part of Mongolia?
China is the Eastern Imperialist, encircling India
Jason, sadly you are wrong. China’s claim over Doklam is fraudulent. Everyone knows it
Jason, "Indian invasion". huh? That is a Chinese invention. They are really good at fabricating narratives. You know that as well as I do. So, lets admit it, it was a Chinese invasion of Bhutanese soil. Doklam is Bhutanese. Get used to it.
Jason there is no Donglang. That is fiction. The Chinese occupy and then rename it. You know that as well as I do. This the Eastern Imperialist way, remember. Eastern imperialism by China
Does China treat Bhutan, Nepal, and even India as an independent sovereigh nations, no. What are the Chinese doing inside Bhutan building illegal roads? Everyone knows that the Chinese have illegal activity all over Bhutan.
India stopped China at Doklam because the PLA was extending its illegal road towards India territory.
Get used to the facts.
Your friends here just said that "India is illegitimate". What gives you people the right to say who is sovereign and who is not. China said "Tibet was never a nation". You are saying the same about India. That means you view India as another Tibet to be liberated by China.,
What gives China, the eastern imperialist the right to take over other nations simply because it believes they are "illegitimate", "never a nation". What gives the eastern imperialist that right?
Georgio Hein, China needs to look even harder at how she treats her neighbors. Get used to that fact
Georgio Hein, China has an amazing record of having multiple disputes concurrently. Over 300 incursions into Indian soil every year. Are you even aware of these things.
Get used to the facts. China routinely enters Indian territory. This year alone at least 30 incursions were recorded.
Get used to the facts.
China needs to start treating her neighbors with respect. That starts with India. Start treating India with the respect she deserves
India is NOT a source of free real estate to be grabbed
Georgio Hein, you pople have a blinkered view of everything. Why? Global Times is your source of infomation. China buys people with money and turns them into adversaries of India.
It is open knowledge that China too control of Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port for 99 years. Sril Lanka is heavily in debt to China. The interest alone is several billion a year. Is this what a friend does?
No. China trapped Sril Lanka in debt and is now doing the same to Pakistan, Nepal,, Maldives.
Get used to it. These are all facts. Open your eyes and you will see the truth.
China’s debt trap politics easily enable it to create ‘adversaries’.
I repeat. How many true friends does China really have? Oh, lets not count all these tiny nations that are caught in a debt trap and now losing their land to China.
How many true friends?
The time has come for China to have a hard look at what she is doing in Tibet?
Staging ground for eating away at India and Bhutan?
Get used to it. China is taking territory
Joe Wong all this is propaganda. No one wanted to take Tibet, except China.
Ilango Gurusamy the other people commenting are not my friends. I would never say that India is illegitimate. You obviously don’t understand how a comments section works. Everyone who is critical of India isn’t friends and they all don’t agree with one another.
Also, you did not address any of the points I made in my argument. Simply stating "get used to the facts" demonstrates that you’re just another indoctrinated Indian. Read my original comment again and see if you can argue the facts. If China’s road is "illegal" and an invasion of Bhutan then how come Bhutan isn’t officially complaining? They don’t even have diplomatic relations with China! And why did the Indian military suddenly run away and leave the entire region to be developed by the Chinese military? Your "get used to the facts" argument doesn’t explain any of this.
Ivor Large you need to stick to propaganda points instead of making factual claims. China only has land-based border disputes with India and this is because India has always refused to negotiate their borders, choosing instead to send their military as far as possible in attempts to claim more land (a tactic which backfired in the Sino-Indian War of 1962). As for the South China Sea, everyone disputes everyone’s claim; so you could say the same thing of every claimant country in that area. And before you say ‘China has the largest claim’, well Vietnam has the most disputed claim as they also have a heated dispute with Indonesia.
Ilango Gurusamy claiming India is some sort of victim by counting "Chinese incursions" every year in an area where there is no border is nonsense. There is no official border because, as a point of historical fact Nehru refused to negotiate its vague northern borders with China. Even India’s official maps in 1958 did not have definite boundaries in many northern areas. China has continuously saught to negotiate its borders with India but they always refuse any negotiation, choosing instead to adopt unilaterally drawn borders either they themselves make or their British colonizers drew.
This form of argument is as pathetic as the Japanese suddenly and unilaterally claiming the Diaoyu Islands in 2012, and when the Chinese refused to accept this annexation, they started counting Chinese "incursions" into their "territory."
Ivor Large China doesn’t accept asylum seekers. As the country with the world’s largest population, the government has enough to deal with. A better question is, how many people choose to live in China illegally because its better than their home countries? The answer is tens of millions. There are tens of millions of Africans and middle-easterners who choose to stay illegially in China rather than return to their home countries.
Ilango Gurusamy you obviously don’t know much about Tibet. The only period of time where it could reasonably claim independence from China in the last thousand years was after 1911 when the 13th Dalai Lama, spurred on by the British, declared Tibet independent of China. However, no other country recognized their independence nor established official diplomatic relations with them. The 14th Dalai Lama, in 1959, attempted a coup against the Chinese but failed. China didn’t need to "take Tibet" because it had been theirs since the Yuan dynasty.
Jason Jean India is now larger. China wont accept asylum seekers as it is an extremely racist country. It’s not 10’s of m’s of Africans, maybe a m. But maybe in 20yrs their offspring might give you a soccer team that can qualify for the World Cup
Ivor Large like les blues in 2018 WC?
Badri Subedi Yes, the Fr are v similar to the Chinese. Good food and small weapons. Unlike the Germans who won last time.
Jason Jean ,or Jason Lee or whoever you are, there is a reason why China only has a dispute with only Indian and Bhutan. China is sitting on the watertower of the world and is an "upstream" occupier power. Tibet and the Himalayas are full of natural resources and of tremendous strategic value to China. That is why China has disputes onnly with India. You need to look only a little beyond Chinese propoganda to get to the truth.
China has settled its borders with other nations but there is a difference, a huge difference in their strategiic value. Get used to the truth, Jason or PRC troll.
Look beyond commie propaganda.
China is the eastern imperilalist. India suffered 2 centuries of imperialist rule. You insult India, but India is wise to ignore insults from the eastern imperialist. China is the arch imperialist and wants more land by accusing other people of imperialism because that is an excuse for ‘liberating’ or annexing land.
You only need to be a little more open to reason and fact to reject PRC lies,
Joe Wong What kind of twisted, contorted logic is this, Wong. Yo make little sense.Everything you say smacks of PRC propoganda
Jason, you are sadly and utterly wrong. Even you know that. Doklam was never Chinese. The Chinese have snatched Doklam from Bhutan and were building roads towards the Jampheri ridge, attempting to take control of the chicken neck area,. Everyone knows this.,
Indian invasion of Doklam So Laughable. China, the land grabber has grabbed Doklam for further her imperialistic expansion goals on Indian and Bhutanese territory.
Plain and simple. There are satelite maps that clearly show China building roads all over Bhutan. China is the illegal party here, Get used to it,
Joe Wong you need to move away from wrong, outdated, foggy and hateful Chinese propoganda. Get into the real world, dude.
So wrong. China is the eastern imperialist and has grabbed Tibet and the so-called Zinjiang and more. It keeps wanting more. That is why it invented all this "india imperialist" nonsense.
No one believes old commie lies anymore. China’s lies are being exposed in the South China sea. it is a laughing stock. The world knows what China is doing.
Ask the philippines, They say that China is a "grand larcenist", and international outlaw, a thief that steals fish from poor fishermen
Which nation enters other people’s EEC, threatens them, takes fish, occupies features, etc.
Only China.
Jason Jean , denying border incursions is so lame. It is also very disrespectful to a neigbor. You have no valid arguments exceot to repeat the same old commie propoganda of others being imperialist.
Dude, your ignorance of the facts is appalling. China is in occupation of tibet and expanding her territory by chewing away on India The entire world knows. Sure, the western imperialists know this. One imperialist understands another imperialist well. In this case, China the imperialist land-grabber