When the British East India Company, led by Robert Clive, defeated the Nawab of Bengal and his French allies in the war of Plassey in 1757, it consolidated its position in Bengal and subsequently expanded to all over India during the next 100 years.
At the same time, an ambitious king of Gorkha, a princely state only a few miles from the outskirts of Kathmandu valley, was also on the rise and busy expanding his kingdom. His name was Prithvi Narayan Shah and he later became known as the father of modern Nepal. He created Nepal by conquering all the small states in the surrounding areas, including the Kathmandu valleys.
The Indian subcontinent had only two major powers by then: The Honorable British East India Company and the Gorkhali Army of Nepal. The two powers were to eventually lock horns as they crossed each other’s paths and fought a decisive battle known as the Anglo-Gorkha War of 1814-16.
Defeat for the Gorkhali side did not only stop its ongoing expansion, but also clipped its wings once and for all. The war had crippled the losing nation and it never recovered its former glory.
However, the 1814-16 war was not the first time the two sides had clashed – they fought a brief war in 1767. The king of the Kathmandu valley and the British had already established a trade relationship and the British sent troops to aid the troubled valley king when he was attacked by the Gorkhali army.
The British, led by Captain Kinloch, suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Gorkhali force, losing more than 1,000 men. They fled, leaving behind weapons and munitions. The incident became known as “The Kinloch Expedition.”
In its heyday, the borders of Nepal extended to Kangra, including Simla and Dehradoon, to the west to the River Tista, including Darjeeling and Sikkim, to the east. After their previous defeat, the British avoided confrontation.
But the Gorkhali army had its own problems. It was founded on an ill-thought out plan called the Jagir system, which meant that the army was paid through taxes raised from newly acquired lands. Since the troops were not paid from the national treasury, they needed to conquer more lands to pay their expanding ranks.

Greed also played a role in defining the course of history. When the Gorkhali army attacked the British Protectorate state of Oudh, the British had no choice but to go to war.
Initially, the war did not go well for the British. Four of six generals had to be reprimanded and eventually relieved of duty, one died and the last remaining general, David Ochterlony, was the final senior ranking man left standing.
Defeated by deception
Despite being outgunned and outnumbered, the Gorkhali army fought bravely and held on. However, they were finally defeated by deception and their own system of recruitment. The men fighting for the Gorkhali army were not all from the hills – they were men of different tribes from the newly conquered lands and their allegiances were not to the Gorkhali commanders, but to their tribal leaders.
The British knew the situation and exploited it. As a result, soldiers deserted in large numbers, forcing the Gorkhali army to accept defeat. The defeat in the Anglo-Gorkha War was the end of the Gorkhali army, and as the saying goes, the rest is history.
Nepal was nothing more than a remote, mosquito-infested and mysterious place for the British, run by a beast-like tribe, and they had no stomach for taming that beast. Still, they had some expectations for the place and hatched a brilliant plan on how to achieve them.
First, they needed an open route to Tibet via Kathmandu for trade and it was imperative to have a friendly regime in Kathmandu, which they achieved once Nepal was brought under the nations of its influence.
Secondly, the British needed someone in Kathmandu to check on the Nepali regime on a regular basis. Having a British resident at the heart of Kathmandu did that job perfectly and the regime in Nepal came under the group of British Protectorate nations without even realizing it.
Thirdly and most importantly, the British had to make sure Nepal would never be allowed to raise a military force and become a powerful nation again. The British had seen the bravery of these men in battle and a plan was hatched to bring them into the British army. The policy of recruiting them into the British Indian Army was, in fact, a masterstroke, and it was so tactfully done that it wasn’t even anointed at the Segauli Treaty that both the British and Nepal were to sign at the end of the war.
Treaty of Sugauli
By signing the Treaty of Sugauli, the British did get what they had hoped for and needed nothing more. The question of colonizing Nepal must have never occurred as it would have further complicated the situation.
Besides, colonization entails responsibility. The British had a free hand with the resources of a whole nation without having to bear any responsibilities. And the British were smart – the resources of the nation were at their disposal and they did not even have to ask for it. History can attest that the rulers of Nepal did their best to help make it even easier for the British for their personal gain, and the ulterior motives of the British side were never questioned.
Had the British colonized Nepal, it would have become a member of the Commonwealth later on and the British would have had to treat the Gurkhas on an equal basis like the forces of other member nations.
But if you can get something for free, why bother to pay for it? That was the main reason the British did not colonize Nepal.
The Honorable British East India Company
The person who wrote this journal failed his history test ????
Thought of slavers is limited so they can’t go beyond boundaries
Yeah. May be they got what they needed at that time. But let me remind you we were never a slave, never colonised, we were soverign country back then too. And that’s what every Nepalese is proud of.
I thought "SHAH" are muslim but here i found a great ruler Prithvi Narayan Shah from the Gorkha community. ???? And as a saying goes on from my great great geandfather that we are brother by blood with the Gol-Kha (strong-bitter) who is left during our journey from the wicked ruler of the Chinese centuries ago
Unless the lion knows how to write, stories will always glorify the hunter.
British never colonized Nepal because they could not do that.
Where is Dislike Button ????????????????
Blady Dhotis.
The Indian subcontinent had only two major powers then: The honorab British east India company and The ghorkhali army of Nepal …..
The man who suffers does not want to see others happiness.
Our history ..our pride..nepal never becomes others slave like urs..
Interesting.
Hey #Mr. writer (the one to write)…Just remeber that you would know nothing much about coffee production after having few sips of coffee. Need more reaserch..If you really wanna put out something for others to read(here as this shit) please have very critical and deep analysis of the topic orelse don’t let the readers to misjudge your mental abilities fella’!!
#CRAp
Anyone can guess this stupid artical writer is from India. . . Awww Indians. . . . .. .
Anglo Nepal war and the conclusion of subsequent Sugauli Treaty in 1816 were responsible why Nepal was left behind in socio/political development, because India on becoming independent from British, inherited Sugauli Treaty, which must have dictated India to frame India-Nepal relations; like open border and friendship Treaty between Nepal and India. As we understand it, it was disadvantageous for socio-political progress of Nepal which we are experiencing now and so time has come to amend it for slivereign Nepal.
Bikram Lama ji saabji..but why do all darwans and bahadurs in india are Nepalis just inquisitive…
I have heard of Gen Gilesbee. His memorial stands on the way to Mussurie ????
If unhve shame stop working in the indisn army all gurkha in indian army. Better to due hungry than work for rat dhotis.we feel proud however to see gurkha in british singapore brunei hkg.
टिम गुरग का लेख, वर्तमान पीढ़ी के लिये एक संदेश है,कि वे अपने विगत को पढ़ें ,समझे और दुनिया को वास्तविक स्वरूप से नेपाल और नेपाली अस्मिता से परिचित कराये यह आज की पीढ़ी की जिम्मेदारी है।काम कठिन है पर असम्भव नहीं! यह कार्य नेपाली, हिन्दी,और अंग्रेजी भाषा में करना होगा, समस्त के ज्ञानवरधन के लिये। आशा और विश्वास है कोई तो यह बीड़ा उठाने का साहस करेगा।मैं नेपाल का निवासी नहीं हूं,फिर भी मेरा प्रेम नेपाल केसाथ है क्यों? मुझे स्वयं मालूम नहीं,आज तक मैने नेपाल को नहीं देखा पर इस के इतिहास को पढ़ने की इच्छा ने मुझे हर नयी और पुरानी किताबों से परिचित कराया।
गुरग ने अपने प्रयास में बहुत कमिया रखी है,लगता है उन्होंने उन लेखकों का सहारा लिया है अपना लेख, लिखने के लिए, जिन्हें नेपाल की आत्मा का ज्ञान नहीं। मैं उनका ध्यान श्री,अमीस राज मलमी, महेश चन्द्र रीगमी व दूसरे बहुत से लेखकों के कार्यों को संदर्भ सामग्री का सहारा लेने की सलाह दूंगा, ताकि जब भी आप फिर कोई लेख या पुस्तक आप नेपाल पर लिखे तो आप वहां न्याय कर सकें।
लेखक और पाठक दोनों को धन्यवाद,कुछ पत्थर और कुछ फूल लेखक को मिलते ही है,उससे न घबराये और आगे बढ़े, पाठकों को भी लेखक की सहायता करनी चाहिए कुछ सन्दर्भ देकर,जो भी उनके पास हो! सहयोग स्वागत है, अन्यथा वियोग या विरोध,जो, नकारात्मक है।
आप की अच्छी,बुरी, टिप्पणियों का स्वागत है,अआपअवश्य भेजीये,फिर मिलेंगे।
Completely wrong. The British never colonized Nepal because they couldn’t. Simple!
Aman Routh ।।तेस्तो नुन खायेको घमण्ड छ भने ईन्डिया ले पनि नेपाल को चिसो पानी नेपाल नै फर्काओस।तस्कर लाई पनि नेपाल तिर सुतुक्क आउने भिसा नदिओस।अनि हामी पनि नखाउला तिम्रो नुन
Some reasons why British did not colonized Nepal are 1) Nepal is geographically rocking country where in tarai regions cover by flooding and 80%land had landslides,throughout the year. 2)they got all the resource with free of cost within the territory of Nepal,3) Rana regime are loyal to British rular 4) nepal extrem weather also importantly not suitable for british 5) Increasing pressure of Gorkha Army over british was also important to control british for easyly enter into Nepal. 5) Nepal is a country of Maleria disease, which was cause british were not intrested in Nepal.
Nepal always had Sikkim , Darjeeling under it and later on was acquired by the British Govt., N it was not a war in Nepal that Kimg Prithvi started and not a problem rather was a solution that india lacked called unification of Country which resulted in Colonization of Inida n Freedom of Nepal, and it was Rana that had agreement with British also these were also the same Dynasty that had brought suffering to Nepalese People, so you cannot say british had done it was all like a trade . and many wars have been lost by Britishers due to our legendary warriors Gorkhalis ,… Proud Gorkhali, Proud Nepal
None takes these social meada news serius coz it’s oftenwritten on table with beer ????…. they won’t read book specially those who launch ???? fire crackers from India as news and it nevertheless lands on target ????
Changing history is easy on gadgets…. even few countries are trying to change books while educating idiots and homelessness children’s by showing them wrong books. So they only know that’s history which was written by uneducated fools with high degrees….
Nepal should not take this Asian times and any other news Hammels serious….
it’s like trying to make us listen to them so each news channel can buy its crowd….
leave this part of history they nevertheless read pro study for being journalists. They type in parliaments those news to see what will Be reaction and then try to make ore not news on other reaction
Just laugh ???? loud and read and let go
They did not colonise Nepal because they knew that the nepalis were brave, but too dumb to fall under the tricks of the Britishers. So why fight them when you can easily trick them! lol…
What about Nepalese Art….cultural heritage… Sculpture… Unity in diversity…. These r also resources…. Dudes.
Why are my people angry at this article? How can you guys get angry at this article? It’s shows how less intetlligent we are. How are we supposed to win against such high intelligent people? U.K.’s Avg IQ is 100, while ours is 78. I know someone of you guys might be thinking since India was part of British empire they are just finding excuse or some reasons to make us feel bad(does that even make sense? ) Why would the article who seems to have Nepali background bad thing about us. What are the reasons do you guys think we didn’t get colonised? Look at the economy, innovation, Science and techonology of U.K. and compare to us. Average Nepali earn 1 U.S. Dollar a day. This is "Asia Times, not India Times"
People who are saying "Indians are slaves" Seriously! Shame on you for writing such things! Your comments can show how we Nepalis are, don’t you know that? Comments like that makes me ashamed to be Nepali. People who would rather die but read 1 article related to Nepali politics are always getting offended by when someone tells reality about us.
If that is true, why did we lose 1/4 land? lol The fact the you didn’t know that shows how low intelligence we have.
When they did lose against us? Seriously! If they lose the war, then did we sign Sugauli Treaty and lose our 1/4 land? If I am lying, you can read here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Nepalese_War .What are Nepali school teaching us? Why get angry over such thing? We lost because we are not intelligent while British are Intelligent. White people invented most of the things, how can we compare against them. lol
Bikram Lama How would you feel if we are part of someone’s empire and some people "Nepalis are slaves of …" . Cmon bro, have some class. Why are you so angry? Saying such things?
Why did you say "you Indian people are slaves of Britishers"? Sumretee Dhoubhadel seems to be Nepali, didn’t you read her comment? Or just writing things without reading. Even the Jatin, who is Indian, wrote nice thing about us. Seriously! What’s wrong with us Nepalis? Our parents should be ashamed of themselves for teaching us to hate Indians. It’s all because our taught us to hate Indians nothing else. Even the "pani puri seller" who Sir Bikram Lama said as if it is a bad thing, are productive. Atleast be happy that they are coming Nepal and selling those things and we can eat delicious food.
Europeans fought each others so much and killed each other many times, they don’t hate each other like we do.
I am so ashamed of knowing people like you are my countrymen. Reading your comments makes me ashamed to say Nepali when someone asks where are you from ( I live outside of Nepal). Don’t you know people can read your comment and know how people of Nepal are like? Shame on you!
So sad for the Nepalese. The British played almost the same role in case of CHT peoples in East Pakistan, in present day Bangladesh.
"But if you can get something for free, why bother to pay for it?", What do you mena by this??? This is the most demeaning news I have ever seen in my life. I don’t know how was this authorized for being published. Please remove this kind of rubbish new which is falsifying the history and demeaning a sovereign country.
Trash article
Phuntsog Lepcha Teita bro, I remember when our lovely countryman said "slaves" to Indians in youtube. All celebrities and people were giving sympathy to Indians. Saying it’s okay Indians, everyone hates Nepalese people in UK and HK. It made me so angry. Do people not know that others can give sympathy? Even if you hate them atleast don’t write those things. It made me feel so bad to Nepali. Because of like those people I hate being Nepalese, seriously!
Phuntsog Lepcha Teita bro, I remember when our lovely countryman said "slaves" to Indians in youtube. All celebrities and people were giving sympathy to Indians. Saying it’s okay Indians, everyone hates Nepalese people in UK and HK. It made me so angry. Do people not know that others can give sympathy? Even if you hate them atleast don’t write those things. It made me feel so bad to Nepali. Because of like those people I hate being Nepalese, seriously!
Nothing but the Truth.
Nothing but the Truth.