Three weeks after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “informal meeting” with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in the resort city of Wuhan that used to be Mao Tse-tung’s summer retreat, he is heading for a similar encounter with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the Black Sea beach resort of Sochi made famous by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, who had his favorite dacha built in that city.
But the Wuhan and Sochi meetings have little in common. The specter of another standoff with China in the Himalayas prompted Modi to seek the informal meeting with Xi. What is the leitmotif of the forthcoming gathering in Sochi?
The chatty remarks by government officials betray a certain strain to rationalize the event. One government “source” brazenly told the media that Modi hopes to create a new template in India’s diplomacy through such informal meets with foreign leaders, as against formal meetings with structured agenda, which he apparently considers “insubstantial for the broad conversations” he desires.
What is absolutely certain is that Modi, who unfailingly keeps an eye on his domestic audience, is assured of media limelight against the ravishingly beautiful backdrop of the Caucasian Biosphere Reserve, which is a World Heritage Site, at a time when his charisma is fading among Indians.
The point is, even without the forthcoming Sochi meet, Modi gets ample opportunities to converse with Putin. They will meet at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in China next month, the BRICS Summit in South Africa in July and the G-20 summit in Argentina in November — and, of course, at the annual bilateral Russian-Indian summit in October in Delhi.
Indian officials are giving the meeting some spin, claiming Modi hopes to have an “exchange of views” on international issues including the impact of the US sanctions against Russia on Delhi’s ties with Moscow. One source told the media, “We are not going to allow our defense requirements to be dictated by any other country. Whatever is in India’s interests in terms of procuring equipment for national security is what will determine how we act with various countries.”
A Russia-India-China alignment? No way
But the source also pointed out that India-Russia bilateral issues as such will form the agenda at the October summit in Delhi. The Russian commentators also tend to harp on the “big picture.” They bracket Wuhan and Sochi as two of a kind signalling, a profound process of Russia, India and China teaming up to counter the US’ “assertive” foreign policies against the backdrop of a historic realignment under way in global politics.
Now, that is a stretch. Modi is by no means a grand strategist playing on the global chessboard. Secondly, the Indian foreign-policy compass, which was set by his predecessor Manmohan Singh, who was a strong votary of the Washington Consensus, cannot be easily reset. There is a “bipartisan consensus” among Indian elites, including among Hindu nationalist groups mentoring Modi’s government that India’s tryst with destiny lies with America. While frictions may arise, the die is cast basically and that journey has well begun.
The mainstream thinking in Delhi is that the Trump administration is an aberration, which requires India to hunker down, awaiting the return of happy times. While Russian analysts excitedly ponder over a Russian-Indian-Chinese strategic congruence propelling the BRICS and SCO to storm the citadels of the international political and economic system dominated by the West, Indian strategists remain quiet.
Thus, India is unlikely to team up with the Astana process on Syria. India took an ambivalent stance at the Organization for the Protection against Chemical Weapons in Vienna over the Skripal spy case and a less-than-categorical stance apropos US-led missile strike on Syria in April. Moscow analysts took note. Delhi won’t even criticize President Trump on his decision to quit the Iran nuclear deal.
The bottom line is that the Sochi meet is taking place under the shadow of a growing Russian disenchantment with India’s “Chanakyan” foreign policy, where subterfuge prevails over principles or ideology. Contrary to Russian expectations, Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman refrained from clinching a $6-billion deal on the S-400 Triumf missile defense system during her visit to Moscow in April.
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimates that Russia’s share of Delhi’s weapons imports has sharply declined over the years, from 79% in the 2008-12 period to 62% in the 2012-17 period. And this is at a time when India looms large as the world’s number one buyer of weaponry and US exports are booming.
Bilateral deals have hit headwinds
Putin has a focused, result-oriented, practical, unemotional mind when it comes to Russia’s relations with foreign countries. The S-400 missile deal or Russia’s energy cooperation with India (which has also run into headwinds following US sanctions against Russia and Iran) will not go unnoticed.
Putin is highly experienced in the complex world of diplomacy and is clear-headed about the essential relationship between his domestic programs and Russia’s national security and the co-relation of forces internationally. He is flexible and pragmatic but unwavering on Russia’s interests. He understands perfectly well that the US diplomacy toward India has lately shifted gear to a new aggressive phase of overtly interfering with Russian-Indian relations. The gloves are off with the cascading US-Russian tensions. Washington specifically targets the two key templates of Russian-Indian cooperation – defense and energy, as American companies have deep business interests in the burgeoning Indian market.
Suffice to say, the sort of barstool conversation spanning everything under the sun between the Arctic and Syria that can be expected in Sochi this month and next between Putin and Germany’s Angela Merkel or France’s Emmanuel Macron or Japan’s Shinzo Abe, is unlikely to happen on Monday. Modi is quintessentially a parochial politician with a nationalist outlook who became an incipient world statesman by chance.
The outcome of the Sochi meeting will be measured in terms of Modi’s success in mollifying the sense of hurt in the Russian mind and in mending a “time-tested” relationship that is in disrepair.

I get tired of pointing out to my fellow Indians that Russia is not a serious alternative as an ally compared to the USA. Russa has only half the GDP of India and only one tenth of the population of China. Russia is totally dependent on China economically and has said openly that she can never help India if china attacks her. Russia today is ruled by a gangster regime sworn to a white fascist ideology. Russia is no good at all as an ally for India.
Ilya Ilyayev
Russia is surely the slavish country you have in mind. Why does she not simply do all that India says? She needs a new False Dmitry.
You Russians are today a bunch of drunken anti-Srmitic clowns. For a few years you were something thanks to Lenin and Trotsky. Then you slid back into your nastiness. Your ideal leader is Rasputin.
Gaurav Chand Arabs are the only SEMITES and Russia has always stuck by the underdog. Russia defeated Nazism all alone and has checkmated the US too. India is a third world divided failed state and can not be propped up by anyone.
India is a basketcase and can not last a day against China. Licking US boots will not help.
India will break up very soon . The racists Hindu sanghs are making the implosion closer
After a lifetime of arguing day in and day out that India and the USA could never ally and that India is doomed to get into the orbit of China, Bhadrakumar with his close Delhi connections has at last admitted that the opposite is the case – India is bound to ally with the USA. Why has it taken him so many years to see the obvious? Eyes he has but he saw not; ears he has but he heard not. What happened for common sense to suddenly break through the age old crust of denialism? And what is he going to write now that his favourite topic of how India and the USA are born enemies is redundant?
India need work visas for its population in canada US and Britain they would lick anything for their personal gain.
They r slaves and wud remain slaves , befoee it was Britain then Russia and now Uncle Sam. no matter how many arms and planes they wud gather they just can’t win any war. History never lies.
India has realised today Russia is nothing more than a pensioner of China. Russia cannot help India against China. Russia has only half the population of the USSR, and only half the GD|P of India.
India and America have no option but to ally against China. Otherwise they will be defeated separately by China. At least, india will.
"…the Indian foreign-policy compass, which was set…Manmohan Singh, who was a strong votary of the Washington Consensus, cannot be easily reset. There is a “bipartisan consensus” among Indian elites, including among Hindu nationalist groups mentoring Modi’s government that India’s tryst with destiny lies with America. While frictions may arise, the die is cast basically and that journey has well begun.
The mainstream thinking in Delhi is that the Trump administration is an aberration, which requires India to hunker down, awaiting the return of happy times. While Russian analysts excitedly ponder over a Russian-Indian-Chinese strategic congruence propelling the BRICS and SCO to storm the citadels of the international political and economic system dominated by the West, Indian strategists remain quiet.
Thus, India is unlikely to team up with the Astana process on Syria. India took an ambivalent stance at the Organization for the Protection against Chemical Weapons in Vienna over the Skripal spy case and a less-than-categorical stance apropos US-led missile strike on Syria in April. Moscow analysts took note. Delhi won’t even criticize President Trump on his decision to quit the Iran nuclear deal."
Unexpected to meet that old weed user Bhadrakumar off the dope and talking solid sense for a change ! Keep up the cure !
India has no use for the advice of criminal anti-Semitic Nazi gangsters like your Rasputin. You Russians were only ever anything worthwhile because of Lenin. Now your hero is Rasputin.
You mean you are burning up because India and America are now allies.
India is a miserable country today because people like Gandhi with anti-modern minds held it back. She is only now beginning to wake up to the real world. China is surely the slavish country you have in mind. Why does she not simply do all that India says? She needs a new Chiang Kai Shek.
India should stick with Russia and shun the US/Zionist camp which will rip off India again as the Brits did until 1947. Russia stuck up for India in all its conflicts. US is a ponzi scammer and sunset power.
Unfortunately India will never be a power it strives to be as it will be always cotailing a power. Whether it was the British or now the US empire, its just built into Indian mindset that they are inferior compare to other nations. They will sheepishly abide by the rules of others and shamefully swallow their pride is to not upset the apple cart. Given that its a country of 1.4 Billion people and Nuclear armed…it is has slavishly followed the US policies to the point of embarrassment. They need to learn from countries like Cuba, Iran and N. Korea and show courage and dignity rather than rolling over like a poodle….they need a new Mahatma Gandhi.