Facilitated by a largely unquestioning media, Indonesian President Joko Widodo’s government has become a master at the game of smoke and mirrors, which in its simplistic form is all about convincing the public that things are happening when they really aren’t.
The protracted negotiations with US mining giant Freeport McMoran Copper & Gold are a good example, but going back to the presidency of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono the deceptive game-playing has covered everything from beef to natural resources to infrastructure.
While not new, the official obfuscation and embellishment of the truth has become more apparent as the 2019 legislative and presidential elections approach and Widodo and his palace spin doctors perceive the need to display his accomplishments.

Yudhoyono played this game back in mid-2011 when the Australian government suspended live cattle exports to Indonesia over animal welfare issues, and Jakarta decided some payback was in order by ordering a ban of its own.
Over the next two years, it slashed cattle imports by half and sought to convince consumers that the local industry could fill the gap when rising prices – and one of the lowest per capita beef consumption rates in Asia — clearly showed it could not.
Fast forward to the much-vaunted China-backed US$5.8 billion Jakarta-Bandung fast-rail project, once seen as the showcase of Widodo’s ambitious infrastructure program and now stalled over land acquisition issues that should have been foreseen.

Getting it started hasn’t been for the want of trying. Widodo attended a ground-breaking ceremony in January 2016, only to see Transport Minister Jonan Ignasius call a halt to the project five days later because of several “unresolved issues.”
Widodo and the Chinese weren’t amused. In July, the same month the construction permit for the project was finally issued, Ignasius — the former, highly successful chief executive of state-run railway Kareta Api — was unceremoniously sacked.
The president should have already learnt his lesson. In mid-2015, he had presided over the ground-breaking of the US$4 billion, Japan-funded Batang power station in Central Java, only to discover local farmers were still refusing to sell a key patch of land.
The courts finally resolved that one, but the railway still isn’t going anywhere despite the efforts of State Enterprise Minister Rini Soemarno, who showed up last July for yet another ground-breaking event – this one a tunnel.
It takes a lot to beat the whole Freeport saga, though, starting with last year’s framework agreement which was hailed at the time as a major victory for the Widodo government in forcing the company to agree to divest 51% of its shares in its local subsidiary.
Maybe so, but no-one seemed to notice that the devil was in the small print. In fact, the Indonesia media failed to point out at the time that the crucial questions of valuation and management control had yet to be settled.

Little surprise then that the negotiations continue, interspersed on frequent occasions with reassuring pronouncements by senior government officials that a final, final deal is just around the corner. It has been a long corner.
So far, there have been at least four government-imposed deadlines, all based on the extension of Freeport’s permit allowing it to continue exporting copper concentrate from its high-altitude Grasberg mine in Papua’s Central Highlands. The next one is in June.
Refusing the permit would clearly hurt the company’s profits, but it would also cut deeply into government revenues and, perhaps more importantly, lead to worker lay-offs that could spark unrest in the country’s already volatile Papua region.
In the latest show-and-tell, the government last week ceremonially signed a memorandum of understanding under which it will hand over 10% of the Freeport Indonesia shares it still needs to acquire to the Papua provincial administration.
The government spin machine has also recently turned to eastern Indonesia’s Marsela natural gas project, which for reasons even some senior Indonesian politicians can’t figure, Widodo wants to be developed on a remote, sparsely-inhabited island.

Joint venture partners Inpex and Shell have been dragging their feet, arguing that only an offshore facility makes sense, given the undersea terrain and a lack of existing infrastructure.
With the project seemingly in limbo, the government announced earlier this month that the partners were working on detailed plans for an onshore plant that would be finished by the end of this year. Tellingly, there was no word from either company.
“The officials are talking on behalf of the company, without the company knowing anything about it,” says one Indonesian oil veteran. “That’s politics, but for me as an industrialist it is very troubling.”
The French oil giant Total has maintained a similarly stoic silence since the state-run Pertamina oil company claimed the firm wanted back into the Mahakham gas field, which it had to leave when its contract expired last December.
In fact, with little money to maintain the Mahakham, it is the government that has been offering Total a slightly higher 39% participating interest to entice it to return as a partner in the field it ran for more than 40 years.
Widodo also adopted Yudhoyono’s cattle chicanery, part of an economic self-sufficiency program in which, with little planning and a lot of wishful thinking, Indonesia was hoping to produce all its own beef, rice, sugar, corn and soybeans.

In 2015, it was proudly announced that the proportion of beef imports to total consumption had dropped from 31% to 24%, without anyone noting that Indonesians were eating just 2.7 kilograms a year, the lowest per capita rate in the region.
A year later, that figure had shot back up again to 32% and last year it increased yet again to 41% with the price of beef at US$10 a kilogram and officials acknowledging the obvious: that Widodo’s five-year self-sufficiency target was now unattainable.
Again, that has a familiar ring to it. By importing rice, seen as almost a crime in some nationalistic quarters, past governments have often been forced to admit (if anyone is listening) that Indonesia’s supposed self-sufficiency in rice is nothing but a myth.
That would have former President Suharto, who did achieve rice self-sufficiency back in the early 1980s with careful planning and a slew of coordinated programs, rolling over in his grave.
Sooner or later, the smoke and the mirrors will inevitably lift to reveal hard realities.

saya melihatnya, tulisan ini pesanan korporasi mainstream, atau ketidaksukaan atas regulasi pemerintah terhadap korporasi luar atau asing, tentu akan menjadi negatif atau kerugian termasuk saham di media ini saya kira. Makanya hati2 terhadap tulisan2 seperti ini yang cenderung menyudutkan dan tidak fair. Isu keberpihakan Indonesia terhadap palestina dan mengenai freeport akan menjadi alat menggoreng yang baik untuk menjatuhkan tidak hanya presiden, tetapi negara Indonesia.
Fritz Carlo Alexis Hartono Esemk still continue my friend, open your mind
Hanya yang bernafas dengan paru yang bisa merasakan pegah dan pedihnya udara yang terpolusi smoke.
Yang bernafas dengan insang dalam air kolam ya aman aman aja.
"Appearances" are only harmful if Reality is ignored,please don’t push issues too far that it becomes overly polarizing to the Nation,then it becomes destructive.
Revered ? by who ?
I think we should be careful with this kind of media. Widodo has shown support for the Palestinians, of course he will not be liked and will be used as a bully tool. Widodo also showed his attitude towards Freeport. Who does not like that action?
of course you can guess it. Widodo’s actions are indeed frontal to mainstream corporate owners and dominant countries. Of course this is experienced by Sukarno as he is frontal to the mainstream country and is drowned in an espionage game. so be careful because many people like our country to be mastered.
Mochammad Iqbal Novangga
Political appointment must be analyzed first, because it is not necessarily true in the field. Try to take a walk to Tanah Abang, take the train there and see what happens. 80% if every mass transportation or a passing car, would grumble nagging.
I am not a supporter of anyone but Anis is a ridiculous person. Why is he not native Indonesia said inclined to the natives? silly right?
Whether you agree or disagree at least the writer has some data and not only assuming, he’s an expert of writing about Asia’s political issues , not only mr jokowi but also the others, your comments will really shows us or me as a reader in what kind of side you really are and sarcasm in the title of this article suddenly proven.
Nila Masagi: cuih. kebohongan jokowi sudah dikenal oleh dunia jauh sebelum John McBeth menulis artikel ini.
Contohnya artikel thn 2016 oleh South China Morning Post:
http://m.scmp.com/business/article/2092048/opinion-sorry-president-widodo-gdp-rankings-are-economists-equivalent-fake
Andy Han It’s just my humble opinion. I’m not some economist and Economy is not my specialiy and also i will not try to become some fake economist just by reading information on the news. If you think easily would people buying car when the economy in crisis? i donk’t think so. My comment just not based on my neighborhood but my region. I already mention that in my comment. Why don’t you tell me then about the the different between these three Presidents. Instead of try become like intelligent person by make standard about my opinion but no opinion about the topic.
This is the truth and perfect
The worst lie I ever read about my country.
Wisnu Arista Haeriyoko your arguments to defend your premise is the fact that in your neighbourhood, plenty cars or no cars?
what? since when this becomes a valid economics measures?
Nila Masagi opo hubunganne? mesakke, ora pinter kok diumbar
Nina Fathony then please present proof (s) that he hasn’t..
Nila Masagi Wuih… All out defending the weak hub?
Ari Susanto true… well said sir!
So, the fact I presented is effectively driving scammer crazy. It is not about who is talking, but what is told.
People can argue, but they cannot deny the facts. We know about jokowi from experiences and what we see, not from McBeth. We don’t even know the name of McBeth before.
If we are agreed to what McBeth says, then it is not because we trust that guy, but because we have the same opinion. Regardless with his own plan.
Nila Masagi ngomong opo to yo???
Keumala Mukafahat Alrrashwa Lyla
This article was wrote by John MB just only REASON about Freeport must divest 51% to Indonesia, and you can not play with the government at this time, so you make an allegation that shows all about FREEPORT with JONAN as ministers clean from corruption and about CHINA whose issues have been MADE BY ELITS WANTED TO WIN TO BE INDONESIAN president IN 2019 & CAN BE YOUR DOLL ,but our people and leaders today do not like corruption, so you ACCUSED our president by cooperating with the local elite politicians who betrayed his own country , just want TO BE WIN IN NEXT PRESIDENT ELECTION & can be your DOLL.