Facilitated by a largely unquestioning media, Indonesian President Joko Widodo’s government has become a master at the game of smoke and mirrors, which in its simplistic form is all about convincing the public that things are happening when they really aren’t.
The protracted negotiations with US mining giant Freeport McMoran Copper & Gold are a good example, but going back to the presidency of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono the deceptive game-playing has covered everything from beef to natural resources to infrastructure.
While not new, the official obfuscation and embellishment of the truth has become more apparent as the 2019 legislative and presidential elections approach and Widodo and his palace spin doctors perceive the need to display his accomplishments.

Yudhoyono played this game back in mid-2011 when the Australian government suspended live cattle exports to Indonesia over animal welfare issues, and Jakarta decided some payback was in order by ordering a ban of its own.
Over the next two years, it slashed cattle imports by half and sought to convince consumers that the local industry could fill the gap when rising prices – and one of the lowest per capita beef consumption rates in Asia — clearly showed it could not.
Fast forward to the much-vaunted China-backed US$5.8 billion Jakarta-Bandung fast-rail project, once seen as the showcase of Widodo’s ambitious infrastructure program and now stalled over land acquisition issues that should have been foreseen.

Getting it started hasn’t been for the want of trying. Widodo attended a ground-breaking ceremony in January 2016, only to see Transport Minister Jonan Ignasius call a halt to the project five days later because of several “unresolved issues.”
Widodo and the Chinese weren’t amused. In July, the same month the construction permit for the project was finally issued, Ignasius — the former, highly successful chief executive of state-run railway Kareta Api — was unceremoniously sacked.
The president should have already learnt his lesson. In mid-2015, he had presided over the ground-breaking of the US$4 billion, Japan-funded Batang power station in Central Java, only to discover local farmers were still refusing to sell a key patch of land.
The courts finally resolved that one, but the railway still isn’t going anywhere despite the efforts of State Enterprise Minister Rini Soemarno, who showed up last July for yet another ground-breaking event – this one a tunnel.
It takes a lot to beat the whole Freeport saga, though, starting with last year’s framework agreement which was hailed at the time as a major victory for the Widodo government in forcing the company to agree to divest 51% of its shares in its local subsidiary.
Maybe so, but no-one seemed to notice that the devil was in the small print. In fact, the Indonesia media failed to point out at the time that the crucial questions of valuation and management control had yet to be settled.

Little surprise then that the negotiations continue, interspersed on frequent occasions with reassuring pronouncements by senior government officials that a final, final deal is just around the corner. It has been a long corner.
So far, there have been at least four government-imposed deadlines, all based on the extension of Freeport’s permit allowing it to continue exporting copper concentrate from its high-altitude Grasberg mine in Papua’s Central Highlands. The next one is in June.
Refusing the permit would clearly hurt the company’s profits, but it would also cut deeply into government revenues and, perhaps more importantly, lead to worker lay-offs that could spark unrest in the country’s already volatile Papua region.
In the latest show-and-tell, the government last week ceremonially signed a memorandum of understanding under which it will hand over 10% of the Freeport Indonesia shares it still needs to acquire to the Papua provincial administration.
The government spin machine has also recently turned to eastern Indonesia’s Marsela natural gas project, which for reasons even some senior Indonesian politicians can’t figure, Widodo wants to be developed on a remote, sparsely-inhabited island.

Joint venture partners Inpex and Shell have been dragging their feet, arguing that only an offshore facility makes sense, given the undersea terrain and a lack of existing infrastructure.
With the project seemingly in limbo, the government announced earlier this month that the partners were working on detailed plans for an onshore plant that would be finished by the end of this year. Tellingly, there was no word from either company.
“The officials are talking on behalf of the company, without the company knowing anything about it,” says one Indonesian oil veteran. “That’s politics, but for me as an industrialist it is very troubling.”
The French oil giant Total has maintained a similarly stoic silence since the state-run Pertamina oil company claimed the firm wanted back into the Mahakham gas field, which it had to leave when its contract expired last December.
In fact, with little money to maintain the Mahakham, it is the government that has been offering Total a slightly higher 39% participating interest to entice it to return as a partner in the field it ran for more than 40 years.
Widodo also adopted Yudhoyono’s cattle chicanery, part of an economic self-sufficiency program in which, with little planning and a lot of wishful thinking, Indonesia was hoping to produce all its own beef, rice, sugar, corn and soybeans.

In 2015, it was proudly announced that the proportion of beef imports to total consumption had dropped from 31% to 24%, without anyone noting that Indonesians were eating just 2.7 kilograms a year, the lowest per capita rate in the region.
A year later, that figure had shot back up again to 32% and last year it increased yet again to 41% with the price of beef at US$10 a kilogram and officials acknowledging the obvious: that Widodo’s five-year self-sufficiency target was now unattainable.
Again, that has a familiar ring to it. By importing rice, seen as almost a crime in some nationalistic quarters, past governments have often been forced to admit (if anyone is listening) that Indonesia’s supposed self-sufficiency in rice is nothing but a myth.
That would have former President Suharto, who did achieve rice self-sufficiency back in the early 1980s with careful planning and a slew of coordinated programs, rolling over in his grave.
Sooner or later, the smoke and the mirrors will inevitably lift to reveal hard realities.

halah mbaaaaak….
pro dan kontra itu pasti ada dimanapun kita berdiri, itu pasti.
Kalau ada orang yang bilang Jokowi harus diganti, salahnya apa? kenapa harus dibela jokowi ini… dia hidupnya enak mbak, ngapain dibela…?
Penulis ini, mau dihujat kayak gimana, abis dia baca tulisan mbak, dia senyum2 trus matiin komputer pulang kerumahnya yang mewah, ngobrol sama temen2nya ketawa2 sambil makan makanan enak…
Lha situ? belain orang yang nggak minta dibela, maki2 orang yang nggak peduli sama anda…
Santai aja mbak…
Schillachi Bianco This article is biased. I goggled the issues, other media explained there are valid responsible reasons for Jokowi decisions. Including Reuters, as example for Masela gas. Reuters use objective language without any blaming. Also, these issues are secondary issues. The main challenge for Indonesia is: severe lack of Infrastructure. Don’t get bogged down with the extremes. In the big picture, Indonesia economy is growing at 5% while the world is at 3%. Indonesia credit rating is now BBB where it was B in 2001. "Let us not be haters, let us celebrate success"
Schillachi Bianco ,,, what are u?? English teacher trying to correct d wrong syllable.
Reuters link deleted by admin
Im indonesian. And i think this article is the one who is full of smoke and mirror. You are either not live in indonesia or just blindly stupid.
You cant get a perpect leader. Not even soeharto, habibie, gusdur, megawati, sby and jokowi. I have been live through all of their rezim. Maybe you who write this article could be a perfect president, or maybe you who held prejudice and dislike againt jokowi. But when you can ONLY choose between jokowi and his competitor, im sure i will choose jokowi again and again. Sadly, No JOHN MCBETH name in my election paper. Or i will vote for you. Maybe you and jokowi haters here will make a PERFECT LEADER.
CRITIZING OTHERS SURE IS EASIER.
WHILE YOU DO NOTHING OTHERS THAN WORK, THINK AND LIVE FOR YOUR OWN AND FAMILY ONLY. NO NEED TO THINK ABOUT 250MILLION PEOPLE IN INDONESIA.
PERFECT.
The above is a link from Reuters regarding Masela gas. It is objective. No blaming. Jokowi wants to build onshore refinery as this will benefit local economy. Whereas a floating refinery would most likely be built in countries with advanced shipbuilding technology and facility. E.g Korea, Japan. Onshore refinery facility is built on land. Doesn’t require more advanced technology and skills than already achievable or available in Indonesia.
Agus Nizami this article is biased. If you google each topic mentioned in the articles, there are valid reasons to postpone or change a decision for the benefit of the ppl. In this sense, Jokowi is truly a public servant. Not someone who is hungry for power. Besides, these are minor issues, but it was written in such a a way that it is a grave mistake. Other articles would give valid reasons and use objective language to explain these issues. Let us look into the big picture. The key word here is infrastructure. Before Jokowi was elected, during BRIC era, it was identified that the biggest problem for Indonesia to be developed nation is severe lack of infrastructure and how quickly it can build it. Which is why there were many projects initiated during SBY time. Unfortunately, they were not many completed during 10 yrs of SBY, but many are completed in 3yrs of Jokowi rule. There are other big picture economic accomplishments that I already mentioned above.
Rara Zava agree with you guys
Detektip Yan I agree. While the debt is big, the INCOME is even bigger. If we look at the big picture, debt to GDP ratio 8n the past 10yrs is between 20-30%. A fat Line compared to 80% in 2001. These ppl make a storm in a teacup. https://tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/government-debt-to-gdp
Salat why Asmat ppl still malnourished after 72 years under Indonesian rule? Why trans Papua only built in the past 3yrs under Jokowi. What had been done previously? How could you expect the development in the past 3 yrs would fix all of the problem from neglect of the past 72yrs?
Wajan Sudja No president is perfect. Let us not only focus on the extremes, lets look at the big picture. 8% growth is a target, Jokowi style is to aim higher. 5% growth is quite hard to achieve while the global economy is only at 3%. No matter who is the president, won’t be much better than 5%. Bersyukurlah, your country is better than most. Indonesia’s credit rating is now BBB, while in 2005 it’s only B. So, the whole world accepts that Indonesia has a positive trend economic performance. It is very strange that you would think otherwise. In terms of debt level, if you have a look at the graph: https://tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/government-debt-to-gdp, in the past 10yrs, the ratio of debt to GDP remain between 20-30%. Almost a flat line if you compare it to 2001 when it was 80% of GDP. Dont make a storm in a teacup. This also means, while i accept that the debt is getting higher, the INCOME IS EVEN HIGHER. Life is hard. But before you complained. You should first Live 72 years in Papuan Jungle, with no water, electricity, road, doctor. Where your natural resources is taken away to enrich other ppl. 3 tahun kerja nyata is better than 72 tahun korupsi. "Let us not be haters , let us celebrate success"
Andy Han… You hurt his heart by saying something bad on his cethekness. Aaw….
Thanks for writing this truth so we can see this objectively…
Wisnu Arista Haeriyoko Well… somebody gets an itch too soon. Spend more time to read the comments is my only suggestion. Please…
then step up and replace him.
Andy Han Take it easy… she is thinking hard now to complete the master degree in the area of know-the-fact-before-commenting.
Emmanuel Christian The more I dug, the more you demonstrated the lack of knowledge on the particular issue. Then you are questioning validity and accuracy of this article? I am laughing out loud again now…
Mochammad Iqbal Novangga Well… I can see your statement is contradicting each other. Do you know the meaning of worst, anyway?
Erwin Pelet Absolutely… including what pelet means. Are you loughing or laughing? Laughing out loud – again…
Schillachi Bianco Your comment is full of troll where the heck is your comment about mines in this section.