China-Australia relations have openly fractured amid a growing scandal that has underscored rising perceptions that Beijing has bid to buy influence over politicians and infiltrate the political process in Canberra.
New South Wales Senator Sam Dastyari announced his resignation on Tuesday after media investigations revealed allegedly dubious links to Chinese donors. The lawmaker was at the center of a similar controversy last year that raised concerns about China’s political donations.
An investigation by Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s (ABC) ‘Four Corners’ program found that Minshen Zhu, manager of the Top Education Institute, a Sydney-based education provider favored and recommended to Chinese students by China’s government, had paid a small bill on Dastyari’s behalf.
Following the revelations, the senator donated A$1,670.82 – the figure in the bill – to charity, admitted wrongdoing and stepped down from his prominent position as deputy opposition whip in the senate.
Last month, recordings of comments Dastyari made last June to Chinese media in Sydney revealed the true extent of his controversial pro-China stance in the South China Sea territorial disputes, following months of maintaining his comments had been off-the-cuff and a mistake.
“The role that Australia should be playing as a friend is to know that we see several thousand years of history, thousands of years of history, where it is and isn’t our place to be involved,” the ABC reported him saying.
“And as a supporter of China, and a friend of China, the Australian Labor Party is playing an important role in maintaining that relationship. And the best way of maintaining that relationship is knowing when it is and isn’t our place to be involved.”
The comments ran counter to the Labor Party’s policy on the issue, which is in-line with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Australia has taken a neutral stand on the disputes, though recent moves towards a quadrilateral strategic alignment with India, Japan and US could start to change that.
The Labor Party and Dastyari appeared determined to leave the past behind and look forward to a 2018 election polling suggests it would win until a Fairfax Media investigation revealed Dastyari had warned influential Chinese businessman Huang Xiangmo that intelligence operatives were likely tapping his phone.
Dastyari made the comments before inviting Huang to speak outside of the Mosman mansion in Sydney’s north shore region. Fairfax reported the recording was made after senior Labor figures had been notified by the Australian Security Intelligence Organization that Huang had been placed under investigation for his links to China’s Communist Party.
Domestically, the scandal has been tumultuous for the Labor Party and a boon for Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s government as it looks to distract from dismal opinion polls and win a crucial by-election later this month.
In thinly veiled criticism of China, Turnbull vowed last week to ban foreign political donations to curb “unprecedented and increasingly attempts to influence the political process” in Australia and the world.
Australia and neighboring New Zealand are among roughly a third of countries worldwide that allow foreign donations to political parties, Reuters reported. Such donations are prohibited in the United States, Britain and several European countries.
Turnbull’s proposed new laws, seemingly modeled on the US Foreign Agents Registration Act, would criminalize foreign interference and require the registration of foreign lobbyists, Turnbull said.
It comes after Australian Attorney-General George Brandis said in June that “the threat of political interference by foreign intelligence services is a problem of the highest order and is getting worse.” At the time, he said the government had conducted a “comprehensive review” and planned to strengthen espionage and foreign interference laws.
For China-Australia watchers, the latest saga has inflamed tensions to a new diplomatic degree.
Nick Bisley, executive director at La Trobe University’s Asia program, warned the relationship had hit a low not seen even during 2009, when an Australian businessman was arrested in China on spying charges. The relationship has never been an easy one, Bisley says, but it is noteworthy it has functioned so well for so long.
“The relationship has not always been easy to manage, but in some respects it is surprising that it has taken this long for the underlying tensions…to come to the surface,” Bisley said.
“The public mantra of governments, from both sides of the aisle, that Australia doesn’t have to choose between Beijing and Washington was always a platitude that served more to paper over the complex reality of the Australia-China relationship.”
Bisley notes the latest kerfuffle has underlined sensitive race relations, evident in the manner Chinese media has covered the Dastyari scandal.
Both the Communist Party-owned China Daily and the People’s Daily have run scathing editorials on Turnbull, suggesting his criticisms of Dastyari’s behavior are largely motivated by racism and anti-Chinese sentiment.
“This type of hysterical paranoia had racist undertones, and is a stain on Australia’s image as a multicultural society,” the People’s Daily wrote in an editorial published on Monday. It echoes a China Daily editorial published last week which suggested Turnbull has been “pandering to anti-China bias” and had fallen for an “orchestrated media falsehood.”
“Given the racial complexion, I think governments have tried to avoid making the issue any more public than it needed to be for fear that it could rapidly get out of control,” Bisley said.
It arguably has. A Xinhua editorial posted to the Chinese Embassy in Canberra’s website in lieu of a public statement last week listed the many local industries to which China contributes, including mining, education and tourism, before concluding that “Australia seems to care little about it.”
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang was similarly miffed, maintaining that China has long held a policy of “non-interference” in the domestic affairs of other countries.
“That is also how we pursue our relationship with Australia. We strongly urge the relevant people in Australia to shake off their Cold War mentality and bias against China,” Geng said last Friday.
Bisley suggests the flare-up was somewhat predictable. “The relationship was always going to enter this kind of difficult terrain – the divergence in values makes that almost inevitable – but the way in which the debate about China has played out has made managing the complexities much harder.”
But if the opposition and government hope the high-profile resignation of Dastyari would alleviate some of the pressure, they are likely to be disappointed, Bisley predicts.
“I think it’s going to get worse before it improves. Both sides are clamoring for the high ground and there seems to be little interest in trying to take the heat out of the relationship,” he said.
“My biggest concern is that each side will begin to pick at the racial dimension and things could get really ugly quickly,” Bisley said. “Track II efforts to improve things don’t seem to be working, the public diplomacy is cack-handed. I hope that there are behind the scenes efforts to lower the temperature.”
Is he better in US pocket?
Disdaining Han cultural practices isn’t racism. it may be bigotry based upon the culture one comes call it ‘culturism’. But paying politican’s bills in return for future favorable treatment isn’t a ‘racial’ trait. And Han people have little standing to cry foul racism in light of how Han culture views, and treats, those of other cultures. Ask the Tibetans and any other minority. Cheers.
The attitude behind the refusal to allow Chinese wives to join their gold-mining husbands after 1901 still pervades much of Australian thinking.Chinese miners were forbidden access to goldfields for a year after a field was declared. Problem? Hardworking and more diligent when panning gold.
Australians have either forgotten or have never known the debt owed by small towns and cities for the benefits of Chinese market gardeners and outback sations for Chinese cooks. I enjoy tenency from a Chinese landlord and have noted with sorrow the response by some of my visitors to the choice of local cuisine. Anyone who thinks Australia is not a racist society has yet to scratch the surface or is totally oblivious to treatment and attitudes to Aboriginals.
That the Australians were racists doesn’t mean the Han aren’t. That’s a junior high school level argument. Get your facts and history together. I’m not Australian and don’t defend racism. Discrimination based upon behavior isn’t necessarily bigotry. Sometimes it’s simply good policy. I’ve witnessed Han racism, or bigotry if you will, against Tibetans and Muslims and Africans, especially Africans, in the PRC. Few are free of it. The Han have been squeezing other ethnicities in the territory of China for hundreds of years. Ask the Miao, Tujia etc. etc. etc. Why do you think the minorities are on the poorest agricultural land. voluntarily. Nope. by force of arms. Cheers.
Nothing to see here..just the usual demonising by the people whose goverment’s greed created this situation…the aborigines still getting nothing.
As an ordinary Australian citizen, although one of the 28% overseas born ones, I like to say that the majority of Australians are accepting of the many migrants from all parts ot the world that make up our population. Unfortunately I don’t think our government represents the people. That disconnect shows at the elections, our Western so called democracy is broken and there is no easy way to fix it. This is a storm in a teacup, all about political point scoring without regard to how it affects our relationship with China. Dastyari was right in his statements that we should look after our own area first without meddling in other countries affairs.
>And Han people have little standing to cry foul racism in light of how Han culture views, and treats, those of other cultures. Ask the Tibetans and any other minority. Cheers.
How positively basic. A Westerner arguing from a morally superior standpoint? Delightfully stereotypical.
Prior to the CCP takeover, Tibet was a theocratic and feudal state ruled by a Lama class of landowners owning their own serfs. Tibetan-Chinese have actually had their lives improved by every metric of progress (infant mortality, average life expectancy, schools, roads, hospitals, education opportunities, GDP per capita, etc). This can be plainly seen by contrasting these metrics against Nepal and Bhutan – areas with very similar landlocked geography.
Let’s compare this to how Australian and American Whites treated their Natives. Plague blankets, Indian *reservations*, systematic genocide (look up General Winfrey Scott and the Indian Removal Act). Assigning the absolute worse, unarable land to the Natives, away from any major economic development. Drugs and alcohol are absolutely pervasive whether in Australia or the US.
Yet you, a White person ignorant to your own history chooses to argue from a morally superior perspective. Laughably ironic if it wasn’t so arrogant.
Michael Zhao There’s not much doubt about the historical record of the Han Communist government murdering Tibetan monks. And the Han Communist government invaded Tibet, not vice versa. And the Han Communist government, many would argue, with a fair amount of evidence, are in the process of genociding the Tibetans. There’s no serious doubt that there is suppression of the Tibetans on religious grounds even if the Han Communist governmet builds nice new airports, and nice railroads and nice roads to make it easier to bring in the Han Communist government army to kidnap and murder unarmed monks. You don’t see the Tibetans fleeing from India back into Tibet. People vote with their feet and, when they can they flee oppressive governments. In this case race and religion based oppression of the Tibetan Buddhists and Xinjiang Muslims. You’ll lose credibility either denying or defending the Han Communist oppression of these minorities. Better to admit it has been done and is being done and try to say something like "Oh, it’s not as bad as it was and it is getting better." But then you’ll be asked to explain even more. Some allegations are accepted as proven and you make yourself complict in attempting to deny. The current Japanese government isn’t ‘guilty’ because their now dead grandfathers were war criminals in china. The current Japanese government is guilty of the separate offense of denying the first offense. Don’t repeat their error. Cheers.
Comments are closed.