As one armed conflict winds down, another has reignited in the Philippines.
On November 23, President Rodrigo Duterte officially cancelled peace negotiations with the Communist Party (CPP) of the Philippines and its affiliated New People’s Army (NPA) after failed talks and a series of violent attacks.
The revived peace initiative, aimed to end Asia’s longest running communist insurgency, had been touted as one of Duterte’s policy successes but now seems destined to the same failed fate as previous governments’ attempts to end the conflict.
The NPA maintains guerilla fronts across the archipelagic nation’s three main islands, with activities mostly in provinces home to big mining and agribusiness operations.
In a proclamation, the government said the communist rebels “failed to show its sincerity and commitment in pursuing genuine and meaningful peace negotiations as it engaged in acts of violence and hostilities, endangering the lives and properties of innocent people.”
The NPA has recently intensified its attacks on public and private targets in several separate regions.
It has also leveraged the military’s focus on the siege of Marawi City – where fighting forces were until recently bogged down in a five-month urban battle against Islamic State-allied militants – to extend its positions.

Duterte placed the entire southern island of Mindanao under martial law until the end of the year in response to the siege, an order that outraged communist rebels who felt it undermined the terms of their preliminary agreement by imposing stronger and largely unchecked military rule.
The attacks have hit close to Duterte. In July, communist guerillas ambushed a Presidential Security Group convoy in Cotabato province in Central Mindanao that wounded four of his elite presidential bodyguards.
NPA rebels have claimed that in Northern Mindanao they have successfully launched 27 attacks against government forces and captured two policemen in the first half of November.
The intensified attacks included an incident on November 9 where a four-month-old child was killed and two other civilians injured in an NPA ambush in Talakag town in Bukidnon province. The rebels apologized to the family of the civilian victims who were driving their private vehicle behind a police car that was the intended target of the guerillas.
The infant’s death gave Duterte the symbolic ammunition to terminate the peace negotiations. “That was the last straw,” Duterte said in a November 21 speech in Taguig City before soldiers who saw action in Marawi. “I am no longer available for any official talk. Let’s go to war,” he added.
The Philippine government has already informed and thanked the Norwegian government for facilitating the peace talks, according to Presidential Peace Adviser Jesus Dureza.
“This is an unfortunate development in our work for peace. Never before have we all reached this far in our negotiations with them,” he said, blaming the communist guerillas for the collapse and their “failure” to reciprocate Duterte’s willingness to travel “an extra-mile to bring peace.”

Duterte and the rebels declared separate unilateral ceasefires as goodwill gestures to restart formal peace talks in August 2016, just months after he was sworn into office.
However, the two sides lifted their respective ceasefires earlier this year amid accusations of breach of trust, including the government’s failure to release 400 remaining CPP/NPA political prisoners and the rebels sustained attacks on state targets.
Duterte’s formal termination of the peace talks comes as both sides had made strides on socio-economic reforms, including agreements to alleviate the widespread poverty at the roots of the conflict.
The National Democratic Front of the Philippines, the CPP’s political arm, revealed the peace panels had signed draft documents on agrarian reform, rural development, national industrialization and economic development that if implemented could benefit millions of Filipinos.
Instead, Duterte is now threatening to re-designate the NPA as a terrorist group, a label that Manila lifted in pursuit of peace under the previous Benigno Aquino III government in 2011.
Whether that designation would further internationalize the conflict is unclear. There have been past reports that China has supplied arms, namely Type 56 assault rifles, and North Korea support to the NPA.
The United States already classified the CPP/NPA as a terror organization in 2002 “because of its aim to overthrow the Philippine government through a protracted guerrilla warfare.” The European Union’s has also designated it a terror organization.

It’s uncertain if ramped up US and Australian counterterrorism assistance could also be directed at the NPA.
Formed in 1969 by leftist academic Jose Maria Sison, the communist insurgency has claimed an estimated 30,000 lives on both sides including civilians.
Its strength peaked during the time of former dictator Ferdinand Marcos with more than 20,000 fighters. In 2015, the Philippine army estimated its strength at 3,200 fighters and has frequently claimed its “people’s war” is a front for extortion collected as revolutionary taxes.
Duterte acknowledged during the Marawi siege that the communist rebels were strengthening their ranks and that they would be his government’s next target after the foreign-backed jihadists were subdued.
The NPA’s scattered presence across the country poses a logistical challenge compared with other local rebel groups which tend to be concentrated in a few Muslim dominated provinces in Mindanao.
NPA rebels are known to maintain nomadic camps in mountainous areas on the three main islands of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao and claim grass roots support from remote communities that allow them to launch frequent surprise attacks against state and private targets.
The NPA’s scattered presence across the country poses a logistical challenge compared with other local rebel groups which tend to be concentrated in a few Muslim dominated provinces in Mindanao
Communist party founder Sison, who once taught Duterte as a student, has personally lambasted the leader for terminating the peace talks and threatening to reclassify the NPA as a terrorist organization. He recently referred to the president as a “mass murderer, a sycophant to foreign powers and a corrupt bureaucrat.”
“The Filipino people and revolutionary forces waging the people´s democratic revolution have no choice but to intensify the people´s war through an extensive and intensive guerrilla warfare in rural areas and partisan or commando operations in urban areas,” Sison said in a statement from the Netherlands, where he has resided in exile for over three decades.
Sison and Duterte were initially cordial when the latter assumed the presidency in mid-2016, but their rapport deteriorated this year through mutual public personal insults that predictably did not augur well for a peace deal successive governments have failed to achieve.
The situation is chaotic but we can trust President Duterte to do the right thing. Why should the communists use Norway rather an ASEAN country to sponsor the negotiations? Norway is an American vassal state.
100% Spot on. Norway is totally incompetent in peace facilitation. Norway are biased to one party. We clearly did see that in the Sri Lankan peace facilitation. In the Sri Lankan conflict, Norway were working together with the USA. They even tried to get the USA to stop Norwegian citizens to tell the truth in Sri Lanka. Thanks to phone tapping of the Norwegian Embassy and the Norwegian General Furuhovde, it became clear for the Sri Lanka, Norway was not a facilitator, but part of the problem.
President Duterte made CPP/NPA a sweet deal, but Jose Maria Sison turned it down, to the surprise of many. They could have worked together and got the Philippines to become corrupt free country beneficial to all Filipinos.
What a pity! Just when things are beginning to settle. It has taken years for the Filipinos to lift themselves of first the Spanish mantle and then the Yankee mantle. Then of recent times the Central Government had to deal with the ISIS connected Islamic resurrection in Mindanao. That itself is is inherited from the Spanish detest for Muslims, which ended up with the Moros being isolated and discriminated against.
Xenophobia against the Chinese were also inherited from the Spanish and perpetuated later with the Yankees – derived from the whitemen seeing the Chinese as an economic (their assiduousness), political (like Jews the Chinese were ‘exclusive to themselves’) and socio-religious (the Chinese were atheists and also clannish) threat. With the Yanks also came the hype about the danger of Communism.
The ‘mestizos de sangley’ or the Chinese Filipinos (‘saeng li’ means ‘business’ or ‘making money’ in the Hokkien Chinese dialect and that was how the indigenous Filipinos saw the Chinese as people who worshipped the making of money – which is still very true) started the rebellion against the Spanish. And thus we have Jose Rizal as the liberator of the Filipinos and San Lorenzo Ruiz as the patron Saint of the Philippines. And as to ‘liberation’ from the Yanks and the resurgence of the mestizos de sangley, we have mestizos in Ferdinand Marcos, Corazon Aquino and also the current President Rodrigo Duterte. What I am leading to is that the founder of Communist Party of the Philippines, Jose Maria Simon is also a mestizo.
This remnant of a fear and hatred of the Communists is something that should be discarded with the Yankee mantle. You cannot say that a Communist Filipino is less of a patriot of the Philippines. Different ideology, yes, but that per se does not equate to treason or disloyalty. The last thing we need is drawing China into the equation. Maybe that is what the CIA had in mind! That state of emergency declared by Duterte should have been localised to the the region around Malawi, not intruding into the areas in Mindanao covered by the then existing ceasefire agreement with the Communists.