Will the China-Pakistan-Economic Corridor (CPEC) benefit both countries, or only China? A number of aspects of the project are only beginning to attract scrutiny, and some of them indicate Pakistan may not benefit at all.
A note of caution was registered recently by the International Monetary Fund. The organization observed in a report that CPEC projects are expected to generate balance of payment outflows to the tune of US$3.5-4.5 billion for Pakistan by 2024. However, the report also warned that enhancing exports poses a real policy challenge for Pakistan and that failure in the endeavor will considerably diminish CPEC’s benefits.
One of the imperatives facing Pakistan is to increase revenues and build up its foreign exchange reserves. CPEC will cause an increase in yuan inflows to the country for both payment and settlement purposes, which may be welcome but will further damage Pakistan’s already yawning trade deficit. Moreover, most of Pakistan’s external trade is currently done using the US dollar, and CPEC will do nothing for its US dollar reserves. Further adding to the sense of insecurity is the government’s complete silence on these issues.
Over the past few months, I have spoken to several Pakistani industrialists and many of them expressed an expectation that CPEC will do damage to the local economy, in both the agricultural and industrial sectors.
Truck convoys coming from China via the mighty Karakoram Highway (KKH) have already begun to flood Pakistan’s domestic market with cheaper, made-in-China goods. The cost of production in Pakistan remains relatively high – partly due to the high costs inflicted by the country’s seemingly never-ending energy crisis. This also hampers the viability of Pakistan’s own exports. The corridor will, additionally, assist China to flood external markets which might otherwise have been receptive to Pakistani goods.
One industrialist summarized the situation thus: while made-in-China goods are already relatively cheap, the shorter route afforded Chinese exports via Gwadar will further reduce import costs in markets that have so far been export destinations for Pakistan.
CPEC appears more and more to be a master plan for deep Chinese penetration into Pakistan’s economy, with long term economic and political consequences
Investments are being made to resolve the energy crisis in Pakistan through building more power plants; however, the roots of the problem go much deeper than a simple production shortfall. Indeed, another IMF report mentions that in the absence of a robust distribution sector, Pakistan’s added generation capacity will have little effect. The report notes that “routing the increased generation capacity through a loss-making distribution sector could result in faster accumulation of circular debt and fiscal costs, as well as undermine long-term financial sustainability of the new energy projects.” No investment has so far been made in improving distribution.
Another potential pitfall for Pakistan is the way Chinese companies are likely to emerge as new “middle-men” in Pakistan’s economy, particularly in the agricultural sector.
Pakistan’s “national food security policy“ mentions the potential of enhancing the country’s agricultural exports to China and perceives opportunities through CPEC to achieve, among other things, “food sovereignty.” The policy measures outlined, however, indicate an increased role for Chinese companies in facilitating exports of produce from Pakistan to China – despite such private sector middle-men also being identified, in the same document, as presenting a major obstacle to producers getting a fair price. It is unclear as to how this enhanced interaction between local producers and Chinese companies will benefit Pakistan.
When one considers this proposed co-operation in agriculture, along with Chinese development of road, rail and energy projects in Pakistan, CPEC appears more and more to be a master plan for deep Chinese penetration into Pakistan’s economy, with long term economic and political consequences. All too few in Pakistan are raising objections but CPEC may turn out to be more of a liability than a golden opportunity for the country.

Zheng He LoL. Pakistan becoming bigger than India… wow. not even in day dreams. India is 2 trillion economy. China is 6 trillion economy. Pakistan is 14 times smaller than India. Grow up man
Low Shen-Cheang normal interest rate for international funding from world bank is not more than 1%. in certain contains it can be 0.1% as well. but Chiba is collecting 6.5% from srilanka. So it’s huge interest from any standards. As simple as that.
Respected Jo Snow
You are right…We Indians very much tanggeled with Pakistani fobia as it was one time part of India.
But the question of happiness is altogether is different thing.
What means of happiness?
Whether it is Great Wall, Bullet Trains or Big Army…No, not at all.
Yes, of course these are important things in life, but not the happiness.
Do you know…. Buddhism?
The religion which you Chinese following from the time immemorial….adopted from the Indian Culture.
Why you adopted?
At that time too, Chinese were prosper from the things….But not from happiness.
Therefore your ancestors to search the happiness reached to India and found here that a king leaved his crown to pursuit of happiness. Then your ancestors realised that happiness.
Hope you would be good in your history.
And please take notice, I am saying you are wrong, just clarifying that the measurements of happiness can’t counts on papers, it is inner feeling to understand.
Hope you would not mind.
Every country is good.
Every person is good.
Every thought is good.
Bye!
When the Pakistanis wake up from their dogmatic slumber and realize they have been colonized, they will fight the Chinese. In consequence, India must prepare for a refugee influx and mull ways of helping the Pakistanis.
Zheng He India is mother of all sour grapes and imcompetence. Pakistan already feeling a lot better than Indian.
"India ranked a lowly 122 on a list of the world’s happiest countries, … according to The World Happiness Report 2017, which ranks 155 countries by their happiness levels. "
"Nations such as China (79), Pakistan (80), Nepal (99), Bangladesh (110), Iraq (117) and Sri Lanka (120) fared better than India on the ranking."
they can seah for "India ranks a low 122 among world’s happiest countries; Pakistan, Nepal fare better" on the indian express
Low Shen-Cheang Had Sri Lanka’s bond interested rate was 11%. 6.5% Chinese loan was very good deal. Only the sour grape Indan can make a good deal sound bad. The reason for high Interest of bond was because Indian sponsored rabels depleted Sri Lanka’ treasure, and make is politically unstable. Indian is a cancer to all its neighbors.
Yes, thanks to the Indian for intefering in Sri Lanka affair. You have been a great help. Sri Lanka will be able to get its house in order sooner if it not follow what ever the Indian tells them.
You Indian don’t like Pakistani isn’t that right? and always wished Pakistani will be worse off than Indian? So, I wonder why every Indian online mentioned the same thing online – not because you love and care about Pakistan it’s because maybe deep inside you feel that Pakistan may actually becomes much better off than Indian in this CPEC ventures. Right?
Low Shen-Cheang , It was the Indian who applied pressure on to Sri Lanka to stop the project already half completed and Indian couldn’t help Sri Lanka to finished the project that laid idled for more than a year and had to crawl back to China to have the project completed and thus added more cost to the projects.
Debarun Joardar I think he meant Indian politians like teaboy Modi 🙂
This CPEC will ultimately become ‘Debt Trap Policy’. Recent example is Sri Lanka, ultimately they have to concede their geography to China for 99 years.
Pakistan may have to commit much more and for much longer period in history which will effect it culturally as well as economically.
Debarun Joardar stop parroting american racists comment on Sri Lankan project. Sri Lanka foreign debt mainly is with world Bank or Asian development bank.long before Chinese investing there. Stupid ceylonese wavered because of listening to western agitators and thus wasted time and money which could have been saved if they stick to original Chinese development plan.
If you want to read all that is (supposedly) positive about CPEC, you should watch Pakistan’s state broadcaster (PTV).
Here, you will find critical analysis rather than unreal and ungrounded presentation of ‘facts.’
Your assessment is right, this phenomenon is very natural when two economies of different sizes would engage to trade, large economy would dominate the market for a considerable period but after some time small one would react fastly and reduce the trade gap. Law of market
>absolutely incompetent like Indians
Really now? That’s rather uncalled for.
Pakistan has lots to be worried about actually. See what happened to Sri Lanka. They had to lease out that port, the projects built by Chinese in their country isn’t economically viable (The airport, stadium, community hall). The Sri Lankans effectively sold a part of their country for 99 years.
The iranian here are liar and sour grape.
Google "For China’s Global Ambitions, ‘Iran Is at the Center of Everything’" on Nytimes and see what iranian said about Chinese open up compan in Iran:
“China is dominating Iran,” said Mehdi Taghavi, an economics professor at Allameh Tabataba’i University in Tehran, adding that the “Iranian authorities do not see any drawbacks to being dependent on China. Together, we are moving ahead.”
Even when the boss was out of earshot, workers in his factories said that they were very happy with the Chinese. “They pay every month on time and only hire people instead of fire them,” Amir Dalilian, a guard, said. “If more will come, our economy will flourish.”
Why Chinese project can benefit Iran and Iranians when in Iran, but it will destroy Pakistan when In Pakistan?
DrRakesh Thukral Sorry, I am not a Indian.
Jo Snow what about you,always bullying neighbors,greedy people,dirty politicians.
Bahi Salman….. I donot know the reason as why you wrote negative aspects of CPEC over Pakistan, rather taking positive impact on Pakistan economy.
The basic concept of CPEC should be made clearer to our Pakistani brothers.Pakistan has no issues to export its products to anywhere since we are having full accessibility to warm waters and our geopolitical position is very vital being located at very important location of world map.
Our issue was NO Money to build Gawader and have no resources to do any infrastructure projects. China took the initiative to invest 46 billion US Dollars in to our country, who will build both above items and shall do trading through this route . We accepted since we see benefits for ourselves because of various industrial units to be built, wharehouses to be erected and manpower utilisation to be made for providing Services and on top of it "Road & Seaport lucrative Royalty"after 15 yrs to be collected.
Incase we wanted to succeed, we need to look into our benefits and should not be gealous of others benefits.
Trust to have made the matter clearer and simplified.
You are very abusive and unfriendly from a brotherly neighbor. Too much inferior complex? I want to see you and Pakistan switch places, how you deal with India when it actively threat your existence. I have notice Iranian seams short sighted, small heart much like Indian. You and the Indian are a lovely pair.