Southeast Asian leaders took a softer stance on disputes in the South China Sea during a summit that ended on Saturday, avoiding tacit references to China’s building and arming of its manmade islands, according to the chairman’s statement.
A final statement of the Association of South East Asian Nations (Asean), which was not made available until Sunday, dropped the references to “land reclamation and militarization” included in the text issued at last year’s meeting in Laos and an earlier, unpublished version seen by Reuters on Saturday.
The outcome follows what two Asean diplomats said were efforts by Chinese foreign ministry and embassy officials in Manila to pressure Asean chair the Philippines to keep Beijing’s contentious activities in the strategic waterway off Asean’s official agenda.
It also indicates four Asean members who the diplomats said had wanted a firmer position had agreed to the more conciliatory tone in the statement.
China is not a member of Asean and was not attending the summit but is extremely sensitive about the content of its statements and considers it a barometer of the bloc’s dissent over its artificial islands in disputed waters.
China’s embassy in Manila could not be reached and its foreign ministry did not respond to request for comment on Saturday.
The Asean statement also noted “the improving cooperation between Asean and China”, and did not include references to “tensions” or “escalation of activities” seen in earlier drafts and in last year’s text. It noted some leaders’ concerns about “recent developments.”
Beijing has reacted angrily to members expressing their concern about its rapid reclamation of reefs in the Spratly archipelago and its installation of missile systems on them.
According to some experts, China is now capable of deploying combat aircraft on several of its manmade features.
POINTLESS TO PRESSURE
The softened statement comes as the current Asean chairman, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, seeks to bury the hatchet with China after years of wrangling over its maritime assertiveness, including its four-year blockade of the Scarborough Shoal.
Beijing has quietly eased that, in response to Duterte’s request to allow Filipinos to fish there again.
Duterte set the tone for the meeting on Thursday when he told reporters it would be pointless discussing China’s maritime activities, because no one dared to pressure Beijing anyway.
An Asean diplomat on Sunday said the statement was a genuine representation of the atmosphere of the Manila meetings.
“We respected the Philippines’ views and cooperated with the Philippines as this year’s chair,” the diplomat said. “It clearly reflected how the issue was discussed.”
Duterte’s foreign policy approach represents a stunning reversal of that of the previous administration, which had close ties with the United States and was seen by China as a nuisance.
The Philippines government in 2013 challenged Beijing by lodging a case with the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2013.
Two weeks into Duterte’s presidency last year, the Hague court ruled in favor of the Philippines, angering China. But Duterte has made it clear he would not press Beijing to comply anytime soon, and is more interested in doing business than sparring.
The chairman’s statement issued on Sunday made no mention to the arbitration case.
However, it did include in a section separate to the South China Sea chapter the need to show “full respect for legal and diplomatic processes” in resolving disputes.
Underlining Beijing’s sensitivity about the arbitration case, the two diplomatic sources who spoke to Reuters on Saturday said Chinese embassy officials had lobbied behind the scenes for that sentence to be dropped, and saw it as a veiled reference to the ruling.
(Reuters)
cvxgh
Shadow boxing between China and US. China ahead 5 points. Lets watch the next round.
jyhjhgjg
Don’t blame ASEAN for this act of raising their hands. China has deep pockets and big stick. Perhaps it is better to be vassals and pay yearly tribute to Imperial China! The only stumbling block to the glory of return of Middle Kingdom is Japan and India. Let us wait and see.
The ASEAN should check whether they have balls. Privately ofcourse.
The last time when China was weak, every one of the south east Asian nations were overrunned by western colonialists and one of their wannabe Japan. Luckily with the rise of China, all have their thousand years old border return to what they used to be. Is it not good enough now that they can trade fairly with everyone as a soverign nation with no fear of being colonized by people from afar? No one glorify those colonialists except their followers.
Agitate Asian to fight Asian to please former colonial masters, and coming from another Asian is bewildering to say the least.
It is not surprising to read a comment coming from Perry Kamath. He seems to be an Indian camouflaged like an American or an Indian American. Either way, it shows how people can be so quick to forget about the few past centuries where the Western European countries including USA were the colonists and masters of the land. They became the militar powers of the land and where many Asian countries paid some sort of a tribute to them. Some others were colonized like India. Talking about becoming a vassal that was the real thing. Then, he talks about India,yes, eventually may become an obstacle to China’s hegemony. I really don’t know about that. The way how the leaders in India are governing their country don’t seem going too far up, economically. Probably, it is going to take a lot of years before India can get at the same level as China’s economical power. On the other hand, Japan is also mentioned. It is true Japan is a powerful economical power, now but unfortunately her populations is aging so rapidly that at the end of few decades it wouldn’t be that many Japanese around.
We need to remember that China is not a Western country. Her ways are very much centered on the Eastern ways of life or philosophies- not interference, not polarization of daily ways of life. She has demonstrated through history that type of behavior. Definitely, China ‘s ways is not like the Western countries’ ways. Even now, you can see her ways, not interference, not invasions and many other principles of an Eastern ways. This type of political philosophy has had some positive conquences on her dealings with some of the countries in Africa. just ask them.