![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="125" width="738" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="750" width="1200" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
In the contemporary arena, Pakistan is facing a host of issues ranging, from grave internal and external threats; regional isolation; descending global image; decades-long menace of religious extremism; historical alienation with its eastern neighbor (India), and western neighbor (Afghanistan); domestic institutional confrontations; and lastly, continued internal destabilization.
All these issues have a direct link with its strategic culture. Therefore, an overview of Pakistan’s strategic culture is imperative to offer a casual analysis.
On a theoretical level, strategic culture does not have a concise and standard definition, but the most agreed definition was provided by Jack Snyder, an American political scientist. According to him: “The sum total of ideals, conditional emotional responses, and patterns of behavior that members of the national strategic community have acquired through instruction or imitation and share with each other…”
Likewise, Alastair Ian Johnston, a professor at Harvard University, in one of his research article, defined strategic culture as: “An ideational milieu which limits behavior choices.” This ideational context is shaped by “shared assumptions and decision rules that in a degree of order on individual and group conceptions of their relationship to social organizational or political environment.”
Both definitions help in describing the determinants of Pakistan’s strategic culture. One of the chief element of Pakistan’s strategic culture has been Indian centric. Since the partition of the sub-continent in 1947, both India and Pakistan have been shaded as arch rivals, and since then, India has occupied a central space in Pakistan’s national security and foreign policy. Such a view further aggravated, after the emergence of the Kashmir conundrum. Consequently, the historical baggage of adversary has dominated the strategic culture of Pakistan.
Our policy of armament, defense, internal and external threat perception, and our global and regional foreign attitudes are also influenced by this key determinant of Pakistan’s strategic culture. Such a dominated view has also affected the domestic narrative against India, where every internal security crisis is considered to be an Indian sponsored campaign. The presence of such a narrative helps the security and political regimes to get themselves acquitted from all their flawed policies.
Moreover, another illustration could be of our policy toward Afghanistan. It has been a well-understood fact that Pakistan’s approach toward Afghanistan has been Indian-centric. Our policy of strategic depth, formulation of proxy forces and Pakistan’s involvement in post 9/11 war on terror, also has an Indian angle. Thus, since its birth, India has been a continued threat, and in balancing this threat we have jeopardized the future of common masses. Additionally, another angle is of confronting Indian hegemonic desires. In Pakistan, it’s widely believed that India has hegemonic desires particularly within South Asia, so it’s our national security which would be jeopardized, therefore, every possible strategy has to be adopted to counter such Indian desires.
In addition to this, another defining determinant of Pakistan’s strategic culture is: The Two Nation theory and consideration of Pakistan as a “Fortress of Islam”, which has also helped in generating a sense of insecurity. Common acronyms like Yahood-o-Nisar, (Jewish and Christian) Gazwa-a-Hind, (military invasion of the Indian subcontinent) are the most favorite jargons to shift the blame to non-Muslims for our sufferings.
Many people still believe neither India nor the West has wholeheartedly accepted Pakistan as a leading and powerful Muslim nation. Therefore, they are jointly collaborating against Pakistan to destabilize it, and thus eliminate it from the map of the world. Such exaggerated and dramatized narrative not only has generated a sense of existential insecurity but, also has generated societal difference. Similarly, Pakistan social discourse and textbooks contain heroic chapters dedicated to well-known Arab invaders of the subcontinent – Muhammad Bin Qasim, Babar, Gaznavi and Ghauri. Nevertheless, the manifestation of such narratives has added fuel to the phenomena of religious extremism and civilizational clash.
Lastly, but the most important determinant of Pakistan strategic culture is the primacy of national security. The ideational and strategic confrontation with India; the consideration of Pakistan as the symbol of Muslim sovereignty and power; and historical genesis of existential threats to Pakistan have intensified the primacy of national security. This primacy has led the nation to acquire nuclear weapons and indulge in a continued arms race with India. Jargon such as national security and national interest are deliberately blurred to support national security discourse. National security has often surpassed our foreign policy goals as illustrated in our policy toward our immediate neighborhood. It has also been a source of institutional confrontation within the state, and for the sake of national
National security has often surpassed our foreign policy goals as illustrated in our policy toward our immediate neighborhood. It has also been a source of institutional confrontation within the state, and for the sake of national security, the state has also compromised on democratic values and human rights. Ironically, in pursuance of our short-term national security goals, we have generated bigger challenges for us.
In summary, the contemporary issues of Pakistan are interlinked with its 70 years old strategic culture. With the emergence of new trends in regional and global politics, geo-strategy, geo-politics, geo-economic, Pakistan needs a fresh and revised strategic culture. Therefore, the need of the hour is to revise our strategic culture and explode clichéd ideological shells which have paralyzed Pakistan’s growth. It’s high time, where the state institution within their constitution limits should give Pakistan a fresh narrative which must be based on the need for an international political arena. Such a fresh narrative not only uplifts Pakistan’s global image but would also help eliminate the menace of terrorism and promotion of a friendly region.
Every nation has to pay a price for its policies. Pakistan actively encouraged religious extremism of its Jihadi warriors, funded, trained and directed these terrorists so openly against India. Now once Frankenstein’s monsters are release, one should also reap its ‘rewards’. As they say, – blow back times.
Reap as u sow. Pakistan’s hate based ideology also helps define its Wahabi culture of hate India/Hindus and sizzling in this hatred ever since. Most unfortunate disastrous issue is that Pakistan also seems to think herself as d custodian of Islam. Shameful regressive thought.
Even after 70 years,pakistan has yet to make a single annual budget without begging for and receiving foreign financial aid.Yet pakistan considers itself to be a ‘powerful nation’ ? Really,is there a limit to the self delusions of the descendants of forcibly converted,self enslaved to an arab nationalist ideology,born beggars pakistanis ?
Pakistan could start selling some it’s nuclear ICBM technologies to friendly states that needed, Qatar and Saudi are getting it already good returns in their investment
Adolf Gentiler paki born beggars had been running a huge nuclear proliferation racket.Which included iran,north korea and libya.Israel will be safe behind its multiple anti missile shields.But once arabs and iran acquire nukes,how long will it be before they destroy each other ?
pakistan has never been a spokesman for the muslim world,just as the gulf rulers are also not speaking on behalf of the muslim world they are allied with the USA for the interest of their royalty,pakistan and india should look forward to economic and political stability which can bring benefit to them and the wider world..
Very well verse article, beautiful one
Oldest born beggar on the planet,even after 70 years paki born beggaristan has yet to survive a single day without foreign bheekh.Social mobility and remaining life long born beggars are contridictions in term.
Rahul Acharya Although pakistan has a fragile economy and entangled intio indiginous catastrophic circumstances yet the condition of india is not different from her. ,as claiming world emerging economy has failed to provide" shuchaly" to their masses .
No doubt,Pakistan had been facing many problems since it,s estableshment but the major and foremost problem is the internal differences between the major political leaders and the party,s. This tendencies of uncooperative attitude among the personalities can destroy the national pride and the personality.However, the policies can be formulated according the need of the need of the nation or the natives and also be destroyed. Therefore,the urgent need of the pakistan is the political stability and ultra islamic attitude then only prosperious pakistan can be grow.
India is doing enough to alienate the mionority population which is fueling religious extremism … it doesn’t need pakistan to do so. From Muslims and Christians to sikhs all are persecuted in India from killing on beef to suppressing voice of Kashmiri freedom fighters as well as sikhs and Nagaland and Aasam Pakistan isn’t responsible for them all these issues are comming from 1947 and needs to be resolved.
As far as the so called frankenstein is considered which is ttp is centely fuelled by the eastern archenemy of Pakistan which is India and we drove them out . And after the arrest of kulbushan yadave the true face of Hindu terror is exposed now . Good luck
Well articulated piece. However, I think strategic culture of a country depends upon the history, values, beliefs and fears of that country. It cannot be intentionally constructed, forexample Pakistan cannot undo the violence of partition nor their wars with India to build their strategic culture in some other way. Strategic cultures changes with time. as the problems with militants have resulted in changing of Pakistan’s Nationalism motos in recent years visible in widespread celebration of independance day in a more liberal way. It may result in changing Pakistan’s strategic culture someday.
Rahul Acharya ,,, By that logic you should move to Armenia and somewhere in Georgia- as these are the places the Aryans are beleived to have come from. I beleive the Arabs had more right to invade India than the Aryans. Moreover, the Americans should move to the the United Kingdom. Not only them, the Canadians, the Australians and the New Zealanders also. Anyways, Georgia and Armenia are not bad places. But do they accept you is worthy of cosideration!
Rahul Acharya ,,, By that logic you should move to Armenia and somewhere in Georgia- as these are the places the Aryans are beleived to have come from. I beleive the Arabs had more right to invade India than the Aryans. Moreover, the Americans should move to the the United Kingdom. Not only them, the Canadians, the Australians and the New Zealanders also. Anyways, Georgia and Armenia are not bad places. But do they accept you is worthy of cosideration!
Rahul Acharya I think you have some personal problem with Pakistan. People like you are responsible for shaping our strategic culture and we welcome it. The more like you are there the more we will believe what we have learnt. One last thing, don’t forget what you called Bharat was not created by your forefathers. It was there very well before even they were born. [Aryans were invaders.] So, you people seem to be an old player in this game of invasions and looting………By the way when are you moving to Armenia and Georgia? Don’t forget the passport!
Rahul Acharya I think you have some personal problem with Pakistan. People like you are responsible for shaping our strategic culture and we welcome it. The more like you are there the more we will believe what we have learnt. One last thing, don’t forget what you called Bharat was not created by your forefathers. It was there very well before even they were born. [Aryans were invaders.] So, you people seem to be an old player in this game of invasions and looting………By the way when are you moving to Armenia and Georgia? Don’t forget the passport!