By the usual gauges America’s Depression-era president Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a failure. With few exceptions, nothing he did helped the crippled US economy very much. His policies lurched from one failed experiment to another: price controls, make-work employment, destruction of agricultural crops (to raise prices) in the midst of starvation. His modest increases in federal spending didn’t even compensate for the contraction of state and local spending.
Yet Roosevelt won the presidency four times, uniquely in US history, and almost certainly held the American social fabric together through the dark years of the Depression — not because he succeeded but because he tried.
Americans chose Donald Trump against all the expectations of the pollsters and political professionals, because they want a president who will do something to counter the quiet desperation that has afflicted them for the past eight years. Donald Trump campaigned on tax cuts and a tough stance on trade, a vague and sometimes inconsistent economic program. It doesn’t matter. FDR campaigned on a promise to balance the budget. Trump understands that something great and dramatic must be done. He may not know what it is, but the American voters have given him a mandate to try until he succeeds.
When Roosevelt took office in 1933 at the depths of the Great Depression, the US unemployment rate stood at a record 25%. But that 25% rate was reckoned against the expectation that nine-tenths of the adult male population would work for a living. The labor force participation rate, if the government had calculated it, would have stood at 65%. Today’s labor force participation rate stands below 63%. The unemployment rate stands at 5% rather than 25% because a sixth of American adult men have left the labor force, and because a plethora of ruses disguise joblessness, from student loans to disability payments.
Trump wants to spend US$1 trillion on infrastructure. That means a massive amount of public employment, and a lot of federal debt issuance. He is exactly right. Much more dangerous than the deterioration of bridges and tunnels is the deterioration of the labor force. No country can afford to let a sixth of its adult manpower rot in idleness and still hope to recover. The first thing to do is to get people back to work fast — just as Roosevelt did with his Alphabet soup of public employment agencies.
I have my own ideas about what President Trump should do, but they are beside the point tonight. Americans repudiated the stagnation and social tinkering of the Obama years, just as they repudiated the incrementalism of small-ball conservatives like John McCain, the 2008 Republican candidate, and Mitt Romney, who followed him to failure in 2012.
It is not strictly speaking a Republican victory. The self-appointed guardians of Republican ideology for the most part supported Clinton or sat the race out. George Bush, father and son, reportedly left their presidential ballots blank. It is, however, an American victory, a triumph for America’s risk-friendliness and willingness to adapt, experiment and tinker.
There’s no reason for America’s partners or competitors to panic. America, after all, is just being America. In its heart of hearts it has very little interest in what happens an ocean away from its coasts, and under a Trump presidency will be less inclined to meddle overseas. I expect that Trump will throw more resources into a rebuilt military and (especially) military technology, something that Moscow and Beijing might not like but which does not by itself portend any sort of confrontation.
American bond yields probably will rise, both because Trump will spend heavily to support economic growth, and because higher growth will bring with it higher interest rates. The dollar will weaken, and the chill wind of deflation that has blown from the United States during the past three years will attenuate.
The American public has given Mr Trump a mandate to try something radically different than the disappointed measures of the past eight years. It is likely to be a bumpy way back from economic stagnation and strategic abnegation. But it is a way back, and that ultimately is a good thing for the rest of the world.
By electing Trump, America is regrouping. Something we havent seen for a long time except for the (indeed) deplorable surge in fearful and ill-begotten pseudo-nationalism in the aftermath of 9/11 (liberty fries anyone?). This here is going to be the good nationalism, much like the good colesterol. We have to get some of this in Europe.
Trump won because of the MSM, Elites and Celebrities 24 / 7 propaganda blitz against him. America loves an underdog and the MSM made him the underdog. He is the middle finger to this loathed group. Good for him he fought the system, the MSM, the Elites chosen candidate, 24/ 7 propaganda against him on all TV channels and beat them all. All this election showed was just how corrupt and one sided this election system is. ( The DNC cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination and instead choose one of the most corrupt politicians in the country in his place. He would have beaten Trump easily, so they shot themselves in both feet.) The American people finally woke up and not only got a look behind the curtain, but acted on it. The voters looked at who was against Trump and saw the same people that brought them free trade and killed the middle class. The same people that have run up a nationel debt of 21 trillion dollars.The same people who bailed out the crooked banksters to the tune of a trillion dollars and assumed responsibility on the part of the taxpayers, for some 200 trillion in bad loans to save their worthless hides. The people that have let the country´s infractructure run to ruin. The people that have started war after ilegal war and is risking nuclear war with Russia and China.The people that have put 2.5 million of their fellow citizens behind bars in for profit prisons. Along with a couple of dozen other criminal actions that are killing the country. In this election the people finally got off their knees and voted to oppose these Masters of the Universe. They may not have chosen wisely, but then again the alternative was just too repugnant even for American Voters. In short they gave them the middle finger.
Congrats! Super absolute majority! I’m sure Spengler will have plenty to say over the coming years. Ehhh… smart rich Jewish bankers hmm better hide!
You will be surprised to hear a deafening silence from the Gulf States, they surely realized by now they are not calling the shots anymore. As for rich jews, they will opportunistically make the best out of it. They are in the end mammals.
The ideological equivalent of the Eloi just got b**** slapped the, wailing and gnashing of their teeth music to my ears
Obama wanted to spend on infrastructure and was turned down by Congress.
Trump will succeed. He will let other nations solve their geopolitical and internal problems. Why waste money and effort? Trump can find his trillion easily…just cut back on so much military waste.
Flying those planes over S. Korea to show off America’s high-end technology is nonsense. Costs lots of money…that could be spent on America’s infrastructure. Just one example of the costly, out-dated military posturig around the world.
America..you are well insulated by two oceans. Just re-build your nation, grow more food, make more of your own consumer products. Let Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe handle themselves.
Wasn’t it the morlocks ?
Interesting, but Mr. Goldman has a poor grasp of New Deal history and what really happened with FDR’s policies. But I give him this: Trying something does count for a lot. “It is common sense to take a method and try it,” he told graduates of Atlanta’s Oglethorpe University in May 1932. “If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something.”
But Mr. Goldman fails to recognize something quite significance about Mr. Trump that is more comparable with another 30’s politician who was trying to address the depression. Much like the fellow in Berlin and the one in power in Rome, Mr. Trump has empowered the mob against several hapless groups, pitting peoples against each other to win political support. In Europe, we call that fascism. FDR sometimes gave in to the bigotry around him, but he didn’t marshal it to strike down his enemies.
To understand Trump’s Make America Strong again, you need to contrast it with the Langston Hughes poem: Let America Be America Again, which Harry Balafonte did in this piece: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/opinion/campaign-stops/harry-belafonte-what-do-we-have-to-lose-everything.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-0&action=click&contentCollection=Opinion®ion=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article
Spoiler alert: This requires an ability to read and understand both poetry and prose.
In a divide and rule system, one would try to have both groups, alive and kicking, warring at each other without tilting the balance. A totalitarian system would rather have one ergonomic "easy-to-handle" folk, no other to pit against (at least that was italian and spanish fascism). Trump is from neither of the two schools, nor the cunning despot among warring parties nor the architect of the "new man". He is inheriting a dispossessed land of the free where the majority has been crossed by left and right alike. I wouldnt know how the Republican party would survive this victory, when it proved absolutely, as a power machine, absolutely useless and inane. As for the New Deal, it really reaped results after WWII, when Europe was a pile of smoking rubble and US was pretty much the only place to make safe investments. Nothing like this foul year of the Lord 2016, when everything is ticking at Beijing time. Trump’s MAGA task will be very very tough, but one has to try. Well, Audentes fortuna iuvat.
Claude Léger is correct to the extent that the Morlocks were descended from the working class (Democrats fit better here), the Eloi from the privileged classes (Republican party a better parallel).
False equivalence and flawed reasoning. Trump phenomenon is what is being called "white-lash" agaist a black president. Population demographics here are on a changing course.The whites fear relegation to a minority staus. In relation to the severity of recession, inherited by Mr Obama, the recovery has been remarkable. The workers’ income had one of the highest increases last year. Yet, the white voters came out in unprecedented numbers to elect Mr Trump in the hope of making America their exclussive land.
Very well argued, David. However, I wonder why those disappointed white folk in a few upper Midwestern states (correctly picked by Michael Moore as about to rule the election) hadn’t instead picked up and moved to other parts of the country/world where better jobs were developing, the way their immigrant ancestors would have done. Liberals like me are crticized for sympathizing with blacks, victims of slavery and segregation. Fair enough. But what is it about midwestern whites, who suffered neither of those outrages, that makes them deserving of a New New Deal? Where’s the old American get up and go?
" Mr. Trump has empowered the mob against several hapless groups,"
Thats called Democracy. You know majority rule? funny you people only cry about that when your ox is getting gored.
Well to start with, if you are going to successfully immigrate to another country you have have a salable skill. Most of the disenfranchised, and Trump supporters cannot move to another country because they would immediately become a burden on the state.
How do I know this? I moved to South America when I was 52 years old and made a career in mining. I was able to do that because I had spent 30 years working in mining in Canada and had a skill that was needed in Latin America. But say I was a used car salesman, or a shelf stocker at Walmart, or a carpenter , electrician, never finished grade school etc. In other words no marketable skill, I could not have successfully emmigrated from Canada and made a life in Colombia where I live now.
Either that or have an independant income, retirement income, relative or some other such thing that will make you independant and self sustaining in the country of your choice. Oh and being able to play guitar, serf the net, dance to a tune is not considered a marketable skill in Latin America, they have enough of their own artists and Window Watchers. And being an American Citizen, on it´s own is not enough either.
Nate Silver correctly anyalized and called this election just as he did the last one and the one before that. Nate and Micheal More are the only guys that I will listen to in future elections.
The infrastructure spending would have occured had congress not thwarted it during the current administration.
Mr Goldman, isn’t Trump better than Ted Cruz?
Majority rule? Who won the popular vote?
Good points about the current younger generation but I’m really referring to those who lost good jobs, and I did say other parts of the country/world. I wouldn’t have expected many to go abroad, but a lot of people have moved lately to North Dakota from somewhere else. Out-of-work auto and steel workers had skills and certainly were trainable in new skills. Why did so many stick around in dying Rust Belt towns? Maybe Michael Moore will tell us.
Thank your Mr Goldman.
It is in fact a Leap of Faith.
When you run out any sensible arguments, you feel strong and get down to anti-Jewish bashing. You s.tupid ignoramusses if not idiot.