Soldiers have a huge stake in Ukraine-Russia drone-tech arms race

Ukrainian drone warfare has evolved from improvisation to a high‑volume, precision‑strike ecosystem that Russia often struggles to match. With some operators flying up to 15 missions a day and factories now producing millions of drones, Ukraine’s domestic drone production has reached an unprecedented scale.

These drones have become central to Ukraine’s battlefield strategy – pinpointing, punishing and relentlessly pushing back Russian forces – even as some analysts question how long Ukraine can hold its technological advantage.

Russian troops, by contrast, are often starved for drones. Some battalions receive just 10 to 15 FPV (first-person view) drones per week. “We know where they are flying from, but there is nothing to kill with,” lamented one Russian operator. A Russian drone developer recently admitted, “Modern combat realities prompt us to modernize and iterate on drones practically every month.”

Regulatory bottlenecks have made matters worse. “Heavy drones now require state approval,” wrote a Russian blogger, noting that units have begun constructing their own drones to fill the vacuum left by the faltering domestic drone industry.

Evolution of drone warfare

One of the standout innovations has been Ukraine’s development of the Vampire – a heavy multirotor drone the Russians have nicknamed Baba Yaga after a mythical Slavic witch. Russian forces have attempted crude countermeasures, attaching long sticks to their FPV drones to intercept Ukraine’s bulky bombers. Russian soldiers, when the Baba Yaga drone flies overhead, are terrified of the resulting impact.

While Ukraine continues to develop newer platforms, it has also refined older systems to enhance their impact on the battlefield. Mavic drones pioneered the use of light bombing in Ukraine, serving as lethal anti-personnel systems early in the war.

But FPVs have since taken over the role, offering greater payload capacity and flexibility. Some FPV drones now carry up to six VOG high-explosive grenade bombs – compared with the two typically deployed by Mavics – allowing for more impactful strikes with greater reach and frequency.

One of the more recent innovations pushing that edge is the emergence of mothership drones. Ukraine is using mothership drones – large unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) capable of carrying and launching multiple FPV drones – to conduct long-range strikes behind enemy lines.

In the (translated) words of one Russian commentator,

FPV drones are about tactical dominance. They bring chaos, fear and uncertainty to close combat. They are not feared, they are hated. They are cheap, massive and deadly effective. And their potential grows with each passing day: AI guidance, automated launches, swarms. These are no longer makeshift weapons, but new close-combat artillery.

FPV drones have emerged as a key interceptor weapon to target Russian reconnaissance drones for the Ukrainian military. The Russians use the FPV drones to target Ukrainian Baba Yaga drones.

Much of Ukraine’s operational drone success stems from specialized units. The Birds of Magyar, one of Ukraine’s most prolific drone units, released some data from the outfit’s drone operations. In March 2025 alone, the unit executed more than 11,600 sorties, hitting over 5,300 targets. Most of these were achieved with FPV drones (67%) and heavy bombers (31%). While viral FPV strike videos captivate online audiences, the less glamorous Baba Yaga night bombers may in fact inflict the bulk of real-world damage.

These UAVs specialize in demolishing infrastructure and personnel shelters, not just enemy armour. The March tally: 1,701 strikes on Russian infantry, resulting in 1,002 confirmed kills, and dozens of bunker-busting missions. Furthermore, in April, Ukrainian drone brigades reported striking 83,000 Russian targets – marking a 5 percent increase compared to March.

Dmytro Lysenko, a drone pilot with the 109th Separate Territorial Defense Brigade, before he was killed in combat in 2024 stated: “Even when we drop explosives from drones on Russians, I sometimes shiver and feel discomfort because I remember all those times I was sitting in a trench.” He added, “The Russians would shoot at us with everything possible. But the drone was the scariest. A shell can fly and miss and that’s it. But a drone pilot aims and will be very accurate when they drop an explosive.”

Russian milblogger “Vault 8” highlighted how Ukrainian FPV and reconnaissance drones dominate territory up to 25 kilometers behind the front line, making road travel highly dangerous and turning rear areas into what he calls a “highway of death,” where even vehicles far from the front are frequently destroyed. Both sides are having to adapt to this reality.

In 2024, one drone pilot told me that at some point in the near future, heavy armor won’t be able to get within 10km (six miles) of the front and that “Autonomous drones will patrol the skies and will be taking out all the heavy armor.” Now, Ukraine is using these drones to build a “drone wall” along the front line, extending the no-man’s land for dozens of kilometers and deterring Russian advances through constant aerial threat.

Russia, for months, has been using motorcycles to spearhead its suicidal offensives, mainly due to a shortage of armored vehicles because of Ukrainian drones.

Ukraine’s 425th Skala Assault Regiment recently established its own motorcycle assault company. With FPV drones acting as the new artillery of modern warfare, motorcycles now offer one of the best chances for assault units to quickly break through.

Beyond direct attacks, the unit also lays mines, conducts drone reconnaissance (more than 10,000 missions to date) and is testing jamming-resistant drones. With national production surging to 200,000 drones a month, the kill rate of Birds of Magyar has soared, from under 300 targets a year ago to over 5,000 now. The drone unit is now averaging one Russian killed every 6.5 minutes.

Even Ukraine’s logistics have gone airborne. “Vampire drones have now started to be used as logistics drones in some directions,” said Oleksii, a drone unit commander in the 108th Separate Territorial Defense Brigade. (The Ukrainian military protocol is for active duty personnel to provide only their given names.) They carry food and ammunition to frontline units, flying at low altitudes to avoid detection.

“FPVs ranging from 10 to 15 inches are being used,” Oleksii said. “Unlike the Vampire, the FPV crew is much more mobile.” And while bombers must drop payloads from high altitudes to avoid small arms fire, FPVs can dive directly into a one-meter target.

“They’re both effective, but each has its nuances,” said Danilo, a drone pilot for the 108th. “FPVs are more effective against pinpoint targets, where the scale of damage doesn’t matter but accuracy does.” For hardened positions, Danilo adds, FPVs fall short: “A Vampire drone can drop a couple of TM-62 mines and take care of it. But it’s a big drone, bulky, and requires a crew. It’s harder to work with.”

Oleksii further described the challenge: “With a Vampire, you still need to transport it by vehicle. That means you either have to get close to the position or fly it from a long distance. At long range, it’s very visible in thermal cameras and can be intercepted, even shot down by another FPV, before it even crosses the line of contact.”

In some cases, however, FPVs outperform the Baba Yaga. “FPVs, even with an effectiveness rate of 30-40%, cause more damage than the Vampire,” said Andrii of the 59th Brigade (Da Vinci Wolves). That’s because Russian vehicles often stay far from the frontline. “Not every Vampire can reach that far, but most FPVs can.” Moreover, FPVs fare better under Russian jamming, as they can switch control frequencies mid-flight, something the Vampire cannot do.

One Russian reported that Ukraine’s heavy drone bombers – targeting artillery crews, tanks, and command posts – offer a major strategic advantage due to Ukraine’s systematic development and deployment methods.

Ukraine also recently recorded its first confirmed kill using a drone-mounted grenade launcher, highlighting how the technological drone race continues to evolve.

Even Ukraine’s logistics have gone airborne. “Vampires have now started to be used as logistics drones in some directions,” said Oleksii. They carry food and ammunition to frontline units, flying at low altitudes to avoid detection. “FPVs ranging from 10 to 15 inches are being used. Unlike the Vampire, the FPV crew is much more mobile.” And while bombers must drop payloads from high altitudes to avoid small arms fire, FPVs can dive directly into a one-meter target.

Russia, meanwhile, is still scrambling to respond. It lacks anything comparable to the Vampire/Baba Yaga. “Ukraine invested in its fleet of larger, long-range drones as a response to Russia’s investment in Shahed/Geran drones,” observed Samuel Bendett, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

“Russia seems to be satisfied with Geran performance to date, has invested heavily in their mass production (many thousands to date) and seems to be content with their relatively low cost,” said Bendett. However, he also noted that “since these drones have different ranges and different missions, they should not be compared to smaller FPVs, which have a different range and different tactical applications.”

“Ukrainian Vampire-type heavy drones have a complementary role to FPVs,” explained Roy Gardiner, an open-source weapons researcher and former Canadian officer. “While FPVs attack Russian logistics vehicles during the day, heavy drones attack the same vehicles at night by precision mining Russian roads. The Russians complain the Ukrainian Baba Yagas have significantly increased in numbers, sometimes attacking several at a time and increasingly during the day.”

“There have been indications that Russian drone units have been forbidden to make direct purchases without permission from above,” said Gardiner. In the meantime, Russian units have resorted to bizarre improvisations, including the “Vobla,” a jerry-rigged drone with four quadcopters connected to a single flight controller.

“Russia has made a lot of noise about developing a domestic drone industry, which of course has failed to deliver,” wrote Gardiner.

With its drone innovation, Ukraine is positioning itself as a future defense hub for Europe. “Ukrainians are training NATO in Poland and the UK, and have consulted with the Pentagon about their innovative use of US equipment,” said Branislav Slantchev, a political science professor at UC San Diego. “Ukraine’s defense industry will be massive,” he added. Ukraine “was a critical hub in Soviet production and will now be part of Europe’s.”

Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine’s former commander-in-chief, said, “Europe needs Ukraine as a shield. We have the biggest army on the continent. We are the only one with an army that knows how to contain Russia.”

Zaluzhnyi added, “The only one with an army that knows how to wage modern, high-tech warfare.”

An associate research fellow of the London-based Henry Jackson Society think tank, David Kirichenko is a Ukrainian-American freelance journalist, activist and security engineer who, multiple times during the Ukraine War, has traveled to and worked in the areas being fought over. He can be found on the social media platform X @DVKirichenko