Xi and Putin met in May 2024. Photo: Sergei Bobylev / POOL / Sputnik Kremlin

Just before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, China announced to much fanfare a “no-limits friendship” with Russia, suggesting a future of close collaboration in trade, energy and, perhaps most importantly, security.

Now, more than two years into the war, the meaning and interpretation of this “no-limits” commitment has evolved.

There has been much debate in Chinese society in recent months about Beijing’s alignment with Moscow. While some have advocated for a more formal alliance with Russia, others have taken a more cautious stance.

In sharp contrast to 2022, China’s growing wariness is increasingly being discussed in the open, even among those who were previously censored. In early 2022, for instance, a joint letter by six Chinese emeritus historians opposing Russia’s invasion was censored by the government. The scholars were also warned.

Now, however, it appears the government is seeking to balance its relationships with both Russia and the West. Beijing may not want to be seen as a “decisive enabler” of the war.

For example, the once-prominent “no-limits” friendship language quietly vanished from a Sino-Russian joint statement in May.

And Beijing’s response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit that month was notably subdued. Putin ingratiated himself with Xi, saying they were “as close as brothers.” Xi’s response was more perfunctory – he called Putin a “good friend and a good neighbor.”

Scholars are also articulating their concerns about China’s political and economic investments in Russia, both publicly and privately.

Shen Dingli, a leading scholar of Chinese security strategy at Fudan University in Shanghai, said China doesn’t want to be seen as collaborating with Russia against Ukraine or any other country.

He also quoted Fu Cong, China’s former ambassador to the European Union, who said last year the “no-limits” [friendship] is “nothing but rhetoric.”

And in August, after Putin referred to China as an “ally” during a visit to far-eastern Russia, Chinese scholars promptly sought to clarify this statement to prevent any misunderstanding China wants a formal alliance with Russia.

These statements carry weight. In many respects, leading Chinese scholars at government-affiliated universities act as propagandists to convey and justify the government’s stance on issues. As a result, subtle shifts in their commentary provide insights into the strategic mindset in Beijing.

China rethinking ‘no-limits’

There are three elements driving this re-evaluation of the Russia-China alignment.

First, there is growing skepticism about Russia’s state capacities. The mutiny by the Wagner Group last year and Ukraine’s recent incursion into Russia’s Kursk region have prompted critical reassessments in Beijing of Russia’s political stability and military preparedness, as well as the growing anti-war sentiment in Russia.

As Feng Yujun, director of Fudan University’s Russia and Central Asia Study Centre, argued, the Wagner rebellion was a reflection of Russia’s internal conflicts and domestic security challenges. He noted every time Russia has faced both internal and external crises in history, its regimes have become less stable.

More recently, Feng has been even bolder, predicting Russian defeat in Ukraine. He argued China should keep its distance from Moscow and resume a policy of “non-alignment, non-confrontation and non-partisanship.”

Second, China’s sluggish economy and its underwhelming trade with Russia have further exposed how dependent both countries are on the West.

While Russia-China trade reached a record US$240 billion in 2023, it has slowed so far this year, as Chinese financial institutions have sought to limit connections with Russia. The relationship still heavily favors Beijing. Russia accounts for only 4% of China’s trade, while China accounts for nearly 22% of Russia’s trade.

Many Chinese experts are now warning against over-dependence on Russia, instead calling for more cooperation with neighboring countries. This echoes a recent concern Russia has been using its natural resources as a bargaining chip to extract greater benefits from China.

Russia’s value as a military ally

Finally, there are rising Chinese concerns its international outlook does not align with Russia’s. Zhao Long, deputy director of the Shanghai Institute of International Relations, says there is an important difference in how they view the world:

Russia wants to destroy the current international system to build a new one. China wants to transform the current system by taking a more prominent place in it.

Shi Yinhong, a strategist at Renmin University in Beijing, has highlighted an unbridgeable gap preventing a stronger China-Russia alliance. He says there’s a deep mutual mistrust on regional security. Russia has never promised support for China in the event of a conflict over Taiwan, just as China has avoided involvement in the war in Ukraine.

As Russia’s war in Ukraine reaches a stalemate, its value as a military ally is increasingly being questioned in China.

Recently, Feng Yujun warned China risks being led by the nose by Russia, despite being the stronger economic partner. He says every time China has attempted an alliance with Russia in history, it has had negative consequences for China.

Consequently, it is crucial for China to maintain its long-term partnership with Russia without undermining its constructive relationship with the West.

Russia has arguably benefited from the current competition between the US and China, as it has sought to exploit the rivalry for its own benefit. But this has also led to uncertainty in the China-Russia relationship.

As another analyst, Ji Zhiye, argues, relying too heavily on Russia will leave China isolated and vulnerable. And this is not a position China wants to be in.

Guangyi Pan is teaching fellow of international politics, UNSW Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. Face it. The Chinese have copied all their military designs from Russland. Now they have realised it’s trash. Russland has been humiliated in their 6wk SMO that is nearly 3yrs in the making. In the meantime they have made a generational enemy with a people they share blood and kinship with. Putin thought, if you speak Russian you want to be ruled by Moskau. Big mistake.
    But in return China have increased their presence in Siberia. I can’t see the oligarchs wanting to spend their illegal loot in a house in Peking. Putin is on borrowed time. When those brutalised, shell-shocked conscripts come home they will not be treated as heroes, unlike the Ukr soldiers.
    Meanwhile Xi has mobilised all China’s neighbors to close off China’s sealanes in the event of war with independent Taiwan.
    Win-win for the IM complex of the USA and chaos for the incoherent EU.

  2. Pan is talking nonsense, He clearly has zero understanding of geopolitics in East Asia. Xi knows that if Russia fails, the US will use all its resources to topple China, hence the “no limit” relationship. Russia is also China’s vital energy and commodity supplier as well as a big customer of China’s goods. Finally, Pan forgets the old saying: your enemy’s enemy is your friend. As long as the US keeps up its hostility towards China, Russia will remain a friend.

    1. And when the US is no longer an enemy of Russia? When the oligarchs decide Putin has deprived them of burying their loot in the West?
      Oh sure they’ll just love buying a house in Peking.
      You’ve been played.

  3. After the last meeting with Xi, Putin needed to sit on a very soft cushion for weeks.
    He was only lucky the Chinese are smaller than average.

  4. Feng is an idiot and a well known one for the matter. Wrong on every prediction on the Russo Ukraine conflict and still double downing on it

  5. Mr Pan, your comments on the China and Russia relationship totally shallow and and very western stereotype mentality. China and Russia are like Siamese twins and cannot be detached. Both leaders of Russia and China knew that their relationship played an important role in protecting world peace and defending the Global South nations. If their relationship falters, there will be no world peace and the poor nations will be exploited by the West.

    1. Ougchin is completely right. You can add that Russia has won the war in Ukraine. Within weeks it will have taken the East and then make a decision about Kiev. By the same token, China hardly needs Russia’s support on Taiwan. Finally, trade figures notwithstanding, Russia’s resources are vital to China. This last point suggests severing the relationship would harm China much more than Russia.

        1. You were expecting the Western tweet storm and sanctions attack to destroy the Russian economy in 2 weeks? Its been a disappointment

          1. Good point. You should add that the failed sanctions led to very strong Russian growth and effectively destroyed the dollar. This will become more evident in the Nov 22-24 meeting of Brics in Kazan.